Skip to main content

Engaging in Climate Change Conversations: A Role-Playing Exercise to Cultivate Effective Communication

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Learner-Centered Teaching Activities for Environmental and Sustainability Studies
  • 1800 Accesses

Abstract

Among the many challenges to effective climate change communication is the extreme polarization engendered by differences in individuals’ ideologies and worldviews. Because of such ideological conflict, and particularly in the USA, most people rarely talk about climate change with each other, and when they do, they may have trouble with perspective taking and empathy. Student-centered teaching activities that use role-play are one potential avenue through which environmental educators can help students develop the skills and confidence necessary to have productive conversations about climate change. The goal of the learning activity described in this chapter is to help students recognize the various challenges of climate change conversations and to experience them through imaginative role-play. To achieve this goal, students consider how others might view climate change—based on ideological positions, worldviews, religious beliefs, professions, life stories, etc.—and then “play” characters whose perspectives on climate change may be different from their own. By viscerally experiencing the challenges of having such conversations, students should become better able to assess and overcome the barriers to effective communication about complex, controversial environmental issues such as climate change. After completing this activity, students should be able to (1) reflect on their own worldviews and perspectives about climate change, (2) investigate a particular perspective on climate change that may differ from their own, (3) explain why communication about climate change can be challenging, (4) identify strategies for having positive and productive climate change conversations, and (5) consider why having conversations about climate change can be important for addressing the ideological barriers to effective climate change communication.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 49.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 64.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 99.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  • Orlowski J (2013) Chasing ice. DVD. New Video Group, New York

    Google Scholar 

  • Bliuc A, Mcgarty C, Thomas E et al (2015) Public division about climate change rooted in conflicting socio-political identities. Nat Clim Change 5:226–229

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Center for Research on Environmental Decisions (CRED) (2009) The principles of climate change communication in brief. The Trustees of Columbia University. http://guide.cred.columbia.edu/guide/principles.html. Accessed 29 June 2015

  • Ding D, Maibach E, Zhao X et al (2011) Support for climate policy and societal action are linked to perception about scientific agreement. Nat Clim Change 1:462–566

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Feldman L, Myers T, Hmielowski J et al (2014) The mutual reinforcement of media selectivity and effects: testing the reinforcing spirals framework in the context of global warming. J Commun 64:590–611

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Henson R (2011) The rough guide to climate change, 3rd edn. Rough Guides, London

    Google Scholar 

  • Hobson K, Niemeyer S (2012) “What sceptics believe”: the effects of information and deliberation on climate change scepticism. Publ Understand Sci 22:396–412

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hulme M (2009) Why we disagree about climate change: understanding controversy, inaction and opportunity. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Leiserowitz A, Maibach E, Roser-Renouf C (2012) Global warming’s six Americas in September 2012. Yale Project on Climate Change Communication, New Haven

    Google Scholar 

  • Marshall G (2014) Don’t even think about it: why our brains are wired to ignore climate change. Bloomsbury, New York

    Google Scholar 

  • Moser S, Dilling L (2011) Communicating climate change: closing the science-action gap. In: Dryzek J, Norgaard R, Schlosberg D (eds) The Oxford handbook of climate change and society. Oxford University Press, New York, pp 161–174

    Google Scholar 

  • Nisbet M (2009) Communicating climate change: why frames matter for public engagement. Environment 51:514–518

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Stephen Siperstein .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Electronic Supplemental Materials

Below is the link to the electronic supplementary material.

39_Siperstein_ESM-A-B-C (DOCX 25 kb)

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2016 Springer International Publishing Switzerland

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Siperstein, S. (2016). Engaging in Climate Change Conversations: A Role-Playing Exercise to Cultivate Effective Communication. In: Byrne, L. (eds) Learner-Centered Teaching Activities for Environmental and Sustainability Studies. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-28543-6_39

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics