Abstract
In this chapter we draw together the themes, identified in earlier chapters, which must be addressed if ‘modelling-based teaching’ is become part of the professional repertoire of all school science teachers. We also tentatively identify the professional agencies that may be best placed, in terms of their expertise, to do so. Finally, we summarise the novel perspectives that we have advanced about these and suggest how these may be helpful in addressing the challenges identified.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
References
Gilbert, J. K. (2004). Models and modelling: Routes to a more authentic science education. International Journal of Science and Mathematics Education, 2, 115–130.
Ibraim, S. S., & Justi, R. (2015). Is PCK a useful construct when pre-service teachers develop their knowledge on argumentation? Paper presented at the 11th conference of the European Science Education Research Association, Helsinki, Finland.
Zohar, A. (2004). Higher order thinking in science classrooms: Students’ learning and teachers’ professional development. Dordrecht, The Netherlands: Kluwer.
Zohar, A., & Schwartzer, N. (2005). Assessing teachers’ pedagogical knowledge in the context of teaching higher-order thinking. International Journal of Science Education, 27(13), 1595–1620.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2016 Springer International Publishing Switzerland
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Gilbert, J.K., Justi, R. (2016). Modelling-Based Teaching and Learning: Current Challenges and Novel Perspectives. In: Modelling-based Teaching in Science Education. Models and Modeling in Science Education, vol 9. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-29039-3_12
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-29039-3_12
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Cham
Print ISBN: 978-3-319-29038-6
Online ISBN: 978-3-319-29039-3
eBook Packages: EducationEducation (R0)