Abstract
In this chapter, I show how culture underpins all aspects of school mathematics, whether it be the curriculum specified by the system, the development of the textbooks that teachers may or may not be compelled to use, the ways teachers teach, the classroom interactions privileged by the system or the beliefs, attitudes and aspirations of teachers, students and parents. To do this, however, I will describe the nature of culture and its educational manifestation.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution.
Buying options
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Learn about institutional subscriptionsNotes
- 1.
The adjective public in this context is misleading; an English public school is an elite independent school. Such schools sustain the higher ranks of the civil service and the judiciary, half of all students at Cambridge and Oxford universities, and a disproportionately high number of members of parliament.
- 2.
- 3.
- 4.
- 5.
References
Aho, E., Pitkänen, K., & Sahlberg, P. (2006). Policy development and reform principles of basic and secondary education in Finland since 1968. Washington: The World Bank.
Andrews, P. (2010). The importance of acknowledging the cultural dimension in mathematics teaching and learning research. Acta Didactica Napocensia, 3(2), 3–16.
Andrews, P. (2011). Finnish mathematics teaching: A case of uniquely implicit didactics. In T. Dooley, D. Corcoran, & M. Ryan (Eds.), Proceedings of the fourth conference on research in mathematics education (mei 4): mathematics teaching matters (pp. 3–18). Dublin: St Patrick’s College.
Andrews, P. (2013). Finnish mathematics teaching from a reform perspective: A video-based case study analysis. Comparative Education Review, 57(2), 189–211.
Andrews, P., & Sayers, J. (2012). Teaching linear equations: Case studies from Finland, Flanders and Hungary. The Journal of Mathematical Behavior, 31(4), 476–488.
Andrews, P., & Sayers, J. (2013). Comparative studies of mathematics teaching: Does the means of analysis determine the outcome? ZDM: The International Journal on Mathematics Education, 45(1), 133–144.
Andrews, P., Ryve, A., Hemmi, K., & Sayers, J. (2014). PISA, TIMSS and Finnish mathematics teaching: An enigma in search of an explanation. Educational Studies in Mathematics, 87(1), 7–26.
Antikainen, A. (2006). In search of the Nordic model in education. Scandinavian Journal of Educational Research, 50(3), 229–243.
Astala, K., Kivelä, S., Koskela, P., Martio, O., Näätänen, M., & Tarvainen, K. (2006). The PISA survey tells only a partial truth of Finnish children’s mathematical skills. Matilde, 29, 9.
Bereday, G. (1964). Sir Michael Sadler’s ‘Study of Foreign Systems of Education’. Comparative Education Review, 7(3), 307–314.
Boyer, E. L. (1983). High school: A report on secondary education in America. New York: Harper and Row.
Carlgren, I., Klette, K., Mýrdal, S., Schnack, K., & Simola, H. (2006). Changes in Nordic teaching practices: From individualised teaching to the teaching of individuals. Scandinavian Journal of Educational Research, 50(3), 301–326.
Clarke, D. (2006). Using international research to contest prevalent oppositional dichotomies. ZDM, 38(5), 376–387.
Cobb, P., Wood, T., Yackel, E., & McNeal, B. (1992). Characteristics of classroom mathematics traditions: An interactional analysis. American Educational Research Journal, 29(3), 573–604.
Cogan, L., & Schmidt, W. (1999). An examination of instructional practices in six countries. In G. Kaiser, E. Luna, & I. Huntley (Eds.), International comparisons in mathematics education (pp. 68–85). London: Falmer.
Cummings, W. (1999). The Institutions of education: Compare, compare, compare! Comparative Education Review, 43(4), 413–437.
Erez, M., & Gati, E. (2004). A dynamic, multi-level model of culture: From the micro level of the individual to the macro level of a global culture. Applied Psychology: An International Review, 53(4), 583–598.
Fiske, A. P. (2002). Using individualism and collectivism to compare cultures—A critique of the validity and measurement of the constructs: Comment on Oyserman et al 2002. Psychological Bulletin, 128(1), 78–88.
Haggarty, L., & Pepin, B. (2002). An investigation of mathematics textbooks and their use in English, French and German classrooms: Who gets an opportunity to learn what? British Educational Research Journal, 28(4), 567–590.
Halinen, I., & Järvinen, R. (2008). Towards inclusive education: The case of Finland. Prospects, 38(1), 77–97.
Hatzinikita, V., Dimopoulos, K., & Christidou, V. (2008). PISA test items and school textbooks related to science: A textual comparison. Science Education, 92(4), 664–687.
Hausstätter, R., & Takala, M. (2011). Can special education make a difference? Exploring the differences of special educational systems between Finland and Norway in relation to the PISA results. Scandinavian Journal of Disability Research, 13(4), 271–281.
Hiebert, J., Gallimore, R., Garnier, H., Bogard Givvin, K., Hollingsworth, H., Jacobs, J., et al. (2003). Teaching mathematics in seven countries: Results from the TIMSS 1999 video study. Washington: National Center for Educational Statistics.
Hofstede, G. (1980). Motivation, leadership and organization: Do American theories apply abroad? Organizational Dynamics, 42–63.
Hofstede, G. (1986). Cultural differences in teaching and learning. International Journal of Intercultural Relations, 10(3), 301–320.
Hofstede, G., & McCrae, R. (2004). Personality and culture revisited: Linking traits and dimensions of culture. Cross-Cultural Research, 38(1), 52–88.
Holmes, B., & McLean, M. (1989). The Curriculum: A comparative perspective. London: Unwin Hyman.
Hufton, N., & Elliott, J. (2000). Motivation to learn: The pedagogical nexus in the Russian school: Some implications for transnational research and policy borrowing. Educational Studies, 26(1), 115–136.
Jennings, S., & Dunne, R. (1996). A critical appraisal of the national curriculum by comparison with the French experience. Teaching Mathematics and its Applications, 15(2), 49–55.
Kaiser, G. (2002). Educational philosophies and their influence on mathematics education—An ethnographic study in English and German mathematics classrooms. ZDM, 34(6), 241–257.
Kamens, D., Meyer, J., & Aaron, B. (1996). Worldwide patterns in academic secondary education curricula. Comparative Education Review, 40(2), 116–138.
Kawanaka, T., Stigler, J., & Hiebert, J. (1999). Studying mathematics classrooms in Germany, Japan and the United States: Lessons from the TIMSS videotape study. In G. Kaiser, E. Luna, & I. Huntley (Eds.), International comparisons in mathematics education (pp. 86–103). London: Falmer.
Kilpatrick, J., Swafford, J., & Findell, B. (Eds.). (2001). Adding it up: Helping children learn mathematics. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press.
Kivirauma, J., & Ruoho, K. (2007). Excellence through special education? Lessons from the Finnish school reform. International Review of Education, 53(3), 283–302.
Knipping, C. (2003). Learning from comparing: A review and reflection on qualitative oriented comparisons of teaching and learning mathematics in different countries. Zentralblatt fur Didaktik der Mathematik, 35(6), 282–293.
Laukkanen, R. (2008). Finnish strategy for high-level education for all. In N. C. Soguel & P. Jaccard (Eds.), Governance and performance of education systems (pp. 305–324). Dordrecht: Springer.
Laukkanen, R. (2013). Finland’s experiences of compulsory education development. Artseduca, 5, 140–167.
Leung, F. (2001). In search of an East Asian identity in mathematics education. Educational Studies in Mathematics, 47(1), 35–51.
Lewis, G. (2007). Racializing culture is ordinary. Cultural Studies, 21(6), 866–886.
Linnakylä, P. (2002). Reading in Finland. In C. Papanastasiou & V. Froese (Eds.), Reading literacy in 14 countries. Lefkosia: University of Cyprus Press.
Martio, O. (2009). Long term effects in learning mathematics in Finland—Curriculum changes and calculators. The Teaching of Mathematics, 12(2), 51–56.
Mason, M. (2007). Comparing cultures. In M. Bray, B. Adamson, & M. Mason (Eds.), Comparative education research: Approaches and methods (Vol. 19, pp. 165–196). Dordrecht: Springer.
Mullis, I., Martin, M., Gonzalez, E., Gregory, K., Garden, R., O’Connor, K., et al. (2000). TIMSS 1999 International mathematics report. Boston: Boston College.
Mullis, I., Martin, M., Foy, P., & Arora, A. (2012). TIMSS 2011 International results in mathematics. Boston: TIMSS & PIRLS International Study Center, Boston College.
Niemi, H., & Jakku-Sihvonen, R. (2006). Research-based teacher education. In R. Jakku-Sihvonen & H. Niemi (Eds.), Research-based teacher education in Finland (pp. 31–50). Turku: Finnish Educational Research Association.
Norris, N., Asplund, R., MacDonald, B., Schostak, J., & Zamorski, B. (1996). An independent evaluation of comprehensive curriculum reform in Finland. Helsinki: National Board of Education.
Organisation for Economic Cooperation and Development. (2007). PISA 2006 Science competencies for tomorrow’s world. Paris: OECD.
Organisation for Economic Cooperation and Development. (2010a). PISA 2009 Results: What students know and can do—Student performance in reading, mathematics and science (Vol. 1). Paris: OECD.
Organisation for Economic Cooperation and Development. (2010b). The high cost of low educational performance: The long-run economic impact of improving PISA outcomes. Paris: OECD.
Organisation for Economic Cooperation and Development. (2013). PISA 2012 results: What students know and can do—Student Performance in mathematics, reading and science (Vol. 1). Paris: OECD.
Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development (OECD). (2001). Knowledge and skills for life: First results from the OECD programme for international student assessment (PISA) 2000. Paris: OECD.
Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development (OECD). (2004). Learning for tomorrow’s world: First results from PISA 2003. Paris: OECD.
Osborn, M. (2004). New methodologies for comparative research? Establishing ‘constants’ and ‘contexts’ in educational experience. Oxford Review of Education, 30(2), 265–285.
Oyserman, D., Coon, H., & Kemmelmeier, M. (2002). Rethinking individualism and collectivism: Evaluation of theoretical assumptions and meta-analyses. Psychological Bulletin, 128(1), 3–72.
Sahlberg, P. (2007). Education policies for raising student learning: The Finnish approach. Journal of Education Policy, 22(2), 147–171.
Schmidt, W., Jorde, D., Cogan, L., Barrier, E., Gonzalo, I., Moser, U., et al. (1996). Characterizing pedagogical flow: An investigation of mathematics and science teaching in six countries. Dordrecht: Kluwer.
Schwartz, S. (1999). A theory of cultural values and some implications for work. Applied Psychology, 48(1), 23–47.
Simola, H. (2005). The Finnish miracle of PISA: Historical and sociological remarks on teaching and teacher education. Comparative Education, 41(4), 455–470.
Soares, A. M., Farhangmehr, M., & Shoham, A. (2007). Hofstede’s dimensions of culture in international marketing studies. Journal of Business Research, 60(3), 277–284.
Stigler, J., & Hiebert, J. (1999). The teaching gap. New York: The Free Press.
Tarvainen, K., & Kivelä, S. K. (2006). Severe shortcomings in Finnish mathematics skills. Matilde, 29, 10.
Triandis, H. (2001). Modern education needs cross-cultural psychology. In D. McInerney & S. van Etten (Eds.), Research on sociocultural influences on motivation and learning (Vol. 1, pp. 1–13). Greenwich CT: Information Age Publishing.
Triandis, H. (2007). Culture and psychology: A history of the study of their relationships. In S. Kitayama & D. Cohen (Eds.), Handbook of cultural psychology (pp. 59–76). New York: Guilford Press.
Triandis, H., & Suh, E. (2002). Cultural influences on personality. Annual Review of Psychology, 53, 133–160.
Tuovinen, J. (2008). Learning the craft of teaching and learning from world’s best practice. The case of Finland. In D. McInerney & G. Liem (Eds.), Teaching and learning: International best practice (pp. 51–77). Charlotte: Information Age Publishing.
Tweed, R., & Lehman, D. (2002). Learning considered within a cultural context: Confucian and socratic approaches. American Psychologist, 57(2), 89–99.
Välijärvi, J. (2004). The system and how does it work: Some curricular and pedagogical characteristics of the Finnish comprehensive school. Education Journal, 32(1), 31–55.
Välijärvi, J., Linnakylä, P., Kupari, P., Reinikainen, P., & Arffman, I. (2002). The Finnish success in PISA—and some reasons behind it. Jyväskylä: Institute for Educational Research, University of Jyväskylä.
Watkins, D. (2000). Learning and teaching: A cross-cultural approach. School Leadership and Management, 20(2), 161–173.
Weber, M. (1930). The Protestant ethic and the spirit of capitalism. New York: Allen and Unwin.
Williams, R. (1958). Culture is ordinary. In N. Mackenzie (Ed.), Conviction (pp. 74–92). London: MacGibbon and Kee.
Williams, R. (1976). Keywords: A vocabulary of culture and society. London: Fontana.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2016 Springer International Publishing Switzerland
About this paper
Cite this paper
Andrews, P. (2016). Understanding the Cultural Construction of School Mathematics. In: Larvor, B. (eds) Mathematical Cultures. Trends in the History of Science. Birkhäuser, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-28582-5_2
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-28582-5_2
Published:
Publisher Name: Birkhäuser, Cham
Print ISBN: 978-3-319-28580-1
Online ISBN: 978-3-319-28582-5
eBook Packages: Mathematics and StatisticsMathematics and Statistics (R0)