Abstract
During the last few years Enterprise Architecture (EA) has received increasing attention among industry and academia. EA can be defined as a formal description of the current and future state(s) of the organisation, and as a managed changes between these states. By adopting EA, organisations may gain a number of benefits such as better decision making, increased revenues and cost reduction, and alignment of business and IT. Despite of the benefits, EA is not widely adopted in organisations. One of the reasons for this is that the adoption has been found to be difficult. In this paper a model to explain the complex dynamics of EA adoption is introduced. The model of the Resistance during the EA adoption Process (REAP) is based on selected EA literature and on general organisational change and change resistance literature. The model introduces novel relationships between strategic level of EA, resulting organisational changes, and the sources of resistance during the planning and execution phases of the adoption. REAP is validated empirically using data collected from an EA-pilot conducted among 11 Finnish higher education institutions. Validation revealed that most of the resistance faced during the adoption was caused by the lack of EA knowledge. By utilising REAP model, organisations may anticipate and prepare for the organisational change resistance during EA adoption.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution.
Buying options
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Learn about institutional subscriptionsReferences
TOGAF: TOGAF Version 9. Van Haren Publishing (2009)
Zachman, J.A.: Enterprise architecture: The issue of the century. Database Program. Des. 10, 44–53 (1997)
Ross, J.W., Weill, P., Robertson, D.C.: Enterprise Architecture as Strategy: Creating a Foundation for Business Execution. Harvard Business School Press, Boston (2006)
Schekkerman, J.: Trends in Enterprise Architecture 2005: How Are Organizations Progressing?. Institute for Enterprise Architecture Developments, Amersfoort (2005)
Scott Ambler. http://www.ambysoft.com/surveys/stateOfITUnion201001.html
Computer Economics. http://www.computereconomics.com/article.cfm?id=1947
Hammer, M., Champy, J.: Reengineering the Corporation: a Manifesto for Business Revolution. Nicholas Brearly, London (1993)
Beer, M., Nohria, N.: Cracking the code of change. Harvard Bus. Rev. 78, 133–141 (2000)
Kotter, J.P.: A Sense of Urgency. Harvard Business Press, Boston (2008)
Lemmetti, J., Pekkola, S.: Understanding enterprise architecture: perceptions by the finnish public sector. In: Scholl, H.J., Janssen, M., Wimmer, M.A., Moe, C.E., Flak, L.S. (eds.) EGOV 2012. LNCS, vol. 7443, pp. 162–173. Springer, Heidelberg (2012)
ISO/IEC/IEEE: Systems and software engineering – Architecture description. ISO/IEC/IEEE 42010:2011(E) (Revision of ISO/IEC 42010:2007 and IEEE Std 1471-2000), pp. 1–46 (2011)
Dietz, J.L.G., Hoogervorst, J.A.P., Albani, A., Aveiro, D., Babkin, E., Barjis, J., Caetano, A., Huysmans, P., Iijima, J., van Kervel, S.J.H., Mulder, H., Op ‘t Land, M., Proper, H.A., Sanz, J., Terlouw, L., Tribolet, J., Verelst, J., Winter, R.: The discipline of enterprise engineering. Int. J. Organ. Des. Eng. 3, 86–114 (2013)
Pragmatic EA Ltd. http://www.pragmaticef.com/frameworks.htm
Proper, H.A.: Enterprise architecture: informed steering of enterprises in motion. In: Hammoudi, S., Cordeiro, J., Maciaszek, L.A., Filipe, J. (eds.) ICEIS 2013. LNBIP, vol. 190, pp. 16–34. Springer, Heidelberg (2014)
CIO Council: A Practical Guide to Federal Enterprise Architecture. http://www.cio.gov/documents/bpeaguide.pdf (2001)
http://www.gartner.com/it-glossary/enterprise-architecture-ea/
GERAM: GERAM: Generalised Enterprise Reference Architecture and Methodology. Version 1.6.3. IFIP-IFAC Task Force on Architectures for Enterprise Integration. IFIP-IFAC Task Force (1999)
Pulkkinen, M.: Enterprise Architecture as a Collaboration Tool, p. 134. University of Jyväskylä, Jyväskylä (2008)
Syynimaa, N.: Taxonomy of purpose of enterprise architecture. In: 12th International Conference on Informatics and Semiotics in Organisations, ICISO 2010, Reading (2010)
Pragmatic EA Ltd. http://www.pragmaticea.com/docs/160-char-challenge-analysis.pdf
Oxford University Press. http://oxforddictionaries.com/
Lee, A.S.: Retrospect and prospect: information systems research in the last and next 25 years. J. Inf. Technol. 25, 336–348 (2010)
