Skip to main content

Modeling the Dynamics of Enterprise Architecture Adoption Process

  • Conference paper
  • First Online:

Part of the book series: Lecture Notes in Business Information Processing ((LNBIP,volume 241))

Abstract

During the last few years Enterprise Architecture (EA) has received increasing attention among industry and academia. EA can be defined as a formal description of the current and future state(s) of the organisation, and as a managed changes between these states. By adopting EA, organisations may gain a number of benefits such as better decision making, increased revenues and cost reduction, and alignment of business and IT. Despite of the benefits, EA is not widely adopted in organisations. One of the reasons for this is that the adoption has been found to be difficult. In this paper a model to explain the complex dynamics of EA adoption is introduced. The model of the Resistance during the EA adoption Process (REAP) is based on selected EA literature and on general organisational change and change resistance literature. The model introduces novel relationships between strategic level of EA, resulting organisational changes, and the sources of resistance during the planning and execution phases of the adoption. REAP is validated empirically using data collected from an EA-pilot conducted among 11 Finnish higher education institutions. Validation revealed that most of the resistance faced during the adoption was caused by the lack of EA knowledge. By utilising REAP model, organisations may anticipate and prepare for the organisational change resistance during EA adoption.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution.

Buying options

Chapter
USD   29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD   39.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD   54.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Learn about institutional subscriptions

References

  1. TOGAF: TOGAF Version 9. Van Haren Publishing (2009)

    Google Scholar 

  2. Zachman, J.A.: Enterprise architecture: The issue of the century. Database Program. Des. 10, 44–53 (1997)

    Google Scholar 

  3. Ross, J.W., Weill, P., Robertson, D.C.: Enterprise Architecture as Strategy: Creating a Foundation for Business Execution. Harvard Business School Press, Boston (2006)

    Google Scholar 

  4. Schekkerman, J.: Trends in Enterprise Architecture 2005: How Are Organizations Progressing?. Institute for Enterprise Architecture Developments, Amersfoort (2005)

    Google Scholar 

  5. Scott Ambler. http://www.ambysoft.com/surveys/stateOfITUnion201001.html

  6. Computer Economics. http://www.computereconomics.com/article.cfm?id=1947

  7. Hammer, M., Champy, J.: Reengineering the Corporation: a Manifesto for Business Revolution. Nicholas Brearly, London (1993)

    Google Scholar 

  8. Beer, M., Nohria, N.: Cracking the code of change. Harvard Bus. Rev. 78, 133–141 (2000)

    Google Scholar 

  9. Kotter, J.P.: A Sense of Urgency. Harvard Business Press, Boston (2008)

    Google Scholar 

  10. Lemmetti, J., Pekkola, S.: Understanding enterprise architecture: perceptions by the finnish public sector. In: Scholl, H.J., Janssen, M., Wimmer, M.A., Moe, C.E., Flak, L.S. (eds.) EGOV 2012. LNCS, vol. 7443, pp. 162–173. Springer, Heidelberg (2012)

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  11. ISO/IEC/IEEE: Systems and software engineering – Architecture description. ISO/IEC/IEEE 42010:2011(E) (Revision of ISO/IEC 42010:2007 and IEEE Std 1471-2000), pp. 1–46 (2011)

    Google Scholar 

  12. Dietz, J.L.G., Hoogervorst, J.A.P., Albani, A., Aveiro, D., Babkin, E., Barjis, J., Caetano, A., Huysmans, P., Iijima, J., van Kervel, S.J.H., Mulder, H., Op ‘t Land, M., Proper, H.A., Sanz, J., Terlouw, L., Tribolet, J., Verelst, J., Winter, R.: The discipline of enterprise engineering. Int. J. Organ. Des. Eng. 3, 86–114 (2013)

    Google Scholar 

  13. Pragmatic EA Ltd. http://www.pragmaticef.com/frameworks.htm

  14. Proper, H.A.: Enterprise architecture: informed steering of enterprises in motion. In: Hammoudi, S., Cordeiro, J., Maciaszek, L.A., Filipe, J. (eds.) ICEIS 2013. LNBIP, vol. 190, pp. 16–34. Springer, Heidelberg (2014)

    Google Scholar 

  15. CIO Council: A Practical Guide to Federal Enterprise Architecture. http://www.cio.gov/documents/bpeaguide.pdf (2001)

  16. http://www.gartner.com/it-glossary/enterprise-architecture-ea/

  17. GERAM: GERAM: Generalised Enterprise Reference Architecture and Methodology. Version 1.6.3. IFIP-IFAC Task Force on Architectures for Enterprise Integration. IFIP-IFAC Task Force (1999)

    Google Scholar 

  18. Pulkkinen, M.: Enterprise Architecture as a Collaboration Tool, p. 134. University of Jyväskylä, Jyväskylä (2008)

    Google Scholar 

  19. Syynimaa, N.: Taxonomy of purpose of enterprise architecture. In: 12th International Conference on Informatics and Semiotics in Organisations, ICISO 2010, Reading (2010)

    Google Scholar 

  20. Pragmatic EA Ltd. http://www.pragmaticea.com/docs/160-char-challenge-analysis.pdf

  21. Oxford University Press. http://oxforddictionaries.com/

  22. Lee, A.S.: Retrospect and prospect: information systems research in the last and next 25 years. J. Inf. Technol. 25, 336–348 (2010)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  23. Van de Ven, A.H., Poole, M.S.: Explaining development and change in organizations. Acad. Manage. Rev. 20, 510–540 (1995)

