Abstract
The most common procedure to compute efficient/nondominated solutions in MOP is using a scalarizing technique, which consists in transforming the original multiobjective problem into a single objective problem that may be solved repeatedly with different parameters. The functions employed in scalarizing techniques are called surrogate scalar functions or scalarizing functions. The optimal solution to these functions should be anon dominated solution to the multiobjective problem. These functions temporarily aggregate in a single dimension the p objective functions of the original model and include parameters derived from the elicitation of the DM’s preference information. Surrogate scalar functions should be able to generate nondominated solutions only, obtain any nondominated solution and be independent of dominated solutions. In addition, the computational effort involved in the optimization of surrogate scalar functions should not be too demanding (e.g., increasing too much the dimension of the surrogate problem or resorting to nonlinear scalarizing functions when all original objective functions are linear) and the preference information parameters should have a simple interpretation (i.e., not imposing an excessive cognitive burden on the DM). Surrogate scalar functions should not be understood as “true” analytical representations of the DM’s preferences but rather as an operational means to transitorily aggregate the multiple objective functions and generate nondominated solutions to be proposed to the DM, which expectedly are in accordance with his/her (evolving) preferences.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Notes
- 1.
Let \( S=\left\{{\mathbf{x}}^i:i=1,\dots, s\right\} \) be the set of efficient basic solutions of X. This set is connected if it contains only one element or if, for any two points \( {\mathbf{x}}^j,{\mathbf{x}}^k\in S \), there is a sequence \( \left\{{\mathbf{x}}^{i_1},\dots, {\mathbf{x}}^{\ell },\dots, {\mathbf{x}}^{i_r}\right\} \) in S, such that x ℓ and \( {\mathbf{x}}^{\ell +1},\ell ={i}_1,\dots, {i}_{r-1} \), are adjacent and \( {\mathbf{x}}^j={\mathbf{x}}^{i_1},{\mathbf{x}}^k={\mathbf{x}}^{i_r} \).
References
Chankong V, Haimes Y (1983) Multiobjective decision making: theory and methodology. North-Holland, New York
Cohon J (1978) Multiobjective programming and planning. Academic, New York, NY
Evans J, Steuer R (1973) A revised simplex method for multiple objective programs. Math Program 5(1):54–72
Hwang C, Masud A (1979) Multiple objective decision making—methods and applications, vol 164, Lecture notes in economics and mathematical systems. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg
Romero C (1991) Handbook of critical issues in goal programming. Pergamon, New York, NY
Steuer R (1986) Multiple criteria optimization: theory computation and application. Wiley, New York, NY
Yu P-L, Zeleny M (1975) The set of all nondominated solutions in linear cases and a multicriteria simplex method. J Math Anal Appl 49(2):430–468
Zeleny M (1974) Linear multiobjective programming. Springer, New York, NY
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2016 Springer International Publishing Switzerland
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Antunes, C.H., Alves, M.J., Clímaco, J. (2016). Surrogate Scalar Functions and Scalarizing Techniques. In: Multiobjective Linear and Integer Programming. EURO Advanced Tutorials on Operational Research. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-28746-1_3
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-28746-1_3
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Cham
Print ISBN: 978-3-319-28744-7
Online ISBN: 978-3-319-28746-1
eBook Packages: Business and ManagementBusiness and Management (R0)