Abstract
A broad range of caring professions in contemporary society use evidence-based criteria as the building blocks of practice, which at a general level is assumed to bridge the gap between research and practice. However, the focus on the use of evidence-based approaches has thus far primarily been on practitioners’ instrumental use of knowledge, rather than on conceptual use in the form of enhanced awareness, knowledge and understanding of one’s work and shifts in ideas and attitudes concerning various aspects of work.
This chapter addresses the issue of workplace reflection as a means for deliberately promoting professional learning and the remaking of practice. A basic assumption in this chapter is that professional learning has the potential to be enhanced when practitioners interact with different knowledge sources in work, such as research, practice experience and policy.
The chapter is structured in three sections. Following a brief introduction, the notion of reflection is elaborated on, as it is important to qualify and position this construct as a deliberate act. Then, a distinction is made between two different but complementary knowledge forms, research-based and practice-based knowledge, and adaptive and developmental modes of learning. The different learning modes show how knowledge and reflection are used to different degrees when handling a certain task in the course of daily work. The first section concludes in a conceptual model. In the second section, two cases involving professionals in the public sector in Sweden serve as an illustration of how organized reflection can provide a mechanism for practitioners to interact with research-based and practice-based knowledge. In the third section, some of the challenges involved in achieving reflection at work are addressed. These challenges are potentially helpful for managing a broad strategic environment for learning at work.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
References
Alvesson, M., & Spicer, A. (2012). A stupidity-based theory of organizations. Journal of Management Studies, 49, 1194–1220.
Argyris, C., & Schön, D. (1978). Organizational learning: A theory of action perspective. Reading, MA: Addison-Wesley.
Avby, G. (2015). Professional practice as processes of muddling through: A study of learning and sense making in social work. Vocations and Learning, 8, 95–113.
Backer, T. E. (1991). Knowledge utilization: The third wave. Science Communication, 12, 225–240.
Baldwin, M. (2004). Critical reflection: Opportunities and threats to professional learning and service development in social work organizations. In N. Gould & M. Baldwin (Eds.), Social work, critical reflection and the learning organization. Aldershot, UK: Ashgate Publishing.
Biesta, G. (2007). Why “what work” won’t work: Evidence-based practice and the democratic deficit in educational research. Educational Theory, 57, 1–22.
Billett, S. (2001). Learning through work: Workplace affordances and individual engagement. Journal of Workplace Learning, 13, 209–214.
Billett, S. (2002). Workplace pedagogic practices: Co-participation and learning. British Journal of Educational Studies, 50, 457–481.
Billett, S. (2004). Learning through work: Workplace participatory practices. In H. Rainbird, A. Fuller, & A. Munro (Eds.), Workplace learning in context (pp. 109–125). London, UK: Routledge.
Boud, D., Cressey, D., & Docherty, P. (2006). Productive reflection at work – Learning for changing organizations. New York, UK: Routledge.
Boud, D., Keogh, R., & Walker, D. (1985). Reflection: Turning experience into learning. London, UK: Kogan Page.
Brante, T. (2013). The professional landscape: The historical development of professions in Sweden. Professions & Professionalism, 3(2), 1–18.
Brehmer, B. (1980). In one word: Not from experience. Acta Psychologica, 4, 223–241.
Broadhurst, K., Hall, C., Wastell, D., White, S., & Pithouse, A. (2010). Risk, instrumentalism and the humane project in social work: Identifying the informal logics of risk management in children’s statutory services. British Journal of Social Work, 40, 1046–1064.
Cressey, P., Boud, D., & Docherty, P. (2006). The emergence of productive reflection. In D. Boud, P. Cressey, & P. Docherty (Eds.), Productive reflection at work. Abingdon, UK: Routledge.
Dewey, J. (1910). How we think; a restatement of the relation of reflective thinking in the educative process. Boston: D.C. Health.
Dewey, J. (1917). The need for a recovery of philosophy. In Creative intelligence – Essays in the pragmatic attitude. New York, NY: Henry Holt.
Dewey, J. (1938). Experience and education. New York, NY: Pocket Books.
Ellström, E., Ekholm, B., & Ellström, P. E. (2008). Two types of learning environment. Journal of Workplace Learning, 20, 84–97.
Ellström, P.-E. (2001). Integrating learning and work: Problems and prospects. Human Resource Development Quarterly, 12, 421–435.
Ellström, P.-E. (2006). Two logics of learning. In E. Antonacopoulou, P. Jarvis, V. Andersen, B. Elkjaer, & S. Hoyrup (Eds.), Learning, working and living: Mapping the terrain of working life learning (pp. 33–49). London, UK: Palgrave Macmillan.
Ellström, P.-E. (2011). Informal learning at work: Conditions, processes and logics. In M. Malloch, L. Cairns, K. Evans, & B. N. O’Connor (Eds.), The SAGE handbook of workplace learning. London, UK: Sage.
Ellström, P.-E., & Nilsen, P. (2014). Promoting practice-based innovations through learning at work. In H. Gruber, C. Harteis, & S. Billett (Eds.), International handbook of research in professional and practice-based learning. Dordrecht, The Netherlands: Springer.
Eraut, M. (2000). Non-formal learning and tacit knowledge in professional work. British Journal of Educational Psychology, 70, 113–136.
Eraut, M. (2004). Practice-based evidence. In G. Thomas & R. Pring (Eds.), Evidence-based practice in education (pp. 91–101). New York, NY: Open University Press.
Eraut, M. (2007). Learning from other people in the workplace. Oxford Review of Education, 33, 403–422.
Ericsson, A. K. (2008). Deliberate practice and acquisition of expert performance: A general overview. Academic Emergency Medicine, 15, 988–994.
Ericsson, K. A., Krampe, R. T., & Tesch-Römer, C. (1993). The role of deliberate practice in the acquisition of expert performance. Psychological Review, 100, 363–406.
Estabrooks, C. A., Rutakumwa, W., O’Leary, K. A., Profetto-McGrath, J., Milner, M., Levers, M. J., et al. (2005). Sources of practice knowledge among nurses. Qualitative Health Research, 15, 460–476.
Evans, K. (2015). Developing knowledgeable practice at work. In M. Elg, P.-E. Ellström, M. Klofsten, M. Tillmar (Eds.), Sustainable development in organizations (pp.109–126). Cheltenham, UK: Edward Elgar.
Evans, T. (2011). Professionals, managers and discretion: Critiquing street-level bureaucracy. British Journal of Social Work, 41, 369–386.
Evetts, J. (2014). The concept of professionalism: Professional work, professional practice and learning. In H. Gruber, C. Harteis, & S. Billett (Eds.), International handbook of research in professional and practice-based learning. Dordrecht, The Netherlands: Springer.
Fuller, A., Munro, A., & Rainbird, H. (2004). Introduction and overview. In H. Rainbird, A. Fuller, & A. Munro (Eds.), Workplace learning in context (pp. 1–18). London, UK: Routledge.
Garud, R. (1997). On the distinction between know-how, know-why, and know-what. Advances in Strategic Management, 14, 81–101.
Giddens, A. (1984). The constitution of society. Berkeley, CA: University of California Press.
Gray, D. E. (2007). Facilitating management learning: Developing critical reflection through reflective tools. Management Learning, 38, 495–517.
Gray, M., Plath, D., & Webb, S. A. (2009). Evidence-based social work. A critical stance. London, UK: Routledge.
Gustavsson, M. (2007). The potential for learning in industrial work. Journal of Workplace Learning, 19, 453–463.
Jarvis, P. (1992). Reflective practice and nursing. Nurse Education Today, 12, 174–181.
Kahneman, D., & Klein, G. (2009). Conditions for intuitive expertise: A failure to disagree. American Psychologist, 64, 515–526.
Kvernbekk, T. (1999). Knowledge that works in practice. Scandinavian Journal of Educational Research, 43, 111–130.
Kvernbekk, T. (2011). The concept of evidence in evidence-based practice. Educational Theory, 61(5), 515–532.
Lindblom, C. E., & Cohen, D. K. (1979). Usable knowledge. social science and social problem solving. Newhaven, CT: Yale University Press.
Malloch, M., Cairns, L., Evans, K., & O’Connor, B. N. (Eds.). (2011). The SAGE handbook of workplace learning. London, UK: Sage.
Mezirow, J. (1991). Transformative dimensions of adult learning. San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass.
Nilsen, P., Nordström (Avby), G., & Ellström, P.-E. (2012). Integrating research-based and practice-based knowledge through workplace reflection. Journal of Workplace Learning, 24, 403–415.
Nonaka, I., & Takeuchi, H. (1995). The knowledge-creating company. New York, NY: Oxford University Press.
Nutley, S. M., Walter, I., & Davies, H. T. O. (2007). Using evidence. How research can inform public services. Bristol, UK: Policy Press.
Otto, H.-U., Polutta, A., & Ziegler, H. (2009). Reflexive professionalism as a second generation of evidence-based practice. Research on Social Work Practice, 19, 472–478.
Pierce, C. S. (1905). What pragmatism is. The Monist, 15(2), 161–181.
Polanyi, M. (1966). The tacit dimension. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.
Rainbird, H., Fuller, A., & Munro, A. (Eds.). (2004). Workplace learning in context. London, UK: Routledge.
Reynolds, M., & Vince, R. (Eds.). (2004). Organizing reflection. Aldershot, UK: Ashgate.
Ryle, G. (1945). Knowing how and knowing that: The presidential address. Proceedings of the Aristotelian Society, 46, 1–16.
Sackett, D. L. (1996). Evidence based medicine: What it is and what it isn’t. British Medical Journal, 312, 71–72.
Sadler-Smith, E., & Sheffy, E. (2004). The intuitive executive: Understanding and applying ‘gut feel’ in decision-making. Academy of Management Executive, 18, 76–91.
Schön, D. A. (1983). The reflective practitioner – How professionals think in action. London, UK: Basic Books.
Stanovich, K. E., & West, R. F. (2000). Individual differences in reasoning: Implications for the rationality debate? Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 23, 645–665.
Svensson, L., & Evetts, J. (2010). Introduction. In L. Svensson & J. Evetts (Eds.), Sociology of professions. Continental and Anglo-Saxon traditions (pp. 8–29). Borås, Sweden: Diadalos.
Thomas, J. (2004). Using ‘critical incident analysis’ to promote critical reflection and holistic assessment. In N. Gould & M. Baldwin (Eds.), Social work, critical reflection and the learning organization (pp. 101–115). Aldershot, UK: Ashgate.
Trinder, L. (2008). Introduction: The context of evidence-based practice. In L. Trinder & S. Reynolds (Eds.), Evidence-based practice. A critical appraisal. Oxford, UK: Blackwell Science.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2016 Springer International Publishing Switzerland
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Avby, G. (2016). Organizing for Deliberate Practice Through Workplace Reflection. In: Billett, S., Dymock, D., Choy, S. (eds) Supporting Learning Across Working Life. Professional and Practice-based Learning, vol 16. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-29019-5_4
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-29019-5_4
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Cham
Print ISBN: 978-3-319-29017-1
Online ISBN: 978-3-319-29019-5
eBook Packages: EducationEducation (R0)