    Google Scholar 

  24. Kezar, A.: Understanding and facilitating organizational change in the 21st century. ASHE-ERIC Higher Education Report. Wiley (2001)

    Google Scholar 

  25. Csibra, G., Gergely, G.: ‘Obsessed with goals’: functions and mechanisms of teleological interpretation of actions in humans. Acta Psychol. 124, 60–78 (2007)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  26. Groesser, S.N., Schwaninger, M.: Contributions to model validation: hierarchy, process, and cessation. Syst. Dyn. Rev. 28, 157–181 (2012)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  27. Barlas, Y.: Formal aspects of model validity and validation in system dynamics. Syst. Dyn. Rev. 12, 183–210 (1996)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  28. Strauss, A., Corbin, J.: Basics of Qualitative Research: Techniques and Procedures for Developing Grounded Theory. Sage Publications, Newbury Park (1990)

    Google Scholar 

  29. Hsieh, H.-F., Shannon, S.E.: Three approaches to qualitative content analysis. Qual. Health Res. 15, 1277–1288 (2005)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  30. Lapalme, J.: 3 schools of enterprise architecture. IT Prof. PP, 1 (2011)

    Google Scholar 

  31. Lapalme, J.: Three schools of thought on enterprise architecture. IT Prof. 14, 37–43 (2012)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  32. Casadesus-Masanell, R., Ricart, J.E.: From strategy to business models and onto tactics. Long Range Plan. 43, 195–215 (2010)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  33. Oreg, S., Vakola, M., Armenakis, A.: Change recipients’ reactions to organizational change: a 60-year review of quantitative studies. J. Appl. Behav. Sci. 47, 461–524 (2011)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  34. Cao, G., Clarke, S., Lehaney, B.: A systemic view of organisational change and TQM. The TQM Mag. 12, 186–193 (2000)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  35. Cao, G., Clarke, S., Lehaney, B.: Diversity management in organizational change: towards a systemic framework. Syst. Res. Behav. Sci. 20, 231–242 (2003)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  36. Bovey, W.H., Hede, A.: Resistance to organizational change: the role of cognitive and affective processes. Leadersh. Organ. Dev. J. 22, 372–382 (2001)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  37. Pardo del Val, M., Martinez Fuentes, C.: Resistance to change: a literature review and empirical study. Manage. Decis. 41, 148–155 (2003)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  38. Hollander, J.A., Einwohner, R.L.: Conceptualizing resistance. Sociol. Forum 19, 533–554 (2004)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  39. Hannan, M.T., Freeman, J.: Structural inertia and organizational change. Am. Sociol. Rev. 49, 149–164 (1984)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  40. http://raketti.csc.fi/kokoa/pilotti

  41. Kitchenham, B.: Guidelines for performing Systematic Literature Reviews in Software Engineering. Keele University, Keele (2007)

    Google Scholar 

  42. Syynimaa, N.: Enterprise architecture adoption method for higher education institutions, p. 262. Gerenios Ltd, Tampere, Finland (2015)

    Google Scholar 

  43. Kvale, S.: Interviews: an introduction to qualitative research interviewing. Sage Publications Inc, Thousand Oaks (1996)

    Google Scholar 

  44. The Finnish Education Evaluation Centre, FINEEC. http://karvi.fi/en/

  45. Hiekkanen, K., Korhonen, J.J., Collin, J., Patricio, E., Helenius, M., Mykkanen, J.: Architects’ perceptions on EA use – an empirical study. In: 2013 IEEE 15th Conference on Business Informatics (CBI), pp. 292–297 (2013)

    Google Scholar 

  46. Mezzanotte, D.M., Dehlinger, J., Chakraborty, S.: On applying the theory of structuration in enterprise architecture design. In: 2010 IEEE/ACIS 9th International Conference on Computer and Information Science (ICIS), pp. 859–863 (2010)

    Google Scholar 

  47. Nassiff, E.: Understanding the Value of Enterprise Architecture for Organizations: A Grounded Theory Approach, p. 135. Nova Southeastern University, Ann Arbor (2012)

    Google Scholar 

  48. Barlas, Y., Carpenter, S.: Philosophical roots of model validation: two paradigms. Syst. Dyn. Rev. 6, 148–166 (1990)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  49. Kaisler, H., Armour, F., Valivullah, M.: Enterprise architecting: critical problems. In: HICSS-38, Proceedings of the 38th Annual Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences (2005)

    Google Scholar 

  50. Pehkonen, J.: Early Phase Challenges and Solutions in Enterprise Architecture of Public Sector, p. 107. Tampere University of Technology, Tampere (2013)

    Google Scholar 

  51. Seppänen, V.: From Problems to Critical Success Factors of Enterprise Architecture Adoption. University of Jyväskylä, Jyväskylä (2014)

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Nestori Syynimaa .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2015 Springer International Publishing Switzerland

About this paper

Cite this paper

Syynimaa, N. (2015). Modeling the Dynamics of Enterprise Architecture Adoption Process. In: Hammoudi, S., Maciaszek, L., Teniente, E., Camp, O., Cordeiro, J. (eds) Enterprise Information Systems. ICEIS 2015. Lecture Notes in Business Information Processing, vol 241. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-29133-8_28

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-29133-8_28

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Cham

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-319-29132-1

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-319-29133-8

  • eBook Packages: Computer ScienceComputer Science (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics