Skip to main content

Mathematics and the Triumph of the Human Intellect

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
  • 303 Accesses

Abstract

A mathematician being inspired to solve a problem. Frontispiece of Algebra by Abel Burja (1786)

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution.

Buying options

Chapter
USD   29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD   84.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD   109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD   109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Learn about institutional subscriptions

References

  • Aspray, W., & Kitcher, P. (Eds.). (1988). History of philosophy of modern mathematics. In Minnesota Studies in the Philosophy of Science (Vol. XI). Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Becker, C. (1932). The heavenly city of the eighteenth century philosophers. New Haven: Yale University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bell, E. T. (1937). Men of mathematics. New York: Simon & Schuster.

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  • Bolyai, F. (1851). Kurzer Grundriss eines Versuchs. No publisher given, M. Vaserhely, Romania.

    Google Scholar 

  • Buehler, W. K. (1981). Gauss: A biographical study. New York: Springer.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Bujarski, G. T. (1972). Polish liberalism, 1815–1823. The Polish Review, 17(2), 3–37.

    Google Scholar 

  • Burja, A. (1786). Der selbstlernende Algebrist. Berlin: Lagarde and Friedrich.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cajori, F. (1897). A history of elementary mathematics with hints on methods of teaching. New York: Macmillan.

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  • Craig, H. (1936). The enchanted glass: The Elizabethan mind in literature. New York: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • D’Alembert, J. (1751). Preliminary discourse. In Encyclopedie, ou Dictionnaire raisonne des sciences, des arts et metiers (Vol. 1). Paris: Briasson.

    Google Scholar 

  • D’Alembert, J. (1766). Mélanges de Litterature, d’Histoire et de Philosophie. Amsterdam: Zacharie Chatelain & Sons.

    Google Scholar 

  • Danielson, D. (2011). Ramus, Rheticus, and the Copernican connection. In S. J. Reid & E. A. Wilson (Eds.), Ramus, pedagogy and the liberal arts: Ramism in Britain and the wider world (pp. 153–170). Farnham: Ashgate.

    Google Scholar 

  • Daston, L. (1988). Classical probability in the enlightenment. Princeton: Princeton University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Débarbat, S., & Dumont, S. (2014). Johann Karl Burckhardt, un Allemand de Gotha a Paris. Almagest, 5(2), 8–25.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Devlin, K. (2002). Kurt Gödel—Separating truth from proof in mathematics. Science, 298, 1899–1900.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Diderot, D. (1754). Pensees sur l’Interpretation de la Nature [English edition: 1999, Thoughts on the interpretation of nature, D. J. Adams, trans.). Manchester: Clinamen Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dubyago, A. (1961). The determination of orbits. New York: Macmillan.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dunnington, G. W. (1937). Carl Friedrich Gauss, inaugural lecture on astronomy. Baton Rouge: Louisiana State University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Euler, L. (1744). Theoria motuum planetarum et cometarum. Berlin: Ambrosius Haude.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gell-Mann, M. (2002). Some adventures among the elementary particles. Presidential Lecture, Florida International University, Miami. Delivered January 23, 2002.

    Google Scholar 

  • Godwin, W. (1831). Thoughts on man, his nature, productions, and discoveries. London: Effingham Wilson.

    Google Scholar 

  • Goedel, K. (1961). Collected works (Vol. III (1981)). Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Goethe, W. (1994). From my life: Poetry and truth (R. R. Heitner, Trans.). Princeton: Princeton University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Golland, L., & Golland, R. (1993). Euler’s troublesome series: An early example of the use of trigonometric series. Historia Mathematica, 20, 54–67.

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  • Grattan-Guinness, I. (1983). Euler’s mathematics in French science 1795–1815. In J. J. Burckhardt, E. A. Fellmann, & W. Habicht (Eds.), Leonhard Euler 1707–1783 (pp. 395–409). Basel: Birkhauser Verlag.

    Google Scholar 

  • Grattan-Guinness, I. (2002). Landmark writings in western mathematics 1640–1940. Amsterdam: Elsevier.

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  • Gregory, F. (2006). Origins and nature of fries’ philosophy of science. In M. Friedman & A. Nordmann (Eds.), The Kantian legacy in nineteenth-century science (pp. 81–100). Cambridge: Massachusetts Institute of Technology.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hahn, R. (1998). A scientist responds to his skeptical crisis: Laplace’s philosophy of science. In J. van der Zande & R. Popkin (Eds.), The skeptical tradition around 1800 (pp. 187–201). Boston: Kluwer.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Harvey, G. (1577). Ciceronianus. London: Henrici Binneman.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hooykaas, R. (1999). Fact, faith and fiction in the development of science. Dordrecht: Springer.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Johnson, F. R. (1937). Astronomical thought in renaissance England. Johns Hopkins Press. Reprinted 1968 by Octagon Books, New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kepler, J. (1627). Rudolphine tables. Ulm: Jonae Saurii.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kramer, E. (1982). The nature and growth of modern mathematics. Princeton: Princeton University Press.

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  • Laplace, P.-S. (1798–1827). Traite de Mecanique Celeste, five volumes. Paris: Chez J.B.M. Duprat.

    Google Scholar 

  • Loemker, L. (1972). Struggle for synthesis: The seventeenth century background of Leibniz’s synthesis of order and freedom. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Mandelbrot, B. (2012). The Fractalist: Memoir of a Scientific Maverick. NY: Pantheon.

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  • Manley, L. (1980). Convention 1500–1750. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Marsden, B. (1995). Eighteenth- and nineteenth-century developments in the theory and practice of orbit determination. In General history of astronomy, Part B (Vol. 2, pp. 181–190). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Newton, I. (1704). Opticks. London: Sam. Smith & Benj. Walford, Royal Society.

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  • Olbers, W. (1797). Abhandlung über die leichteste und bequemste Methode die Bahn eines Cometen aus einigen Beobachtungen zu berechnen (Computation of the paths of comets). Weimar: Verlage des Industrie-Comptoirs. Published in English in: The Quarterly Journal of Science. This appeared in installments between 1820 and 1823.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ong, W. (1958). Ramus: Method, and the decay of dialogue. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ong, W. (1962). The barbarian within. New York: Macmillan.

    Google Scholar 

  • Patrick, G. T. W. (1889). The fragments of the work of Heraclitus of Ephesus on Nature. Baltimore: N. Murray.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Pulte, H. (2006). Kant, fries, and the expanding universe of science. In M. Friedman & A. Nordmann (Eds.), The Kantian legacy in nineteenth-century science (pp. 101–122). Cambridge: Massachusetts Institute of Technology.

    Google Scholar 

  • Quillet, C. (1655). Calvidii Leti Callipsedia. Leyden. Callipaedia: A poem. Written in Latin, made English by N. Rowe, Esq., 1712. London: E. Sanger and E. Curil.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ramus, P. (1569). Scholarum mathematicarum, libri unus et triginta. Basel: Episcopius.

    Google Scholar 

  • Saur, G. (1705). Difficultates physicae cartesianae, thesibus inauguralibus philosophicis propositae (Difficulties of Cartesian physics subjected to peripatetic inquiry). Würzburg: Kleyer.

    Google Scholar 

  • Stenger, V. (2013). Atheism and the physical sciences. In S. Bullivant & M. Ruse (Eds.), The Oxford handbook of atheism (pp. 432–448). Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wells, G. (1978). Goethe and the development of science, 1750–1900. Science in History (Vol. 5). Alphen an den Rijn: Sijthoff & Noordhoff.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wigner, E. (1960). The unreasonable effectiveness of mathematics in the natural sciences. Communications in Pure and Applied Mathematics, 13, 1–14.

    Article  ADS  MATH  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2016 Springer International Publishing Switzerland

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Cunningham, C. (2016). Mathematics and the Triumph of the Human Intellect. In: Early Investigations of Ceres and the Discovery of Pallas. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-28815-4_1

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics