Abstract
A mathematician being inspired to solve a problem. Frontispiece of Algebra by Abel Burja (1786)
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution.
Buying options
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Learn about institutional subscriptionsReferences
Aspray, W., & Kitcher, P. (Eds.). (1988). History of philosophy of modern mathematics. In Minnesota Studies in the Philosophy of Science (Vol. XI). Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press.
Becker, C. (1932). The heavenly city of the eighteenth century philosophers. New Haven: Yale University Press.
Bell, E. T. (1937). Men of mathematics. New York: Simon & Schuster.
Bolyai, F. (1851). Kurzer Grundriss eines Versuchs. No publisher given, M. Vaserhely, Romania.
Buehler, W. K. (1981). Gauss: A biographical study. New York: Springer.
Bujarski, G. T. (1972). Polish liberalism, 1815–1823. The Polish Review, 17(2), 3–37.
Burja, A. (1786). Der selbstlernende Algebrist. Berlin: Lagarde and Friedrich.
Cajori, F. (1897). A history of elementary mathematics with hints on methods of teaching. New York: Macmillan.
Craig, H. (1936). The enchanted glass: The Elizabethan mind in literature. New York: Oxford University Press.
D’Alembert, J. (1751). Preliminary discourse. In Encyclopedie, ou Dictionnaire raisonne des sciences, des arts et metiers (Vol. 1). Paris: Briasson.
D’Alembert, J. (1766). Mélanges de Litterature, d’Histoire et de Philosophie. Amsterdam: Zacharie Chatelain & Sons.
Danielson, D. (2011). Ramus, Rheticus, and the Copernican connection. In S. J. Reid & E. A. Wilson (Eds.), Ramus, pedagogy and the liberal arts: Ramism in Britain and the wider world (pp. 153–170). Farnham: Ashgate.
Daston, L. (1988). Classical probability in the enlightenment. Princeton: Princeton University Press.
Débarbat, S., & Dumont, S. (2014). Johann Karl Burckhardt, un Allemand de Gotha a Paris. Almagest, 5(2), 8–25.
Devlin, K. (2002). Kurt Gödel—Separating truth from proof in mathematics. Science, 298, 1899–1900.
Diderot, D. (1754). Pensees sur l’Interpretation de la Nature [English edition: 1999, Thoughts on the interpretation of nature, D. J. Adams, trans.). Manchester: Clinamen Press.
Dubyago, A. (1961). The determination of orbits. New York: Macmillan.
Dunnington, G. W. (1937). Carl Friedrich Gauss, inaugural lecture on astronomy. Baton Rouge: Louisiana State University Press.
Euler, L. (1744). Theoria motuum planetarum et cometarum. Berlin: Ambrosius Haude.
Gell-Mann, M. (2002). Some adventures among the elementary particles. Presidential Lecture, Florida International University, Miami. Delivered January 23, 2002.
Godwin, W. (1831). Thoughts on man, his nature, productions, and discoveries. London: Effingham Wilson.
Goedel, K. (1961). Collected works (Vol. III (1981)). Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Goethe, W. (1994). From my life: Poetry and truth (R. R. Heitner, Trans.). Princeton: Princeton University Press.
Golland, L., & Golland, R. (1993). Euler’s troublesome series: An early example of the use of trigonometric series. Historia Mathematica, 20, 54–67.
Grattan-Guinness, I. (1983). Euler’s mathematics in French science 1795–1815. In J. J. Burckhardt, E. A. Fellmann, & W. Habicht (Eds.), Leonhard Euler 1707–1783 (pp. 395–409). Basel: Birkhauser Verlag.
Grattan-Guinness, I. (2002). Landmark writings in western mathematics 1640–1940. Amsterdam: Elsevier.
Gregory, F. (2006). Origins and nature of fries’ philosophy of science. In M. Friedman & A. Nordmann (Eds.), The Kantian legacy in nineteenth-century science (pp. 81–100). Cambridge: Massachusetts Institute of Technology.
Hahn, R. (1998). A scientist responds to his skeptical crisis: Laplace’s philosophy of science. In J. van der Zande & R. Popkin (Eds.), The skeptical tradition around 1800 (pp. 187–201). Boston: Kluwer.
Harvey, G. (1577). Ciceronianus. London: Henrici Binneman.
Hooykaas, R. (1999). Fact, faith and fiction in the development of science. Dordrecht: Springer.
Johnson, F. R. (1937). Astronomical thought in renaissance England. Johns Hopkins Press. Reprinted 1968 by Octagon Books, New York.
Kepler, J. (1627). Rudolphine tables. Ulm: Jonae Saurii.
Kramer, E. (1982). The nature and growth of modern mathematics. Princeton: Princeton University Press.
Laplace, P.-S. (1798–1827). Traite de Mecanique Celeste, five volumes. Paris: Chez J.B.M. Duprat.
Loemker, L. (1972). Struggle for synthesis: The seventeenth century background of Leibniz’s synthesis of order and freedom. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.
Mandelbrot, B. (2012). The Fractalist: Memoir of a Scientific Maverick. NY: Pantheon.
Manley, L. (1980). Convention 1500–1750. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.
Marsden, B. (1995). Eighteenth- and nineteenth-century developments in the theory and practice of orbit determination. In General history of astronomy, Part B (Vol. 2, pp. 181–190). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Newton, I. (1704). Opticks. London: Sam. Smith & Benj. Walford, Royal Society.
Olbers, W. (1797). Abhandlung über die leichteste und bequemste Methode die Bahn eines Cometen aus einigen Beobachtungen zu berechnen (Computation of the paths of comets). Weimar: Verlage des Industrie-Comptoirs. Published in English in: The Quarterly Journal of Science. This appeared in installments between 1820 and 1823.
Ong, W. (1958). Ramus: Method, and the decay of dialogue. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.
Ong, W. (1962). The barbarian within. New York: Macmillan.
Patrick, G. T. W. (1889). The fragments of the work of Heraclitus of Ephesus on Nature. Baltimore: N. Murray.
Pulte, H. (2006). Kant, fries, and the expanding universe of science. In M. Friedman & A. Nordmann (Eds.), The Kantian legacy in nineteenth-century science (pp. 101–122). Cambridge: Massachusetts Institute of Technology.
Quillet, C. (1655). Calvidii Leti Callipsedia. Leyden. Callipaedia: A poem. Written in Latin, made English by N. Rowe, Esq., 1712. London: E. Sanger and E. Curil.
Ramus, P. (1569). Scholarum mathematicarum, libri unus et triginta. Basel: Episcopius.
Saur, G. (1705). Difficultates physicae cartesianae, thesibus inauguralibus philosophicis propositae (Difficulties of Cartesian physics subjected to peripatetic inquiry). Würzburg: Kleyer.
Stenger, V. (2013). Atheism and the physical sciences. In S. Bullivant & M. Ruse (Eds.), The Oxford handbook of atheism (pp. 432–448). Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Wells, G. (1978). Goethe and the development of science, 1750–1900. Science in History (Vol. 5). Alphen an den Rijn: Sijthoff & Noordhoff.
Wigner, E. (1960). The unreasonable effectiveness of mathematics in the natural sciences. Communications in Pure and Applied Mathematics, 13, 1–14.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2016 Springer International Publishing Switzerland
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Cunningham, C. (2016). Mathematics and the Triumph of the Human Intellect. In: Early Investigations of Ceres and the Discovery of Pallas. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-28815-4_1
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-28815-4_1
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Cham
Print ISBN: 978-3-319-28813-0
Online ISBN: 978-3-319-28815-4
eBook Packages: Physics and AstronomyPhysics and Astronomy (R0)