Abstract
Environmental justice (EJ), as both a body of scholarship and social movement, is concerned with the intersections of social justice and environmental issues. The goal of the learning activity described in this chapter is to challenge such views and introduce EJ by asking students to critically examine what a “fair” or “just” situation is through an activity in which students distribute resources (candy and hypothetical parks) and hazards (hypothetical industrial sites) among their classmates and then discuss both the outcomes and their decision-making processes. Ultimately, the exercise will demonstrate that “justice” is not a straightforward concept and that decisions that seem just for one person or group might be unjust for another. After completing this activity, students should be able to (1) compare and contrast different ideas of justice, (2) apply ideas of justice to environmental controversies, and (3) develop their own personal definition of justice in the context of environmental issues.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
References
Bullard RD (1983) Solid waste sites and the black Houston community. Socio Inq 53:273–288
Bullard RD, Mohai P, Saha R, Wright B (2007) Toxic wastes and race at twenty (1987–2007). United Church of Christ. http://www.ejnet.org/ej/twart.pdf. Accessed 21 Aug 2015
Cole L, Foster S (2000) From the ground up: environmental racism and the rise of the environmental justice movement. NYU Press, New York
First National People of Color Environmental Summit (1991) Principles of environmental justice. http://www.ejnet.org/ej/principles.html. Accessed 21 Aug 2015
Gottlieb R (2005) Forcing the spring: the transformation of the American environmental movement. Island Press, Washington, DC
Holifield R (2001) Defining environmental justice and environmental racism. Urban Geog 22:78–90
Mutz K, Bryner G, Kenney D (2002) Justice and natural resources: concepts, strategies, and applications. Island Press, Washington, DC
Schlosberg D (1999) Environmental justice and the new pluralism: the challenge of difference for environmentalism. Oxford University Press, Oxford
Shrader-Frechette KS (2002) Environmental justice: creating equality, reclaiming democracy. Oxford University Press, Oxford
United Church of Christ (1987) Toxic wastes and race in the United States: a national report on the racial and socio-economic characteristics of communities with hazardous waste sites: Public data access, Inc. www.ucc.org/about-us/archives/pdfs/toxwrace87.pdf. Accessed 21 Aug 2015
(EPA) U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (2015) Environmental justice. http://www.epa.gov/environmentaljustice/. Accessed 21 Aug 2015
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Electronic Supplementary Materials
Below is the link to the electronic supplementary material.
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2016 Springer International Publishing Switzerland
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Darby, K.J. (2016). Introducing the Conflicting Meanings of “Justice” Using a Candy-Distribution Exercise. In: Byrne, L. (eds) Learner-Centered Teaching Activities for Environmental and Sustainability Studies. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-28543-6_27
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-28543-6_27
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Cham
Print ISBN: 978-3-319-28541-2
Online ISBN: 978-3-319-28543-6
eBook Packages: Earth and Environmental ScienceEarth and Environmental Science (R0)