Skip to main content

Intuition and Flow

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Flow Experience
  • 3975 Accesses

Abstract

Intuition is the capacity to make decisions and create new ideas without conscious deliberation. Flow is the optimal experience where action becomes automatic and conscious thought seems to meld together with the action itself. Both intuition and flow concern our capacity to cognition and action without heavy input from reflective and conscious cognitive mechanisms. Dual process theories of cognition offer a compelling position to explain the functioning of both intuition and flow. In the dual process theories of cognition, two separate cognitive systems are suggested: the non-conscious System 1 and the conscious System 2. Intuition and flow engage to a great extent the same cognitive mechanisms, at the same time without being reduced to definitions in terms of one another. Both intuition and flow involve ontogenetic System 1 processing that enables us to function very well in a culturally evolving, changing environment. In summary, flow can be construed as intuitive action, whereas intuition can be thought of as cognition in flow.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 139.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 179.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 179.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  • Bargh, J. A., & Chartrand, T. L. (1999). The unbearable automaticity of being. American Psychologist, 54(7), 462–479.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bargh, J. A., Chen, M., & Burrows, L. (1996). Automaticity of social behavior: Direct effects of trait construct and stereotype activation on action. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 71(2), 230–244.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Baumeister, R. F., & Tierney, J. (2011). Willpower: Rediscovering the greatest human strength (Kindle Edition). New York: The Penguin Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Baumeister, R. F., Bratlavsky, E., Muraven, M., & Tice, D. M. (1998). Ego depletion: Is the active self a limited resource? Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 74(5), 1252–1265.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Bealer, G. (1996). A priori knowledge and the scope of philosophy. Philosophical Studies, 81, 121–142.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Csikszentmihályi, M. (1975). Beyond boredom and anxiety: Experiencing flow in work and play. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.

    Google Scholar 

  • Csikszentmihályi, M. (1990). Flow: The psychology of optimal performance. New York: Harper Perennial.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dane, E., & Pratt, M. G. (2007). Exploring intuition and its role in managerial decision making. Academy of Management Review, 32(1), 33–54.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dietrich, A. (2004). Neurocognitive mechanisms underlying the experience of flow. Consciousness and Cognition, 13, 746–761.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Djiksterhuis, A. (2004). Think different: The merits of unconscious thought in preference development and decision making. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 87(5), 586–598.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Djiksterhuis, A., & Nordgren, L. F. (2006). A theory of unconscious thought. Perspectives on Psychological Science, 1, 95–106.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Djiksterhuis, A., Aarts, H., & Smith, P. K. (2006). The power of the subliminal: On subliminal persuasion and other potential applications. In The new unconscious (pp. 77–105). New York: Oxford University Press.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Ericsson, K. A., Krampe, R. T., & Resch-Römer, C. (1993). The role of deliberate practice in the acquisition of expert performance. Psychological Review, 100(3), 363–406.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ericsson, K. A., Prietula, M. J., & Cokely, E. T. (2007). The making of an expert. Harvard Business Review, 85(7–8), 114–121.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Evans, J. S. B. T. (2003). In two minds: Dual-process accounts of reasoning. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 7(10), 454–459.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Evans, J. S. B. T. (2009). How many dual-process theories do we need? One, two, or many? In J. S. B. T. Evans & K. Frankish (Eds.), In two minds: Dual processes and beyond (pp. 33–54). Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Evans, J. S. B. T. (2010). Thinking twice. Chippenham: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Evans, J. S. B. T., & Stanovich, K. (2013). Dual process theories of higher cognition: Advancing the debate. Perspectives on Psychological Science, 8(3), 223–241.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Gigerenzer, G. (2007). Gut feelings: The intelligence of the unconscious (Kindle Edition). Londan: Allen Lane.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gladwell, M. (2005). Blink: The power of thinking without thinking. London: Penguin.

    Google Scholar 

  • Järvilehto, L. (2015). The nature and function of intuitive thought and decision making. Cham: Springer.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kahneman, D. (1973). Attention and effort. Englewood Cliffs: Prentice-Hall.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kahneman, D. (2011). Thinking, fast and slow (Kindle Edition). London: Penguin.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kahneman, D., & Klein, G. (2009). Conditions for intuitive expertise: A failure to disagree. American Psychologist, 64(6), 515–526.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Kant, I. (1998). Critique of pure reason (P. Guyer & A. W. Wood, Trans.). New York: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Klein, G. (1998). Sources of power: How people make decisions. Cambridge: The MIT Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Miller, G. (1956). The magical number seven, plus or minus two: Some limits on our capacity for processing information. Psychological Review, 63, 81–97.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Nakamura, J., & Csikszentmihályi, M. (2002). The concept of flow. In Handbook of positive psychology (pp. 89–105). New York: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Simon, H. A. (1978). Rationality as process and as product of thought. The American Economic Review, 68(2), 1–16.

    Google Scholar 

  • Stanovich, K. (2004). Robot’s rebellion: Finding meaning in the Age of Darwin. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Stanovich, K. (2009). Distinguishing the reflective, algorithmic, and autonomous minds: Is it time for a tri-process theory? In J. S. B. T. Evans & K. Frankish (Eds.), In two minds: Dual processes and beyond (pp. 55–88). Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Stanovich, K. E., & West, R. F. (2000). Individual differences in reasoning: Implications for the rationality debate? Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 23, 646–726.

    Google Scholar 

  • Zimmermann, M. (1989). The nervous system in the context of information theory. In R. F. Schmidt & G. Thews (Eds.), Human physiology (pp. 166–173). Berlin: Springer.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Lauri Järvilehto .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2016 Springer International Publishing Switzerland

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Järvilehto, L. (2016). Intuition and Flow. In: Harmat, L., Ørsted Andersen, F., Ullén, F., Wright, J., Sadlo, G. (eds) Flow Experience. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-28634-1_7

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics