Abstract
A system that exploits information—e.g. to support decision making—can use contextual information both in providing expectations and in resolving uncertain inferences. In the latter case, contextual reasoning involves inferring desired information (values of “problem variables”) on the basis of other available information (“context variables”). Relevant contexts are often not self-evident, but must be discovered or selected as a means to problem-solving. Therefore, context exploitation involves (a) predicting the value of contextual information to meet information needs; (b) selecting information types and sources expected to provide information useful in meeting those needs; (c) determining the relevance and quality of acquired information; and (d) applying selected information to a problem at hand. Fusion of contextual information can improve the quality of inferences, but involves concerns about the quality of the contextual information. The availability and quality of predictive models dictate the ways in which contextual information can be used. Many applications are benefitted by inference systems that adaptively discover and exploit context and refine such models to meet evolving information states and information needs.
The original version of this chapter was revised: Order of the names of authors was changed to Alan N. Steinberg and Galina L. Rogova. The erratum to this chapter is available at DOI 10.1007/978-3-319-28971-7_26
An erratum to this chapter can be found at http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-28971-7_26
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Notes
- 1.
In Sect. 7.5.2 we distinguish four categories of reasoning. Anomaly-based detection is Category 1.
- 2.
We will use the term ‘target’ throughout this chapter to refer to any real, perceived or postulated entity of interest at any level of abstraction: a feature, signal, individual, attribute, event, relationship, aggregation, process, concept, etc.
- 3.
In [10] we examine these traditional fusion levels derived from the JDL Data Fusion Model, suggesting that the partitionings are not clear-cut. In particular, the dissimilarity of the L4 → L3 flow relative to other inter-level flows indicates that L4 does not obey the same partitioning criteria as the other levels. Additionally, the example state variables listed in Table 7.1 suggest that “level 4” fusion issues are the same as those for the other levels, but applied reflexively to the particular system doing the fusing.
- 4.
We discuss abduction in Sect. 7.5.2 as Category 2 reasoning.
- 5.
It might be useful to add yet another category (perhaps Category-1) to encompass estimation refinement via filtering or smoothing in the absence of a model; e.g., without model-driven filter gains.
References
C.L. Bowman, Process assessment and process management for intelligent data fusion & resource management systems, in Proceedings of AIAA Space 2012, Pasadena, CA, Sept 2012
L. Gong, Contextual modeling and applications, in Proceedings of IEEE International Conference on SMC, V1, 2005
A.N. Steinberg, G.L. Rogova, Situation and context in data fusion and natural language understanding, in Proceedings of Eleventh International Conference on Information Fusion (2008)
A.N. Steinberg, Context-sensitive data fusion using Structural Equation Modeling, in Proceedings, Twelfth International Conference on Information Fusion (Seattle, 2009)
D. Kahneman, Thinking, Fast and Slow (Farrar, Straus and Giroux, New York, 2011)
W.C. Salmon, Statistical Explanation and Statistical Relevance (University of Pittsburgh Press, Pittsburgh, 1971)
D. Angelova, L. Mihaylova, Sequential Monte Carlo algorithms for joint target tracking and classification using kinematic radar information, in Proceedings of 7th International Conference on Information Fusion (2004)
A.N. Steinberg, Foundations of situation and threat assessment, Chap. 18, in Handbook of Multisensor Data Fusion, ed. by M.E. Liggins, D.L. Hall, J. Llinas (CRC Press, London, 2009)
A.N. Steinberg, C.L. Bowman, Revisions to the JDL data fusion model, Chap. 3, in Handbook of Multisensor Data Fusion, ed. by M.E. Liggins, D.L. Hall, J. Llinas (CRC Press, London, 2009)
A. Steinberg, L. Snidaro, Levels?, in Proceedings, Eighteenth International Conference on Information Fusion (Washington, D.C., 2015), pp. 1985–1992
D.A. Lambert, A unification of sensor and higher-level fusion, in Proceedings of 9th International Conference on Information Fusion (2006)
G. Rogova, E. Bosse, Information quality in information fusion, in Proceedings of 13th International Conference on Information Fusion (2010)
G. Rogova, V. Nimier, Reliability in information fusion: literature survey, in Proceedings of the FUSION’2004-7th Conference on Multisource-Information Fusion (2004)
G. Rogova, M. Hadrazagic, M-O. St-Hilaire, M. Florea, P. Valin, Context-based information quality for sequential decision making, in Proceedings of the 2013 IEEE International Multi-disciplinary Conference on Cognitive Methods in Situation Awareness and Decision Support (CogSIMA) (2013)
G. Rogova, P. Scott, C. Lollett, Distributed reinforcement learning for sequential decision making, in Proceedings of 5th International Conference on Information Fusion (2002)
G. Rogova, Adaptive real-time threat assessment under uncertainty and conflict, in Proceedings of 2014 IEEE International Multi-disciplinary Conference on Cognitive Methods in Situation Awareness and Decision Support (CogSIMA) (2014)
V. Nimier, Supervised multisensor tracking algorithm by context analysis, in Proceedings of the International Conference on Information Fusion (1998), pp. 149–156
F. Delmotte, P. Borne, Context-dependent trust in data fusion within the possibility theory, in Proceedings of IEEE International Conference on Systems, Man and Cybernetics (1998), pp. 78–88
S. Fabre, A. Appriou, X. Briottet, Presentation and description of two classification methods using data fusion based on sensor management. ELSEVIER J. Inf. Fusion 2, 47–71 (2001)
A. Appriou, Situation assessment based on spatially ambiguous multisensory measurements. Intl. J. Intell. Syst. 16(10), 1135–1166 (2001)
G. Rogova, P. Scott, C. Lollett, R. Mudiyanur, Reasoning about situations in the early post-disaster response environment, in Proceedings of 9th International Conference on Information Fusion (2006)
J. Josephson, On the logical form of abduction, in AAAI Spring Symposium Series: Automated Abduction (1990), pp. 140–144
J. Juan Gómez-Romero, M.A. Serrano, J. García, J.M. Molina, G. Rogova, Context-based multi-level information fusion for harbor surveillance. Inf. Fusion 21, 173–186 (2015)
D.L. Hall, A.N. Steinberg, Dirty secrets in multisensor data fusion, Chap. 21, in Handbook of Multisensor Data Fusion, ed. by D.L. Hall, J. Llinas (CRC Press, London, 2001)
E. Waltz, Knowledge Management in the Intelligence Enterprise (Artech House, 2003)
A.N. Steinberg, A model for threat assessment, Chap. 15, in Fusion Methodologies in Crisis Management: Higher Level Fusion and Decision Making, ed. by G. Rogova, P. Scott (Springer, 2016)
A.N. Steinberg, Situations and contexts, in Perspectives on Information Fusion 1(1), International Society on Information Fusion, 16–24 (2016)
R. Hummel, MSTAR: next generation ATR technologies, in IDGA Image Fusion Conference (2005)
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2016 Springer International Publishing Switzerland (outside the USA)
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Steinberg, A.N., Rogova, G.L. (2016). System-Level Use of Contextual Information. In: Snidaro, L., García, J., Llinas, J., Blasch, E. (eds) Context-Enhanced Information Fusion. Advances in Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-28971-7_7
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-28971-7_7
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Cham
Print ISBN: 978-3-319-28969-4
Online ISBN: 978-3-319-28971-7
eBook Packages: Computer ScienceComputer Science (R0)