Skip to main content

Conceptual Model for Developing Platform-Centric Production Architectures

  • Conference paper
  • First Online:
Managing Complexity

Part of the book series: Springer Proceedings in Business and Economics ((SPBE))

Abstract

Research into product architectures and product platforms has increased extensively the last decade to cope with challenges of increasing product variance. However, increasing demand for speed and cost-effectiveness motivates a more holistic and integrated approach to new product introductions which do not only consider product design. Thus, needs exist for extending the scope of architecture and platform development to cover production aspects and thereby improving the robust process design capability of mass customization. Although attention to production architectures and production platforms has increased lately, not much has been published within this research area. Furthermore, empirical observations show that current vocabulary and detail level of constructs, models and methods for developing production platforms are not sufficient for proper industrial application—they need to be put into context. With origin in software architecture research, this paper provides a conceptual model that sets the context of creating production platform architectures.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Institutional subscriptions

References

  1. Apel, S., Batory, D., Kästner, C., et al.: Feature-oriented software product lines. Springer, Berlin (2013)

    Book  Google Scholar 

  2. Baldwin, C.Y., Woodard, C.J.: The architecture of platforms: a unified view. In: Gawer, A. (ed.) Platforms, markets and innovation, p. 19. EE Publishing, Cheltenham (2009)

    Google Scholar 

  3. Benkamoun, N., ElMaraghy, W., Huyet, A., et al.: Architecture framework for manufacturing system design. Procedia CIRP 17, 88–93 (2014)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Bossen, J., Brunoe, T.D., Nielsen, K.: Platform-Based Production Development. IFIP Advances in Information and Communication Technology 459, 53–61 (2015)

    Google Scholar 

  5. Brunoe, T.D., Bossen, J., Nielsen, K.: Identification of drivers for modular production. IFIP Advances in Information and Communication Technology 459, 235–242 (2015)

    Google Scholar 

  6. Claesson, A.: A configurable component framework supporting platform-based product development. Ph.D. thesis, Chalmers University of Technology, Gothenburg (2006)

    Google Scholar 

  7. ElMaraghy, H.A., Wiendahl, H.P.: Changeability—an introduction. In: ElMaraghy, H.A. (ed.) Changeable and reconfigurable manufacturing systems, pp. 3–24. Springer, London (2009)

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  8. Ericsson, A., Erixon, G.: Controlling design variants: modular product platforms. ASME Press, New York (1999)

    Google Scholar 

  9. Ford, N.: Build your own technology radar. Whitepaper. Online. ThoughtWorks (2013)

    Google Scholar 

  10. Gregor, S., Jones, D.: The anatomy of a design theory. J. Assoc. Inf. Syst. 8, 312–335 (2007)

    Google Scholar 

  11. Harlou, U.: Developing product families based on architectures: contribution to a theory of product families. ORBIT (2006)

    Google Scholar 

  12. ISO/IEC/IEEE 42010: Systems and software engineering—architecture description (ISO/IEC/IEEE 42010:2011). (2011)

    Google Scholar 

  13. Jepsen, A.D.: Architecture descriptions—a contribution to modeling of production system architecture. Ph.D. Thesis—Annual Report, DTU Mechanical Engineering (2015)

    Google Scholar 

  14. Koren, Y., Shpitalni, M.: Design of reconfigurable manufacturing systems. J. Manuf. Syst. 29, 130–141 (2010)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Kvist, M.: Product family assessment. Ph.D. Thesis, DTU Management Engineering (2010)

    Google Scholar 

  16. Landherr, M., Westkämper, E.: Integrated product and assembly configuration using systematic modularization and flexible integration. Procedia CIRP 17, 260–265 (2014)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Meyer, M.H., Lehnerd, A.P.: The power of product platforms: building value and cost leadership. Free Press, New York (1997)

    Google Scholar 

  18. Michaelis, M.T., Johannesson, H.: Platform approaches in manufacturing: considering integration with product platforms. In: Proceedings of the ASME 2011 International Design Engineering Technical Conferences & Computers and Information in Engineering Conference, Washington, DC, pp. 1115–1124 (2011)

    Google Scholar 

  19. Michaelis, M.T., Johannesson, H., ElMaraghy, H.A.: Function and process modeling for integrated product and manufacturing system platforms. Journal of Manufacturing Systems, Rev. 36, 203–215 (2015)

    Google Scholar 

  20. Michaelis, M.T.: Co-development of products and manufacturing systems using integrated platform models. Chalmers University of Technology, Gothenburg (2013)

    Google Scholar 

  21. Michaelis, M.T.: Co-development of products and manufacturing systems-applying a configurable platform approach. Licentiate thesis, Chalmers University of Technology, Gothenburg (2011)

    Google Scholar 

  22. Nielsen, O.F.: Continuous platform development. DTU Management Engineering, Department of Management Engineering, Technical University of Denmark (2010)

    Google Scholar 

  23. Pine, I., Joseph, B., Victor, B.: Making mass customization work. Harv. Bus. Rev. 71, 108–117 (1993)

    Google Scholar 

  24. Robertson, D., Ulrich, K.: Planning for product platforms. Sloan Manag. Rev. 39, 19–32 (1998)

    Google Scholar 

  25. Rozanski, N., Woods, E.: Software systems architecture: working with stakeholders using viewpoints and perspectives. Addison-Wesley, Boston (2011)

    Google Scholar 

  26. Salvador, F., De Holan, P.M., Piller, F.: Cracking the code of mass customization. MIT Sloan Manag. Rev. 50, 71–78 (2009)

    Google Scholar 

  27. Ulrich, K., Eppinger, S.D.: Product design and development. McGraw-Hill, New York (2003)

    Google Scholar 

  28. Wiendahl, H., ElMaraghy, H.A., Nyhuis, P., et al.: Changeable manufacturing-classification, design and operation. CIRP Ann. Manuf. Technol. 56, 783–809 (2007)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  29. Zahn, E.: Wandlungsfähige produktionsunternehmen: Das stuttgarter unternehmensmodell. Springer, Berlin (2009)

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Jacob Bossen .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Open Access This chapter is licensed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 2.5 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/2.5/), which permits any noncommercial use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license and indicate if changes were made.

The images or other third party material in this chapter are included in the chapter's Creative Commons license, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the chapter's Creative Commons license and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder.

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2017 Springer International Publishing Switzerland

About this paper

Cite this paper

Bossen, J., Brunoe, T.D., Bejlegaard, M., Nielsen, K. (2017). Conceptual Model for Developing Platform-Centric Production Architectures. In: Bellemare, J., Carrier, S., Nielsen, K., Piller, F.T. (eds) Managing Complexity. Springer Proceedings in Business and Economics. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-29058-4_7

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics