Skip to main content

Information Levels and Barriers

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Evolutionary Bioinformatics
  • 1708 Accesses

Abstract

Information is an abstract entity that we recognize in the form of a message conveyed in a medium. Messages are read (decoded) to extract meanings (information content) and are compared with copies of the same messages to detect and correct errors. These functions require that a message contain both its primary information and a barrier (secondary information) that preserves the context within which the primary information is read for meaning and for errors. There must be discontinuity between different messages. Just as the themes that can be developed within the context of a single play (e.g. Macbeth) are limited, so that new themes require new plays (e.g. The Tempest), evolutionary themes that can be developed within the context of a biological species are limited, so that further evolutionary progress requires a barrier-breaching change that establishes a new species. Just as error-correction of the text of Macbeth requires another text of Macbeth from an independent source, so error-correction of a genome text is best carried out with a genome text from an unrelated member of the same species. Sex is primarily a within-species error-correcting device requiring that species be discontinuous and reproductively isolated from each other. Members of allied species that fail to recognize their context and breach the reproductive barrier may produce offspring, but these are sterile (hybrid sterility). Similarly, humans who fail to recognize the context of cognitive discourse may be schizophenic.

All messages and parts of messages are like phrases or segments of equations which a mathematician puts in brackets. Outside the brackets there may always be a qualifier or multiplier which will alter the whole tenor of the phrase.

Gregory Bateson (1960) [1]

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 129.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 169.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 249.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  1. Bateson G (1967) Cybernetic explanations. American Behavioural Scientist 10:29–32

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Romanes GJ (1891) Aristotle as a naturalist. Contemporary Review 59:275–289

    Google Scholar 

  3. Delbrück M (1971) Aristotle-totle-totle. In: Monod J. Borek F (eds) Of Microbes and Life. Columbia University Press, New York, pp 50–55

    Google Scholar 

  4. Lyell C (1863) The Geological Evidences of the Antiquity of Man with Remarks on Theories of the Origin of Species by Variation. Childs, Philadelphia, p 467

    Google Scholar 

  5. Shaw GB (1913) Pygmalion. In: Bernard Shaw. Complete Plays with Prefaces. Volume I. Dodd, Mead, New York (1963)

    Google Scholar 

  6. Galton F (1876) A theory of heredity. Journal of the Anthropological Institute 5:329–348

    Google Scholar 

  7. Butler S (1878) Life and Habit. Trübner, London, pp 172–180, 200–201 [“Locus poenitentiae” is Latin for a “place of repentance.” Legally the term signifies a, perhaps brief, temporal safe-haven where there is an opportunity to change one’s mind. Thus, between the last bid and the fall of the auctioneer’s hammer, there is a locus poenitentiae for a decision, which cannot be stretched out for ever. Technically, a cross between a male horse and a female donkey results in a “hinny,” whereas a cross between a female horse and a male donkey results in a “mule.” Butler did not bother with such niceties, claiming that “I neither know, nor want to know, more detail than is necessary to enable me to give a fairly broad and comprehensive view of my subject.”]

    Google Scholar 

  8. Olby R, Posner E (1967) An early reference on genetic coding. Nature 215:556

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Du Maurier D (1952) The Birds. Penguin Books, London.

    Google Scholar 

  10. Jenkin F (1867) The origin of species. The North British Review 46:277–318

    Google Scholar 

  11. Alberts B, Bray D, Lewis J, Raff M, Roberts K, Watson JD (1994) Molecular Biology of the Cell. 3rd Edition. Garland Publishing, New York, p 340

    Google Scholar 

  12. Lehninger AL, Nelson DL, Cox MM (1993) Principles of Biochemistry. 2nd Edition. Worth Publishers, New York, p 789

    Google Scholar 

  13. Bateson W (1894) Materials for the Study of Variation Treated with Especial Regard to Discontinuities in the Origin of Species. Macmillan, London, pp 16, 69 [Bateson and his St. John’s College colleague, the physicist Joseph Larmor, were friends. Some of the ideas associated with the new physics may have influenced Bateson’s thinking.]

    Google Scholar 

  14. Galton F (1869) Hereditary Genius. Macmillan, London

    Book  Google Scholar 

  15. Bateson G (1973) Steps to an Ecology of Mind. Paladin, St. Albans, p 127

    Google Scholar 

  16. Lipset D (1980) Gregory Bateson: The Legacy of a Scientist. Prentice-Hall, Englewood Cliffs, p 208

    Google Scholar 

  17. Bateson G (1963) The role of somatic change in evolution. Evolution 17:529–539

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Wilson NG (1999) Archimedes: the palimpsest and the tradition. Byzantinische Zeitschrift 92:89–101

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. Crick F (1988) What Mad Pursuit. A Personal View of Scientific Discovery. Basic Books, New York, p 150

    Google Scholar 

  20. Forsdyke DR (2006) Heredity as transmission of information. Butlerian intelligent design. Centaurus 48: 133–148

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2016 Springer Science+Business Media, LLC

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Forsdyke, D.R. (2016). Information Levels and Barriers. In: Evolutionary Bioinformatics. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-28755-3_3

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics