Skip to main content

Health Dossier in Italy: Elements for Reflection, What’s New, What Are Possible Improvements

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
New Perspectives in Medical Records

Part of the book series: TELe-Health ((TEHE))

  • 910 Accesses

Abstract

In recent years the European Union and Italy are calling for a new healthcare attitude in response to the strong growth of health needs; eHealth may be a tool to facilitate change in a view of connected health; in order to properly manage information, it is necessary to realize a substrate of data, information, and knowledge, shared among all the actors in the social and health system, to obtain a holistic view of the most relevant business processes. We applied the method of use cases to define the functional requirements of a platform for continuity of care. As an example of application, we present an analysis of the Italian FSE (health dossier) and discuss its limits and its evolution.

LAVSE (Virtual Laboratory for eHealth) is composed of various researchers from different institutes of the National Research Council (CNR), Italy.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

eBook
USD 16.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 99.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Notes

  1. 1.

    The members of Working Group on FSE are:

    • LAVSE-CNR: Isabella Castiglioni, Daniela Luzi, Gregorio Mercurio, Carmelo Militello, Fabrizio L. Ricci (coordinator), Angelo Rossi Mori Oscar Tamburis, and Rita Verbicaro

    • SIT: Maurizio Cipolla, Mario Costa, Antonio V. Gaddi, Velio Macellari, Marco Manca, Michele Martoni, Chiara Rabbito, Giulio Rigon, Giovanni Rinaldi, Giancarmine Russo, Giacomo Vespasiani, and Luigi Zampetti.

  2. 2.

    The concepts to be used are those modeled in the standard ContSys (ISO-CEN EN13940:2007).

References

  1. Bulik RJ (2008) Human factors in primary care telemedicine encounters. J Telemed Telecare

    Google Scholar 

  2. Detmer D, Bloomrosen M, Raymond B, Tang P (2008) Integrated personal health records: transformative tools for consumer-centric care. BMC Med Inf Decis Making

    Google Scholar 

  3. Enos N, Enos M (2013) Three EHR-related coding errors to avoid. MGMA Connexion/Med Group Manag Assoc

    Google Scholar 

  4. Free C et al (2013) The effectiveness of mobile-health technology-based health behaviour change or disease management interventions for health care consumers: a systematic review. PLoS Med

    Google Scholar 

  5. Gaddi A, Capello F, Manca M (Eds.) (2013) eHealth, care and quality of life. Springer

    Google Scholar 

  6. Gu Y, Day K (2013) Propensity of people with long-term conditions to use personal health records. Stud Health Technol Inf

    Google Scholar 

  7. Hamilton C (2013) The WHO-ITU National eHealth strategy toolkit as an effective approach to national strategy development and implementation. Stud Health Technol Inf

    Google Scholar 

  8. Nazi KM, Hogan TP, McInnes DK, Woods SS, Graham G (2013) Evaluating patient access to Electronic Health Records: results from a survey of veterans. Med Care

    Google Scholar 

  9. Ricci FL, Gaddi, Rossi Mori A, Russo G (Eds.) (2014) Verso il Fascicolo Sanitario Elettronico: elementi di riflessione (Toward Electronic Health Dossier: food for thought). RA edition, (in Italian)

    Google Scholar 

  10. Rinaldi G, Gaddi A, Capello F (2013) Medical data, information economy and federative networks. The concepts underlying the comprehensive electronic clinical record framework. Nova Science Publisher

    Google Scholar 

  11. Rossi Mori A, Mercurio G, Verbicaro R (2012) Enhanced policies on connected health are essential to achieve accountable social and health systems issue on ‘Policy lessons from a decade of eGovernment, eHealth & eInclusion. Eur J ePractice

    Google Scholar 

  12. Rossi Mori A, Mazzeo M (2013) Holistic health: predicting our data future, from inter-operability among systems to co-operability among people. Int J Med Inform

    Google Scholar 

  13. Serbanati L, Ricci FL, Mercurio G, Vasilateanu A (2011) Steps towards a digital health ecosystem. JMI

    Google Scholar 

  14. Tamburis O, Rossi Mori R, Mangia M (2011) The LITIS conceptual framework measuring eHealth readiness and adoption dynamics across the healthcare organizations. Health Technol, Spring

    Google Scholar 

  15. Tang PC et al (2006) Health records: definitions, benefits, and strategies for overcoming barriers to adoption. J Am Med Inform Assoc

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

This work is inspired by the book [9]; our thanks go to the members of the Working Group of LAVSE-CNR and SIT on FSE.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Fabrizio L. Ricci .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Appendix: The Manifesto and LAVSE-CNR and SIT on FSE [9]

Appendix: The Manifesto and LAVSE-CNR and SIT on FSE [9]

  1. 1.

    The FSE is a citizens tool that helps in improving the quality of his/her life, of his/her family, and of community.

  2. 2.

    The FSE is a tool of health and social providers. They use this tool according to technical and scientific knowledge as well as their responsibilities, adapted to patient’s needs.

The Significant Use of the FSE

  1. 3.

    The FSE promotes the proactive role of the citizen, even through the presence of dedicated services to enable them to (a) monitor the health and development of therapies, (b) improve the lifestyles, (c) strengthen the self-care management, and (d) collaborate with more consciously with health and social providers.

  2. 4.

    The primary value of the FSE is the ability to stimulate an environment that works with citizens and health and social providers, coordinating and interconnecting the different types of processes that act on the patient to give rise to a global process of social and health services. To this end the FSE facilitates the management and sharing of information by all professionals, also assembled in functional groups, in the context of care pathways shared.

  3. 5.

    Secondary uses of FSE for purposes of clinical governance, epidemiology, scientific research, vocational training, health education, and proper allocation of resources are reconciled with the main aim to improve the management of individual and community health and to reduce the burdens of bureaucratic-administrative, managerial and organizational tasks, as well as control of productivity and spending.

The FSE in the Context of eHealth

  1. 6.

    The FSE supports the other tools of eHealth for health management and is interoperable with them; as all systems connected to the health protection, it is consistent with (a) the Constitution, (b) the definition of health of the World Health Organization, and (c) general principles on the health of the European Union, including cross border aspects of care and freedom of treatment.

  2. 7.

    Each value-added service based on FSE must (a) join the interests of the population, the potential of the industry world, and the skills and achievements of scientific and technological research; (b) be designed and implemented in an environment like living lab through a joint development of multidisciplinary organizational models and technological solutions; (c) take into account the holistic view of the process in which fits in terms of coproduction and data sharing and the activities of any other interconnected processes; and (d) be subjected to evaluation of the clinical risk with results made public.

The Adoption Process

  1. 8.

    The widespread adoption of FSE and related value-added services (a) follows a well-defined roadmap managed from a control booth with a strong political decision-making and (b) develops in such a way that the FSE is used primarily for the solution of problems connected with other high-impact problems, addressed in a holistic manner, based on a virtuous relationship between citizens and concerned professionals.

  2. 9.

    The adoption must be supported by (a) an awareness campaign directed at citizens about the benefits and the opportunity of the FSE and (b) training programs and staff training at all professional levels in order to provide an adequate preparation and a correct approach to resources of eHealth.

The Content

  1. 10.

    The FSE manages the object information necessary to the definition, planning, implementation, and historicizing of a care plan in the context of prevention, diagnosis, care, rehabilitation, and social health. These information objects concern data, complex information, warning, and the discussions of clinical case, structured according to a precise dictionary of cumulative clinical and social and health data.

  2. 11.

    The FSE enables the management of individual data, clinical and nonclinical, so as to allow them to connect semantically between them and other information; the data (a) can be processed according to precise semantic standards, systems of encodings, and terminology subsidiaries; (b) are associated with attribute definitors/associations (metadata) appropriate to allow a better and intelligent use of data and a better research; (c) are shared with the candidate applications to use them, developed according European standards; and (d) are relating to documents that contain them in order to interpret its context.

  3. 12.

    The model of the concepts underlying the processes, the standard of integration of interoperability, and coding systems are developed and adopted at national, European, and international level, in accordance with the output from the respective authorities.

  4. 13.

    The information object present in the FSE and necessary to a medical doctor or a social and health provider to carry out social and healthcare activities and assistance can be stored in the same system of the structure in which the staff works, even if generated elsewhere; the storage of any information object relative to the patient must comply as expressly authorized by the latter and is associated with the storage of the information required to be able to trace, within the FSE, the document that contains the element in question.

  5. 14.

    The information collected for purposes not social or health, even if they are tied to the assistance of the citizen (especially if at risk of rapid obsolescence), can be managed in a different system than the FSE, such system must be interoperable to all levels with the FSE, and the information flows must be interwoven with the related information flows of the FSE.

Privacy

  1. 15.

    The FSE must ensure, in any application, the respect of the protection of personal data, professional secrecy and its declination practices, technical measures of security, and guidelines and indications coming from the Authority for the Protection of Personal Data.

  2. 16.

    The FSE must facilitate its use for purposes of scientific and epidemiological research, reworking the information without causing any damage or limiting the protection of personal data. The flow aimed at boosting the FSE will be fully subject to the discipline on the treatment of personal data and the resulting information requirements and collection of consent; it is necessary to provide methods and timing of anonymization of information which would implement the feed flow of the data warehouse, in accordance with the principles that govern the protection of privacy.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2017 Springer International Publishing Switzerland

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Ricci, F.L., Rossi Mori, A. (2017). Health Dossier in Italy: Elements for Reflection, What’s New, What Are Possible Improvements. In: Rinaldi, G. (eds) New Perspectives in Medical Records. TELe-Health. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-28661-7_17

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-28661-7_17

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Cham

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-319-28659-4

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-319-28661-7

  • eBook Packages: MedicineMedicine (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics