Skip to main content

Flow and Individual Differences – A Phenotypic Analysis of Data from More than 10,000 Twin Individuals

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Flow Experience

Abstract

Earlier studies suggest that individual differences in flow experiences depend on both situational variables, e.g. the environmental opportunities to engage in flow promoting activities, and personal traits. Here, we present results of phenotypic analyses of associations between flow proneness and five major modalities of individual differences, i.e. personality, cognitive abilities, motivation, emotional competence (alexithymia) and performance on chronometric tasks. The data was collected using self-report questionnaires in a cohort of more than 10,000 Swedish twin individuals. The aim of the study was partly exploratory, but we also addressed three specific hypotheses suggested by earlier literature, i.e. that flow proneness is (i) correlated with personality, specifically with traits reflecting emotional stability (low neuroticism) and conscientiousness; (ii) unrelated to cognitive ability; and (iii) correlated with trait intrinsic motivation. The results confirmed all three hypotheses. Additional main findings were that flow proneness is related to extraversion, agreeableness, openness to experience, low schizotypy, and emotional competence (low alexithymia). Sex differences in flow proneness were mostly negligible, but flow proneness increased weakly with age. In summary, individual differences in flow proneness show substantial relations to personality related traits but appear essentially independent of cognitive abilities. We conclude that the results taken together support the notion of flow proneness being related to an autotelic personality, and discuss the potential implication of relations between the observed correlates of flow proneness and outcomes related to health and well-being.

The original version of this book was revised. An erratum can be found at http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-28634-1_23

An erratum to this chapter can be found at http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-28634-1_23

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 139.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 179.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 179.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  • Adlai-Gail, W. (1994). Exploring the autotelic personality. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, University of Chicago.

    Google Scholar 

  • Asakawa, K. (2004). Flow experience and autotelic personality in Japanese college students: How do they experience challenges in everyday life? Journal of Happiness Studies, 5, 123–154.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Asakawa, K. (2010). Flow experience, culture, and well-being: How do autotelic Japanese college students feel, behave, and think in their daily lives? Journal of Happiness Studies, 11, 205–223.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bagby, R. M., Parker, J. D., & Taylor, G. J. (1994). The twenty-item Toronto Alexithymia Scale–I. Item selection and cross-validation of the factor structure. Journal of Psychosomatic Research, 38(1), 23–32.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Bagby, R. M., Ayearst, L. E., Morariu, R. A., Watters, C., & Taylor, G. J. (2014). The internet administration version of the 20-item Toronto Alexithymia Scale. Psychological Assessment, 26, 16–22.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Bem, S. L. (1974). The measurement of psychological androgyny. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 42, 155–162.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Bruya, B. (Ed.). (2010). Effortless attention. Cambridge, MA: The MIT Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Butković, A., Ullén, F., & Mosing, M. A. (2015). Personality and related traits as predictors of music practice: Underlying environmental and genetic influences. Personality and Individual Differences, 74, 133–138.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Carroll, J. B. (1993). Human cognitive abilities. A survey of factor-analytic studies. New York: Cambridge University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Cattell, R. B. (1987). Intelligence: Its structure, growth, and action. Amsterdam: North-Holland

    Google Scholar 

  • Choi, N., Fuqua, D. R., & Newman, J. L. (2009). Exploratory and confirmatory studies of the structure of the Bem sex role inventory short form with two divergent samples. Educational and Psychological Measurement, 69, 696–705.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Clarke, D. (2004). Neuroticism: Moderator or mediator in the relation between locus of control and depression? Personality and Individual Differences, 37, 245–258.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Colom, R., & Quiroga, M. A. (2009). Neuroticism, intelligence, and intra-individual variability in elementary cognitive tasks: Testing the mental noise hypothesis. Psicothema, 21(3), 403–408.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Csikszentmihalyi, M. (1975/2000). Beyond boredom and anxiety. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.

    Google Scholar 

  • Csikszentmihalyi, M. (1997a). Creativity: Flow and the psychology of discovery and invention. New York: Harper Perennial.

    Google Scholar 

  • Csikszentmihalyi, M. (1997b). Finding flow: The psychology of engagement with everyday life. New York: Basic Books.

    Google Scholar 

  • Csikszentmihalyi, M., & Csikszentmihalyi, I. (1988). Optimal experience. Psychological studies of flow in consciousness. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Csikszentmihalyi, M., & Schneider, B. (2000). Becoming adult: How teenagers prepare for the world of work. New York: Basic Books.

    Google Scholar 

  • D’Zurilla, T. J., Maydeu-Olivares, A., & Gallardo-Pujol, D. (2011). Predicting social problem solving using personality traits. Personality and Individual Differences, 50(2), 142–147.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Davies, S. E., Connelly, B. S., Ones, D. S., & Birkland, A. S. (2015). The general factor of personality: The “Big One,” a self-evaluative trait, or a methodological gnat that won’t go away? Personality and Individual Differences, 81, 13–22. doi:10.1016/j.paid.2015.01.006.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • de Manzano, Ö., Cervenka, S., Jucaite, A., Hellenäs, O., Farde, L., & Ullén, F. (2013). Individual differences in the proneness to have flow experiences are linked to dopamine D2-receptor availability in the striatum. NeuroImage, 67, 1–6.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Deary, I. J., Der, G., & Ford, G. (2001). Reaction times and intelligence differences – a population-based cohort study. Intelligence, 29(5), 389–399.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Deci, E., & Ryan, R. (1985). Intrinsic motivation and self-determination in human behavior. New York: Plenum.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Digman, J. M. (1997). Higher-order factors of the Big Five. Journal of Personal and Social Psychology, 73, 1246–1256.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Eid, M., & Diener, E. (1999). Intraindividual variability in affect: Reliability, validity, and personality correlates. Journal of Personal and Social Psychology, 76, 662–676.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Erdle, S., Irwing, P., Rushton, J. P., & Park, J. (2010). The general factor of personality and its relation to self-esteem in 628,640 internet respondents. Personality and Individual Differences, 48, 343–346.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Flehmig, H. C., Steinborn, M., Langner, R., & Westhoff, K. (2007). Neuroticism and the mental noise hypothesis: Relationships to lapses of attention and slips of action in everyday life. Psychological Science, 49, 343–360.

    Google Scholar 

  • Formann, A. K., & Piswanger, K. (1979). Wiener Matrizen-Test. Ein Rasch-skalierter sprachfreier Intelligenztest. Beltz, Weinheim.

    Google Scholar 

  • Forsman, L., Madison, G., & Ullén, F. (2009). Neuroticism is correlated with drift in serial time interval production. Personality and Individual Differences, 47(3), 229–232.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Grabe, H. J., Schwahn, C., Barnow, S., Spitzer, C., John, U., Freyberger, H. J., et al. (2010). Alexithymia, hypertension, and subclinical atherosclerosis in the general population. Journal of Psychosomatic Research, 68(2), 139–147. doi:10.1016/j.jpsychores.2009.07.015.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Gray, J. A., & McNaughton, N. (2000). The neuropsychology of anxiety: An inquiry into the functions of the septo-hippocampal system. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Guay, F., Mageau, G. A., & Vallerand, R. J. (2003). On the hierarchical structure of self-determined motivation: A test of top-down, bottom-up, reciprocal, and horizontal effects. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 29, 992–1004.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Gustafsson, J.-E. (1984). A unifying model for the structure of intellectual abilities. Intelligence, 8, 179–203.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Holt, C. L., & Ellis, J. B. (1998). Assessing the current validity of the Bem sex-role inventory. Sex Roles, 39, 929–941.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Honkalampi, K., Hintikka, J., Tanskanen, A., Lehtonen, J., & Viinamaki, H. (2000). Depression is strongly associated with alexithymia in the general population. Journal of Psychosomatic Research, 48(1), 99–104. doi:10.1016/s0022-3999(99)00083-5.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Hunt, E. (2011). Human intelligence. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ishimura, I., & Kodama, M. (2006). Dimensions of flow experience in Japanese college students: Relation between flow experience and mental health. Japanese Journal of Health Psychology, 13, 23–34.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jackson, S. A., & Eklund, R. C. (2004). The flow scales manual. Morgantown: Publishers Graphics.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jackson, S. A., Kimiecik, J. C., Ford, S., & Marsh, H. W. (1998). Psychological correlates of flow in sport. Journal of Sport and Exercise Psychology, 20, 358–378.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jackson, S. A., Thomas, P. R., Marsh, H. W., & Smethurst, C. J. (2001). Relationships between flow, self-concept, psychological skills, and performance. Journal of Applied Sport Psychology, 13, 129–153.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jackson, S. A., Martin, A. J., & Eklund, R. C. (2008). Long and short measures of flow: The construct validity of the FSS-2, DFS-2, and new brief counterparts. Journal of Sport and Exercise Psychology, 30(5), 561–587.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Jensen, A. R. (1998). The g factor (The g factor). Westport: Praeger Publishers.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jensen, A. R. (2006). Clocking the mind: Mental chronometry and individual differences. Oxford: Elsevier.

    Google Scholar 

  • John, O. P., Donahue, E. M., & Kentle, R. L. (1991). The Big Five Inventory-Versions 4a and 54. Berkeley: Institute of Personality and Social Research.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jorgensen, R. S., & Houston, B. K. (1986). Family history of hypertension, personality pattern, and cardiovascular reactivity to stress. Psychosomatic Medicine, 48, 102–117.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Kappe, R., & van der Flier, H. (2010). Using multiple and specific criteria to assess the predictive validity of the Big Five personality factors on academic performance. Journal of Research in Personality, 44(1), 142–145.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Keefer, K. V. (2015). Self-report assessments of emotional competencies: A critical look at methods and meanings. Journal of Psychoeducational Assessment, 33(1), 3–23. doi:10.1177/0734282914550381.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kotov, R., Gamez, W., Schmidt, F., & Watson, D. (2010). Linking “Big” personality traits to anxiety, depressive, and substance use disorders: A meta-analysis. Psychological Bulletin, 136, 768–821.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • LeFevre, J. (1988). Flow and the quality of experience during work and leisure. In M. Csikszentmihalyi & I. S. Csikszentmihalyi (Eds.), Optimal experience: Psychological studies of flow in consciousness (pp. 307–318). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Lichtenstein, P., Sullivan, P. F., Cnattingius, S., Gatz, M., Johansson, S., Carlström, E., et al. (2006). The Swedish twin registry in the third millenium: An update. Twin Research and Human Genetics, 9(6), 875–882.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Madison, G., Forsman, L., Blom, Ö., Karabanov, A., & Ullén, F. (2009). Correlations between general intelligence and components of serial timing variability. Intelligence, 37(1), 68–75.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Madison, G., Karampela, O., Ullén, F., & Holm, L. (2013). Effects of practice on variability in an isochronous serial interval production task: Asymptotical levels of tapping variability after training are similar to those of musicians. Acta Psychologica, 143, 119–128.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Marrero Quevedo, R. J., & Carballeira Abella, M. (2011). Well-being and personality: Facet-level analyses. Personality and Individual Differences, 50, 206–211.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • McGrew, K. S. (2009). CHC theory and the human cognitive abilities project: Standing on the shoulders of the giants of psychometric intelligence research. Intelligence, 37, 1–10.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mendelson, G. (1982). Alexithymia and chronic pain – prevalence, correlates and treatment results. Psychotherapy and Psychosomatics, 37(3), 154–164.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Moneta, G. (2004). The flow model of intrinsic motivation in Chinese: Cultural and personal moderators. Journal of Happiness Studies, 5, 181–217.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mosing, M. A., Cesarini, D., Johannesson, M., Magnusson, P. K. E., Pedersen, N. L., Nakamura, J., et al. (2012a). Genetic and environmental influences on the relationship between flow proneness, locus of control and behavioral inhibition. PLoS One, 7(11), e47958.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  • Mosing, M. A., Magnusson, P. K., Pedersen, N. L., Nakamura, J., Madison, G., & Ullén, F. (2012b). Heritability of proneness for psychological flow experiences. Personality and Individual Differences, 53(5), 699–704.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mosing, M. A., Madison, G., Pedersen, N. L., Kuja-Halkola, R., & Ullén, F. (2014). Practice does not make perfect: No causal effect of music practice on music ability. Psychological Science, 25(9), 1795–1803.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Mosing, M. A., Madison, G., Pedersen, N. L., & Ullén, F. (2015). Investigating cognitive transfer within the framework of music practice: Genetic pleiotropy rather than causality. Developmental Science. doi:10.1111/desc.12306.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Musek, J. (2007). A general factor of personality: Evidence for the Big One in the five-factor model. Journal of Research in Personality, 41, 1213–1233.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Owen, K. B., Smith, J., Lubans, D. R., Ng, J. Y. Y., & Lonsdale, C. (2014). Self-determined motivation and physical activity in children and adolescents: A systematic review and meta-analysis. Preventive Medicine, 67, 270–279. doi:10.1016/j.ypmed.2014.07.033.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Robinson, M. D., & Tamir, M. (2005). Neuroticism as mental noise: A relation between neuroticism and reaction time standard deviations. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 89(1), 107–114.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Salminen, J. K., Saarijarvi, S., Aarela, E., Toikka, T., & Kauhanen, J. (1999). Prevalence of alexithymia and its association with sociodemographic variables in the general population of Finland. Journal of Psychosomatic Research, 46(1), 75–82. doi:10.1016/s0022-3999(98)00053-1.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Scarr, S. (1996). How people make their own environments: Implications for parents and policy makers. Psychology, Public Policy, and Law, 2, 204–228.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Schweizer, K., & Moosbrugger, H. (2004). Attention and working memory as predictors of intelligence. Intelligence, 32(4), 329–347.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Schweizer, K., Moosbrugger, H., & Goldhammer, F. (2005). The structure of the relationship between attention and intelligence. Intelligence, 33, 589–611.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sifneos, P. E. (1973). The prevalence of ‘alexithymic’ characteristics in psychosomatic patients. Psychotherapy and Psychosomatics, 22(2), 255–262.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Simonsson-Sarnecki, M., Lundh, L. G., Torestad, B., Bagby, R. M., Taylor, G. J., & Parker, J. D. (2000). A Swedish translation of the 20-item Toronto Alexithymia Scale: Cross-validation of the factor structure. Scandinavian Journal of Psychology, 41, 25–30.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Spinhoven, P., van der Does, W., Ormel, J., Zitman, F. G., & Penninx, B. (2013). Confounding of Big Five personality assessments in emotional disorders by comorbidity and current disorder. European Journal of Personality, 27(4), 389–397. doi:10.1002/per.1885.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Stefanis, N. C., Hanssen, M., Smirnis, N. K., Avramopoulos, D. A., Evdokimidis, I. K., Stefanis, C. N., et al. (2002). Evidence that three dimensions of psychosis have a distribution in the general population. Psychology and Medicine, 32(2), 347–358.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Taylor, G. J., Bagby, R. M., & Parker, J. D. (1991). The alexithymia construct: A potential paradigm for psychosomatic medicine. Psychosomatics, 32, 153–164.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Theorell, T., Alfredssson, L., Knox, S., Perski, A., Svensson, J., & Waller, D. (1984). On the interplay between socioeconomic factors, personality and work environment in the pathogenesis of cardiovascular disease. Scandinavian Journal of Working Environment and Health, 10, 373–380.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Theorell, T., Mosing, M. A., Lennartsson, A.-K., & Ullén, F. (2014). Musical activity and emotional competence – a twin study. Frontiers in Psychology, 5, 744.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Theorell, T., Lennartsson, A.-K., Madison, G., Mosing, M. A., & Ullén, F. (2015). Predictors of continued music practice – from childhood and adolescence to adult years. Acta Paediatrica, 104(3), 274–284.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  • Therman, S., Suvisaari, J., & Hultman, C. M. (2014). Dimensions of psychotic experiences among women in the general population. International Journal Methods in Psychiatric Research, 23(1), 62–68. doi:10.1002/mpr.1427.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ullén, F., de Manzano, Ö., Theorell, T., & Harmat, L. (2010). The physiology of effortless attention. In B. Bruya (Ed.), Effortless attention (pp. 205–218). Cambridge, MA: The MIT Press.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Ullén, F., de Manzano, Ö., Almeida, R., Magnussson, P. K. E., Pedersen, N. L., Nakamura, J., et al. (2012a). Proneness for psychological flow in everyday life: Associations with personality and intelligence. Personality and Individual Differences, 52, 167–172.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ullén, F., Söderlund, T., Kääriä, L., & Madison, G. (2012b). Bottom-up mechanisms are involved in the relation between accuracy in timing tasks and intelligence – further evidence using manipulations of state motivation. Intelligence, 40, 100–106.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ullén, F., Mosing, M. A., Holm, L., Eriksson, H., & Madison, G. (2014). Psychometric properties and heritability of a new online test for musicality, the Swedish musical discrimination test. Personality and Individual Differences, 63, 87–93.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Vallerand, R. J., & Bissonnette, R. (1992). Intrinsic, extrinsic, and amotivational styles as predictors of behavior – a prospective-study. Journal of Personality, 60(3), 599–620.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Whiteside, S. P., & Lynam, D. R. (2001). The Five Factor Model and impulsivity: Using a structural model of personality to understand impulsivity. Personality and Individual Differences, 30(4), 669–689.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zakrisson, I. (2010). Big Five Inventory (BFI): Utprövning för svenska förhållanden. Social Science Reports from Mid Sweden University 3: Mid Sweden University.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgement

This work was supported by the Bank of Sweden Tercentenary Foundation (M11-0451:1).

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Fredrik Ullén .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2016 Springer International Publishing Switzerland

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Ullén, F., Harmat, L., Theorell, T., Madison, G. (2016). Flow and Individual Differences – A Phenotypic Analysis of Data from More than 10,000 Twin Individuals. In: Harmat, L., Ørsted Andersen, F., Ullén, F., Wright, J., Sadlo, G. (eds) Flow Experience. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-28634-1_17

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics