Abstract
This chapter addresses the intersection of professionalization, policy, performance assessment, and privatization in English teacher education, beginning with the development of content area and professional standards in English language arts. Following this historical contextualization, a brief review of performance assessment in English language arts leads into a discussion of the affordances and constraints of performance assessment in English teacher education, highlighting the tensions that arise at the intersection of policy, privatization, and professionalization, as exemplified in the initial efforts to implement the edTPA in response to state mandates. Beyond addressing the impact of mandated performance assessment in English teacher education, the author examines the ways in which expectations of preservice teachers in teacher preparation programs also affect curriculum and pedagogy (and ultimately students) across a wide range of classroom contexts.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Notes
- 1.
The New York State CCSS document has the following asterisked statement on the first page: “All of the New York State additions to the Common highlighted in yellow under the related strand (reading, writing, speaking and listening, and language) or standard” (https://www.engageny.org/resource/new-york-state-p-12-common-core-learning-standards-for-english-language-arts-and-literacy).
- 2.
The program is currently developing a more formal exit interview process in order to be able to analyze attrition rates in subsequent years.
References
American Association of Colleges for Teacher Education. (2013). About edTPA: Overview. American Association of Colleges for Teacher Education. Available in http://edtpa.aacte.org/about-edtpa.
Anagnostopoulos, D. (2003). Testing and student engagement with literature in urban classrooms: A multi-layered perspective. Research in the Teaching of English, 38(2), 177–212.
Au, K. H., & Raphael, T. E. (2000). Equity and literacy in the next millennium. Reading Research Quarterly, 35(1), 170–188.
Au, W. (2013). What’s a nice test like you doing in a place like this? The edTPA and corporate education “reform”. Rethinking Schools, 27(4). Available: http://www.rethinkingschools.org/archive/27_04/27_04_au.shtml.
Burroughs, R., & Smagorinsky, P. (2009). The secondary English curriculum and adolescent literacy. In L. Christenbury, R. Bomer, & P. Smagorinsky (Eds.), Handbook of Adolescent Literacy Research (pp. 170–182). New York, NY: Guilford Press.
Caraballo, L. (2011). Theorizing identities in a “just(ly)” contested terrain: Practice theories of identity amid critical-poststructural debates on curriculum and achievement. Journal of Curriculum and Pedagogy, 8(2), 155–177. doi:10.1080/15505170.2011.624939.
Caraballo, L. (2012). Identities-in-practice in a figured world of achievement: Toward curriculum and pedagogies of hope. Journal of Curriculum Theorizing, 28(2), 43–59.
Caraballo, L. (2016). Students' Critical Meta-Awareness in a Figured World of Achievement: Toward a Culturally Sustaining Stance in Curriculum, Pedagogy, and Research. Urban Education. Retrieved from http://uex.sagepub.com/content/early/2016/01/12/0042085915623344.
Caraballo, L., Genao, S., Lipnevich, A. (2015, April). Expanding communities of practice: Collaboration and mentoring in educational leadership & teacher education. In paper session, Communities of Practice in Place-Based, Field-Based, and University-Based Programs. Division K: Teacher Education, American Educational Research Association Annual Meeting. Chicago, IL.
Carlson, D. (1993). Literacy and urban school reform: Beyond vulgar pragmatism. In C. Lankshear & P. McLaren (Eds.), Critical literacy: Politics, praxis, and the postmodern (pp. 217–246). New York, NY: State University of New York Press.
Caughlan, S., & Jiang, H. (2014). Observation and teacher quality: Critical analysis of observational instruments in preservice teacher performance assessment. Journal of Teacher Education, 65(5), 375–388.
Commission on English Education. (2009, October). Supporting Linguistically and Culturally Diverse Learners in English Education. CEE Position Statement: A Statement on an Education Issue Approved by the CEE Executive Committee. Urbana, Illinois: National Council of Teachers of English. Available in http://www.ncte.org/cee/positions/diverselearnersinee.
Compton-Lilly, C., & Steward, K. (2013). “Common” and “Core” and the diversity of students’ lives and experiences. In P. Shannon (Ed.), Closer Readings of the Common Core: Asking Big Questions About the English/Language Arts Standards (pp. 62–70). Portsmouth, NH: Heinemann.
Costigan, A. T. (2008). Teaching authentic language arts in a test-driven era. New York, NY: Taylor and Francis.
Costigan, A. T. (2013). New urban teachers transcending neoliberal educational reforms: Embracing aesthetic education as a curriculum of political action. Urban Education, 48(1), 116–148.
Christenbury, L. (2006). Making the journey: Being and becoming a teacher of English language arts. Portsmouth, NH: Heinemann.
Danielowich, R. M., & McCarthy, M. J. (2013). Teacher educators as learners: How supervisors shape their pedagogies by creating and using classroom videos with their student teachers. Action in Teacher Education, 35, 147–164.
Darling-Hammond, L. (2006). Constructing 21st-century teacher education. Journal of Teacher Education, 57(3), 300–314.
Deng, Z. (2007). Transforming the subject matter: Examining the intellectual roots of pedagogical content knowledge. Curriculum Inquiry, 37(3), 279–295.
Denton, D. H. (2013). “Responding to edTPA: Transforming practice or applying shortcuts?” AILACTE Journal 10(1), 19–36. Retrieved from http://www.ailacte.org/images/uploads/general/AILACTE_Journal_Fall_2013.pdf.
Dover, A. G., Schultz, B. D., Smith, K., & Duggan, T. J. (2015). Who’s preparing our candidates? edTPA, localized knowledge, and the Outsourcing of teacher evaluation. Teachers College Record, ID Number: 17914.
Falk, B. (2013). Lessons from the performance assessment of California teachers (PACT). The New Educator, 9(1), 1–2.
Gallop, J. (2000). The ethics of reading. Journal of Curriculum Theorizing, 16(3), 7–17.
Giroux, H. A. (1987). Introduction. In P. Freire & D. Macedo (Eds.), Literacy: Reading the word and the world (pp. 1–27). Westport, CT: Bergin & Garvey.
Haberman, M. (1991). The pedagogy of poverty versus good teaching. Phi Delta Kappan, 73, 290–294.
Heshusius, L. (1989). The Newtonian mechanistic paradigm, special education, and the contours of alternatives: An overview. Journal of Learning Disabilities, 22, 402–415.
Hillocks, G, Jr. (2002). The testing trap: How state writing assessments control learning. New York, NY: Teachers College Press.
Hirsch, E. D. (1987). Cultural literacy: What every American needs to know. Boston, MA: Houghton Mifflin.
Holland, D., Lachicotte, W., Jr., Skinner, D., & Cain, C. (1998). Identity and agency in cultural worlds. Cambridge, Massachusetts: Harvard University Press.
Hollingsworth, S., & Gallego, M. (1995). Toward a collaborative praxis of multiple literacies. Curriculum Inquiry, 26(3), 265–292.
Hollingsworth, S., Gallego, M., & Whitenack, D. (2001). Relational knowing in the reform of educational cultures. Teachers College Record, 103(2), 240–266.
Lee, H. (1960). To kill a mockingbird. New York: Grand Central Publishing.
Lipman, P. (2004). High stakes education. New York, NY: Routledge Falmer.
McCann, T. M. (2013). Mentoring matters. English Journal, 102(2), 135–139.
Milner, H.R. (2013). Policy Reforms and De-professionalization of Teaching. Boulder, CO: National Education Policy Center. Retrieved from http://nepc.colorado.edu/publication/policy-reforms-deprofessionalization.
Morrell, E. (2005). Critical English education. English Education, 37(4), 312–321.
Morrell, E. (2015). The 2014 NCTE Presidential Address: Powerful English at NCTE yesterday, today, and tomorrow–Toward the next movement. Research in the Teaching of English, 49(3), 307–329.
National Commission on Excellence in Education. (1983). A nation at risk: The imperative for educational reform. Washington, DC: US Government Printing Office.
National Council of Teachers of English & International Reading Association. (1996). Standards for the English language arts. Urbana, Illinois and Newark, Delaware: Authors. Available: http://www.ncte.org/standards/ncte-ira.
National Council of Teachers of English. (2012a). Evaluating English/Language arts teachers: A policy research brief. Urbana, IL: NCTE James R. Squire Office of Policy Research.
National Council of Teachers of English. (2012b). Standards for initial preparation of teachers of secondary English language arts 7–12. Urbana, IL: Author.
Oakes, J., Rogers, J., & Lipton, M. (2006). Learning power: Organizing for education and justice. New York, NY: Teachers College Press.
Paris, D. (2012). Culturally sustaining pedagogy: A needed change in stance, terminology, and practice. Educational Researcher, 41(3), 93–97. doi:10.3102/0013189X12441244.
Peck, C. A., Gallucci, C., & Sloan, T. (2010). Negotiating implementation of high-stakes performance assessment policies in teacher education: From compliance to inquiry. Journal of Teacher Education, 61(5), 451–463.
Pence, L. E. P., & Alvine, L. (2003). Conversations from the Commissions: Teacher candidate assessment: Policy, practice, and professional judgment. English Education, 35(4), 328–332.
Rosaen, C. L., Lundeberg, M., Cooper, M., Fritzen, A., & Terpstra, M. (2008). Noticing noticing: How does investigation of video records change how teachers reflect on their experiences? Journal of Teacher Education, 59(4), 347–360.
Santagata, R., Zannoni, C., & Stigler, J. W. (2007). The role of lesson analysis in preservice teacher education: An empirical investigation of teacher learning from a virtual video-based field experience. Journal of Mathematics Teacher Education, 10(2), 123–140.
Sleeter, C., & Stillman, J. (2005). Standardizing knowledge in a multicultural society. Curriculum Inquiry, 35(1), 27–46.
Smagorinsky, P. (2007). Teaching English by design: How to create and carry out instructional units. Portsmouth, NH: Heinemann.
Smagorinsky, P. (2014). Authentic teacher evaluation: A two-tiered proposal for formative and summative assessment. English Education, 46(2), 165–185.
Sonu, D. (2011). Breathing spaces in neoliberal places: An essay review of Peter Taubman’s Teaching By Numbers. Journal of Curriculum Theorizing, 27(3), 308–316.
Spangler, S. (2013). With a Little Help from Their Friends: Making the Transition from Student to Teacher. English Journal, 102(3), 87–92.
Stanford Center for Assessment, Learning & Equity. (2013). edTPA Secondary English-Language Arts Assessment Handbook. In L. E. S. Stanford Center for Assessment (Ed.). Palo Alto, CA: Author.
Stanford Center for Assessment, Learning and Equity (SCALE). (2015). Teachers Who Support Teacher Candidates. Available in http://edtpa.aacte.org/news-area/new-document-offers-edtpa-guidance-to-supervising-teachers.html.
Street, B. (1984). Literacy in theory and practice. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Street, B. (1995). Social literacies: Critical approaches to literacy in development, ethnography and education. Boston, MA: Addison Weasley Publishing.
Taubman, P. (2009). Teaching by numbers: Deconstructing the discourse of standards and accountability in education. New York, NY: Routledge.
Tellez, K. (2003). Three themes on standards in teacher education: Legislative expediency, the role of external review, and test bias in the assessment of pedagogical knowledge. Teacher Education Quarterly, 30(1), 9–18.
Tillema, H. H. (2009). Assessment for learning to teach: Appraisal of practice teaching lessons by mentors, supervisors, and student teachers. Journal of Teacher Education, 60(2), 155–167.
Weiner, L. (2000). Research in the 90s: Implications for urban teacher preparation. Review of Educational Research, 70(3), 369–406.
Wiggins, G. (1989). May). A true test: Toward more authentic and equitable assessment. Phi Delta Kappan, 70, 9.
Wiggins, G. (1990). The case for authentic assessment. Washington, District of Columbia: ERIC Clearinghouse on Tests, Measurement, and Evaluation. Document No: ED328611.
Williamson, P. (2013). Enacting high leverage practices in English methods: The case of discussion. English Education, 46(1), 34–67.
Zemelman, S., Daniels, H., & Hyde, A. (2005). Best practice: Today’s standards for teaching and learning in America’s schools (3rd ed.). Portsmouth, NH: Heinemann.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2016 The Author(s)
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Gurl, T.J., Caraballo, L., Grey, L., Gunn, J.H., Gerwin, D., Bembenutty, H. (2016). Performance Assessment, Policy, Privatization, and Professionalization in English Teacher Education. In: Policy, Professionalization, Privatization, and Performance Assessment. SpringerBriefs in Education. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-29146-8_5
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-29146-8_5
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Cham
Print ISBN: 978-3-319-29144-4
Online ISBN: 978-3-319-29146-8
eBook Packages: EducationEducation (R0)