Advertisement

Mechanisms: Social Recognition and Social Organisation

  • Ashley Ward
  • Mike Webster
Chapter

Abstract

Social organisation in animals takes many forms. It includes assemblages of territorial animals, dominance hierarchies and social groups, among other things. The basic tenet that underlies these forms of social organisation is that animals adapt their responses to the different individuals that they encounter according to some recognised characteristic. For example, an individual may be socially attracted to some, but may ignore others; it may defer to some, or it may dominate others. Consequently, all forms of social organisation are reliant upon social recognition, which is the ability of an individual to discriminate among other animals that it encounters within its environment and to bias its behaviour accordingly, directing the appropriate behaviour towards the appropriate individual. Even mass displays of self-organised, collective phenomena typically occur in flocks, swarms or shoals of a single species, or at least dominated by a single species, implying, at the very least, basic recognition and discrimination of conspecifics from heterospecifics. In terms of group-living animals, the level of structure within the social organisation of a species is reliant upon a suite of interacting and often dynamic factors (see Chap.  1). Thus, their social organisation may be highly structured in time and space or comparatively evanescent. Animals in many instances form groups with kin or with familiar individuals. In doing so, they potentially gain access to inclusive fitness benefits or to the enhanced antipredator, foraging or social learning benefits that have been described for individuals in such groups. Moreover, social organisation can feed back to strengthen social recognition – animals that spend greater time in association may learn each other’s identity with increasing specificity – hence, there is an interrelationship of social recognition and social organisation, both within the lifetime of an animal and most especially throughout evolutionary time. The challenges posed by living among conspecifics in social groups have given rise to the development of cognitive abilities relating to communication, social learning and the development of culture.

Keywords

Social Recognition Individual Recognition Lemur Catta Poecilia Reticulata Tonkean Macaque 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

References

  1. Adamo SA, Hanlon RT (1996) Do cuttlefish (Cephalopoda) signal their intentions to conspecifics during agonistic encounters? Anim Behav 52:73–81. doi: 10.1006/anbe.1996.0153 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Archawaranon M, Dove L, Wiley RH (1991) Social inertia and hormonal-control of aggression and dominance in white-throated sparrows. Behaviour 118:42–65. doi: 10.1163/156853991x00193 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Atema J (1996) Eddy chemotaxis and odor landscapes: exploration of nature with animal sensors. Biol B 191(1):129–138CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Balshine-Earn S, Lotem A (1998) Individual recognition in a cooperatively breeding cichlid: evidence from video playback experiments. Behaviour 135:369–386CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Bateson PPG (1978a) Sexual imprinting and optimal outbreeding. Nature 273(5664):659–660. doi: 10.1038/273659a0 PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Bateson PPG (1978b) Early experience and sexual preferences. In: Hutchison JB (ed) Biological determinants of sexual behaviour. Wiley, New York, pp 29–53Google Scholar
  7. Beecher MD (1989) Signaling systems for individual recognition – an information-theory approach. Anim Behav 38:248–261. doi: 10.1016/s0003-3472(89)80087-9 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Beecher MD, Beecher IM, Hahn S (1981a) Parent-offspring recognition in bank swallows (Riparia riparia). 2. Development and acoustic basis. Anim Behav 29(FEB):95–101. doi: 10.1016/s0003-3472(81)80156-x
  9. Beecher MD, Beecher IM, Lumpkin S (1981b) Parent-offspring recognition in bank swallows (Riparia riparia). 1. Natural history. Anim Behav 29(FEB):86–94. doi: 10.1016/s0003-3472 (81)80155-8
  10. Beecher MD, Loesche P, Stoddard PK, Medvin MB (1989) Individual recognition by voice in swallows: signal or perceptual adaptation. In: Dooling RJ, Hulse SH (eds) The comparative psychology of audition: perceiving complex sounds. Erlbaum, Hillsdale, pp 227–294Google Scholar
  11. Beer CG (1970) Individual recognition of voice in the social behaviour of birds. Adv Study Behav 3:27–74CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Bergman TJ, Beehner JC, Cheney DL, Seyfarth RM (2003) Hierarchical classification by rank and kinship in baboons. Science 302(5648):1234–1236. doi: 10.1126/science.1087513 PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Bird CD, Emery NJ (2008) Using video playback to investigate the social preferences of rooks, Corvus frugilegus. Anim Behav 76:679–687. doi: 10.1016/j.anbehav.2008.04.014 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Blaustein AR, Waldman B (1992) Kin recognition in anuran amphibians. Anim Behav 44(2):207–221. doi: 10.1016/0003-3472(92)90027-7 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Boissy A, Dumont B (2002) Interactions between social and feeding motivations on the grazing behaviour of herbivores: sheep more easily split into subgroups with familiar peers. App Anim Behav Sci 79(3):233–245. doi: 10.1016/s0168-1591(02)00152-1 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Bokony V, Lendvai AZ, Liker A (2006) Multiple cues in status signalling: The role of wingbars in aggressive interactions of male house sparrows. Etholo 112(10):947–954. doi: 10.1111/j.1439-0310.2006.01246.x CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Boughman JW, Wilkinson GS (1998) Greater spear-nosed bats discriminate group mates by vocalizations. Anim Behav 55:1717–1732. doi: 10.1006/anbe.1997.0721 PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Bradbury JW, Vehrencamp SL (1998) Principles of animal communication. Sinauer Associates, SunderlandGoogle Scholar
  19. Brown SD, Dooling RJ (1992) Perception of conspecific faces by budgerigars (Melopsittacus-undulatus).1. Natural faces. J Comp Psychol 106(3):203–216. doi: 10.1037/0735-7036.106.3.203 PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Brown GE, Godin JGJ, Pedersen J (1999) Fin-flicking behaviour: a visual antipredator alarm signal in a characin fish, Hemigrammus erythrozonus. Anim Behav 58:469–475. doi: 10.1006/anbe.1999.1173 PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Bruck JN (2013) Decades-long social memory in bottlenose dolphins. Proc Royal Soc B Biol Sci 280(1768). doi: 10.1098/rspb.2013.1726
  22. Bshary R, Wickler W, Fricke H (2002) Fish cognition: a primate’s eye view. Anim Cogn 5(1):1–13. doi: 10.1007/s10071-001-0116-5 PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Buhrman-Deever SC, Hobson EA, Hobson AD (2008) Individual recognition and selective response to contact calls in foraging brown-throated conures, Aratinga pertinax. Anim Behav 76:1715–1725. doi: 10.1016/j.anbehav.2008.08.007 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Bull CM, Griffin CL, Lanham EJ, Johnston GR (2000) Recognition of pheromones from group members in a gregarious lizard, Egernia stokesii. J Herpetol 34(1):92–99CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Campbell DLM, Hauber ME (2009) Cross-fostering diminishes song discrimination in zebra finches (Taeniopygia guttata). Anim Cogn 12(3):481–490. doi: 10.1007/s10071-008-0209-5 PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Cheney DL, Seyfarth RM (1999) Recognition of other individuals’ social relationships by female baboons. Anim Behav 58:67–75. doi: 10.1006/anbe.1999.1131 PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Clayton NS (1990) The effects of cross-fostering on assortative mating between zebra finch subspecies. Anim Behav 40:1102–1110. doi: 10.1016/s0003-3472(05)80176-9 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Cook M, Mineka S (1989) Observational conditioning of fear to fear-relevant versus fear-irrelevant stimuli in rhesus-monkeys. J Abnorm Psychol 98(4):448–459. doi: 10.1037/0021-843x.98.4.448 PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Cotoneschi C, Dani FR, Cervo R, Sledge MF, Turillazzi S (2007) Polistes dominulus (Hymenoptera : Vespidae) larvae possess their own chemical signatures. J Insect Physiol 53(9):954–963. doi: 10.1016/j.jinsphys.2006.12.016 PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Coulon M, Deputte BL, Heyman Y, Delatouche L, Richard C (2007) Visual discrimination by heifers (Bos taurus) of their own species. J Comp Psychol 121(2):198–204. doi: 10.1037/0735-7036.121.2.198 PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Coulon M, Deputte BL, Heyman Y, Baudoin C (2009) Individual recognition in domestic cattle (Bos taurus): evidence from 2D-images of heads from different breeds. Plos One 4(2). doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0004441
  32. Courtenay SC, Quinn TP, Dupuis HMC, Groot C, Larkin PA (1997) Factors affecting the recognition of population-specific odours by juvenile coho salmon. J Fish Biol 50(5):1042–1060Google Scholar
  33. D’Eath RB, Stone RJ (1999) Chickens use visual cues in social discrimination: an experiment with coloured lighting. Appl Anim Behav Sci 62(2–3):233–242. doi: 10.1016/s0168-1591(98)00216-0 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. da Costa AP, Leigh AE, Man MS, Kendrick KM (2004) Face pictures reduce behavioural, autonomic, endocrine and neural indices of stress and fear in sheep. Proc Royal Soc B Biol Sci 271(1552):2077–2084. doi: 10.1098/rspb.2004.2831 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Dale J, Lank DB, Reeve HK (2001) Signaling individual identity versus quality: a model and case studies with ruffs, queleas, and house finches. Am Nat 158(1):75–86. doi: 10.1086/320861 PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Davenport D, Norris KS (1958) Observations on the symbiosis of the sea anemone stoichactis and the pomacentrid fish, Amphiprion percula. Biol B 115(3):397–410. doi: 10.2307/1539105 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. Dawkins R (1976) The selfish gene. Oxford University Press, OxfordGoogle Scholar
  38. Detto T, Backwell PRY, Hemmi JM, Zeil J (2006) Visually mediated species and neighbour recognition in fiddler crabs (Uca mjoebergi and Uca capricomis). Proc Royal Soc B Biol Sci 273(1594):1661–1666. doi: 10.1098/rspb.2006.3503 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. Dittrich W (1990) Representation of faces in longtailed macaques (Macaca fascicularis). Etholo 85(4):265–278CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. Drea CM, Vignieri SN, Kim HS, Weldele ML, Glickman SE (2002) Responses to olfactory stimuli in spotted hyenas (crocuta crocuta): II. Discrimination of conspecific scent. J Comp Psychol 116(4):342–349. doi: 10.1037//0735-7036.116.4.342 PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. Duvall D (1986) A new question of pheromones: aspects of possible chemical signaling and reception in the mammal-like reptiles. In: Hotton N, MacLean PD, Roth JJ, Roth EC (eds) The ecology and biology of mammal-like reptiles. Smithsonian Institution Press, Washington, DC, pp 219–238Google Scholar
  42. Eens M, Van Duyse E, Berghman L, Pinxten R (2000) Shield characteristics are testosterone-dependent in both male and female moorhens. Horm Behav 37(2):126–134. doi: 10.1006/hbeh.1999.1569 PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. Ewer RF (1973) The carnivores. Cornell University Press, IthacaGoogle Scholar
  44. Falls JB, Krebs JR, McGregor PK (1982) Song matching in the great tit (parus-major) – the effect of similarity and familiarity. Anim Behav 30(NOV):997–1009. doi: 10.1016/s0003-3472(82)80188-7
  45. Fletcher DJC, Michener CD (1987) Kin recognition in animals. John Wiley, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  46. Foster EA, Franks DW, Mazzi S, Darden SK, Balcomb KC, Ford JKB, Croft DP (2012) Adaptive prolonged postreproductive life span in killer whales. Science 337(6100):1313. doi: 10.1126/science.1224198 PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  47. Fricke HW (1973) Individual partner recognition in fish – field studies on Amphiprion bicinctus. Naturwissenschaften 60(4):204–205PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  48. Frommen JG, Mehlis M, Brendler C, Bakker TCM (2007) Shoaling decisions in three-spined sticklebacks (Gasterosteus aculeatus) – familiarity, kinship and inbreeding. Behav Ecolo Soc 61(4):533–539. doi: 10.1007/s00265-006-0281-2 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  49. Frommolt KH, Goltsman ME, MacDonald DW (2003) Barking foxes, Alopex lagopus: field experiments in individual recognition in a territorial mammal. Anim Behav 65:509–518. doi: 10.1006/anbe.2003.2064 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  50. Gamboa GJ, Reeve HK, Ferguson ID, Wacker TL (1986) Nestmate recognition in social wasps – the origin and acquisition of recognition odors. Anim Behav 34:685–695. doi: 10.1016/s0003-3472(86)80053-7 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  51. Gerlach G, Lysiak N (2006) Kin recognition and inbreeding avoidance in zebrafish, Danio rerio, is based on phenotype matching. Anim Behav 71:1371–1377. doi: 10.1016/j.anbehav.2005.10.010 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  52. Gerlach G, Hodgins-Davis A, Avolio C, Schunter C (2008) Kin recognition in zebrafish: a 24-hour window for olfactory imprinting. Proce Royal Soc London Series B Biol Sci 275(1647):2165–2170. doi: 10.1098/rspb.2008.0647 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  53. Gherardi F, Tricarico E, Atema J (2005) Unraveling the nature of individual recognition by odor in hermit crabs. J Chem Ecol 31(12):2877–2896. doi: 10.1007/s10886-005-8400-5 PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  54. Gherardi F, Aquiloni L, Tricarico E (2012) Revisiting social recognition systems in invertebrates. Anim Cogn 15(5):745–762. doi: 10.1007/s10071-012-0513-y PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  55. Gheusi G, Bluthe RM, Goodall G, Dantzer R (1994) Social and individual recognition in rodents – methodological aspects and neurobiological bases. Behav Processes 33(1–2):59–87. doi: 10.1016/0376-6357(94)90060-4 PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  56. Grafen A (1998) Evolutionary biology – green beard as death warrant. Nature 394(6693):521−+. doi: 10.1038/28948 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  57. Griffiths SW (2003) Learned recognition of conspecifics by fishes. Fish Fish 4(3):256–268CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  58. Griffiths SW, Magurran AE (1997a) Familiarity in schooling fish: how long does it take to acquire? Anim Behav 53:945–949CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  59. Griffiths SW, Magurran AE (1997b) Schooling preferences for familiar fish vary with group size in a wild guppy population. Proce Royal Soc London Series B Biol Sci 264(1381):547–551CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  60. Griffiths SW, Brockmark S, Hojesjo J, Johnsson JI (2004) Coping with divided attention: the advantage of familiarity. Proce Royal Soc London Series B Biol Sci 271(1540):695–699. doi: 10.1098/rspb.2003.2648 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  61. Grinsted L, Bilde T, d’Ettorre P (2011) Cuticular hydrocarbons as potential kin recognition cues in a subsocial spider. Behav Ecology 22(6):1187–1194. doi: 10.1093/beheco/arr105 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  62. Grosenick L, Clement TS, Fernald RD (2007) Fish can infer social rank by observation alone. Nature 445(7126):429–432. doi: 10.1038/nature05511 PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  63. Halpin ZT (1980) Individual odors and individual recognition – review and commentary. Biol Behav 5(3):233–248Google Scholar
  64. Hamilton WD (1964) Genetical evolution of social behaviour I. J Theor Biol 7(1):1–16PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  65. Hanlon RT, Messenger JB (1988) Adaptive coloration in young cuttlefish (Sepia officinalis L) – the morphology and development of body patterns and their relation to behavior. Philos T Royal Soc London Series B Biol Sci 320(1200):437. doi: 10.1098/rstb.1988.0087 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  66. Hepper P (1991) Kin recognition. Cambridge University Press, CambridgeCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  67. Hesse S, Bakker TCM, Baldauf SA, Thuenken T (2012) Kin recognition by phenotype matching is family- rather than self-referential in juvenile cichlid fish. Anim Behav 84(2):451–457. doi: 10.1016/j.anbehav.2012.05.021 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  68. Hojesjo J, Johnsson JI, Petersson E, Jarvi T (1998) The importance of being familiar: individual recognition and social behavior in sea trout (Salmo trutta). Behav Ecol 9(5):445–451CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  69. Holldobler B, Wilson EO (2008) The superorganism: the beauty, elegance and strangeness of insect societies. W.W.Norton, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  70. Holmes WG (1994) The development of littermate preferences in juvenile beldings ground-squirrels. Anim Behav 48(5):1071–1084. doi: 10.1006/anbe.1994.1341 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  71. Holmes WG, Sherman PW (1982) The ontogeny of kin recognition in 2 species of ground-squirrels. Am Zool 22(3):491–517CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  72. Hoogland JL (1995) The black-tailed prairie dog: social life of a burrowing mammal. The black-tailed prairie dog: social life of a burrowing mammalGoogle Scholar
  73. Hurst JL, Beynon RJ (2004) Scent wars: the chemobiology of competitive signalling in mice. Bioessays 26(12):1288–1298. doi: 10.1002/bles.20147 PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  74. Insley SJ (2000) Long-term vocal recognition in the northern fur seal. Nature 406(6794):404–405. doi: 10.1038/35019064 PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  75. Insley SJ, Phillips AV, Charrier I (2003) A review of social recognition in pinnipeds. Aqu Mamm 29(2):181–201. doi: 10.1578/016754203101024149 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  76. Jaeger RG (1981) Dear enemy recognition and the costs of aggression between salamanders. Am Natu 117(6):962–974CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  77. Janik VM, Sayigh LS, Wells RS (2006) Signature whistle shape conveys identity information to bottlenose dolphins. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 103(21):8293–8297. doi: 10.1073/pnas.0509918103 PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  78. Johannesen J, Lubin Y (2001) Evidence for kin-structured group founding and limited juvenile dispersal in the sub-social spider Stegodyphus lineatus (Araneae, Eresidae). J Arachnol 29(3):413–422. doi: 10.1636/0161-8202(2001)029[0413:efksgf]2.0.co;2 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  79. Johnsen TS, Hengeveld JD, Blank JL, Yasukawa K, Nolan V (1996) Epaulet brightness and condition in female red-winged blackbirds. Auk 113(2):356–362CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  80. Johnston RE (2003) Chemical communication in rodents: from pheromones to individual recognition. J Mammal 84(4):1141–1162. doi: 10.1644/BLe-010 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  81. Jouventin P, Aubin T, Lengagne T (1999) Finding a parent in a king penguin colony: the acoustic system of individual recognition. Anim Behav 57:1175–1183. doi: 10.1006/anbe.1999.1086 PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  82. Karavanich C, Atema J (1998) Individual recognition and memory in lobster dominance. Anim Behav 56:1553–1560. doi: 10.1006/anbe.1998.0914 PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  83. Keenleyside MHA (1955) Some aspects of the schooling behaviour of fish. Behaviour 8:83–248CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  84. Keller L, Ross KG (1998) Selfish genes: a green beard in the red fire ant. Nature 394(6693):573–575. doi: 10.1038/29064 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  85. Kendrick KM, da Costa AP, Leigh AE, Hinton MR, Peirce JW (2001) Sheep don’t forget a face. Nature 414(6860):165–166. doi: 10.1038/35102669 PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  86. Kershenbaum A, Sayigh LS, Janik VM (2013) The encoding of individual identity in Dolphin signature whistles: how much information is needed?. Plos One 8 (10). doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0077671
  87. Komdeur J, Hatchwell BJ (1999) Kin recognition: function and mechanism in avian societies. Trends Ecol Evol 14(6):237–241. doi: 10.1016/s0169-5347(98)01573-0 PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  88. Kulahci IG, Drea CM, Rubenstein DI, Ghazanfar AA (2014) Individual recognition through olfactory – auditory matching in lemurs. Proc Royal Soc B Biolo Sci 281(1784). doi: 10.1098/rspb.2014.0071
  89. Kurvers R, Adamczyk V, Kraus RHS, Hoffman JI, van Wieren SE, van der Jeugd HP, Amos W, Prins HHT, Jonker RM (2013) Contrasting context dependence of familiarity and kinship in animal social networks. Anim Behav 86(5):993–1001. doi: 10.1016/j.anbehav.2013.09.001 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  90. Lancaster J (1971) Play-mothering – relations between juvenile females and young infants among free-ranging vervet monkeys – Cercopithecus aethiops. Folia Primatol 15(3–4):161. doi: 10.1159/000155377 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  91. Leadbeater E, Dapporto L, Turillazzi S, Field J (2014) Available kin recognition cues may explain why wasp behavior reflects relatedness to nest mates. Behav Ecolo 25(2):344–351. doi: 10.1093/beheco/art113 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  92. Lecchini D, Nakamura Y (2013) Use of chemical cues by coral reef animal larvae for habitat selection. Aquat Biol 19(3):231–238. doi: 10.3354/ab00532 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  93. Leopold DA, Rhodes G (2010) A comparative view of face perception. J Comp Psychol 124(3):233–251. doi: 10.1037/a0019460 PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  94. Leopold DA, Rhodes G, Muller KM, Jeffery L (2005) The dynamics of visual adaptation to faces. Proc Royal Soc B Biol Sci 272(1566):897–904. doi: 10.1098/rspb.2004.3022 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  95. Liebert AE, Starks PT (2004) The action component of recognition systems: a focus on the response. Ann Zool Fennici 41(6):747–764Google Scholar
  96. Lihoreau M, Rivault C (2009) Kin recognition via cuticular hydrocarbons shapes cockroach social life. Behav Ecolo 20(1):46–53. doi: 10.1093/beheco/arn113 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  97. Lubbock R (1980) Why are clownfishes not stung by sea-anemones. Proc R Soc Ser B Biol Sci 207(1166):35. doi: 10.1098/rspb.1980.0013 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  98. Mateo JM (2004) Recognition systems and biological organization: the perception component of social recognition. Ann Zool Fennici 41(6):729–745Google Scholar
  99. Mateo JM (2006) The nature and representation of individual recognition odours in Belding’s ground squirrels. Anim Behav 71:141–154. doi: 10.1016/j.anbehav.2005.04.006 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  100. Mateo JM (2009) The causal role of odours in the development of recognition templates and social preferences. Anim Behav 77(1):115–121. doi: 10.1016/j.anbehav.2008.09.015 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  101. Mateo JM (2010) Self-referent phenotype matching and long-term maintenance of kin recognition. Anim Behav 80(5):929–935. doi: 10.1016/j.anbehav.2010.08.019 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  102. Matsumura K, Matsunaga S, Fusetani N (2004) Possible involvement of phosphatidylcholine in school recognition in the catfish, Plotosus lineatus. Zoolog Sci 21(3):257–264PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  103. McComb K, Moss C, Sayialel S, Baker L (2000) Unusually extensive networks of vocal recognition in African elephants. Anim Behav 59:1103–1109. doi: 10.1006/anbe.2000.1406 PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  104. McComb K, Reby D, Baker L, Moss C, Sayialel S (2003) Long-distance communication of acoustic cues to social identity in African elephants. Anim Behav 65:317–329. doi: 10.1006/anbe.2003.2047 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  105. Mebs D (2009) Chemical biology of the mutualistic relationships of sea anemones with fish and crustaceans. Toxicon 54(8):1071–1074. doi: 10.1016/j.toxicon.2009.02.027 PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  106. Mennill DJ, Doucet SM, Montgomerie R, Ratcliffe LM (2003) Achromatic color variation in black-capped chickadees, Poecile atricapilla: black and white signals of sex and rank. Behav Ecol Sociobiol 53(6):350–357. doi: 10.1007/s00265-003-0581-8 Google Scholar
  107. Metcalfe NB, Thomson BC (1995) Fish recognize and prefer to shoal with poor competitors. Proc Roy Soc London Ser B Biol Sci 259(1355):207–210CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  108. Miklosi A, Topal J, Csanyi V (2004) Comparative social cognition: what can dogs teach us? Anim Behav 67:995–1004. doi: 10.1016/j.anbehav.2003.10.008 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  109. Moore A, Ives MJ, Kell LT (1994) The role of urine in sibling recognition in Atlantic salmon Salmo salar parr. Proc Roy Soc London Ser B Biol Sci 255(1343):173–180CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  110. Moore H, Dvorakova K, Jenkins N, Breed W (2002) Exceptional sperm cooperation in the wood mouse. Nature 418(6894):174–177. doi: 10.1038/nature00832 PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  111. Muleta MG, Schausberger P (2013) Smells familiar: group-joining decisions of predatory mites are mediated by olfactory cues of social familiarity. Anim Behav 86(3):507–512. doi: 10.1016/j.anbehav.2013.05.040 PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  112. Nakamura T, Croft DB, Westbrook RF (2003) Domestic pigeons (Columba livia) discriminate between photographs of individual pigeons. Learn Behav 31(4):307–317PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  113. Olsen KH, Grahn M, Lohm J, Langefors A (1998) MHC and kin discrimination in juvenile Arctic charr, Salvelinus alpinus (L.). Anim Behav 56:319–327PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  114. Olsen KH, Grahn M, Lohm J (2002) Influence of MHC on sibling discrimination in Arctic char, Salvelinus alpinus (L.). J Chem Ecol 28(4):783–795PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  115. Olsson M (1994) Rival recognition affects male contest behavior in sand lizards (Lacerta agilis). Behav Ecol Sociobiol 35(4):249–252. doi: 10.1007/bf00170705 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  116. Overath P, Sturm T, Rammensee H-G (2014) Of volatiles and peptides: in search for MHC-dependent olfactory signals in social communication. Cell Mol Life Sci 71(13):2429–2442. doi: 10.1007/s00018-014-1559-6 PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  117. Palagi E, Dapporto L (2006) Beyond odor discrimination: demonstrating individual recognition by scent in Lemur catta. Chem Senses 31(5):437–443. doi: 10.1093/chemse/bjj048 PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  118. Partan S, Marler P (1999) Behavior – communication goes multimodal. Science 283(5406):1272–1273. doi: 10.1126/science.283.5406.1272 PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  119. Penn D, Potts W (1998) How do major histocompatibility complex genes influence odor and mating preferences? In: Advances in immunology, vol 69. Academic Press Inc, San Diego, pp 411–436Google Scholar
  120. Peso M, Richards MH (2010) Knowing who’s who: nestmate recognition in the facultatively social carpenter bee, Xylocopa virginica. Anim Behav 79(3):563–570. doi: 10.1016/j.anbehav.2009.11.010 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  121. Pfalzer G, Kusch J (2003) Structure and variability of bat social calls: implications for specificity and individual recognition. J Zool 261:21–33. doi: 10.1017/s0952836903003935 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  122. Pouyaud L, Desmarais E, Chenuil A, Agnese TF, Bonhomme F (1999) Kin cohesiveness and possible inbreeding in the mouthbrooding tilapia Sarotherodon melanotheron (Pisces Cichlidae). Mol Ecol 8(5):803–812CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  123. Prendergast GS, Zurn CM, Bers AV, Head RM, Hansson LJ, Thomason JC (2008) Field-based video observations of wild barnacle cyprid behaviour in response to textural and chemical settlement cues. Biofouling 24(6):449–459. doi: 10.1080/08927010802340135 PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  124. Price JJ (1999) Recognition of family-specific calls in stripe-backed wrens. Anim Behav 57:483–492. doi: 10.1006/anbe.1998.1018 PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  125. Proops L, McComb K, Reby D (2009) Cross-modal individual recognition in domestic horses (Equus caballus). Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 106(3):947–951. doi: 10.1073/pnas.0809127105 PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  126. Rajakaruna RS, Brown JA, Kaukinen KH, Miller KM (2006) Major histocompatibility complex and kin discrimination in Atlantic salmon and brook trout. Mol Ecol 15(14):4569–4575. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-294X.2006.03113.x PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  127. Reeve HK (1989) The evolution of conspecific acceptance thresholds. Am Nat 133(3):407–435. doi: 10.1086/284926 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  128. Robisson P, Aubin T, Bremond JC (1993) Individuality in the voice of the emperor penguin aptenodytes-forsteri – adaptation to a noisy environment. Ethology 94(4):279–290CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  129. Ruch J, Heinrich L, Bilde T, Schneider JM (2009) Relatedness facilitates cooperation in the subsocial spider, Stegodyphus tentoriicola. Bmc Evol Biol 9:257. doi: 10.1186/1471-2148-9-257 PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  130. Ruch J, Herberstein ME, Schneider JM (2014) Families hunt more successfully: effect of group composition on hunting and communal feeding. Anim Behav 91:171–178. doi: 10.1016/j.anbehav.2014.03.013 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  131. Ryan CME, Lea SEG (1994) Images of conspecifics as categories to be discriminated by pigeons and chickens – slides, video tapes, stuffed birds and live birds. Behav Processes 33(1–2):155–175. doi: 10.1016/0376-6357(94)90064-7 PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  132. Rybak F, Sureau G, Aubin T (2002) Functional coupling of acoustic and chemical signals in the courtship behaviour of the male Drosophila melanogaster. Proc Royal Soc B-Biol Sci 269(1492):695–701. doi: 10.1098/rspb.2001.1919 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  133. Sandem AI, Janczak AM, Salte R, Brotastad BO (2006) The use of diazepam as a pharmacological validation of eye white as an indicator of emotional state in dairy cows. Appl Anim Behav Sci 96(3–4):177–183. doi: 10.1016/j/applanim.2005.06.008 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  134. Sayigh LS, Tyack PL, Wells RS, Solow AR, Scott MD, Irvine AB (1999) Individual recognition in wild bottlenose dolphins: a field test using playback experiments. Anim Behav 57:41–50. doi: 10.1006/anbe.1998.0961 PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  135. Senar JC, Camerino M, Metcalfe NB (1990) Familiarity breeds tolerance – the development of social stability in flocking siskins (Carduelis spinus). Ethology 85(1):13–24CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  136. Seppa T, Laurila A, Peuhkuri N, Piironen J, Lower N (2001) Early familiarity has fitness consequences for Arctic char (Salvelinus alpinus) juveniles. Can J Fish Aquat Sci 58(7):1380–1385CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  137. Shapiro PN, Penrod S (1986) Metaanalysis of facial identification studies. Psychol Bull 100(2):139–156. doi: 10.1037/0033-2909.100.2.139 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  138. Sheehan MJ, Tibbetts EA (2011) Specialized face learning is associated with individual recognition in paper wasps. Science 334(6060):1272–1275. doi: 10.1126/science.1211334 PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  139. Sherman PW, Holmes WG (1985) Kin recognition – issues and evidence. In: Hölldobler B, Lindauer M (eds) Experimental behavioral ecology and sociobiology. Sinauer Associates, Mass., pp 437–460Google Scholar
  140. Sherman PW, Reeve HK, Pfennig DW (1997) Recognition systems. In: Krebs JR, Davies NB (eds) Behavioural ecology, 4th edn. Blackwell, OxfordGoogle Scholar
  141. Sinervo B, Chaine A, Clobertt J, Calsbeek R, Hazard L, Lancaster L, McAdam AG, Alonzo S, Corrigan G, Hochberg ME (2006) Self-recognition, color signals, and cycles of greenbeard mutualism and altruism. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 103(19):7372–7377. doi: 10.1073/pnas.0510260103 PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  142. Singer TL (1998) Roles of hydrocarbons in the recognition systems of insects. Am Zool 38(2):394–405CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  143. Spehar SN, Di Fiore A (2013) Loud calls as a mechanism of social coordination in a fission-fusion taxon, the white-bellied spider monkey (Ateles belzebuth). Behav Ecol Sociobiol 67(6):947–961. doi: 10.1007/s00265-013-1520-y CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  144. Steiger S, Mueller JK (2008) ‘True’ and ‘untrue’ individual recognition: suggestion of a less restrictive definition. Trends Ecol Evol 23(7):355. doi: 10.1016/j.tree.2008.01.014 PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  145. Stoddard PK, Kilburn MD, Patterson KH (1996) Complex electric signal structure in reproducing gymnotiform electric fish. Soc Neurosci Abstr 22(1–3):450Google Scholar
  146. Strassmann JE, Klingler CJ, Arevalo E, Zacchi F, Husain A, Williams J, Seppa P, Queller DC (1997) Absence of within-colony kin discrimination in behavioural interactions of swarm-founding-wasps. Proc Royal Soc B-Biol Sci 264(1388):1565–1570CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  147. Strodl MA, Schausberger P (2012) Social familiarity modulates group living and foraging behaviour of juvenile predatory mites. Naturwissenschaften 99(4):303–311. doi: 10.1007/s00114-012-0903-7 PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  148. Strodl MA, Schausberger P (2013) Social familiarity relaxes the constraints of limited attention and enhances reproduction of group-living predatory mites. Oikos 122(8):1217–1226. doi: 10.1111/j.1600-0706.2012.20833.x PubMedCentralCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  149. Sturdy CB, Phillmore LS, Sartor JJ, Weisman RG (2001) Reduced social contact causes auditory perceptual deficits in zebra finches, Taeniopygia guttata. Anim Behav 62:1207–1218. doi: 10.1006/anbe.2001.1864 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  150. Sturm T, Leinders-Zufall T, Macek B, Walzer M, Jung S, Pommerl B, Stevanovic S, Zufall F, Overath P, Rammensee HG (2013) Mouse urinary peptides provide a molecular basis for genotype discrimination by nasal sensory neurons. Nat Commun 4:1616. doi: 10.1038/ncomms2610 PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  151. Sueur C, King AJ, Conradt L, Kerth G, Lusseau D, Mettke-Hofmann C, Schaffner CM, Williams L, Zinner D, Aureli F (2011b) Collective decision-making and fission-fusion dynamics: a conceptual framework. Oikos 120:1608–1617CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  152. Swaney W, Kendal J, Capon H, Brown C, Laland KN (2001) Familiarity facilitates social learning of foraging behaviour in the guppy. Anim Behav 62:591–598CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  153. Tate AJ, Fischer H, Leigh AE, Kendrick KM (2006) Behavioural and neurophysiological evidence for face identity and face emotion processing in animals. Philos Trans Royal Soc B-Biol Sci 361(1476):2155–2172. doi: 10.1098/rstb.2006.1937 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  154. Theis KR, Venkataraman A, Dycus JA, Koonter KD, Schmitt-Matzen EN, Wagner AP, Holekamp KE, Schmidt TM (2013) Symbiotic bacteria appear to mediate hyena social odors. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 110(49):19832–19837. doi: 10.1073/pnas.1306477110 PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  155. Tibbetts EA (2002) Visual signals of individual identity in the wasp Polistes fuscatus. Proc Royal Soc B Biolo Sci 269(1499):1423–1428. doi: 10.1098/rspb.2002.2031 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  156. Tibbetts EA, Dale J (2007) Individual recognition: it is good to be different. Trends Ecol Evol 22(10):529–537. doi: 10.1016/j.tree.2007.09.001 PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  157. Tibbetts EA, Lindsay R (2008) Visual signals of status and rival assessment in Polistes dominulus paper wasps. Biol Lett 4(3):237–239. doi: 10.1098/rsbl.2008.0048 PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  158. Uetz GW, Roberts JA (2002) Multisensory cues and multimodal communication in spiders: insights from video/audio playback studies. Brain Behav Evol 59(4):222–230PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  159. Utne-Palm AC, Hart PJB (2000) The effects of familiarity on competitive interactions between threespined sticklebacks. Oikos 91(2):225–232CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  160. Van der Velden J, Zheng Y, Patullo BW, Macmillan DL (2008) Crayfish recognize the faces of fight opponents. Plos One 3(2). doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0001695
  161. Van Dyk DA, Evans CS (2007) Familiar-unfamiliar discrimination based on visual cues in the Jacky dragon, Amphibolurus muricatus. Anim Behav 74:33–44. doi: 10.1016/j.anbehav.2006.06.018 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  162. van Zweden JS, D’Ettorre G (2010) Nestmate recognition in social insects and the role of hydrocarbons. In: Blomquist GJ, Bagnères AG (eds) Insect hydrocarbons: biology, biochemistry and chemical ecology. Cambridge University Press, New York, pp 222–243CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  163. Waldman B, Adler K (1979) Toad tadpoles associate preferentially with siblings. Nature 282(5739):611–613. doi: 10.1038/282611a0 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  164. Wanker R, Apcin J, Jennerjahn B, Waibel B (1998) Discrimination of different social companions in spectacled parrotlets (Forpus conspicillatus): evidence for individual vocal recognition. Behav Ecol Sociobiol 43(3):197–202. doi: 10.1007/s002650050481 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  165. Warburton K, Lees N (1996) Species discrimination in guppies: learned responses to visual cues. Anim Behav 52:371–378CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  166. Ward AJW, Hart PJB (2003) The effects of kin and familiarity on interactions between fish. Fish Fish 4(4):348–358CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  167. Ward AJW, Hart PJB (2005) Foraging benefits of shoaling with familiars may be exploited by outsiders. Anim Behav 69:329–335. doi: 10.1016/j.anbehav.2004.06.005 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  168. Ward AJW, Mehner T (2010) Multimodal mixed messages: the use of multiple cues allows greater accuracy in social recognition and predator detection decisions in the mosquitofish, Gambusia holbrooki. Behav Ecolo 21(6):1315–1320. doi: 10.1093/beheco/arq152 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  169. Ward AJW, Hart PJB, Krause J (2004a) The effects of habitat- and diet-based cues on association preferences in three-spined sticklebacks. Behav Ecolo 15(6):925–929. doi: 10.1093/beheco/arh097 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  170. Ward AJW, Thomas P, Hart PJB, Krause J (2004b) Correlates of boldness in three-spined sticklebacks (Gasterosteus aculeatus). Behav Ecolo Sociobiolo 55:561–568CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  171. Ward AJW, Holbrook RI, Krause J, Hart PJB (2005) Social recognition in sticklebacks: the role of direct experience and habitat cues. Behav Ecolo Sociobiolo 57(6):575–583. doi: 10.1007/s00265-004-0901-7 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  172. Ward AJW, Webster MM, Magurran AE, Currie S, Krause J (2009) Species and population differences in social recognition between fishes: a role for ecology? Behav Ecolo 20(3):511–516. doi: 10.1093/beheco/arp025 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  173. Watanabe S, Ito Y (1991) Discrimination of individuals in pigeons. Bird Behav 9(1–2):20–29Google Scholar
  174. Webster MM, Ward AJW, Hart PJB (2008) Shoal and prey patch choice by co-occurring fishes and prawns: inter-taxa use of socially transmitted cues. Proc Royal Soc B Biolo Sci 275(1631):203–208. doi: 10.1098/rspb.2007.1178 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  175. Weddle CB, Hunt J, Sakaluk SK (2013) Self-referent phenotype matching and its role in female mate choice in arthropods. Curr Zool 59(2):239–248CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  176. Whitfield DP (1987) Plumage variability, status signaling and individual recognition in avian flocks. Trends Ecol Evol 2(1):13–18CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  177. Wiley RH (2013) Specificity and multiplicity in the recognition of individuals: implications for the evolution of social behaviour. Biol Rev 88(1):179–195. doi: 10.1111/j.1469-185X.2012.00246.x PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  178. Wiley RH, Wiley MS (1977) Recognition of neighbors duets by stripe-backed wrens Campylorhynchus nuchalis. Behaviour 62:10–34. doi: 10.1163/156853977x00027 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  179. Wilkinson GS, Boughman JW (1998) Social calls coordinate foraging in greater spear-nosed bats. Anim Behav 55:337–350. doi: 10.1006/anbe.1997.0557 PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  180. Woolfenden GE, Fitzpatrick JW (1978) Inheritance of territory in group-breeding birds. Bioscience 28(2):104–108. doi: 10.2307/1307423 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  181. Zahavi A (1977) Testing of a bond. Anim Behav 25(FEB):246–247. doi: 10.1016/0003-3472(77)90089-6

Copyright information

© Springer International Publishing Switzerland 2016

Authors and Affiliations

  • Ashley Ward
    • 1
  • Mike Webster
    • 2
  1. 1.School of Life and Environmental SciencesThe University of SydneySydneyAustralia
  2. 2.School of BiologyUniversity of St AndrewsSt AndrewsUK

Personalised recommendations