Abstract
In 1966, Gilbert White led a task force for the United States Bureau of the Budget (BOB), forerunner of the modern Office of Management and Budget (OMB), that recommended a comprehensive national approach to mitigating private flood losses through an insurance program (Rumsey 2010, 56–63). White had suggested the idea as early as his 1942 dissertation on floodplain management (White 1942, 202–204). The task force’s report recommended many of the features associated with the National Flood Insurance Program (NFIP) today, such as mapping of the floodplain and the management of floodplain development. However, the task force’s report also included a note suggesting national flood insurance may lead to aggravated flood losses by encouraging unsound building in flood-prone areas. The task force’s recommendations were implemented in 1968 and, since then, the NFIP has grown into a large monoline insurer with more than 1 trillion dollars in insured assets (Congressional Budget Office 2009, 1). Since 1977, Federal Emergency Management Agency (FEMA) has administered the program.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Notes
- 1.
The MLS is a system for cataloging real estate available for sale.
References
Anderson PS (2006) Floodplain development and considerations for better national policies. Master’s Thesis, South Dakota State University
Arnold JL (1988) The evolution of the 1936 Flood Control Act. United States Army Corps of Engineers, Fort Belvoir
Atkinson AB (1970) On the measurement of economic inequality. J Econ Theory 3(2):244–263
Bin O, Polasky S (2004) Effects of flood hazards on property values: evidence before and after Hurricane Floyd. Land Econ 80(4):490–500
Bin O, Kruse JB, Landry CE (2008) Flood hazards, insurance rates, and amenities: evidence from the coastal housing market. J Risk Insur 75(1):63–82
Bin O, Bishop JA, Kousky C (2011) Redistributional effects of the National Flood Insurance Program. Technical Report DP 11-14, Washington
Bingham K, Charron M, Kirschner G, Messick R, Sabade S (2006) The role of actuarial soundness in the National Flood Insurance Program. Deloitte Consulting and American Institutes for Research, Washington
Boardman AE, Greenberg DH, Vining AR, Weimer DL (2010) Cost-benefit analysis: concepts and practice, 4th edn. Pearson series in economics. Prentice Hall, Upper Saddle River
Boulware GW (2009) Public policy evaluation of the National Flood Insurance Program (NFIP). Ph.D Thesis, University of Florida
Bouma JJ, François D, Troch P (2005) Risk assessment and water management. Environ Model Softw 20(2):141–151
Brody SD, Zahran S, Maghelal P, Grover H, Highfield WE (2007) The rising costs of floods: examining the impact of planning and development decisions on property damage in Florida. J Am Plan Assoc 73(3):330–345
Brown MA (2010a) Anything but a breeze: moving forward without NFIP wind coverage. Boston Coll Environ Aff Law Rev 37(2):365–392
Brown OW (2010b) National Flood Insurance Program: continued actions needed to address financial and operational issues
Brown PH, Tullos D, Tilt B, Magee D, Wolf AT (2008) Modeling the costs and benefits of dam construction from a multidisciplinary perspective. J Environ Manag 90:S303–S311
Bullock A, Acreman M (1999) The role of wetlands in the hydrological cycle. Hydrol Earth Syst Sci 7(3):358–389
Bullock JA, Haddow GD, Ergin DCE, Westerman L, Yeletaysi S (2006) Introduction to homeland security, 2nd edn. Butterworth-Heinemann homeland security series. Elsevier Butterworth-Heinemann, Burlington
Burby RJ (2001) Flood insurance and floodplain management: the US experience. Glob Environ Chang Part B Environ Hazards 3(3–4):111–122
Burby RJ, French SP (1981) Coping with floods: the land use management paradox. J Am Plan Assoc 47(3):289–300
Cheatham LR (1975) A case study of some economic aspects of the national flood insurance. Technical Report, Water Resources Research Institute, Mississippi State University, Starkville
Comfort LK, Cigler BA, Birkland TA, Nance E (2010) Retrospectives and prospectives on Hurricane Katrina: five years and counting. Public Adm Rev 70(5):669–678
Congressional Budget Office (2009) The National Flood Insurance Program: factors affecting actuarial soundness
Cooper C, Block R (2006) Disaster: Hurricane Katrina and the failure of homeland security. Henry Holt and Company, New York
Crowell M, Coulton K, Johnson C, Westcott J, Bellomo D, Edelman S, Hirsch E (2010) An estimate of the U.S. population living in 100-year coastal flood hazard areas. J Coast Res 26(2):201–211
Cutter SL, Emrich CT (2006) Moral hazard, social catastrophe: the changing face of vulnerability along the hurricane coasts. Ann Am Acad Pol Soc Sci 102–112
Farrow S (2011) Incorporating equity in regulatory and benefit-cost analysis using risk-based preferences. Risk Anal 31(6):902–907
Frank RH (2006) Microeconomics and behavior, 6th edn. McGraw-Hill Irwin, Boston
Fraser JC, Doyle MW, Young H (2006) Creating effective flood mitigation policies. EOS Trans Am Geophys Union 87(27):265–270
Freeman AM III (1989) Ex Ante and Ex Post values for changes in risks. Risk Anal 9(3)
Godschalk DR, Brody S, Burby R (2003) Public participation in natural hazard mitigation policy formation: challenges for comprehensive planning. J Environ Plan Manag 46(5):733–754
Godschalk DR, Rose A, Mittler E, Porter K, West CT (2009) Estimating the value of foresight: aggregate analysis of natural hazard mitigation benefits and costs. J Environ Plan Manag 52(6):739–756
Griffith CT (1994a) The National Flood Insurance Program: unattained purposes, liability in contract, and takings. William Mary Law Rev 35:727–765
Griffith RS (1994b) The impact of mandatory purchase requirements for flood insurance on real estate markets. Ph.D Thesis, The University of Texas at Arlington
Harberger AC (1978) On the use of distributional weights in social cost-benefit analysis. J Polit Econ 86(2 Part 2: Research in Taxation):S87–S120
Herke J (1993) Teething pains at age 25: developing meaningful enforcement of the National Flood Insurance Program. Tulane Environ Law J 7:165–196
Hines JR (1999) Three sides of Harberger triangles. J Econ Perspect 13:167–188
Holway JM, Burby RJ (1990) The effects of floodplain development controls on residential land values. Land Econ 66(3):259–271
Horne J (2006) Breach of faith: Hurricane Katrina and the near death of a great American city. Random House, New York
Jones CP, Coulbourne WL, Marshall J, Rogers SM Jr (2006) Evaluation of the National Flood Insurance Program’s building standards
King RO (2005) Federal flood insurance: the repetitive loss problem
Kousky C (2008) Responding to risk: information and decision making in the floodplains of St. Louis County, Missouri. Ph.D Thesis, Harvard University, Cambridge
Kriesel W, Landry CE (2004) Participation in the National Flood Insurance Program: an empirical analysis for coastal properties. J Risk Insur. 71(3):405–420
Kunreuther H (2006) Has the time come for comprehensive natural disaster insurance? University of Pennsylvania Press, Philadelphia, pp 175–201
Kunreuther H, Ginsberg R, Miller L, Sagi P, Slovic P, Borkan B, Katz N (1978) Disaster insurance protection: public policy lessons. Wiley-Interscience, Wiley, New York
Lambert PJ (2001) The distribution and redistribution of income, 3rd edn. Manchester University Press, Manchester
Landis ML (1998) Let me next time be tried by fire: disaster relief and the origins of the American welfare state. Northwest Univ Law Rev 92:967–1034
Landry CE, Li J (2011) Participation in the community rating system of NFIP: an empirical analysis of North Carolina counties. Nat Hazard Rev 13(3):205–220
Lawless RM (2005) Bankruptcy filing rates after a major hurricane. Nev Law J 6:7–20
Luebken U (2008) Die natur der gefahr. zur geschichte der überschwemmungsversicherung in deutschland und den USA. Behemoth A J Civilis 3:4–20
Martin MA (2008) The impact of flood insurance on development in Ocean City, Maryland. Master’s Thesis, Salisbury University, Salisbury
McLeman R, Smit B (2006) Vulnerability to climate change hazards and risks: crop and flood insurance. Can Geogr 50(2):217–226
Michel-Kerjan E, Kousky C (2010) Come rain or shine: evidence on flood insurance purchases in Florida. J Risk Insur 77(2):369–397
Michel-Kerjan E, de Forges SL, Kunreuther H (2012) Policy tenure under the U.S. National Flood Insurance Program (NFIP). Risk Anal 32(4):644–658
Moore DE, Cantrell RL (1976) Community response to external demands: an analysis of participation in the federal flood insurance program. Rural Sociol 41(4):484–508
Moss DA (1999) Courting disaster? The transformation of federal disaster policy since 1803, Chap 8. University of Chicago Press, Chicago, pp 307–355
Moss M, Schellhamer C, Berman DA (2009) The Stafford Act and priorities for reform. J Homel Secur Emerg Manag 6(1):1–21
National Research Council (2004) Analytical methods and approaches for water resources project planning. Technical Report, Washington
National Research Council (2010) A review of the proposed revisions to the federal principles and guidelines water resources planning document. Technical Report, Washington
Nicholson W (2004) Microeconomic theory, 9th edn. Thomson South-Western College Pub
Office of Management and Budget (1992) Guidelines and discount rates for benefit-cost analysis of federal programs. Technical Report A-94, Washington
Orie M (2013) Case study 2. U.S. National Flood Insurance Program. The Geneva Association, Geneva, pp 23–28
Ramirez J, Adamowicz WL, Easter KW, Graham-Tomasi T (1988) Ex Post analysis of flood control: benefit-cost analysis and the value of information. Water Resour Res 24(8):1397–1405
Rumsey MA (2010) Beyond bigger and better: Gilbert White and America’s new approach to floodplain management. Master’s Thesis, Mississippi State University, Starkville
Sarmiento C, Miller TR (2006) Costs and consequences of flooding and the impact of the National Flood Insurance Program. Pacific Institute for Research and Evaluation, Calverton
Scales AF (2006) A nation of policyholders: governmental and market failure in flood insurance. Miss Coll Law Rev 26:3–47
Shilling JD, Sirmans CF, Benjamin JD (1989) Flood insurance, wealth redistribution, and urban property values incorporating distributional issues into benefit cost. J Urban Econ 26(1):43–53
Sirmans GS, Macpherson DA, Zietz EN (2005) The composition of hedonic pricing models. J Real Estate Lit 113(1):3–43
United States Geological Survey (2010) 100-year flood—it’s all about chance. General Information Product 106
Viscusi WK (2000) Risk equity. J Leg Stud 29(S2):843–871
Water Resources Council (1983) Economic and environmental principles and guidelines for water and related land resources implementation studies. Technical Report, Washington
White GF (1942) Human adjustment to floods: a geographical approach to the flood problem in the United States. Ph.D Thesis, University of Chicago, Chicago
Yasui S (2005) A critical review of the tradition methodology of cost-benefit analysis and a proposed alternative. Hum Ecol Risk Assess 11:411–432
Yildirim U (1997) The decision to purchase flood insurance: a case study of Reno and Sparks. Master’s Thesis, University of Nevada, Reno
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2016 Springer International Publishing Switzerland
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Howard, J.P. (2016). Literature Review. In: Socioeconomic Effects of the National Flood Insurance Program. SpringerBriefs in Political Science. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-29063-8_2
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-29063-8_2
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Cham
Print ISBN: 978-3-319-29062-1
Online ISBN: 978-3-319-29063-8
eBook Packages: Political Science and International StudiesPolitical Science and International Studies (R0)