Van de Ven, A.H., Poole, M.S.: Explaining development and change in organizations. Acad. Manage. Rev. 20, 510–540 (1995)
Kezar, A.: Understanding and facilitating organizational change in the 21st century. ASHE-ERIC Higher Education Report. Wiley (2001)
Csibra, G., Gergely, G.: ‘Obsessed with goals’: functions and mechanisms of teleological interpretation of actions in humans. Acta Psychol. 124, 60–78 (2007)
Groesser, S.N., Schwaninger, M.: Contributions to model validation: hierarchy, process, and cessation. Syst. Dyn. Rev. 28, 157–181 (2012)
Barlas, Y.: Formal aspects of model validity and validation in system dynamics. Syst. Dyn. Rev. 12, 183–210 (1996)
Strauss, A., Corbin, J.: Basics of Qualitative Research: Techniques and Procedures for Developing Grounded Theory. Sage Publications, Newbury Park (1990)
Hsieh, H.-F., Shannon, S.E.: Three approaches to qualitative content analysis. Qual. Health Res. 15, 1277–1288 (2005)
Lapalme, J.: 3 schools of enterprise architecture. IT Prof. PP, 1 (2011)
Lapalme, J.: Three schools of thought on enterprise architecture. IT Prof. 14, 37–43 (2012)
Casadesus-Masanell, R., Ricart, J.E.: From strategy to business models and onto tactics. Long Range Plan. 43, 195–215 (2010)
Oreg, S., Vakola, M., Armenakis, A.: Change recipients’ reactions to organizational change: a 60-year review of quantitative studies. J. Appl. Behav. Sci. 47, 461–524 (2011)
Cao, G., Clarke, S., Lehaney, B.: A systemic view of organisational change and TQM. The TQM Mag. 12, 186–193 (2000)
Cao, G., Clarke, S., Lehaney, B.: Diversity management in organizational change: towards a systemic framework. Syst. Res. Behav. Sci. 20, 231–242 (2003)
Bovey, W.H., Hede, A.: Resistance to organizational change: the role of cognitive and affective processes. Leadersh. Organ. Dev. J. 22, 372–382 (2001)
Pardo del Val, M., Martinez Fuentes, C.: Resistance to change: a literature review and empirical study. Manage. Decis. 41, 148–155 (2003)
Hollander, J.A., Einwohner, R.L.: Conceptualizing resistance. Sociol. Forum 19, 533–554 (2004)
Hannan, M.T., Freeman, J.: Structural inertia and organizational change. Am. Sociol. Rev. 49, 149–164 (1984)
Kitchenham, B.: Guidelines for performing Systematic Literature Reviews in Software Engineering. Keele University, Keele (2007)
Syynimaa, N.: Enterprise architecture adoption method for higher education institutions, p. 262. Gerenios Ltd, Tampere, Finland (2015)
Kvale, S.: Interviews: an introduction to qualitative research interviewing. Sage Publications Inc, Thousand Oaks (1996)
The Finnish Education Evaluation Centre, FINEEC. http://karvi.fi/en/
Hiekkanen, K., Korhonen, J.J., Collin, J., Patricio, E., Helenius, M., Mykkanen, J.: Architects’ perceptions on EA use – an empirical study. In: 2013 IEEE 15th Conference on Business Informatics (CBI), pp. 292–297 (2013)
Mezzanotte, D.M., Dehlinger, J., Chakraborty, S.: On applying the theory of structuration in enterprise architecture design. In: 2010 IEEE/ACIS 9th International Conference on Computer and Information Science (ICIS), pp. 859–863 (2010)
Nassiff, E.: Understanding the Value of Enterprise Architecture for Organizations: A Grounded Theory Approach, p. 135. Nova Southeastern University, Ann Arbor (2012)
Barlas, Y., Carpenter, S.: Philosophical roots of model validation: two paradigms. Syst. Dyn. Rev. 6, 148–166 (1990)
Kaisler, H., Armour, F., Valivullah, M.: Enterprise architecting: critical problems. In: HICSS-38, Proceedings of the 38th Annual Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences (2005)
Pehkonen, J.: Early Phase Challenges and Solutions in Enterprise Architecture of Public Sector, p. 107. Tampere University of Technology, Tampere (2013)
Seppänen, V.: From Problems to Critical Success Factors of Enterprise Architecture Adoption. University of Jyväskylä, Jyväskylä (2014)
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2015 Springer International Publishing Switzerland
About this paper
Cite this paper
Syynimaa, N. (2015). Modeling the Dynamics of Enterprise Architecture Adoption Process. In: Hammoudi, S., Maciaszek, L., Teniente, E., Camp, O., Cordeiro, J. (eds) Enterprise Information Systems. ICEIS 2015. Lecture Notes in Business Information Processing, vol 241. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-29133-8_28
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-29133-8_28
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Cham
Print ISBN: 978-3-319-29132-1
Online ISBN: 978-3-319-29133-8
eBook Packages: Computer ScienceComputer Science (R0)