Abstract
Information is an abstract entity that we recognize in the form of a message conveyed in a medium. Messages are read (decoded) to extract meanings (information content) and are compared with copies of the same messages to detect and correct errors. These functions require that a message contain both its primary information and a barrier (secondary information) that preserves the context within which the primary information is read for meaning and for errors. There must be discontinuity between different messages. Just as the themes that can be developed within the context of a single play (e.g. Macbeth) are limited, so that new themes require new plays (e.g. The Tempest), evolutionary themes that can be developed within the context of a biological species are limited, so that further evolutionary progress requires a barrier-breaching change that establishes a new species. Just as error-correction of the text of Macbeth requires another text of Macbeth from an independent source, so error-correction of a genome text is best carried out with a genome text from an unrelated member of the same species. Sex is primarily a within-species error-correcting device requiring that species be discontinuous and reproductively isolated from each other. Members of allied species that fail to recognize their context and breach the reproductive barrier may produce offspring, but these are sterile (hybrid sterility). Similarly, humans who fail to recognize the context of cognitive discourse may be schizophenic.
All messages and parts of messages are like phrases or segments of equations which a mathematician puts in brackets. Outside the brackets there may always be a qualifier or multiplier which will alter the whole tenor of the phrase.
Gregory Bateson (1960) [1]
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
References
Bateson G (1967) Cybernetic explanations. American Behavioural Scientist 10:29–32
Romanes GJ (1891) Aristotle as a naturalist. Contemporary Review 59:275–289
Delbrück M (1971) Aristotle-totle-totle. In: Monod J. Borek F (eds) Of Microbes and Life. Columbia University Press, New York, pp 50–55
Lyell C (1863) The Geological Evidences of the Antiquity of Man with Remarks on Theories of the Origin of Species by Variation. Childs, Philadelphia, p 467
Shaw GB (1913) Pygmalion. In: Bernard Shaw. Complete Plays with Prefaces. Volume I. Dodd, Mead, New York (1963)
Galton F (1876) A theory of heredity. Journal of the Anthropological Institute 5:329–348
Butler S (1878) Life and Habit. Trübner, London, pp 172–180, 200–201 [“Locus poenitentiae” is Latin for a “place of repentance.” Legally the term signifies a, perhaps brief, temporal safe-haven where there is an opportunity to change one’s mind. Thus, between the last bid and the fall of the auctioneer’s hammer, there is a locus poenitentiae for a decision, which cannot be stretched out for ever. Technically, a cross between a male horse and a female donkey results in a “hinny,” whereas a cross between a female horse and a male donkey results in a “mule.” Butler did not bother with such niceties, claiming that “I neither know, nor want to know, more detail than is necessary to enable me to give a fairly broad and comprehensive view of my subject.”]
Olby R, Posner E (1967) An early reference on genetic coding. Nature 215:556
Du Maurier D (1952) The Birds. Penguin Books, London.
Jenkin F (1867) The origin of species. The North British Review 46:277–318
Alberts B, Bray D, Lewis J, Raff M, Roberts K, Watson JD (1994) Molecular Biology of the Cell. 3rd Edition. Garland Publishing, New York, p 340
Lehninger AL, Nelson DL, Cox MM (1993) Principles of Biochemistry. 2nd Edition. Worth Publishers, New York, p 789
Bateson W (1894) Materials for the Study of Variation Treated with Especial Regard to Discontinuities in the Origin of Species. Macmillan, London, pp 16, 69 [Bateson and his St. John’s College colleague, the physicist Joseph Larmor, were friends. Some of the ideas associated with the new physics may have influenced Bateson’s thinking.]
Galton F (1869) Hereditary Genius. Macmillan, London
Bateson G (1973) Steps to an Ecology of Mind. Paladin, St. Albans, p 127
Lipset D (1980) Gregory Bateson: The Legacy of a Scientist. Prentice-Hall, Englewood Cliffs, p 208
Bateson G (1963) The role of somatic change in evolution. Evolution 17:529–539
Wilson NG (1999) Archimedes: the palimpsest and the tradition. Byzantinische Zeitschrift 92:89–101
Crick F (1988) What Mad Pursuit. A Personal View of Scientific Discovery. Basic Books, New York, p 150
Forsdyke DR (2006) Heredity as transmission of information. Butlerian intelligent design. Centaurus 48: 133–148
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2016 Springer Science+Business Media, LLC
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Forsdyke, D.R. (2016). Information Levels and Barriers. In: Evolutionary Bioinformatics. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-28755-3_3
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-28755-3_3
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Cham
Print ISBN: 978-3-319-28753-9
Online ISBN: 978-3-319-28755-3
eBook Packages: Biomedical and Life SciencesBiomedical and Life Sciences (R0)