Skip to main content

Schools of Thought in Foreign Policy Discourse: The Potential for Convergence and Divergence Amongst IBSA States

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Framing Foreign Policy in India, Brazil and South Africa

Part of the book series: Contributions to Political Science ((CPS))

  • 411 Accesses

Abstract

Analyses of IBSA tend to take the declared South–South logic of IBSA at face value and use it as a benchmark against which to evaluate the coherence of the initiative. Chapter 4 provides a detailed review of the discursive sediment that foreign policy makers can and must build on in IBSA countries in defining their country’s role in the international system. Basis for this chapter is a review of the secondary literature on foreign policy discourses of the three countries, complemented by primary sources. The selection of material is grounded on the main analytical perspective of this study, especially the spectrum of foreign policy role conceptions as well as the main operational dimensions of IBSA. In order to connect this review with the following content analysis of official and societal discourse (Chaps. 5 and 6), the main strands of discourse are summarized in terms of ideal-typical framings:

  • India: Gandhian, Nehruvian, Hindu, and neoliberal-globalist framing

  • Brazil: developmentalist, neoliberal and neo-developmentalist framing

  • South Africa: revolutionary-internationalist, Pan-Africanist, and neoliberal framing

On this basis, this chapter aims for a first comparative look at the discursive potential of IBSA as it appears from the commonalities and contradictions among the main discourses present in its member countries.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 39.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 54.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 54.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Notes

  1. 1.

    The Satyagraha method of non-violent resistance was developed by Gandhi during his stay in South Africa, where he organised the struggle of Indians against the practice of discrimination against them. See his own account in his book Satyagraha in South Africa (1928) as well as Goswami (2009).

  2. 2.

    Lower castes “are quite hostile to Gandhi, who they criticise for having been paternalistic to lower castes, […] and unable to launch a national campaign against the caste system” (Levien 2007: 137).

  3. 3.

    The basic approval of the necessity of an army reveals that Gandhi’s pacifism was not absolute but rather flexible, embracing three notions: (1) absolute pacifism, (2) qualified pacifism, which retains the principle of justice and (3) the expedient justification of force for the purpose of achieving a greater good (Power 1961: 118). On this basis Gandhian pacifism is flexible enough to concede that “when confronted with brute force, a person is permitted to use just enough force to repel the attack” (Coates 2008: 140).

  4. 4.

    With regard to the early independence struggle in Africa, Mazrui identifies a whole tradition of “Black Gandhism” (1978: 103–119).

  5. 5.

    The controversial word was inserted in 1976 by the 42nd amendment to the Constitution, which changed India from a “sovereign democratic republic” to a “sovereign socialist secular democratic republic” (India Code Information System 2011).

  6. 6.

    The ideal-typical realist framing of foreign policy is based on the assumption of an anarchic international system, where states struggle for survival. The key principle of this framing is the pursuit of self-interest as defined primarily in security terms, which in turn can only be guaranteed by pursuing the objective of acquiring or even maximising power. In terms of action, the realist recommendations would consist in the build-up of military power. Beyond these basic functions there is a variety of recommendations ranging from balancing other states (defensive realism) through bandwagoning with more powerful states in the system to expanding as soon as the gains of doing so outweigh the costs (offensive realism).

  7. 7.

    On the question of the authorship of the book, see Zaman (2006: 233–235).

  8. 8.

    Based on this vision of the world, Kautilya recommends six methods of foreign policy: “(i) Sandhi (peace): ‘Whoever is inferior to another shall make peace […]’; (ii) Vigraha (war): ‘Whoever is superior in power shall make war.’; (iii) Asana (neutrality): ‘Whoever thinks “No enemy can hurt me, or am I strong enough to destroy my enemy” shall observe neutrality.’; (iv) Yana (march): ‘Whoever is possessed of necessary means shall march against his enemy.’; (v) Samshraya (seeking alliance or shelter): ‘Whoever is devoid of necessary strength to defend himself shall seek the protection of another.’; (vi) Dvaidhibhava (double policy): ‘Whoever thinks that help is necessary to work out an end shall make peace with one and wage war with another.’” (Zaman 2006: 237).

  9. 9.

    Indeed Kautilya’s view resembles the version of “offensive realism”, as proposed by Mearsheimer (2001), who builds on the argument that states not only seek security, but explicitly seek to maximise power, even if they are already the most powerful state in the world. Only the status of hegemony will allow a great power to rest assured of its survival (Mearsheimer 2001: 35).

  10. 10.

    In the past, individual aspects of India’s foreign policy have been identified as being directly inspired by Kautilyan realism, e.g. “India’s entire Afghanistan policy flows from the principle of ‘my enemy’s enemy is my friend’ and Indian strategists often quoted Kautilya to justify their steady support to whatever regime rules in Kabul as long as that regime is hostile to Pakistan” (Tanham 1996: 59).

  11. 11.

    As the above-cited election manifesto argues, the usefulness of foreign capital is restricted to certain sectors.

  12. 12.

    The Organiser is considered the BJP’s mouthpiece. It is published by the Hindu-nationalist organisation Rashtriya Swayamsevak Sangh (RSS), which is part of the BJP’s family of organisations.

  13. 13.

    As opposed to the “conciliatory India” lobby of Gandhian heritage (ibid.).

  14. 14.

    Indeed a review of the weekly publication The Organizer (see footnote 47), has revealed a reduction over time of narrow references to identity and a rise in economic and social topics, even a move away from the fixation on the Kashmir-Issue towards broader topics of foreign policy (Elsenhans 2005: 171).

  15. 15.

    For a discussion of neoliberalism as a “hegemonic project”, see Taylor (2001: 23–35).

  16. 16.

    CII represented the more export-oriented industries and increased its influence on government policy to the point that the 1994–1995 budget came to be called after the CII’s director at the time (Kohli 2009: 168).

  17. 17.

    For a detailed criticism see Rotte (2000: 12–28).

  18. 18.

    The policies of a “great commercial power” would “be directed primarily towards ensuring access to resources and markets” (Sagar 2009: 815).

  19. 19.

    For example, it would be important to stress that there were supporters of the liberal, Gandhian and Socialist development model within the Congress from the very beginning (Hardgrave and Kochanek 2008: 417). Similarly, in the case of the BJP, Shulman (2000: 388) argues that there are two diverging internal strands, motivated by their difference in stressing two elements of identity present in the Hindu Nationalist discourse: while the nationalists within the BJP emphasise cultural purity, the pro-liberalisation advocates stress the element of prestige. In consequence, this leads to the compromise position “that India should open up its market to world trade, but gradually” (Shulman 2000: 379).

  20. 20.

    Indeed the Arthashastra contains references to humanitarian action by the state, which is, however, only appropriate if it is in the interests of the state in question. Also, when a king has the choice between attacking a neighbouring state that has a just ruler and another one governed by an unjust ruler, Kautilya recommends attacking the one with the unjust ruler. However this seemingly noble posture is justified by simple military considerations, the principle being that the people of a just ruler will fight more loyally than the people of an unjust ruler. For more details see Boesche (2003).

  21. 21.

    When Gandhi requested that the INC declare that India should refrain from using violence in dealing with external aggression, he got as a response that the INC was “not an institution for organizing world peace” (cit. in Sagar 2009: 802).

  22. 22.

    Later, Cervo concretised these factors, leading to a mix of concepts and actions considered typical of Brazilian foreign policy: (a) self-determination, non-intervention and peaceful solution of controversies; (b) legalism (juricidismo); (c) normative multilateralism; (d) cooperative and non-confrontational external action; (e) strategic partnerships; (f) realism and pragmatism; (g) official cordiality in the treatment of neighbours; (h) development as a “vector of external action”; (i) independence of international insertion (2008: 26–31).

  23. 23.

    This leaves out the liberal-conservador paradigm (1808–1930), which is of only historical interest.

  24. 24.

    As a sign of adherence to the positivist outlook, the founders of the Second Republic included a positivist motto into the Brazilian national flag in 1889: the motto “ORDEM E PROGRESSO” (order and progress) on the flag is an homage to the positivist philosopher Auguste Comte (Cowen and Shenton 1995: 39).

  25. 25.

    Pinheiro (2000) suggests a further subdivision of americanismo into an ideological and a pragmatic type and globalismo into a Grotian and a Hobbesian type.

  26. 26.

    While this provided the globalist current of thought with renewed arguments for its vision of diversifying external relations, Vargas’ americanist successor, Kubitschek, went on to welcome US investments in Brazil. Subsequently US investors managed to accumulate two thirds of the capital of the 34 largest companies in Brazil by 1960 (Cockcroft 2001: 721).

  27. 27.

    “verdadeira guerra santa” (Kubitschek 1962: 196).

  28. 28.

    “o ingresso do Brasil no Primeiro Mundo. Até o final do século […] construirse-á no país uma sociedade efetivamente desenvolvida, democrática e soberana, assegurando-se a viabilidade econômica, social e política do Brasil como grande potência”.

  29. 29.

    For a detailed account of the intellectual “group struggles” between structuralists and neoclassical monetarists in Brazil see Loureiro (2009).

  30. 30.

    Dependency theorists, led by Cardoso, did call for democracy and civil society as elements of opposition to the authoritarian regimes (Hollensteiner 2005: 236).

  31. 31.

    “O Estado Revolucionário, sob o qual nos encontramos no Brasil, transitório como deve ser, se apresenta como um produto da luta contra a anarquia que chegou a ameaçar os mais sagrados valores da nacionalidade. […] e não muito longe de atingir a maturidade social e politica, vemos que o estilo de vida democrático e o regime politico da democracia se fixam na consciência do povo, como interesse e aspiração nacional. Concretiza-se assim, o ONP [Objectivo Nacional Permanente] – DEMOCRACIA.”

  32. 32.

    “proposta de modernização econômica pela privatização e abertura é a esperança de completar a liberdade política, […], com a mais ampla e efetiva liberdade econômica.”

  33. 33.

    This has been termed the “hemispheric-bilateral” outlook of the neoliberal framing under which “Brazil, like other countries, joined with neoliberal governments in the region, to develop the agenda of universal hegemonic or internationally recognized values” (Bernal-Meza 2010: 198).

  34. 34.

    “A questão é que o Brasil e outros países emergentes poderiam ter um desempenho melhor se a arquitetura financeira internacional fosse mais estável, mais previsível.”

  35. 35.

    “credibilidade pela participação na ordem”.

  36. 36.

    O Brasil está pronto para fazer a sua parte. E de fato, temos feito muito, em particular no plano regional.

  37. 37.

    An initiative of the US National Endowment for Democracy.

  38. 38.

    “autonomia pela mudança do ordem”.

  39. 39.

    Samuel Pinheiro Guimarães, a former Professor at the University of Brasilia and Brazil’s Diplomatic Academy (Instituto Rio Branco) was Secretary General of Itamaraty between 2003 and October 2009, then he moved on as Ministro-Chefe of the Strategic Issues Secretariat (Secretaria de Assuntos Estratégicos) associated to the Office of the President.

  40. 40.

    This and the following citations were taken from the first English edition of 2009, however the cited passages were already part of the first Portuguese edition of 1999.

  41. 41.

    See footnote 104 on the translation of this term.

  42. 42.

    Evidence of this is given for example by the fact that in 2003 Lula participated in both the World Social Forum and Davos, a year later he “skipped Porto Alegre and, a year later, he did not show up either in Mumbai, where the social summit had moved. What message could be crisper?” (Daudelin 2008: 56).

  43. 43.

    The surprisingly low significance of desenvolvimentistas in the Lula administration also showed in the setup of the Lula government. Carlos Lessa, a disciple of Celso Furtado was selected to lead the national development bank BNDES as a “solitary national developmentalist Don Quijote in the midst of a team oriented mainly towards monetary issues” (Loureiro 2009: 132). After continued differences with the finance and development minsters over the degree of involvement of the state in the economy, he was fired in November 2004.

  44. 44.

    For example, the “belief in Gandhian philosophy of non-violent passive resistance” of Albert Luthuli, former President of the ANC, is said to have been “unquestionable” (More 2004b: 208).

  45. 45.

    Umkhonto we Sizwe is estimated to have had 7000–12,000 fighters, who organised 40–60 acts of sabotage per year (Falk 1985: 29–34).

  46. 46.

    For example, Traeder (1975: 29–42) distinguishes between liberal, race-based, socialist and cultural Pan-Africanism.

  47. 47.

    A first meeting, which introduced the term “Pan-African”, was called by the Trinidadian lawyer and author Henry Sylvester-Williams in London in 1900.

  48. 48.

    See Braveboy-Wagner (2009: 77–79) for the milestones and setbacks in this process.

  49. 49.

    See Snail (1992: 97–128) for a more detailed and differentiated account of Pan-Africanist influences in South Africa.

  50. 50.

    For the pursuit of these objectives, Garvey founded an army (the African Legion), a Black Cross modeled on the Red Cross, which even had its own shipping line (Black Star Line), see Traeder (1975: 30).

  51. 51.

    For example, the drafting of the 1948 ANC Youth League’s manifesto formulated a version of Africanism which explicitly drew on Garvey (Hill and Pirio 1987: 242).

  52. 52.

    At the time, the racial approach of the PAC was more in tune with the understanding of Pan-Africanism in the rest of Africa and the competition between the PAC and the ANC for legitimate representation of the South African liberation movement led to the OAU acting as a “main impediment to gaining exclusive international legitimacy” (Thomas 1996: 234).

  53. 53.

    The corresponding political party, the Azanian People’s Organization, has acquired only a single seat (ca. 0.355 % of the votes) in the elections since 1999.

  54. 54.

    Its representation in the South African parliament fell from five seats (1.25 % of votes, 1994) to one seat (0.27 % of votes) in 2009.

  55. 55.

    As Louw (2001: 17) explains: “The person one is to become “through other persons” is, ultimately, an ancestor. And, by the same token, these ‘other persons’ include ancestors. Ancestors are extended family. […] And, […], many Africans also believe in God through the mediation of ancestors”.

  56. 56.

    According to Kwame Nkrumah the Pan-African ideal was supposed to be realised in four stages: “(1) ‘the attainment of freedom and independence’; (2) ‘the consolidation of that independence and freedom’; (3) the creation of unity and community between the African states’; and (4) ‘the economic and social reconstruction of Africa’” (Ajala 1988: 36, cit. in Schraeder 2001: 150).

  57. 57.

    Further important representatives of socialist ideas were Sékou Touré and Marien N’Gouabi, and Leopold S. Senghor (Büttner et al. 1978: 225; Traeder 1975: 76–80). For an overview of “africanizations” of Marxism see Mudimbe (1988: 92–97).

  58. 58.

    The fusion of Pan-Africanism and socialist ideas was not without its critics, who stressed that its proponents tried to combine “two ideologies which were historically unrelated and conceptually antagonistic” (Tsomondo 1975: 39).

  59. 59.

    On the role of traditional leaders under apartheid, see Hendricks and Ntsebeza (1999).

  60. 60.

    Cousins (2008: 28) also sees the danger of authoritarian rule in ethnically delineated communities, but points out that there is also a “decidedly democratic strand within customary regimes”, and Mamdani sees the need to “disentangle authoritarian from emancipatory possibilities” (1996: 299).

  61. 61.

    For a detailed account of how neoliberalism was increasingly adopted by the ANC, see the detailed analysis in Taylor (2001: 37–84).

  62. 62.

    See Welsh (1998) for an overview of the “liberal inheritance” in South Africa.

  63. 63.

    This is illustrated for instance, in the discourse around military missions. The use of military force was deeply discredited by the fact that under apartheid the South African Defence Force (SADF) had been used to fight the resistance to apartheid at home, and to invade and destabilise neighbouring countries (Truesdell 2009).

  64. 64.

    Indeed, the anti-apartheid struggle of the ANC was frequently criticised by communist observers for its narrow focus on the goal of abolishment of apartheid and neglect of the class struggle (e.g. Lee 1971: 168–176).

  65. 65.

    This is not to say, however, that a Pan-Africanist framing of foreign policy automatically meets with support by South African society as a whole. At this level, there seems to exist serious opposition to African solidarity, which is offset by xenophobic “hostility to fellow black Africans”, mainly based on the fear of job competition (Daniel et al. 2006: 36–37).

  66. 66.

    The other elements being sovereignty as responsibility and accountability, African Renaissance and Southernism.

References

  • Abrahamsen R (2000) Disciplining democracy. Development discourse and good governance in Africa. Zed Books, London/New York

    Google Scholar 

  • Acharya A, Buzan B (2007) Conclusion: on the possibility of a non-Western IR theory in Asia. Int Relat Asia Pac 7:427–438

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Adam H, Moodley K (1993) The negotiated revolution. Society and politics in post-apartheid South Africa. Jonathan Ball Publishers, Johannesburg

    Google Scholar 

  • Adejumobi SA (2001) The Pan-African Congress. In: Mjagkij N (ed) Organizing Black America: an encyclopedia of African American Associations. New York. Available at: http://www.blackpast.org/?q=perspectives/pan-african-congresses-1900-1945. Accessed 19 Apr 2011

  • Ajala A (1988) Background to the establishment, nature and structure of the Organization of African Unity. Nigerian J Int Aff 14(1):35–66

    Google Scholar 

  • Ajulu R (2001) Thabo Mbeki’s African renaissance in a globalising world economy: the struggle for the soul of the continent. Rev Afr Polit Econ 28(87):27–42

    Google Scholar 

  • Alden C, le Pere G (2003) South Africa’s post-apartheid foreign policy – from reconciliation to revival? Adelphi paper 362, London

    Google Scholar 

  • ANC (1955) The Freedom Charter. As adopted at the Congress of the People, Kliptown, on 26 June 1955. http://www.anc.org.za/show.php?id=72. Accessed 12 May 2011

  • ANC (1994) Foreign policy perspective in a democratic South Africa. http://www.anc.org.za/230. Accessed 09 Feb 2011

  • ANC (2001) Through the eye of the needle – choosing the best cadres to lead transformation. Umrabulo, no 11. http://www.anc.org.za/2945. Accessed 23 Mar 2011

  • Andreasson S (2010) Africa’s development impasse: rethinking the political economy of transformation. Zed Books, London/New York

    Google Scholar 

  • Appiah KA (1999) Pan-Africanism. In: Appiah KA, Gates HL Jr. (eds) Africana: the encyclopedia of the African and African-American experience. Basic Civitas Books, New York, pp 1484–1485

    Google Scholar 

  • Aragon DP (2010) Chancellery Sepulchers. Jânio Quadros, João Goulart and the forging of Brazilian foreign policy in Angola, Mozambique, and South Africa, 1961–1964. Luso-Braz Rev 47(1):121–149

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Arbilla JM (2000) Arranjos Institucionais e Mudança Conceitual nas Políticas Externas Argentina e Brasileira (1989–1994). Contexto Int 22(2):337–383

    Google Scholar 

  • Bajpai GS (1977) Ethical stand on world issues: cornerstone of India’s foreign policy. In: Misra KP (ed) Foreign policy of India: a book of readings. Thomson Press, New Delhi, pp 91–97

    Google Scholar 

  • Bajpai K (2002) Indian strategic culture. In: Chambers MR (ed) South Asia in 2020: future strategic balances and alliances. Strategic Studies Institute, U.S. Army War College, Carlisle, pp 254–303

    Google Scholar 

  • Bajpai K (2003) Indian conceptions of order and justice: Nehruvian, Gandhian, Hindutva, and Neo-Liberal. In: Foot R, Gaddis J, Hurrell A (eds) Order and justice in international relations. Oxford University Press, Oxford, pp 236–261

    Google Scholar 

  • Bajpai KS (2007) Engaging with the world. In: Sinha A, Mohta M (eds) Indian foreign policy. Challenges and opportunities. Academic Foundation, New Delhi, pp 75–89

    Google Scholar 

  • Bajpai KP, Mattoo A (1996) Introduction. In: Tanham GK, Bajpai KP, Mattoo A (eds) Securing India. Strategic thought and practice. Manohar Publishers & Distributors, New Delhi, pp 15–27

    Google Scholar 

  • Barbosa Filho A (2010) A imprensa x Lula. Golpe ou ‘Sangramento’? All Print Editora, São Paulo

    Google Scholar 

  • Barrios H (1999) Die Außenpolitik junger Demokratien in Südamerika. Argentinien, Brasilien, Chile und Uruguay. Leske + Budrich, Opladen

    Google Scholar 

  • Basu R (1990) Gandhi and Nehru: two approaches to economic development. In: Grover V (ed) Political thinkers of modern India, vol 10. Jawaharlal Nehru. Deep & Deep, New Delhi, pp 446–453

    Google Scholar 

  • Bava S (2010) India: foreign policy strategy between interests and ideas. In: Flemes D (ed) Regional leadership in the global system. Ideas, interests and strategies of regional powers. Ashgate, Farnham, pp 113–125

    Google Scholar 

  • Bernal-Meza R (2010) International thought in the Lula era. In: Revista Brasileira de Política Internacional 53 (Special Edition December 2010):193–213

    Google Scholar 

  • Bernstoff DG (1965) Indiens Rolle in der Weltpolitik. Eine Untersuchung über das Selbstverständnis indischer Führungskräfte. Nomos, Baden-Baden

    Google Scholar 

  • Birle P, Gratius S (2010) Die Außenpolitik. In: Costa S, Kohlhepp G, Nitschack H, Sangmeister H (eds) Brasilien heute. Geographischer Raum, Wirtschaft, Politik, Kultur. Vervuert, Frankfurt/Main, pp 297–316

    Google Scholar 

  • BJP (1998) Our Swadeshi approach. http://www.bjp.org/documents/manifesto/bjp-election-manifesto-1998/chapter-4

  • BJP (2009) Presidential speech by Shri Rajnath Singh at the National executive meeting, Nagpur, 6 Feb 2009. http://www.bjp.org/index.php?option=com_content&view=article&id=206&catid=81&Itemid=503. Accessed 06 June 2011

  • Blaney DL (1996) Reconceptualizing autonomy: the difference dependency theory makes. Rev Int Polit Econ 3(3):459–497

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Boele van Hensbroek P (1999) Political discourses in African thought. 1860 to the present. Praeger, Westport/London

    Google Scholar 

  • Boesche R (2003) Kautilya’s Arthaśāstra on war and diplomacy in ancient India. J Mil Hist 67(1):9–37

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bond P (2004) South Africa tackles global apartheid. Is the reform strategy working. South Atlantic Q 103(4):817–839

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Borges Neto JM (2005) Governo Lula – uma opção neoliberal. In: de Paula JA (ed) Adeus ao desenvolvimento. A opção do governo Lula. Autêntica, Belo Horizonte, pp 69–92

    Google Scholar 

  • Bose S (1999) Hindu nationalism and the crisis of the Indian State: a theoretical perspective. In: Bose S, Jalal A (eds) Nationalism, democracy, and development: state and politics in India, 3rd impr. Oxford University Press, Oxford, pp 104–164

    Google Scholar 

  • Botwe-Asamoah K (2005) Kwame Nkrumah’s politico-cultural thought and policies: an African-centered paradigm for the second phase of the African revolution. Routledge, New York

    Google Scholar 

  • Boyer R (2005) How and why capitalisms differ. Econ Soc 34(4):509–557

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Banco Central do Brasil (2006) Capitais Brasileiros no exterior (CBE). http://www4.bcb.gov.br/rex/CBE/Port/ResultadoCBE2006.pdf. Accessed 19 July 2011

  • Boele van Hensbroek P (2001) Philosophies of African renaissance in African intellectual history. Quest: An Afr J Philos 15(1-2):127–138

    Google Scholar 

  • Brass PR (2002) India, Myron Weiner and the political science of development. Econ Polit Wkly 37(29):3026–3040

    Google Scholar 

  • Bratton M, Mattes R, Gyimah-Boadi E (2005) Public opinion, democracy and market reform in Africa, Cambridge University Press, New York

    Google Scholar 

  • Braveboy-Wagner JA (2009) Institutions of the Global South. Routledge, London/New York

    Google Scholar 

  • Bresser-Pereira CL (2005) From ECLAC and ISEB to dependency theory. http://www.bresserpereira.org.br/papers/2005/05.6-ISEB-CEPAL-DependencyTheory.i.pdf

  • Bresser Pereira LC (2006) The new developmentalism and conventional Orthodoxy. Paper prepared for the XI Congreso Internacional del CLAD sobre la Reforma del Estado y de la Administración Pública, Ciudad de Guatemala, 7-10 November 2006. http://siare.clad.org/fulltext/0055726.pdf

  • Bresser Pereira LC (2009) Developing Brazil. Overcoming the failure of the Washington consensus. Lynne Rienner, Boulder

    Google Scholar 

  • Brosius C (2010) India’s middle class. New forms of urban leisure, consumption and prosperity. Routledge India, New Delhi

    Google Scholar 

  • Brutents K (1977) The liberation struggle of the Asian and African peoples at the present stage and revolutionary democracy. Novosti, Moscow

    Google Scholar 

  • Burges S (2005) Auto-estima in Brazil: the logic of Lula’s South-South foreign policy. Int J 60(4):1133–1151

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Burges S (2009) Brazilian foreign policy after the cold war. University Press of Florida, Gainesville

    Google Scholar 

  • Butler A (2005) How democratic is the African National Congress? J South Afr Stud 31(4):719–736

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Butler A (2008) The state of the African National Congress. In: Buhlungu S et al (eds) State of the Nation. South Africa 2007. HSRC Press, Cape Town, pp 35–52

    Google Scholar 

  • Büttner K, Schmidt U, Rachel C (1978) Grundfragen des ideologischen Klassenkampfes. In: Kramer H (ed) Afrika im antiimperialistischen Kampf. Probleme eines Kontinents. Akademie-Verlag, Berlin, pp 200–255

    Google Scholar 

  • Cardoso FH (2001a) A política externa do Brasil no início de um novo século: uma mensagem do Presidente da República. Revista Brasileira de Política Internacional 44(1):5–12

    Google Scholar 

  • Cardoso FH (2001b) Democracy as a starting point. J Democr 12(1):5–14

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cardoso FH, Falletto E (1970) Dependência e Desenvolvimento na América Latina. Zahar, Rio de Janeiro

    Google Scholar 

  • Cardoso FH, Falletto E (1979) Dependency and development in Latin America. University of California Press, Berkeley

    Google Scholar 

  • Cardozo S, Miyamoto S (2006) Política Externa Brasileira em Dois Momentos: Uma Análise Comparativa entre a Política Externa do Governo Geisel e do Governo Lula. Paper presented at the 5° encontro da Associação Brasileira de Ciência Política, 26–29 July 2006, FAFICH/UFMG, Belo Horizonte. http://cienciapolitica.servicos.ws/abcp/cadastro/atividade/arquivos/ 21_7_2006_17_18_22.pdf. Accessed 12 Apr 2011

    Google Scholar 

  • Castelo Branco L (1983) Staat, Raum und Macht in Brasilien. Anmerkungen zu Genese und Struktur der brasilianischen Staats- und Großmachtideologie. W. Fink, München

    Google Scholar 

  • CEPAL (1990) Changing production patterns with social equity. The prime task of Latin American and Caribbean development in the 1990s. United Nations Economic Commission for Latin America and the Caribbean, Santiago

    Google Scholar 

  • Cervo AL (1994) O desafío internacional. Editora UnB, Brasília

    Google Scholar 

  • Cervo AL (2003) Política exterior e relações internacionais do Brasil: enfoque paradigmático. Revista brasileira de política internacional 46(2):5–25

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cervo AL (2008) Inserção internacional: formação dos conceitos brasileiros. Editora Saraiva, São Paulo

    Google Scholar 

  • Cervo AL, Bueno C (2002) História da política exterior do Brasil. Editora UnB, Brasília

    Google Scholar 

  • Chan S (2002) Liberalism, democracy and development. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge

    Google Scholar 

  • Chang H-J (2002) Kicking away the ladder. Development strategy in historical perspective. Anthem, London

    Google Scholar 

  • Chaulia SS (2002) BJP, India’s foreign policy and the ‘realist alternative’ to the Nehruvian tradition. Int Polit 39:215–234

    Google Scholar 

  • Chazan N et al (ed) (1999) Politics and society in contemporary Africa, 3rd edn. Lynne Rienner, Boulder

    Google Scholar 

  • Chipkin I (2007) Do South Africans exist? Nationalism, democracy and the identity of ‘the people’. Wits University Press, Johannesburg

    Google Scholar 

  • Cockcroft JD (2001) América Latina y Estados Unidos. Historia y política país por país. Siglo XXI, Mexico City/Buenos Aires

    Google Scholar 

  • Cohen S (2001) India: emerging power. Oxford University Press, New Delhi

    Google Scholar 

  • Coleman JS (1955) Current political movements in Africa. Ann Am Acad Pol Soc Sci 298:95–108

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Collor F (2008) O Brasil aberto ao mundo. Discurso de posse na Presidência da República. http://www2.senado.leg.br/bdsf/bitstream/handle/id/243041/O%20Brasil%20aberto%20ao%20mundo.pdf?sequence=7

  • Corbridge S, Harriss J (2000) Reinventing India. Liberalization, Hindu nationalism and popular democracy. Polity, Cambridge

    Google Scholar 

  • Cousins B (2008) Contextualising the controversies: dilemmas of communal tenure reform in post-apartheid South Africa. In: Claassens A, Cousins B (eds) Land, power & custom. Controversies generated by South Africa’s Communal Land Rights Act. UCT Press, Cape Town, pp 3–32

    Google Scholar 

  • Cowen M, Shenton R (1995) The invention of development. In: Crush J (ed) Power of development. Routledge, London/New York, pp 27–43

    Google Scholar 

  • Cruz SV (1988) Empresários, economistas e perspectivas da democratização no Brasil. In: Reis FW, O’Donnell G (eds) A democracia no Brasil: dilemas e perspectivas. Vertice, São Paulo, pp 256–281

    Google Scholar 

  • Cunningham S (1999) Made in Brazil: Cardoso’s critical path from dependency via neoliberal options and the Third Way in the 1990s. Eur Rev Lat Am Caribb Stud 67:75–86

    Google Scholar 

  • da Costa TG (2000) Brazil in the new decade. Searching for a future. Center for Strategic and International Studies, Washington, DC

    Google Scholar 

  • Coates BE (2008) Modern India’s strategic advantage to the United States: her twin strengths in Himsa and Ahimsa. Comp Strateg 27(2):133–147

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Damachi UG (1976) Leadership ideology in Africa. Attitudes towards socioeconomic development. Praeger, New York

    Google Scholar 

  • Das R (2003) Postcolonial (in)securities, the BJP and the politics of Hindutva: broadening the security paradigm between the realist and anti-nuclear/peace groups in India. Third World Q 24(1):77–96

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Das R (2010) Strategic culture, identity and nuclear (in)security in Indian politics. Int Polit 47(5):472–496

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Daudelin J (2008) Joining the club: Lula and the end of periphery in Brazil. In: Birle P, Costa S, Nitschack H (eds) Brazil and the Americas: convergences and perspectives. Vervuert, Frankfurt/Main, pp 51–78

    Google Scholar 

  • Davenport R (1987) The cape liberal tradition to 1910. In: Butler J, Elphick R, Welsh D (eds) Democratic liberalism in South Africa. Wesleyan University Press, Middletown, pp 21–34

    Google Scholar 

  • de Almeida PR (2004) Relações internacionais e política externa do Brasil. História e sociologia da diplomacia brasileira, 2nd edn. UFRGS Editora, Porto Alegre

    Google Scholar 

  • de Lima MRS (1994) Ejes analiticos y conflictos de paradigmas en la politica exterior brasileña. America Latina / Internacional 1(2):27–46

    Google Scholar 

  • de Lima MRS (2007) Autonomia, não-indiferença, e pragmatismo: Vetores conceituais da política externa do governo Lula. In: da Motta Veiga P (ed) Comércio e política comercial no Brasil. Desempenho, interesses e estratégias. Singular, Sao Paulo, pp 11–20

    Google Scholar 

  • de Lima MRS, Coutinho MV (2007) Uma versão estrutural do regionalismo. In: Diniz E (ed) Globalização, Estado e Desenvolvimento. Dilemas do Brasil no novo milênio. FGV Editora, Rio de Janeiro, pp 125–151

    Google Scholar 

  • Desai R (1999) Culturalism and contemporary right: Indian bourgeoisie and political Hindutva. Econ Pol Wkly 34(12):695–712

    Google Scholar 

  • Desai R (2007) Dreaming in technicolour? India as a BRIC economy. Int J 62(4):781–804

    Google Scholar 

  • Desai R (2008) Indien: Gegenrevolution im Zeitlupentempo – Vom Entwicklungsstaat zum Neoliberalismus. In: Schmidt I (ed) Spielarten des Neoliberalismus. VSA-Verlag, Hamburg, pp 161–190

    Google Scholar 

  • Deshpande S (2003) Contemporary India. A sociological view. Viking, New Delhi/New York

    Google Scholar 

  • Diniz E (2003) Empresariado industrial e estratégias de desenvolvimento: dilemas do capitalismo brasileiro. In: Ferraz JC, Crocco M, Elias LA (eds) Liberalização econômica e desenvolvimento. Modelos, politicas e restrições. Editora Futura, São Paulo, pp 54–74

    Google Scholar 

  • Diniz E, Boschi RR (2007) A Difícil Rota do Desenvolvimento. Empresários e a Agenda Pós-Neoliberal. Editora UFMG, Belo Horizonte/Rio de Janeiro

    Google Scholar 

  • Drechsel P, Schmidt B (1995) Südafrika. Chancen für eine pluralistische Gesellschaftsordnung. Geschichte und Perspektiven. Westdeutscher Verlag, Opladen

    Google Scholar 

  • Dubashi J (1999) Swadeshi and globalization. Organiser, 21 Mar 1999, pp 52–53

    Google Scholar 

  • Dugard J (1998) The new constitution: a triumph for liberalism? A positive view. In: Johnson RW, Welsh D (eds) Ironic victory. Liberalism in post-liberation South Africa. Oxford University Press, Cape Town, pp 23–29

    Google Scholar 

  • Düsing S (2002) Traditional leadership and democratisation in Southern Africa. A comparative study of Botswana, Namibia and South Africa. Lit Verlag, Münster/Hamburg/London

    Google Scholar 

  • Eckert A (2007) Bringing the ‘Black Atlantic’ into global history: the project of Pan-Africanism. In: Conrad S, Sachsenmaier D (eds) Competing visions of world order. Global moments and movements, 1880s–1930s. Palgrave, New York, pp 237–257

    Google Scholar 

  • Elsenhans H (2004) Good governance, moral economy, and the shift from secular state classes to identitarian political movements with reference to developing countries. Indian J Polit Sci 65(4):469–498

    Google Scholar 

  • Elsenhans H (2005) BJP und die Konjunktur des Weltsystems. In: Skoda U, Voll K (eds) Der Hindu-Nationalismus in Indien. Aufstieg, Konsolidierung, Niedergang? Weissensee Verlag, Berlin, pp 161–178

    Google Scholar 

  • Engelmeier TF (2009) Nation-building and foreign policy in India. An identity-strategy conflict. Foundation Books, New Delhi

    Google Scholar 

  • Erber FS (2003) Desenvolvimento brasileiro nos anos 1990: mitos, círculos, e estruturas. In: Ferraz JC, Crocco M, Elias LA (eds) Liberalização econômica e desenvolvimento. Modelos, politicas e restrições. Editora Futura, São Paulo, pp 28–53

    Google Scholar 

  • Erber FS (2011) As convenções de desenvolvimento no governo Lula: um ensaio de economia política. Revista de Economia Política 31(1):31–55

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Falk R (1985) Südafrika. Widerstand und Befreiungskampf. Pahl-Rugenstein, Köln

    Google Scholar 

  • Fernandes L (2006) India’s new middle class: democratic politics in an era of economic reform. University of Minnesota Press, Minneapolis

    Google Scholar 

  • Flecha de Lima P-T (1999) Liberalism versus nationalism: the prodevelopment ideology in recent Brazilian political history (1930–1997). Pres Stud Q 29(2):370–388

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Flynn M (2007) Between subimperialism and globalization: a case study in the internationalization of Brazilian capital. Lat Am Perspect 34(6):9–27

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fonseca, FC Pinto da (2001) Divulgadores e Vulgarizadores: a Grande Imprensa e a Constituição da Hegemonia Ultraliberal no Brasil. Universidade de São Paulo, São Paulo

    Google Scholar 

  • Fonseca P (2004) Gênese e precursores do desenvolvimentismo no Brasil. Pesquisa & Debate 15(2):225–256

    Google Scholar 

  • Foreign Affairs (2006) ‘The rise of India’, special issue. Foreign Aff 85(2006):4

    Google Scholar 

  • Fritz B (2010) Orthodoxie und Sozialpolitik. Zur gemischten Bilanz der brasilianischen Wirtschaftspolitik. In: Costa S, Kohlhepp G, Nitschack H, Sangmeister H (eds) Brasilien heute. Geographischer Raum, Wirtschaft, Politik, Kultur. Vervuert, Frankfurt/Main, pp 335–347

    Google Scholar 

  • Furtado C (1959) Formação econômica do Brasil. Fundo de Cultura, Rio

    Google Scholar 

  • Gandhi MK (1946) Independence. Harijan 10(25):236–237

    Google Scholar 

  • Gandhi MK (1928) Satyagraha in South Africa (trans: Desai VG). Navajivan Publishing House, Ahmedabad

    Google Scholar 

  • Ganguly S (2003) Introduction. In: Ganguly S (ed) India as an emerging power. Frank Cass, London/Portland, pp 1–5

    Google Scholar 

  • Garvey AJ (1969[1925]) Philosophy and opinions of Marcus Garvey, vol. 2. Atheneum, New York

    Google Scholar 

  • Geiss I (1968) Panafrikanismus: Zur Geschichte der Dekolonisation. Europäische Verlagsanstalt, Frankfurt

    Google Scholar 

  • Government of India (2007) The Constitution of India. http://lawmin.nic.in/coi/coiason29july08.pdf

  • Geldenhuys D (2010) South Africa: the idea-driven foreign policy of a regional power. In: Flemes D (ed) Regional leadership in the global system. Ideas, interests and strategies of regional powers. Ashgate, Farnham, pp 151–167

    Google Scholar 

  • Gibson NC (2008) Upright and free: Fanon in South Africa, from Biko to the shackdwellers’ movement (Abahlali baseMjondolo). Soc Identities 14(6):683–715

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gilbert A (1999) Must global politics constrain democracy? Great-power realism, democratic peace, and democratic internationalism. Princeton University Press, Princeton

    Google Scholar 

  • Gordon, LR (2008) An introduction to Africana philosophy. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge

    Google Scholar 

  • Goswami P (2009) A re-reading of Gandhi’s Satyagraha in South Africa for contemporary community organizing. Community Dev J 44(3):393–402

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Grosfoguel R (2000) Developmentalism, modernity, and dependency theory in Latin America. Nepantla: Views from South 1(2):347–374

    Google Scholar 

  • Grugel J (2000) State and business in neo-liberal democracies in Latin America. In: Smith H (ed) Democracy and international relations. Critical theories/problematic practices. Macmillan/St Martin's Press, Houndmills/New York, pp 108–125

    Google Scholar 

  • Guimarães S (ed) (1996a) South Africa and Brazil. Risks and opportunities in the turmoil of globalisation. Instituto de Pesquisa de Relações Internacionais, Brasilia

    Google Scholar 

  • Guimarães SP (1996b) South Africa and Brazil. Risks and opportunities in the Turmoil of globalisation. Comments on a complex topic. In: Guimarães SP (ed) South Africa and Brazil. Risks and opportunities in the Turmoil of globalisation. Instituto de Pesquisa de Relações Internacionais, Brasilia, pp 775–784

    Google Scholar 

  • Guimarães SP (ed) (1997) Estratégias India e Brasil. Instituto de Pesquisa de Relações Internacionais, Brasília

    Google Scholar 

  • Guimarães SP (1998) Desafios e dilemas dos grandes países periféricos: Brasil e Índia. Revista Brasileira de Política Internacional 41(1):109–132

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Guimarães SP (1999) Quinhentos anos de periferia. Editora da UFRGS/Contraponto, Porto Alegre/Rio de Janeiro

    Google Scholar 

  • Guimarães SP (2006) Desafios Brasileiros na Era dos Gigantes. Contraponto, Rio de Janeiro

    Google Scholar 

  • Guimarães SP (2009) Five hundred years on the periphery. A contribution to the study of international politics. Fundação Alexandre de Gusmão, Brasilia

    Google Scholar 

  • Habib A, Kotzé H (2003) Civil society, governance and development in an era of globalization: the South African case. In: Mhone GCZ, Edigheji O (eds) Governance in the New South Africa: the challenges of globalisation. University of Cape Town Press, Lansdowne, pp 246–270

    Google Scholar 

  • Hall P, Soskice D (2001) Varieties of capitalism. The institutional foundations of comparative advantage. Oxford University Press, Oxford/New York

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Halliday F (1988) Three concepts of internationalism. Int Aff 64(2):187–198

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Halliday F (1999) Revolution and world politics. The rise and fall of the sixth great power. Duke University Press, Durham

    Google Scholar 

  • Hansen TB (1999) The saffron wave. Democracy and hindu nationalism in India. Princeton University Press, Princeton

    Google Scholar 

  • Harder H (2004) Überlegungen zur indischen Nationalidentität. Orientwissenschaftliche Hefte 13(2004):68–80

    Google Scholar 

  • Hardgrave RL, Kochanek SA (2008) India. Government and politics in a developing nation, 7th edn. Thomson/Wadsworth, Boston

    Google Scholar 

  • Harshe R (1990) India’s non-alignment: an attempt at conceptual reconstruction. Econ Pol Wkly (Bombay) 25(7–8):399–405

    Google Scholar 

  • Hatcher A (1994) ‘The cosmos is one family’ (Vasudhaiva Kutumbakam): problematic Mantra of Hindu humanism. Contrib Indian Sociol 28(1):149–163

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hendricks F, Lungisile N (1999) Chiefs and rural local government in post-apartheid South Africa. African J Polit Sci 4(1):99–126

    Google Scholar 

  • Herring RJ (1999) Embedded particularism: India’s failed developmental state. In: Woo-Cumings M (ed) The developmental state. Cornell University Press, Ithaca/London, pp 306–334

    Google Scholar 

  • Hill RA, Pirio GA (1987) ‘Africa for the Africans’: the Garvey movement in South Africa, 1920–1940. In: Marks S, Trapido S (eds) The politics of race, class and nationalism in twentieth century South Africa. Longman, New York, pp 209–253

    Google Scholar 

  • Hirst M (1991) Demokratie und Außenpolitik: Der Fall Brasilien. In: Nohlen D, Fernández M, van Klaveren A (eds) Demokratie und Außenpolitik in Lateinamerika. Leske + Budrich, Opladen, pp 79–92

    Google Scholar 

  • Hobsbawm E (1983) Introduction. In: Habsbawn E, Ranger T (eds) The invention of tradition. Cambridge University Press, New York, pp 1–14

    Google Scholar 

  • Hollensteiner S (2005) Aufstieg und Randlage. Linksintellektuelle, demokratische Wende und Politik in Argentinien und Brasilien.Vervuert, Frankfurt/Main

    Google Scholar 

  • India Code Information System (2011) The constitution (forty-second amendment) act, 1976. http://indiacode.nic.in/coiweb/amend/amend42.htm. Accessed 17 May 2011

  • Jaffrelot C (2001) Hindu nationalism and democracy. In: Jayal NG (ed) Democracy in India. Oxford University Press, New Delhi/Oxford, pp 509–534

    Google Scholar 

  • Jean CM (1991) Behind the eurocentric veils. The search for African Realities. University of Massachusetts Press, Amherst

    Google Scholar 

  • Jeffery A (1998) The new constitution: a triumph for liberalism? Some doubts. In: Johnson RW, Welsh D (eds) Ironic victory. Liberalism in post-liberation South Africa. Oxford University Press, Cape Town/New York, pp 31–44

    Google Scholar 

  • Jha P (2001) A note on India’s post-independence economic development and some comments on the associated development discourse. Berichte aus dem weltwirtschaftlichen Colloquium der Universität Bremen, Nr. 70. http://www.iwim.uni-bremen.de/publikationen/pdf/b070.pdf. Accessed 25 Apr 2011

  • Johnson RW (1998) Liberalism and the future of South Africa’s new democracy. In: Johnson RW, Welsh D (eds) Ironic victory. Liberalism in post-liberation South Africa. Oxford University Press, Cape Town/New York, pp 275–391

    Google Scholar 

  • Johnstone A, Shezi S (1993) The ANC’s foreign policy. In: Johnston A, Shezi S, Bradshaw G (eds) Constitution-Making in the new South Africa. Leicester University Press, London, pp 169–180

    Google Scholar 

  • Kankwenda MJ (2007) Revisiting the African development agenda: from LPA to NEPAD. In: Senghor JC, Poku NK (eds) Towards Africa’s renewal. Ashgate, Aldershot/Burlington, pp 107–142

    Google Scholar 

  • Kapur D (2009) Introduction: future issues in India’s foreign policy: ideas, interests and values. India Rev 8(3):200–208

    Google Scholar 

  • Karis T, Carter GM (1987) From protest to challenge. a documentary history of African politics in South Africa 1882–1964, vol. 3. Challenge and violence 1953–1964. Stanford

    Google Scholar 

  • Karnad B (2005) Nuclear weapons & Indian security. The realist foundations of strategy, 2nd edn. Macmillan, New Delhi

    Google Scholar 

  • Karner C (2006) The thought world of Hindu nationalism. Analyzing a political ideology. Edwin Mellen Press, Lewiston

    Google Scholar 

  • Kerttunen M (2009) ‘A responsible nuclear weapons power’ – nuclear weapons and Indian foreign policy. National Defence College, Helsinki

    Google Scholar 

  • Kofman J (1997) How to define economic nationalism: a critical review of some old and new standpoints. In: Szlajfer H (ed) Economic nationalism in East-Central Europe and South America: 1918–1939. Librairie Dioz, Geneva, pp 17–54

    Google Scholar 

  • Kohli A (1990) Democracy and discontent. India’s growing crisis of governability. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge/New York

    Google Scholar 

  • Kohli A (2009) Democracy and development in India. From socialism to pro-business. Oxford University Press, New Delhi

    Google Scholar 

  • Krugman P (1995) Cycles of conventional wisdom on economic development. Int Aff 71(4):717–732

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kubitschek J (2010) Discursos selecionados do Presidente Juscelino Kubitschek. Fundação Alexandre de Gusmão, Brasilia

    Google Scholar 

  • Kubitschek J (1962) A marcha do Amanhecer. Bestseller, Sao Paulo

    Google Scholar 

  • Kumar S (2004) The concept of state and democracy in Gandhian thought. Indian J Polit Sci 65(3):377–382

    Google Scholar 

  • Kumar R (2008) India as a foreign policy actor – normative redux. CEPS working document no 285/Feb 2008. http://aei.pitt.edu/7585/01/Wd285.pdf. Accessed 11 Jan 2011

  • Kumar A (2009) The global financial crisis and the Indian response: some sociological aspects. Ästhetik Kommunikation 40(147):15–18

    Google Scholar 

  • Lafer C (2000) Brazilian international identity and foreign policy: past, present, and future. Daedalus 129(2):207–238

    Google Scholar 

  • Lee FJT (1971) Der Einfluss des Marxismus auf die nationalen Befreiungsbewegungen in Südafrika. Mit besonderer Berücksichtigung des Trotzkismus und Stalinismus. Author's edition, Frankfurt/Main

    Google Scholar 

  • Legassick M (2007) Towards socialist democracy. University of KwaZulu-Natal Press, Scottsville

    Google Scholar 

  • Leiva FI (2008) Latin American neostructuralism. The contradictions of post-neoliberal development. University of Minnesota Press, Minneapolis

    Google Scholar 

  • Levien M (2007) India’s double-movement: Polanyi and the national alliance of people’s movements. Berkeley J Sociol 51:119–149

    Google Scholar 

  • Lipton M (2009) Understanding South Africa’s foreign policy: the perplexing case of Zimbabwe. S A J Int Aff 16(3):331–346

    Google Scholar 

  • Loureiro RM (2009) Economists in the Brazilian government. From developmentalist state to neoliberal policies. In: Montecinos V, Markoff J (eds) Economists in the Americas. Edward Elgar, Cheltenham, pp 100–141

    Google Scholar 

  • Louw DJ (2001) Ubuntu and the challenges of multiculturalism in post-apartheid South Africa. Quest: African J Philos 15(1–2):15–36

    Google Scholar 

  • Love JL (2005) The rise and decline of economic structuralism in Latin America. New dimensions. Lat Am Res Rev 3(40):100–125

    Google Scholar 

  • Makgoba MW (1998) Oppositions, difficulties, and tensions between liberalism and African thought. In: Johnson RW, Welsh D, Husemeyer L (eds) Ironic victory. Liberalism in post-liberation South Africa. Oxford University Press, Cape Town, pp 265–291

    Google Scholar 

  • Mallavarapu S (2009) Development of international relations theory in India: traditions, contemporary perspectives and trajectories. Int Stud 46(1–2):165–183

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mamdani M (1996) Citizen and subject: contemporary Africa and and the legacy of late colonialism. Princeton University Press, Princeton

    Google Scholar 

  • Mandaza I (2001) Southern African identity: a critical assessment. In: Bekker S, Dodds M, Khosa MM (eds) Shifting African identities, vol II: Identity? Theory, politics, history. Human Sciences Research Council, Pretoria, pp 133–139

    Google Scholar 

  • Mandela N (1993) South Africa’s future foreign policy. Foreign Aff 72(5):86–97

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mandela N (1997) Statement by President Nelson Mandela, as Chairperson of SADC, at the official opening of the summit of SADC heads of state or government. Blantyre, 8 Sept 1997. http://www.info.gov.za/speeches/1997/100845497.htm. Accessed 24 June 2011

  • Mangcu X (2008) To the brink. The state of democracy in South Africa. University of KwaZulu-Natal Press, Scottsville

    Google Scholar 

  • Mantega G (1989) Celso Furtado e o pensamento econômico brasileiro. Rev Econ Polít 9(4):29–37

    Google Scholar 

  • Marx AW (1992) Lessons of struggle South African internal opposition, 1960–1990. Oxford University Press, New York

    Google Scholar 

  • Mathebe L (2001) Bound by tradition. The world of Thabo Mbeki. Unisa Press, Pretoria

    Google Scholar 

  • Mazrui AA (1978) Political values and the educated class in Africa. University of California Press, Berkeley

    Google Scholar 

  • Mbeki T (2002) Address at the welcome ceremony of the world summit on sustainable development. 25 Aug 2002. http://www.dfa.gov.za/docs/speeches/2002/mbek0825.htm. Accessed 24 June 2011

  • McKinley DT (2010) Ein Schritt vorwärts, zwei Schritte zurück: Südafrikas African National Congress und die Dreierallianz seit 1994. In: Ambacher JE, Khan R (eds) Südafrika. Die Grenzen der Befreiung. Assoziation A, Berlin/Hamburg, pp 29–40

    Google Scholar 

  • Mearsheimer JJ (2001) The tragedy of great power politics. Norton, New York

    Google Scholar 

  • Menon, KPS (1947) Delhi-Chungking. A travel diary. Oxford University Press, London

    Google Scholar 

  • Menon S (2010) Speech by NSA Shri Shivshankar Menon at NDC on ‘The role of force in strategic affairs’. 21 Oct 2010. http://meaindia.nic.in/mystart.php?id=530116584. Accessed 22 Mar 2011

  • Merke F (2009) Narrativas de Identidad Internacional: Tragedia, Romance y Comedia en la Política Exterior de Brasil. In: Lechini G, Klagsbrunn V, Gonçalves W (eds) Argentina e Brasil. Vencendo os Preconceitos. As várias arestas de uma concepção estratégica. Editora Revan, Rio de Janeiro, pp 295–325

    Google Scholar 

  • Mitra SK (2003) The reluctant hegemon: India’s self-perception and the South Asia strategic environment. Contemp South Asia 12(3):399–417

    Google Scholar 

  • Mitra SK (2009) Nuclear, engaged, and non-aligned: contradiction and coherence in India’s foreign policy. India Q (New Delhi) 65(1)1:15–35

    Google Scholar 

  • Modelski G (1964) Kautilya: foreign policy and international system in the ancient Hindu world. Am Polit Sci Rev 58(3):549–560

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mohan CR (2007) Poised for power: the domestic roots of India’s slow rise. In: Tellis AJ, Wills M (eds) Domestic political change and grand strategy. National Bureau of Asian Research, Seattle/Washington DC, pp 177–207

    Google Scholar 

  • More MP (2004a) Philosophy in South Africa under and after apartheid. In: Wiredu K (ed) A companion to African philosophy. Blackwell, Malden, pp 149–160

    Google Scholar 

  • More MP (2004b) Albert Luthuli, Steve Biko, and Nelson Mandela: the philosophical base of their thought and practice. In: Wiredu K (ed) A companion to African philosophy. Blackwell, Malden, pp 207–215

    Google Scholar 

  • Mudimbe VY (1988) The invention of Africa. Gnosis, philosophy, and the order of knowledge. Indiana University Press, Bloomington

    Google Scholar 

  • Mukherji R (2010) India’s foreign economic policies. In: Ganguly S (ed) India’s foreign policy. Retrospect and prospect. Oxford University Press, Oxford, pp 301–322

    Google Scholar 

  • Mukherjee R, Malone DM (2011) Indian foreign policy and contemporary security challenges. Int Aff 87(1):87–104

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mwagiru M (2009) Re-inventing the future: linkages between human rights, foreign policy and regional integration. Thought and Practice 1(2):73–86

    Google Scholar 

  • Nafey A (2005) IBSA Forum: the rise of a ‘new’ non-alignment. India Q 61(1):1–78

    Google Scholar 

  • NAPM (2011) National alliance of people’s movements. Struggle against injustice and discrimination. Assertion of rights and reconstruction towards austainability and self-reliance. http://napm-india.org/aboutus. Accessed 25 Mar 2011

  • Nash A (2002) Mandela’s democracy. In: Jacobs S, Calland R (eds) Thabo Mbeki’s world. The politics and ideology of the South African president. University of Natal Press, Pietermeritzburg, pp 243–255

    Google Scholar 

  • Nayar BR (2004) BJP’s economic nationalism in theory and practice. In: Varshney A (ed) India and the politics of developing countries. SAGE Publications, New Delhi/Thousand Oaks, pp 227–255

    Google Scholar 

  • Nayyar D (2001) Economic development and political democracy: interaction of economics and politics in independent India. In: Jayal NG (ed) Democracy in India. Oxford University Press, New Delhi/Oxford, pp 361–369

    Google Scholar 

  • Ndlovu-Gatsheni SJ (2007) Tracking the historical roots of post-apartheid citizenship problems: the native club, restless natives, panicking settlers and the politics of nativism in South Africa. ASC working paper 72/2007, African Studies Centre, Leiden University

    Google Scholar 

  • Nehru J (1961) India’s foreign policy. Selected speeches, September 1946–April 1961. Ministry of Information and Broadcasting, New Delhi

    Google Scholar 

  • Nel P, Stephen M (2010) The foreign economic policies of regional powers in the developing world. In: Flemes D (ed) Regional leadership in the global system. Ideas, interests and strategies of regional powers. Ashgate, Farnham/Burlington, pp 71–90

    Google Scholar 

  • Nel P, Taylor I, van der Westhuizen J (2001) Reformist initiatives and South Africa’s multilateral diplomacy: a framework for understanding. In: Nel P, Taylor I, van der Westhuizen J (eds) South Africa’s multilateral diplomacy and global change: the limits of reformism. Ashgate, Aldershot/Burlington, pp 1–30

    Google Scholar 

  • Nkrumah K (1963) Speech on occasion of the OAU founding conference in Addis Abeba. 24 May 1963. http://www.uneca.org/adfiii/riefforts/ref/speech/Ghana.pdf. Accessed 10 May 2011

  • Ntsebeza L (2005) Democracy compromised. Chiefs and the politics of the land in South Africa. Brill, Leiden/Boston

    Google Scholar 

  • Onslow S (2009) The Cold War in Southern Africa. White power, black nationalism and external intervention. In: Onslow S (ed) Cold War in Southern Africa. White power, black liberation. Routledge, London/NewYork, pp 9–34

    Google Scholar 

  • O'Donnell G (1973) Modernization and Bureaucratic-Authoritarianism: studies in South American politics. University of California, Berkeley

    Google Scholar 

  • Owusu F (2003) Pragmatism and the gradual shift from dependency to neoliberalism: the World Bank, African leaders and development policy in Africa. World Dev 31(10):1655–1672

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Panagariya A (2008) The emerging giant. Oxford University Press, New York

    Google Scholar 

  • Paranjape M (2008) The ‘Sanatani’ Mahatma? Re-reading Gandhi Post-Hindutva. In: Allen D (ed) The philosophy of Mahatma Gandhi for the twenty-first century. Oxford University Press, New Delhi, pp 201–214

    Google Scholar 

  • Parekh B (1991) Nehru and the national philosophy of India. Econ Pol Wkly 26(1-2):35–48

    Google Scholar 

  • Parthasarathy G (1990) Nehru on democracy, socialism and peace. In: Grover V (ed) Political thinkers of modern India, vol 10: Jawaharlal Nehru. Deep & Deep, New Delhi, pp 376–385

    Google Scholar 

  • Pérez Lindo A (2003) Reconstruir la sociedad, reinventar el estado. Del Neo-Liberalismo al neo-desarrollismo. Proyecto Editorial, Buenos Aires

    Google Scholar 

  • Pinheiro L (2000) Traídos pelo Desejo: Um Ensaio sobre a Teoria e a Prática da Política Externa Brasileira Contemporânea. Contexto Int 22(2):305–335

    Google Scholar 

  • Plot M, Semán E (2007) Neither/Nor: mapping Latin America’s response to neoliberalism and neoconservatism. Constellations 14(3):355–372

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Power PF (1961) Gandhi on world affairs. A survey of Gandhian influence on international and intercultural relations. Perennial Press, Bombay

    Google Scholar 

  • Power PF (1977) Ideological currents in India’s foreign policy. In: Misra KP (ed) Foreign policy of India. A book of readings. Thomson Press, New Delhi, pp 21–36

    Google Scholar 

  • Prebisch R (1950) The economic development of Latin America and its principal problems. United Nations Dept. of Economic Affairs, Lake Success, NY

    Google Scholar 

  • Puchala DJ (1998) Third world thinking and contemporary international relations. In: Neuman SG (ed) International relations theory and the third world. St. Martin's Press, New York, pp 133–157

    Google Scholar 

  • Racine J-L (2008) Post-post-colonial India: from regional power to global player. Politique étrangère 111(2008):65–78

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ramose MB (1999) African philosophy through Ubuntu. Mond Books, Harare

    Google Scholar 

  • Rist G (2002) The history of development. From Western origins to global faith. Zed Books, London/New York

    Google Scholar 

  • Robinson WI (1996) Promoting polyarchy. Globalization, US intervention and hegemony. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge

    Google Scholar 

  • Robinson WI (2005) Globalization and democracy. Is it possible to forge a transitional [sic] popular project? In: Calland R, Graham P (eds) Democracy in the time of Mbeki. IDASA, Cape Town, pp 105–117

    Google Scholar 

  • Rosecrance R (1986) The rise of the trading state. Commerce and conquest in the modern world. Basic Books, New York

    Google Scholar 

  • Rosenthal G (2000) Los años ochenta y noventa. In: Ocampo JA (ed) La CEPAL en sus 50 años. Notas de un seminario conmemorativo. http://www.eclac.cl/publicaciones/xml/4/10704/lcg2103e.pdf. Accessed 31 Mar 2011

  • Rotte R (2000) Der liberale und demokratische Frieden als ‘neues Paradigma’ der internationalen Politik? Ein kritischer Überblick. Institut für Internationale Politik, München

    Google Scholar 

  • Russett B (1993) Grasping the democratic peace. Principles for a post-cold war world. Princeton University Press, Princeton

    Google Scholar 

  • Saad Filho A (2010) Neoliberalism, democracy, and development policy in Brazil. Dev Soc 39(1):1–28

    Google Scholar 

  • Sachs I (2004) Inclusive development strategy in an era of globalization, International Labour Organization. World Commission on the Social Dimension of Globalization, Working paper no 35. http://ssrn.com/abstract=908233. Accessed 16 May 2011

  • Sagar R (2009) State of mind: what kind of power will India become? Int Aff 85(4):801–816

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sahle EN (2008) African States’ NEPAD project. A global elite neoliberal settlement. In: Mensah J (ed) Neoliberalism and globalization in Africa. Contestations on the embattled continent. Palgrave Macmillan, New York, pp 135–154

    Google Scholar 

  • Sampaio Espellet E, Bodstein AC, de Araújo JJ, Pinto AF (1970) Objectivos Nacionais Permanentes. Equipe do Departamento de Estudos, Brasilia

    Google Scholar 

  • Santiso C (2003) The Gordian Knot of Brazilian foreign policy: promoting democracy while respecting sovereignty. Camb Rev Int Aff 16(2):343–358

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sarkar BK (1919) Hindu theory of international relations. Am Polit Sci Rev 13(3):400–414

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Schleicher H-G (2004) Südafrikas neue Elite. Die Prägung der ANC-Führung durch das Exil. Institut für Afrika-Kunde, Hamburg

    Google Scholar 

  • Schmalz S (2008) Brasilien in der Weltwirtschaft. Die Regierung Lula und die neue Süd-Süd-Kooperation, Westfälisches Dampfboot, Münster

    Google Scholar 

  • Schneider BR (1999) The Desarrollista state in Brazil and Mexico. In: Woo-Cumings M (ed) The developmental state. Cornell University Press, Ithaca/London, pp 276–305

    Google Scholar 

  • Schoeman M (2008) South Africa: between history and a hard place. In: Tickner AB, Wæver O (eds) International relations scholarship around the world. Routledge, Abingdon/New York, pp 53–70

    Google Scholar 

  • Schraeder PJ (2001) African international relations. In: Gordon AA, Gordon DL (eds) Understanding contemporary Africa. Lynne Rienner, Boulder, pp 143–188

    Google Scholar 

  • Schumacher U (1994) Politische Formen für fragmentierte Gesellschaften. Das Beispiel Südafrika. Duncker & Humblot, Berlin

    Google Scholar 

  • Schurer W (2005) A geopolitical and geo-economic overview: on the rise of China and India as two Asian giants. Fletcher Forum World Aff 29(2):145–164

    Google Scholar 

  • Serrão O, Paul-Henri B (2009) Foreign policy ambiguity on the part of an emergent middle power: South African foreign policy through other lenses. Politikon 36(3):363–380

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sharma BK (2007) Introduction to the constitution of India. Prentice-Hall India, New Delhi

    Google Scholar 

  • Shivji IG (1989) The concept of human rights in Africa. Codesria, London

    Google Scholar 

  • Shulman S (2000) Nationalist sources of international economic integration. Int Stud Q 44(3):365–390

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sidiropoulos E (2010) Global power shifts and South Africa’s global agenda. In: Kumar A, Messner D (eds) Power shifts and global governance: challenges from South and North. Anthem Press, London, pp 141–152

    Google Scholar 

  • Sikkink K (1991) Ideas and institutions. Developmentalism in Brazil and Argentina. Cornell University Press, Ithaca/London

    Google Scholar 

  • Singer HW (1950) Gains and losses from trade and Investment in underdeveloped countries. Am Econ Rev 40(2):473–485

    Google Scholar 

  • Singh J (1999) Defending India. St. Martin's Press, New York

    Google Scholar 

  • Slakter D (2011) On matsyanyaya: the state of nature in Indian thought source. Asian Philos 21(1):23–34

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Smith K (2012) India’s identity and its global aspirations. Glob Soc 26(3):369–385

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Snail ML (1992) The antecedents and the emergence of the black consciousness movement in South Africa – its ideology and organization. Dissertation, Universität Bayreuth

    Google Scholar 

  • Spektor M (2004) Origens e direção do Pragmatismo Ecumênico e Responsável (1974–1979). Revista Brasileira de Política Int 47(2):191–222

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Stewart-Ingersoll R, Frazier D (2010) India as a regional power: identifying the impact of roles and foreign policy orientation on the South Asian security order. Asian Secur 6(1):51–73

    Google Scholar 

  • Suri KC (2005) The dilemma of democracy: economic reforms and electoral politics in Andhra Pradesh. In: Mooij J (ed) The politics of economic reforms in India. Sage, New Delhi, pp 130–168

    Google Scholar 

  • Taljaard R (2007) Minor shift in ANC’s thinking. The Star 2 July 2007

    Google Scholar 

  • Tanham GK (1996) Indian strategic thought. An interpretive essay. In: Bajpai KP, Mattoo A (eds) Securing India. Strategic thought and practice. Manohar Publishers & Distributors, New Delhi, pp 28–111

    Google Scholar 

  • Tavolaro S (2008) ‘Neither traditional nor fully modern…’ Two classic sociological approaches on contemporary Brazil. Int J Polit Cult Soc 19(2008):109–128

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Taylor I (2001) Stuck in middle GEAR. South Africa’s post-apartheid foreign relations. Praeger, Westport/London

    Google Scholar 

  • Tharoor S (2007) The elephant, the tiger and the cellphone. Reflections on India in the twenty-first century. Penguin Viking, New Delhi

    Google Scholar 

  • Thomas S (1994) The diplomacy of liberation: the ANC in defence of sanctions. In: Mills G (ed) From pariah to participant. South Africa’s evolving foreign relations, 1990–1994. South African Institute of International Affairs, Johannesburg, pp 169–192

    Google Scholar 

  • Thomas S (1996) The diplomacy of liberation: the foreign relations of the ANC since 1960. Tauris Academic Studies, London/New York

    Google Scholar 

  • Traeder H (1975) Panafrikanismus und Staatsnationalismus. Untersuchungen zur Theorie und Praxis afrikanischer Politik bis zur Gründung der ‘Organisation der Afrikanischen Einheit’. Peter Lang, Frankfurt/M

    Google Scholar 

  • Truesdell A (2009) Achieving political objectives: South African defense priorities from the Apartheid to the Postapartheid Era. Afr Stud Rev 52(3):107–125

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tsomondo MS (1975) From Pan-Africanism to socialism: the modernization of an African liberation ideology. Issue: A J Opin 5(4):39–46

    Google Scholar 

  • Vale P (2005) Foreign policy and democracy. Has South Africa now lost its voice? In: Calland R, Graham P (eds) Democracy in the time of Mbeki. IDASA, Cape Town, pp 93–104

    Google Scholar 

  • Vale P, Maseko S (1998) South Africa and the African renaissance. Int Aff 74(2):271–287

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • van Binsbergen W (2001) Ubuntu and the globalisation of African thought and society. Quest: An Afr J Philos 15(1-2):53–86

    Google Scholar 

  • van der Waal K (2008) Development. In: Shepherd N, Robins S (eds) New South African keywords. Jacana, Johannesburg, pp 58–68

    Google Scholar 

  • van der Westhuizen J (1998) South Africa’s emergence as a middle power. Third World Q 19(3):435–455

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • van der Westhuizen J, Nel P, Taylor I (2001) Of rogues, rebels, renegades and reformers: South African multilateralism in context. In: Nel P, Taylor I, van der Westhuizen J (eds) South Africa’s multilateral diplomacy and global change: the limits of reformism. Ashgate, Aldershot, pp 111–125

    Google Scholar 

  • van Klaveren A (1997) América Latina: hacia un regionalismo abierto. Estudios Internacionales 30(117):62–78

    Google Scholar 

  • Vale P (1993) Upstairs and downstairs. Paper presented to the seminar on reconceptualising peace in the Indian Ocean, Osmania University, Hyderabad, 5–6 March 1993

    Google Scholar 

  • Varma PK (2007) The great Indian middle class, updated and revised edn. Penguin Books, New Delhi

    Google Scholar 

  • von Lieres B, Robins S (2008) Democracy and citizenship. In: Shephard N, Robins S (eds) New South African keywords. Jacana Media, Auckland Park, pp 47–57

    Google Scholar 

  • Vinson RT (2006) ‘Sea Kaffirs’: ‘American Negroes’ and the gospel of Garveyism in early-twentieth-century Cape Town. J Afr Hist 47(2):281–303

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Vizentini P (2003) Relações Internacionais do Brasil. Do Vargas a Lula. Editora Fundação Perseu Abramo, São Paulo

    Google Scholar 

  • Waghid Y (2003) Community and democracy in South Africa: liberal versus communitarian perspectives. Peter Lang, Bern/New York

    Google Scholar 

  • Wagner C (2003) Großmacht im Wartestand? Indische Außenpolitik am Beginn des 21. Jahrhunderts. In: Draguhn W (ed) Indien 2003. Politik, Wirtschaft, Gesellschaft. Institut für Asienkunde, Hamburg, pp 205–220

    Google Scholar 

  • Wagner C (2005) Die “verhinderte” Großmacht? Die Außenpolitik der indischen Union, 1947–1998. Nomos, Baden-Baden

    Google Scholar 

  • Welsh D (1998) Introduction: the liberal inheritance. In: Johnson RW, Welsh D, Husemeyer L (eds) Ironic victory. Liberalism in post-liberation South Africa. Oxford University Press, Cape Town, pp 1–21

    Google Scholar 

  • Werz N (1992) Das neuere politische und sozialwissenschaftliche Denken in Lateinamerika. Arnold-Bergstraesser-Institut, Freiburg

    Google Scholar 

  • Weyland K (2004) Threats to Latin America’s market model? Polit Sci Q 119(2):291–313

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wiarda EJ (2005) Dilemmas of democracy in Latin America. Crises and opportunity. Rowman & Littlefield, Lanham et al

    Google Scholar 

  • Williamson J (1993) Democracy and the ‘Washington consensus’. World Dev 21(8):1329–1336

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Yadav RS (2005) International peace and Gandhian World Worder. Indian J Polit Sci 66(3):443–462

    Google Scholar 

  • Zaman RU (2006) Kautilya: the Indian strategic thinker and Indian strategic culture. Comp Strateg 25(3):231–247

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2016 Springer International Publishing Switzerland

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Husar, J. (2016). Schools of Thought in Foreign Policy Discourse: The Potential for Convergence and Divergence Amongst IBSA States. In: Framing Foreign Policy in India, Brazil and South Africa. Contributions to Political Science. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-28715-7_4

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics