Abstract
Environmental and sustainability studies can create pathways for positive social transformation through fostering individual reflection and behavioral change. The circumstances in which many people find themselves, however, are not always conducive to immediate change in support of sustainability. There is much navigating and negotiating that takes place in personal decision-making, which can lead to unintended contradictions between people’s pro-sustainability values and their unsustainable actions. In this chapter’s activity, students identify personal behaviors that could be considered “crimes,” against sustainability (that would generate green guilt) and contrast them with “eco-redeeming” acts which cultivate sustainability. Overall, the goal is to engage students in open and creative dialogue about how to promote positive social change through attention to individual behaviors. For a variety of courses, this insightful, exploratory activity can help students become excited about the possible solutions and behaviors that should/could be commonplace in society, if we all operated with more environmentally-ethical and sustainable awareness. After completing the activity, students should be able to (1) evaluate personal and societal behaviors in relationship to positive (“eco-redemptions”) and negative (“eco-crimes”) sustainability outcomes; (2) assess the prominence of green guilt and other personal and societal difficulties of sustainability; (3) articulate the need for creative, positive behaviors and communicate possible eco-redemptions to exemplify that change; and (4) understand the value of nonjudgmental reflection, critical inquiry, and thoughtful dialogue as constructive ways to inspire an individual’s capacity to improve sustainability practices.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
References
Bedford T, Collingwood P, Darnton A, et al (2011) Guilt: an effective motivator for pro-environmental behaviour change? RESOLVE: Working Paper. p 1–24
Dietz T, Gardner GT, Gilligan J et al (2009) Household actions can provide a behavioral wedge to rapidly reduce US carbon emissions. Proc Natl Acad Sci 106:18452–18456
Gardner GT, Stern PC (2008) The short list: the most effective actions US households can take to curb climate change. Environ Sci Policy Sust Dev 50:12–25
Gifford R, Nilsson A (2014) Personal and social factors that influence pro‐environmental concern and behaviour: a review. Int J Psychol 49:141–157
Gifford R (2011) The dragons of inaction: psychological barriers that limit climate change mitigation and adaptation. Am Psychol 66:290–302
Maniates MF (2001) Individualization: plant a tree, buy a bike, save the world? Global Env Pol 1:31–52
Steg L, Vlek C (2009) Encouraging pro-environmental behaviour: an integrative review and research agenda. J Environ Psychol 29:309–317
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Electronic Supplementary Materials
Below is the link to the electronic supplementary material.
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2016 Springer International Publishing Switzerland
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Quesada-Embid, M.C. (2016). Eco-crimes and Eco-redemptions: Discussing the Challenges and Opportunities of Personal Sustainability. In: Byrne, L. (eds) Learner-Centered Teaching Activities for Environmental and Sustainability Studies. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-28543-6_6
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-28543-6_6
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Cham
Print ISBN: 978-3-319-28541-2
Online ISBN: 978-3-319-28543-6
eBook Packages: Earth and Environmental ScienceEarth and Environmental Science (R0)