Skip to main content

Understanding the Cultural Construction of School Mathematics

  • Conference paper
  • First Online:

Part of the book series: Trends in the History of Science ((TRENDSHISTORYSCIENCE))

Abstract

In this chapter, I show how culture underpins all aspects of school mathematics, whether it be the curriculum specified by the system, the development of the textbooks that teachers may or may not be compelled to use, the ways teachers teach, the classroom interactions privileged by the system or the beliefs, attitudes and aspirations of teachers, students and parents. To do this, however, I will describe the nature of culture and its educational manifestation.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution.

Buying options

Chapter
USD   29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD   129.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD   169.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD   169.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Learn about institutional subscriptions

Notes

  1. 1.

    The adjective public in this context is misleading; an English public school is an elite independent school. Such schools sustain the higher ranks of the civil service and the judiciary, half of all students at Cambridge and Oxford universities, and a disproportionately high number of members of parliament.

  2. 2.

    See https://www.gov.uk/government/uploads/system/uploads/attachment_data/file/239058/SECONDARY_national_curriculum_-_Mathematics.pdf.

  3. 3.

    See http://www.oph.fi/english/publications/2009/national_core_curricula.

  4. 4.

    See http://www.ond.vlaanderen.be/dvo/english/.

  5. 5.

    See http://www.okm.gov.hu/letolt/nemzet/kerettanterv36.doc.

References

  • Aho, E., Pitkänen, K., & Sahlberg, P. (2006). Policy development and reform principles of basic and secondary education in Finland since 1968. Washington: The World Bank.

    Google Scholar 

  • Andrews, P. (2010). The importance of acknowledging the cultural dimension in mathematics teaching and learning research. Acta Didactica Napocensia, 3(2), 3–16.

    Google Scholar 

  • Andrews, P. (2011). Finnish mathematics teaching: A case of uniquely implicit didactics. In T. Dooley, D. Corcoran, & M. Ryan (Eds.), Proceedings of the fourth conference on research in mathematics education (mei 4): mathematics teaching matters (pp. 3–18). Dublin: St Patrick’s College.

    Google Scholar 

  • Andrews, P. (2013). Finnish mathematics teaching from a reform perspective: A video-based case study analysis. Comparative Education Review, 57(2), 189–211.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Andrews, P., & Sayers, J. (2012). Teaching linear equations: Case studies from Finland, Flanders and Hungary. The Journal of Mathematical Behavior, 31(4), 476–488.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Andrews, P., & Sayers, J. (2013). Comparative studies of mathematics teaching: Does the means of analysis determine the outcome? ZDM: The International Journal on Mathematics Education, 45(1), 133–144.

    Google Scholar 

  • Andrews, P., Ryve, A., Hemmi, K., & Sayers, J. (2014). PISA, TIMSS and Finnish mathematics teaching: An enigma in search of an explanation. Educational Studies in Mathematics, 87(1), 7–26.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Antikainen, A. (2006). In search of the Nordic model in education. Scandinavian Journal of Educational Research, 50(3), 229–243.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Astala, K., Kivelä, S., Koskela, P., Martio, O., Näätänen, M., & Tarvainen, K. (2006). The PISA survey tells only a partial truth of Finnish children’s mathematical skills. Matilde, 29, 9.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bereday, G. (1964). Sir Michael Sadler’s ‘Study of Foreign Systems of Education’. Comparative Education Review, 7(3), 307–314.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Boyer, E. L. (1983). High school: A report on secondary education in America. New York: Harper and Row.

    Google Scholar 

  • Carlgren, I., Klette, K., Mýrdal, S., Schnack, K., & Simola, H. (2006). Changes in Nordic teaching practices: From individualised teaching to the teaching of individuals. Scandinavian Journal of Educational Research, 50(3), 301–326.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Clarke, D. (2006). Using international research to contest prevalent oppositional dichotomies. ZDM, 38(5), 376–387.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cobb, P., Wood, T., Yackel, E., & McNeal, B. (1992). Characteristics of classroom mathematics traditions: An interactional analysis. American Educational Research Journal, 29(3), 573–604.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cogan, L., & Schmidt, W. (1999). An examination of instructional practices in six countries. In G. Kaiser, E. Luna, & I. Huntley (Eds.), International comparisons in mathematics education (pp. 68–85). London: Falmer.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cummings, W. (1999). The Institutions of education: Compare, compare, compare! Comparative Education Review, 43(4), 413–437.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Erez, M., & Gati, E. (2004). A dynamic, multi-level model of culture: From the micro level of the individual to the macro level of a global culture. Applied Psychology: An International Review, 53(4), 583–598.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fiske, A. P. (2002). Using individualism and collectivism to compare cultures—A critique of the validity and measurement of the constructs: Comment on Oyserman et al 2002. Psychological Bulletin, 128(1), 78–88.

    Google Scholar 

  • Haggarty, L., & Pepin, B. (2002). An investigation of mathematics textbooks and their use in English, French and German classrooms: Who gets an opportunity to learn what? British Educational Research Journal, 28(4), 567–590.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Halinen, I., & Järvinen, R. (2008). Towards inclusive education: The case of Finland. Prospects, 38(1), 77–97.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hatzinikita, V., Dimopoulos, K., & Christidou, V. (2008). PISA test items and school textbooks related to science: A textual comparison. Science Education, 92(4), 664–687.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hausstätter, R., & Takala, M. (2011). Can special education make a difference? Exploring the differences of special educational systems between Finland and Norway in relation to the PISA results. Scandinavian Journal of Disability Research, 13(4), 271–281.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hiebert, J., Gallimore, R., Garnier, H., Bogard Givvin, K., Hollingsworth, H., Jacobs, J., et al. (2003). Teaching mathematics in seven countries: Results from the TIMSS 1999 video study. Washington: National Center for Educational Statistics.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hofstede, G. (1980). Motivation, leadership and organization: Do American theories apply abroad? Organizational Dynamics, 42–63.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hofstede, G. (1986). Cultural differences in teaching and learning. International Journal of Intercultural Relations, 10(3), 301–320.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hofstede, G., & McCrae, R. (2004). Personality and culture revisited: Linking traits and dimensions of culture. Cross-Cultural Research, 38(1), 52–88.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Holmes, B., & McLean, M. (1989). The Curriculum: A comparative perspective. London: Unwin Hyman.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hufton, N., & Elliott, J. (2000). Motivation to learn: The pedagogical nexus in the Russian school: Some implications for transnational research and policy borrowing. Educational Studies, 26(1), 115–136.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jennings, S., & Dunne, R. (1996). A critical appraisal of the national curriculum by comparison with the French experience. Teaching Mathematics and its Applications, 15(2), 49–55.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kaiser, G. (2002). Educational philosophies and their influence on mathematics education—An ethnographic study in English and German mathematics classrooms. ZDM, 34(6), 241–257.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kamens, D., Meyer, J., & Aaron, B. (1996). Worldwide patterns in academic secondary education curricula. Comparative Education Review, 40(2), 116–138.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kawanaka, T., Stigler, J., & Hiebert, J. (1999). Studying mathematics classrooms in Germany, Japan and the United States: Lessons from the TIMSS videotape study. In G. Kaiser, E. Luna, & I. Huntley (Eds.), International comparisons in mathematics education (pp. 86–103). London: Falmer.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kilpatrick, J., Swafford, J., & Findell, B. (Eds.). (2001). Adding it up: Helping children learn mathematics. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kivirauma, J., & Ruoho, K. (2007). Excellence through special education? Lessons from the Finnish school reform. International Review of Education, 53(3), 283–302.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Knipping, C. (2003). Learning from comparing: A review and reflection on qualitative oriented comparisons of teaching and learning mathematics in different countries. Zentralblatt fur Didaktik der Mathematik, 35(6), 282–293.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Laukkanen, R. (2008). Finnish strategy for high-level education for all. In N. C. Soguel & P. Jaccard (Eds.), Governance and performance of education systems (pp. 305–324). Dordrecht: Springer.

    Google Scholar 

  • Laukkanen, R. (2013). Finland’s experiences of compulsory education development. Artseduca, 5, 140–167.

    Google Scholar 

  • Leung, F. (2001). In search of an East Asian identity in mathematics education. Educational Studies in Mathematics, 47(1), 35–51.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lewis, G. (2007). Racializing culture is ordinary. Cultural Studies, 21(6), 866–886.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Linnakylä, P. (2002). Reading in Finland. In C. Papanastasiou & V. Froese (Eds.), Reading literacy in 14 countries. Lefkosia: University of Cyprus Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Martio, O. (2009). Long term effects in learning mathematics in Finland—Curriculum changes and calculators. The Teaching of Mathematics, 12(2), 51–56.

    MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  • Mason, M. (2007). Comparing cultures. In M. Bray, B. Adamson, & M. Mason (Eds.), Comparative education research: Approaches and methods (Vol. 19, pp. 165–196). Dordrecht: Springer.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Mullis, I., Martin, M., Gonzalez, E., Gregory, K., Garden, R., O’Connor, K., et al. (2000). TIMSS 1999 International mathematics report. Boston: Boston College.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mullis, I., Martin, M., Foy, P., & Arora, A. (2012). TIMSS 2011 International results in mathematics. Boston: TIMSS & PIRLS International Study Center, Boston College.

    Google Scholar 

  • Niemi, H., & Jakku-Sihvonen, R. (2006). Research-based teacher education. In R. Jakku-Sihvonen & H. Niemi (Eds.), Research-based teacher education in Finland (pp. 31–50). Turku: Finnish Educational Research Association.

    Google Scholar 

  • Norris, N., Asplund, R., MacDonald, B., Schostak, J., & Zamorski, B. (1996). An independent evaluation of comprehensive curriculum reform in Finland. Helsinki: National Board of Education.

    Google Scholar 

  • Organisation for Economic Cooperation and Development. (2007). PISA 2006 Science competencies for tomorrow’s world. Paris: OECD.

    Google Scholar 

  • Organisation for Economic Cooperation and Development. (2010a). PISA 2009 Results: What students know and can do—Student performance in reading, mathematics and science (Vol. 1). Paris: OECD.

    Google Scholar 

  • Organisation for Economic Cooperation and Development. (2010b). The high cost of low educational performance: The long-run economic impact of improving PISA outcomes. Paris: OECD.

    Google Scholar 

  • Organisation for Economic Cooperation and Development. (2013). PISA 2012 results: What students know and can do—Student Performance in mathematics, reading and science (Vol. 1). Paris: OECD.

    Google Scholar 

  • Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development (OECD). (2001). Knowledge and skills for life: First results from the OECD programme for international student assessment (PISA) 2000. Paris: OECD.

    Google Scholar 

  • Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development (OECD). (2004). Learning for tomorrow’s world: First results from PISA 2003. Paris: OECD.

    Google Scholar 

  • Osborn, M. (2004). New methodologies for comparative research? Establishing ‘constants’ and ‘contexts’ in educational experience. Oxford Review of Education, 30(2), 265–285.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Oyserman, D., Coon, H., & Kemmelmeier, M. (2002). Rethinking individualism and collectivism: Evaluation of theoretical assumptions and meta-analyses. Psychological Bulletin, 128(1), 3–72.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sahlberg, P. (2007). Education policies for raising student learning: The Finnish approach. Journal of Education Policy, 22(2), 147–171.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Schmidt, W., Jorde, D., Cogan, L., Barrier, E., Gonzalo, I., Moser, U., et al. (1996). Characterizing pedagogical flow: An investigation of mathematics and science teaching in six countries. Dordrecht: Kluwer.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schwartz, S. (1999). A theory of cultural values and some implications for work. Applied Psychology, 48(1), 23–47.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Simola, H. (2005). The Finnish miracle of PISA: Historical and sociological remarks on teaching and teacher education. Comparative Education, 41(4), 455–470.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Soares, A. M., Farhangmehr, M., & Shoham, A. (2007). Hofstede’s dimensions of culture in international marketing studies. Journal of Business Research, 60(3), 277–284.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Stigler, J., & Hiebert, J. (1999). The teaching gap. New York: The Free Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tarvainen, K., & Kivelä, S. K. (2006). Severe shortcomings in Finnish mathematics skills. Matilde, 29, 10.

    Google Scholar 

  • Triandis, H. (2001). Modern education needs cross-cultural psychology. In D. McInerney & S. van Etten (Eds.), Research on sociocultural influences on motivation and learning (Vol. 1, pp. 1–13). Greenwich CT: Information Age Publishing.

    Google Scholar 

  • Triandis, H. (2007). Culture and psychology: A history of the study of their relationships. In S. Kitayama & D. Cohen (Eds.), Handbook of cultural psychology (pp. 59–76). New York: Guilford Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Triandis, H., & Suh, E. (2002). Cultural influences on personality. Annual Review of Psychology, 53, 133–160.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tuovinen, J. (2008). Learning the craft of teaching and learning from world’s best practice. The case of Finland. In D. McInerney & G. Liem (Eds.), Teaching and learning: International best practice (pp. 51–77). Charlotte: Information Age Publishing.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tweed, R., & Lehman, D. (2002). Learning considered within a cultural context: Confucian and socratic approaches. American Psychologist, 57(2), 89–99.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Välijärvi, J. (2004). The system and how does it work: Some curricular and pedagogical characteristics of the Finnish comprehensive school. Education Journal, 32(1), 31–55.

    Google Scholar 

  • Välijärvi, J., Linnakylä, P., Kupari, P., Reinikainen, P., & Arffman, I. (2002). The Finnish success in PISA—and some reasons behind it. Jyväskylä: Institute for Educational Research, University of Jyväskylä.

    Google Scholar 

  • Watkins, D. (2000). Learning and teaching: A cross-cultural approach. School Leadership and Management, 20(2), 161–173.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Weber, M. (1930). The Protestant ethic and the spirit of capitalism. New York: Allen and Unwin.

    Google Scholar 

  • Williams, R. (1958). Culture is ordinary. In N. Mackenzie (Ed.), Conviction (pp. 74–92). London: MacGibbon and Kee.

    Google Scholar 

  • Williams, R. (1976). Keywords: A vocabulary of culture and society. London: Fontana.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Paul Andrews .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2016 Springer International Publishing Switzerland

About this paper

Cite this paper

Andrews, P. (2016). Understanding the Cultural Construction of School Mathematics. In: Larvor, B. (eds) Mathematical Cultures. Trends in the History of Science. Birkhäuser, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-28582-5_2

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics