Skip to main content

What Does the Child’s Assent to Research Participation Mean to Parents? Empirical Findings in Paediatric Oncology in Germany

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Ethics and Governance of Biomedical Research

Part of the book series: Research Ethics Forum ((REFF,volume 4))

  • 480 Accesses

Abstract

National law in Germany requires that, whenever possible, children must provide their assent before participating in clinical research. However, there is still academic debate about many fundamental components of assent in order to address, for example, the age or stage of development respectively, at which children should be asked for assent. Furthermore, only a few studies approach the child’s assent to research participation empirically. We present empirical findings from a population-based survey in Germany on parents whose children were first diagnosed with childhood cancer in 2005. The survey’s primary objective was to evaluate what the child’s assent to research participation means to parents who gave consent on behalf of their minor child. In particular, we wanted to better understand what parents think about the requirement of seeking assent, how to assess the children’s competence to give assent and who should be in charge of it. Our empirical findings indicate that parents want to give children a voice in the decision-making regarding research participation. Even though the child’s competence to rationally understand the research protocol is primarily discussed in the literature as the most important precondition for a valid assent, the surveyed parents emphasise the child’s maturity instead. Given that maturity is regarded as a gradual process, parents want to have a say in assessing it. From this, it follows that parents develop and use a decision-making model that establishes appropriate roles, individual choices and responsibilities for the children, the parents and the physicians.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 39.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 54.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 54.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Notes

  1. 1.

    Based on the Segi WHO world standard, the GCCR uses age-specific incidence rates for children under age 1, ages 1–4, ages 5–9 and ages 10–14. From 2009 onward adolescents aged 15–17 are also included. For further information on registry methods please visit: http://www.kinderkrebsregister.de/dkkr-gb/about-us/overview.html?L=1 (Accessed 15 Feb 2015).

References

  • Abramovitch, R., J.L. Freedman, K. Henry, and M. Van Brunschot. 1995. Children’s capacity to agree to psychological research: Knowledge of risks and benefits and voluntariness. Ethics and Behavior 5(1): 25–48.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Aulisio, M.P., R.M. Arnold, and S.J. Youngner. 2000. Health care ethics consultation: Nature, goals, and competencies. A position paper from the society for health and human values-society for bioethics consultation task force on standards for bioethics consultation. Annals of Internal Medicine 133(1): 59–69.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Baylis, F., J. Downie, and N. Kenny. 1999. Children and decision making in health research. IRB 21(4): 5–10.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Berger, O., B.H. Grønberg, K. Sand, S. Kaasa, and J.H. Loge. 2009. The length of consent documents in oncological trials is doubled in twenty years. Annals of Oncology 20(2): 379–385.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bluebond-Langner, M., J.B. Belasco, and M. DeMesquita Wander. 2010. “I want to live, until I don’t want to live anymore”: Involving children with life-threatening and life-shortening illnesses in decision making about care and treatment. The Nursing Clinics of North America 45(3): 329–343.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Broome, M.E., and D.J. Richards. 2003. The influence of relationships on children’s and adolescents’ participation in research. Nursing Research 52(3): 191–197.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Broome, M.E., D.J. Richards, and J.M. Hall. 2001. Children in research: The experience of Ill children and adolescents. Journal of Family Nursing 7(1): 32–49.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Carroll, T.W., and M.P. Gutmann. 2011. The limits of autonomy: The Belmont report and the history of childhood. Journal of the History of Medicine and Allied Sciences 66(1): 82–115.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chappuy, H., F. Doz, S. Blanche, J.C. Gentet, and J.M. Tréluyer. 2008. Children’s views on their involvement in clinical research. Pediatric Blood & Cancer 50(5): 1043–1046.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chappuy, H., A. Baruchel, G. Leverger, C. Oudot, B. Brethon, S. Haouy, et al. 2010. Parental comprehension and satisfaction in informed consent in paediatric clinical trials: A prospective study on childhood leukaemia. Archives of Disease in Childhood 95(10): 800–804.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Code of Federal Regulations 116–117 CoFRC. 1991. Federal policy for the protection of human subjects (Subpart A). Washington, DC: United States Department of Health and Human Services.

    Google Scholar 

  • Council for International Organizations of Medical Science (CIOMS). 2002. International ethical guidelines for biomedical research involving human subjects. Geneva.

    Google Scholar 

  • Council of Europe (CoE). 2005. Convention on human rights and biomedicine. Additional protocol concerning biomedical research. Strasbourg.

    Google Scholar 

  • De Lourdes, Levy M., V. Larcher, and R. Kurz. 2003. Ethics working group of the Confederation of European Specialists in Paediatrics (CESP). Informed consent/assent in children. Statement of the ethics working group of the Confederation of European Specialists in Paediatrics (CESP). European Journal of Pediatrics 162(9): 629–633.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • de Vries, M.C., D. Bresters, D.P. Engberts, J.M. Wit, and E. van Leeuwen. 2009. Attitudes of physicians and parents towards discussing infertility risks and semen cryopreservation with male adolescents diagnosed with cancer. Pediatric Blood & Cancer 53(3): 386–391.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • de Vries, M.C., J.M. Wit, D.P. Engberts, G.J. Kaspers, and E. van Leeuwen. 2010. Pediatric oncologists’ attitudes towards involving adolescents in decision-making concerning research participation. Pediatric Blood & Cancer 55(1): 123–128.

    Google Scholar 

  • de Vries, M.C., M. Houtlosser, J.M. Wit, D.P. Engberts, D. Bresters, G.J. Kaspers, et al. 2011. Ethical issues at the interface of clinical care and research practice in pediatric oncology: A narrative review of parents’ and physicians’ experiences. BMC Medical Ethics 12: 18.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • DeHart, G.B., L.A. Sroufe, and R.G. Cooper. 2004. Child development: It’s nature and course. London/New York: McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dermatis, H., and L.M. Lesko. 1990. Psychological distress in parents consenting to child’s bone marrow transplantation. Bone Marrow Transplantation 6(6): 411–417.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dorn, L.D., E.J. Susman, and J.C. Fletcher. 1995. Informed consent in children and adolescents: Age, maturation and psychological state. The Journal of Adolescent Health 16(3): 185–190.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fernandez, C.V. 2003. Context in shaping the ability of a child to assent to research. The American Journal of Bioethics 3(4): 29–30.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Field, M.J., and R.E. Behrman (eds.). 2004. Ethical conduct of clinical research involving children. Washington: National Academic Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Geller, G., E.S. Tambor, B.A. Bernhardt, G. Fraser, and L.S. Wissow. 2003. Informed consent for enrolling minors in genetic susceptibility research: A qualitative study of at-risk children’s and parents’ views about children’s role in decision-making. The Journal of Adolescent Health 32(4): 260–271.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gross, T. 2010. Challenges and practicalities of obtaining parental consent and child assent in paediatric trials. Regulatory Rapporteur 7(6): 15–18.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hein, I.M., P.W. Troost, R. Lindeboom, M.C. de Vries, C.M. Zwaan, and R.J. Lindauer. 2012. Assessing children’s competence to consent in research by a standardized tool: A validity study. BMC Pediatrics 12: 156.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Howlader, N., A.M. Noone, M. Krapcho, J. Garshell, N. Neyman, and S.F. Altekruse, et al., editors. SEER cancer statistics review, 1975–2010. National Cancer Institute. 2014. http://seer.cancer.gov/csr/1975_2011. Accessed 21 Feb 2015.

  • Joffe, S., C.V. Fernandez, R.D. Pentz, D.R. Ungar, N.A. Mathew, C.W. Turner, et al. 2006. Involving children with cancer in decision-making about research participation. Journal of Pediatrics 149(6): 862–868.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kaatsch, P. 2010. Epidemiology of childhood cancer. Cancer Treatment Reviews 36(4): 277–285.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kaatsch, P., G. Haaf, and J. Michaelis. 1995. Childhood malignancies in Germany—methods and results of a nationwide registry. European Journal of Cancer 31A(6): 993–999.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kodish, E., M. Eder, R.B. Noll, K. Ruccione, B. Lange, A. Angiolillo, et al. 2004. Communication of randomization in childhood leukemia trials. JAMA 291(4): 470–475.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kuther, T.L. 2003. Medical decision-making and minors: Issues of consent and assent. Adolescence 38(150): 343–358.

    Google Scholar 

  • Larcher, V., and A. Hutchinson. 2010. How should paediatricians assess Gillick competence? Archives of Disease in Childhood 95(4): 307–311.

    Google Scholar 

  • Martenson, E.K., and A.M. Fägerskiöld. 2008. A review of children’s decision-making competence in health care. Journal of Clinical Nursing 17(23): 3131–3141.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • McKenna, K., J. Collier, M. Hewitt, and H. Blake. 2010. Parental involvement in paediatric cancer treatment decisions. European Journal of Cancer Care 19(5): 621–630.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Miller, V.A., D. Drotar, and E. Kodish. 2004. Children’s competence for assent and consent: A review of empirical findings. Ethics and Behavior 14(3): 255–295.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ondrusek, N., R. Abramovitch, P. Pencharz, and G. Koren. 1998. Empirical examination of the ability of children to consent to clinical research. Journal of Medical Ethics 24(3): 158–165.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Petersen, I., C. Spix, P. Kaatsch, N. Graf, G. Janka, and R. Kollek. 2013. Parental informed consent in pediatric cancer trials: A population-based survey in Germany. Pediatric Blood & Cancer 60(3): 446–450.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Piaget, J. 1929. The child’s conception of the world. London/New York: K. Paul, Trench, Trubner & Co, Itd.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rossi, W.C., W. Reynolds, and R.M. Nelson. 2003. Child assent and parental permission in pediatric research. Theoretical Medicine and Bioethics 24(2): 131–148.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Roth-Cline, M., and R.M. Nelson. 2013. Parental permission and child assent in research on children. Yale Journal of Biology and Medicine 86(3): 291–301.

    Google Scholar 

  • Roth-Cline, M., J. Gerson, P. Bright, C.S. Lee, and R.M. Nelson. 2011. Ethical considerations in conducting pediatric research. Handbook of Experimental Pharmacology 205: 219–244.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Scherer, D.G. 1991. The capacities of minors to exercise voluntariness in medical treatment decisions. Law and Human Behavior 15(4): 431–449.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Scherer, D.G., and N.D. Reppucci. 1988. Adolescents’ capacitiesto provide voluntary informed consent. The effects of parental influence and medical dilemma. Law and Human Behavior 12: 123–141.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Shields, L., J. Hunter, and J. Hall. 2004. Parents’ and staff’s perceptions of parental needs during a child’s admission to hospital: An English perspective. Journal of Child Health Care 8(1): 9–33.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sloper, P. 1996. Needs and responses of parents following the diagnosis of childhood cancer. Child: Care, Health and Development 22(3): 187–202.

    Google Scholar 

  • Steliarova-Foucher, E., C. Stiller, B. Lacour, and P. Kaatsch. 2005. International classification of childhood cancer, third edition. Cancer 103(7): 1457–1467.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Susman, E.J., L.D. Dorn, and J.C. Fletcher. 1987. Reasoning about illness in ill and healthy children and adolescents: Cognitive and emotional developmental aspects. Journal of Developmental and Behavioral Pediatrics 8(5): 266–273.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Susman, E.J., L.D. Dorn, and J.C. Fletcher. 1992. Participation in biomedical research: The consent process as viewed by children, adolescents, young adults, and physicians. Journal of Pediatrics 121(4): 547–552.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tait, A.R., T. Voepel-Lewis, and S. Malviya. 2003. Do they understand? (part II): Assent of children participating in clinical anesthesia and surgery research. Anesthesiology 98(3): 609–614.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tomlinson, D., M. Capra, J. Gammon, J. Volpe, M. Barrera, P.S. Hinds, et al. 2006. Parental decision making in pediatric cancer end-of-life care: Using focus group methodology as a prephase to seek participant design input. European Journal of Oncology Nursing 10(3): 198–206.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Unguru, Y. 2011. Making sense of adolescent decision-making: Challenge and reality. Adolescent Medicine: State of the Art Reviews 22(2): 195–206.

    Google Scholar 

  • Unguru, Y., M.J. Coppes, and N. Kamani. 2008. Rethinking pediatric assent: From requirement to ideal. Pediatric Clinics of North America 55(1): 211–222.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Weithorn, L.A., and S.B. Campbell. 1982. The competency of children and adolescents to make informed treatment decisions. Child Development 53(6): 1589–1598.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Weithorn, L.A., and D.G. Scherer. 1994. Children’s involvement in research participation decisions: Psychological consideration. In Children as research subjects: Science, ethics, and law, ed. M.A. Grodin and L.H. Glantz, 133–179. New York: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Imme Petersen .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2016 Springer International Publishing Switzerland

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Petersen, I., Kollek, R. (2016). What Does the Child’s Assent to Research Participation Mean to Parents? Empirical Findings in Paediatric Oncology in Germany. In: Strech, D., Mertz, M. (eds) Ethics and Governance of Biomedical Research. Research Ethics Forum, vol 4. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-28731-7_6

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics