Abstract
Recent increases in reliance on simple Internet searches for quick access to information and the general expectation that reliable information can be easily acquired have confounded student development of skills in determining source credibility. This is of particular concern within environmental science and sustainability studies because the polarizing nature of many related topics has yielded a plethora of inaccurate, biased, and even falsified web sources that students may find confusing. “The Story of Stuff,” a popular web-based video, provides an exemplary case study for students to practice assessing source reliability and differentiating between informative and persuasive sources. In this lesson, students watch, critique, and discuss the “Story of Stuff.” In an optional activity, students investigate the validity of a claim in the video, analyze their research sources, and present their findings to the class. After completing the lesson, students should be able to (1) determine the reliability of a potential source of information, (2) distinguish between persuasive and informative sources, and (3) be able to express the importance of using credible sources to inform one’s opinions.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution.
Buying options
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Learn about institutional subscriptionsReferences
Doren L (2009) Story of Stuff, the critique. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=c5uJgG05xUY. Accessed 1 Mar 2014
Kaufman L (2009) A cautionary video about America’s ‘stuff’. http://www.nytimes.com/2009/05/11/education/11stuff.html. Accessed 10 Jan 2015
Leonard A (2007) The Story of Stuff. http://storyofstuff.org/movies/story-of-stuff/. Accessed 1 Aug 2009
Mandalios J (2013) RADAR: an approach for helping students evaluate Internet sources. J Inf Sci 39:470–478
Mark (2009) The Story of Stuff critique—a critique. http://breathenetwork.org/2009/10/08/story-of-stuff-critique-%E2%80%93-a-critique/. Accessed 1 Aug 2009
McClure R, Clink K (2009) How do you know that? An investigation of student research practices in the digital age. Portal Libr Acad 9:115–132
Metzger MJ, Flanagin AJ, Zwarun L (2003) College student Web use, perceptions of information credibility, and verification behavior. Comput Educ 41:271–290
Metzger MJ, Flanagin AJ, Medders RB (2010) Social and heuristic approaches to credibility evaluation online. J Commun 60:413–439
Stapleton P (2005) Evaluating web-sources: internet literacy and L2 academic writing. ELT J 59:135–143
White R (2013) Beliefs and biases in web search. In: Proceedings of the 36th international ACM SIGIR conference on research and development in information retrieval, Dublin, Ireland, July 28–August 01, 2013
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Electronic Supplemental Materials
Below is the link to the electronic supplementary material.
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2016 Springer International Publishing Switzerland
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
LaFantasie, J.J. (2016). The Story of Source Reliability: Practicing Research and Evaluation Skills Using “The Story of Stuff” Video. In: Byrne, L. (eds) Learner-Centered Teaching Activities for Environmental and Sustainability Studies. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-28543-6_35
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-28543-6_35
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Cham
Print ISBN: 978-3-319-28541-2
Online ISBN: 978-3-319-28543-6
eBook Packages: Earth and Environmental ScienceEarth and Environmental Science (R0)