Abstract
The use of the water resource is closely related to the geographical situation of the territory, but above all to the type and degree of socioeconomic development of countries, which is why in order to analyze water footprint in Mexico it is necessary to put the country’s characteristics into context. This chapter presents a general view of the country and puts it into the World and Latin-American contexts based on the main socioeconomic indicators, highlighting the unequal income distribution, the rural bias of poverty and the particular importance of the agricultural sector. This sector’s heterogeneity, as well as its relevance as a water user and an important cause of its deterioration are mentioned. We also mention that notwithstanding the importance of irrigation, to a good extent with underground water, the most important crops in Mexican people’s diet is produced in rain-fed lands, and a high percentage of both irrigated and rain-fed fields are devoted to livestock raising. Mexico’s growing dependence on food imports and the paradox that this brings environmental benefits is also commented upon.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution.
Buying options
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Learn about institutional subscriptionsNotes
- 1.
For the confection of its marginalization index for localities, Conapo considers the following variables: percentage of illiterate population 15 years old or more, percentage of the population without elementary school studies 15 years old or more, percentage of population living in housing no sanitary services and drainage, percentage of people living in housing without electric power, percentage of people living in housing without water piping, percentage of housing with overcrowding, percentage of people living in housing with dirt floor, percentage of population in localities with less than 5,000 inhabitants, percentage of people with income below two minimum wages.
- 2.
“The Human Development Index synthetizes the average progress on three basic aspects of human development, measured in a zero to one range, in which values closer to one represent higher human development. In reports previous to the twentieth edition of the HDI, the long and healthy life used to be measured by the life expectancy at birth index; the access to knowledge index was obtained by using the literacy rate and the combined enrollment rate together; while the decent standard of living was calculated through the gross domestic product per capita in Purchasing Power Parity (PPP) stated in US dollars. Thus, the HDI was obtained as the simple average, or arithmetic mean, of those three indicators”.
References
CONAGUA. Atlas del agua, México: SEMARNAT, 2012.
CONEVAL. http://www.coneval.gob.mx, Accessed January 19, 2014.
CONAPO. Índice de marginación por entidad federativa y municipio 2010, México: SEGOB, 2010.
Cortés, Fernando. Desigualdad económica y poder en México, México: CEPAL, 2011.
INEGI. Encuesta nacional de ingresos y gastos de los hogares, México: INEGI, 2012.
INEGI. Censo nacional de población y vivienda 2010, México: INEGI, 2012.
UNDP. Índice de desarrollo humano en México 2012, México: ONU, 2012.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2016 The Author(s)
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Dávila-Ibáñez, H.R., Pérez-Espejo, R.H., Hernández-Amezcua, T. (2016). Socioeconomic Framework. In: Pérez-Espejo, R., Constantino-Toto, R., Dávila-Ibáñez, H. (eds) Water, Food and Welfare. SpringerBriefs in Environment, Security, Development and Peace, vol 23. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-28824-6_2
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-28824-6_2
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Cham
Print ISBN: 978-3-319-28822-2
Online ISBN: 978-3-319-28824-6
eBook Packages: Earth and Environmental ScienceEarth and Environmental Science (R0)