Abstract
In this chapter we wish to present the diagnostic significance of visual field deficits with the help of case presentations. We would like to focus primarily on aspects that are best suited to facilitate everyday diagnostic practice, at least according to our experience. We are not going to cover the appropriate technique of visual field testing and potential mistakes that can be made, although in some cases we are going to highlight them.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Further Readings
Bell RA, Thompson HS. Relative afferent pupillary defect in optic tract hemianopsia. Am J Ophthalmol. 1978;85:538–43.
Benton S, Levy J, Swash M. Vision in the temporal crescent in occipital infarction. Brain. 1980;103:83–97.
Bunt AH, Minckler DS. Foveal sparing. Arch Ophthalmol. 1977;95:1445–7.
Frontera AT, et al. Bilateral homonym hemianopsia with preservation of central vision. Mt Sinai J Med NY. 1974;41:480–5.
O’Connor PS. The Marcus–Gunn pupil in experimental optic tract lesions. Ophthalmology. 1982;89:1690–8.
Spector RH, et al. Occipital lobe infarctions: perimetry and computed tomography. Neurology. 1981;31:1098–106.
Walsh TJ. Temporal crescent or half-moon syndrome. Ann Ophthalmol. 1974;6:501–5.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2016 Springer International Publishing Switzerland
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Gács, G., Szilvássy, I. (2016). The Differential Diagnosis of Visual Field Deficits at the Bedside. In: Somlai, J., Kovács, T. (eds) Neuro-Ophthalmology. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-28956-4_18
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-28956-4_18
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Cham
Print ISBN: 978-3-319-28954-0
Online ISBN: 978-3-319-28956-4
eBook Packages: MedicineMedicine (R0)