Abstract
Annual, biennial or perennial herbs, subshrubs, shrubs, rarely small trees (Wigandia), often aromatic; primary root usually persistent and developed as strong taproot, sometimes roots tuberous; stems erect, rarely prostrate to ascending, sometimes forming simple or few- to many-branched rhizomes; indumentum usually present and strongly developed on whole plant, usually scabrid to hispid, often densely glandular, sometimes distinct stinging hairs present. Leaves alternate or opposite, basal and/or cauline, exstipulate, lamina linear, narrowly ovate to subcircular, simple to compound, margins entire or variously lobed, sessile to petiolate. Inflorescences terminal or axillary, frondose, bracteose or ebracteose, paraclades monochasial or dichasial, lax or very dense, usually scorpioid and contracted into boragoids, these paraclades present as simple terminal inflorescences or combined into complex thyrsoids, sometimes with extensive accessory paraclades; sometimes inflorescences congested into terminal “heads”, or strongly reduced to axillary or terminal single flowers. Flowers pentamerous, usually hypogynous, bisexual, commonly protandrous; perianth biseriate, sepals united at base or nearly to apex, usually radially symmetrical, sometimes slightly or distinctly unequal with some lobes much larger than others, with or without appendages between the lobes, persistent and usually accrescent in fruit, spreading or closing; corolla sympetalous, mostly campanulate, more rarely rotate or infundibuliform, tube internally often with scales, glands or hair lines near base of each filament; lobes spreading or porrect, rarely reflexed, narrowly triangular to (usually) oblong or subcircular; aestivation usually quincuncial, rarely contorted; stamens epipetalous and antesepalous, inserted at the same or at different heights in corolla tube, anthers included or exserted, free from each other, dorsifixed, dithecous, tetrasporangiate, opening by longitudinal slits; gynoecium 2-carpellate, syncarpous, superior to half-inferior, pubescent, often glandular, usually with basal nectar disk; stylodia 2 or connate into a usually bifid or deeply bifurcate, rarely entire, slender style; stigma punctate or capitate, dry; ovules (1–)4–∞, anatropous, unitegmic, tenuinucellate; placentation parietal or intrusive-parietal. Fruits 1- to many-seeded capsules, 2–4-valved, with loculicidal or loculicidal and septicidal dehiscence, rarely indehiscent. Seeds ovoid, globose or angular, with dark, often reticulate testa, endosperm copious, oily, rarely with elaiosome; embryo small, straight.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Notes
- 1.
Hydrophyllaceae including tribe Nameae (Eriodictyon Benth., Nama, L., Wigandia Kunth) are doubtfully monophyletic. Segregation of tribe Nameae as a separate family could resolve this issue.
Selected Bibliography
Anonymous. 2007. Status of pollinators in North America. National Research Council (U.S.). Committee on the Status of Pollinators in North America. National Academy of Science, Washington DC, 307 pp.
APG III 2009. An update of the Angiosperm Phylogeny Group classification for the orders and families of flowering plants. Bot. J. Linn. Soc. 161: 105–121.
Armstrong, V.A. 1992. Site characteristics and habitat requirements of the endangered clay phacelia (Phacelia argillacea Atwood, Hydrophyllaceae) and aspects of the biology of Phacelia argillacea Atwood (Hydrophyllaceae), an annual. M.S. Thesis, Biology, Brigham Young University, Provo UT.
Atwood, N.D. 1975. A revision of the Phacelia crenulata group (Hydrophyllaceae) for North America. Great Basin Nat. 35: 127–191.
Bacon, J.D. 1974. Chromosome numbers and taxonomic notes on the genus Nama (Hydrophyllaceae). Brittonia 26: 101–105.
Bacon, J.D. 1986. Chemosystematics of the Hydrophyllaceae: flavonoids of three species of Eriodictyon. Biochem. Syst. Ecol. 14: 591–595.
Bacon, J.D., Bragg, L.H., Hannan, G.L. 1986a. Systematics of Nama (Hydrophyllaceae): Comparison of seed morphology of sects. Arachnoidea and Cinerascentia with five species of Eriodictyon and Turricula parryi. Sida 11: 271–281.
Bacon, J.D., Fang, N., Mabry, T.J. 1986b. Systematics of Nama (Hydrophyllaceae): flavonoids and phyletic position of sect. Arachnoidea and sect. Cinerascentia. Plant Syst. Evol. 151: 223–228.
Baskin, J.M., Baskin, C.C. 1973. Delayed germination in seeds of Phacelia dubia var. dubia. Can. J. Bot. 51: 2481–2486.
Baskin, J.M., Baskin, C.C. 1983. Germination ecophysiology of eastern deciduous forest herbs: Hydrophyllum macrophyllum. Am. Midl. Nat. 109: 63–71.
Beckmann, R.L. 1979. Biosystematics of the genus Hydrophyllum L. (Hydrophyllaceae). Am. J. Bot. 66: 1053–1061.
Berg, R.Y. 1985. Gynoecium and development of embryo sac, endosperm, and seed in Pholistoma (Hydrophyllaceae) relative to taxonomy. Am. J. Bot. 72: 1775–1787.
Berg, R.Y. 2009. Embryo sac, endosperm, and seed of Nemophila (Boraginaceae) relative to taxonomy, with a remark on embryogeny in Pholistoma. Am. J. Bot. 96: 565–579.
Berry, C.Z., Dahlen, R.F., Shapiro, S.I. 1962. Dermatitis venenata from Phacelia crenulata. Arch. Dermatol. 85: 737.
Biswell, H.H., Gilman, J.H. 1961. Brush management in relation to fire and other environmental factors on the Tehama deer winter range. Calif. Fish Game 47: 357–389.
Bohm, B.A., Constant, H. 1990. Leaf surface flavonoids of Eriodictyon trichocalyx. Biochem. Syst. Ecol.18: 491–492.
Brand, A. 1913. Hydrophyllaceae. In: Pflanzenreich 59, IV. 251. Leipzig: W. Engelmann. 210 pp.
Carlquist, S. 1992. Wood anatomy of sympetalous dicotyledon families: A summary, with comments on systematic relationships and evolution of the woody habit. Ann. Missouri Bot. Gard.79: 303–332.
Carlquist, S., Eckhart, V.M. 1984. Wood anatomy of Hydrophyllaceae. II. Genera other than Eriodictyon, with comments on parenchyma bands containing vessels with large pits. Aliso 10: 527–546.
Carlquist, S., Eckhart, V.M., Michener, D.C. 1983. Wood anatomy of Hydrophyllaceae. I. Eriodictyon. Aliso 10: 397–412.
Cave, M.S., Constance, L. 1950. Chromosome numbers in the Hydrophyllaceae: IV. Univ. Calif. Publ. Bot. 23: 363–382.
Chuang, T.I., Constance, L. 1992. Seeds and systematics in Hydrophyllaceae: Tribe Hydrophylleae. Am. J. Bot. 79: 257–264.
Constance, L. 1938. The genus Eucrypta Nuttall. Lloydia 1: 143–152.
Constance, L. 1941. The genus Nemophila Nuttall Univ. Calif. Publ. Bot. 19: 341–398.
Constance, L. 1963. Chromosome number and classification in Hydrophyllaceae. Brittonia 15: 273–285.
Constance, L., Chuang, T.I. 1982. SEM survey of pollen morphology and classification in Hydrophyllaceae (waterleaf family). Am. J. Bot. 69: 40–53.
Cruden, R.W. 1972a. Information on chemistry and pollination biology relevant to the systematics of Nemophila menziesii (Hydrophyllaceae). Madroño 21: 505–516.
Cruden, R.W. 1972b. Pollination biology of Nemophila menziesii with comments on the evolution of oligolectic bees. Evolution 26: 373–389.
Davenport, L.J. 1988. A monograph of Hydrolea (Hydrophyllaceae). Rhodora 90: 169–208.
Deginani, N.B. 1982. Revisión de las especies argentinas del género Phacelia (Hydrophyllaceae). Darwiniana 24: 405–496.
del Castillo, R.F. 1993. Consequences of male sterility in Phacelia dubia. Evol. Trend Plants 7: 15–22.
del Castillo, R.F. 1994. Factors influencing the genetic structure of Phacelia dubia, a species with a seed bank and large fluctuations in population size. Heredity 72: 446–458.
del Castillo, R.F. 1998. Fitness consequences of maternal and nonmaternal components of inbreeding in the gynodioecious Phacelia dubia. Evolution 52: 44–60.
del Castillo, R.F., Trujillo, S. 2009. Evidence of restoration cost in the annual gynodioecious Phacelia dubia. Evol. Biol. 22: 306–313.
Des Granges, J. 1979. Organization of a tropical nectar feeding bird guild in a variable tropical environment. Living Bird 17: 199–236.
Di Fulvio, T.E. 1987. La endospermogénesis en Hydrophylleae (Hydrophyllaceae) con relación a la taxonomía. Kurtziana 19: 13–34.
Di Fulvio, T.E. 1989. Embriología de Nama jamaicense (Phacelieae, Hydrophyllaceae). Kurtziana 20: 9–31.
Di Fulvio, T.E. 1993. Embriología de Lemmonia californica (Phacelieae). Kurtziana 22: 19–30.
Di Fulvio, T.E., Dottori, N. 1995. Contribución al conocimiento de tricomas y emergencias en Hydrophyllaceae. Clasificación y consideraciones taxonómicas. Kurtziana 24: 19–24.
Eckhart, V.M. 1991. The effects of floral display on pollinator visitation vary among populations of Phacelia linearis (Hydrophyllaceae). Evol. Ecol. 5: 370–384.
Eckhart, V.M. 1992. The genetics of gender and the effects of gender on floral characters in gynodioecious Phacelia linearis (Hydrophyllaceae). Am. J. Bot. 79: 792–800.
Elam, D.R. 1994. Genetic variation and reproductive output in plant populations: effects of population size and incompatibility (Lilium parryi, Lilium humboldtii, Raphanus sativus, Eriodictyon capitatum). Ph.D. Dissertation, University of California, Riverside CA, 221 pp.
Erbar, C., Porembski, S., Leins, P. 2005. Contributions to the systematic position of Hydrolea (Hydroleaceae) based on floral development. Plant Syst. Evol. 252: 71–83.
Ferguson, D.M. 1998. Phylogenetic analysis and relationships in Hydrophyllaceae based on ndhF sequence data. Syst. Bot. 23: 253–268.
Ganders, F.R. 1978. The genetics and evolution of gynodioecy in Nemophila menziesii (Hydrophyllaceae). Can. J. Bot. 56: 1400–1408.
Gibson, D.N. 1967. Hydrophyllaceae. In: Macbride, J.F. (ed.) Flora of Peru. Publ. Field Mus. Nat. Hist., Bot. Ser. 13, part V–A, no. 2: 101–131.
Gilbert, C., Dempcy, J.M., Ganong, C.K., Patterson, R., Spicer, G.S. 2005. Phylogenetic relationships within Phacelia subgenus Phacelia (Hydrophyllaceae) inferred from nuclear rDNA ITS sequence data. Syst. Bot. 30: 627–634.
Gillett, G.W. 1955. Variation and genetic relationships in the Whitlavia and Gymnobythus phacelias. Univ. Calif. Publ. Bot. 28: 19–78.
Gillett, G.W. 1960. A systematic treatment of the Phacelia franklinii group. Rhodora 62: 205–222.
Gillett, G.W. 1968. Systematic relationships in the Cosmanthus phacelias (Hydrophyllaceae). Brittonia 20: 368–374.
Gray, A. 1875. A conspectus of the North American Hydrophyllaceae. Proc. Am. Acad. Arts Sci. 10: 312–332.
Greene, E.L. 1902. Revision of Romanzoffia. Pittonia 5: 34–42.
Hadley, W.J., Gisvold, O. 1944. A phytochemical study of Eriodictyon angustifolium, Nutt. J. Am. Pharm. Assoc. Sci. Ed. 33: 275–277.
Halse, R.R. 1979. Taxonomy of Phacelia sect. Miltitzia (Hydrophyllaceae). Ph.D. Dissertation, Biology, Oregon State University, Corvallis OR.
Halse, R.R. 1981. Taxonomy of Phacelia sect. Miltitzia (Hydrophyllaceae). Madroño 28: 121–132.
Hansen, D.R., Spicer, G.S., Patterson, R. 2009. Phylogenetic relationships between and within Phacelia sections Whitlavia and Gymnobythus (Boraginaceae). Syst. Bot. 34: 737–746.
Heckard, L.R. 1956. The subspecies of Phacelia nemoralis Greene. Leafl. W. Bot. 8: 29–32.
Heckard, L.R. 1960. Taxonomic studies in the Phacelia magellanica polyploid complex. Univ. Calif. Publ. Bot. 32: 1–126.
Hilger, H.H. 1987. Flower and fruit development in Wigandia caracasana (Hydrophyllaceae). Am. J. Bot. 74: 250–259.
Hitchcock, C.L. 1933a. A taxonomic study of the genus Nama I. Am. J. Bot. 20: 415–430.
Hitchcock, C.L. 1933b. A taxonomic study of the genus Nama II. Am. J. Bot. 20: 518–534.
Hitchcock, C.L. 1939. The perennial Mexican namas. Am. J. Bot. 26: 341–347.
Hofmann, M. 1999. Flower and fruit development in the genus Phacelia (Phacelieae, Hydrophyllaceae): Characters of systematic value. Syst. Geogr. Plants 68: 203–212.
Horner, P.F. 1977. Biosystematics of the Phacelia distans – P. tanacetifolia complex. Ph.D. Dissertation, Botany, University of California Riverside, Riverside, CA.
Horner, P., Scora, R.W. 1983. Leaf hydrocarbons of Phacelia species (Hydrophyllaceae). Phytochemistry 22: 2489–2491.
Horner-Till, S. 1982. Experimental insights on factors effecting the distribution of Phacelia cookei Constance & Heckard, a narrow endemic. M.S. Thesis, Biology, Utah State University.
Johnson, N.D. 1983. Flavonoid aglycones from Eriodictyon californicum resin and their implications for herbivory and UV screening. Biochem. Syst. Ecol. 11: 211–215.
Johnson, N.D., Brain, S.A., Ehrlich, P.R. 1985. The role of leaf resin in the interaction between Eriodictyon californicum (Hydrophyllaceae) and its herbivore, Trirhabda diducta (Chrysomelidae). Oecologia 66: 106–110.
Klocke, J.A., Vanwagenen, B., Balandrin, M.F. 1986. Biologically active constituents of North American plants. 2. The ellagitannin geraniin and its hydrolysis products as insect growth inhibitors from semiarid land plants. Phytochemistry 25: 85–91.
Kruckeberg, A.R. 1956. Notes on the Phacelia magellanica complex in the Pacific Northwest. Madroño 13: 209–221.
Levy, F. 1988. Effects of pollen source and time of pollination on seed production and seed weight in Phacelia dubia and P. maculata (Hydrophyllaceae). Am. Midl. Nat. 119: 193–198.
Ley, J.P., Krammer, G., Reinders, G., Gatfield, I.L., Bertram, H.J. 2005. Evaluation of bitter masking flavanones from Herba Santa (Eriodictyon californicum (H.&A.) Torr., Hydrophyllaceae). J. Agric. Food Chem. 53: 6061–6066.
Mayrose, I., Zhan, S.H., Rothfels, C.J., Magnuson-Ford, K., Barker, M.S., Rieseberg, L.H., Otto, S.P. 2011. Recently formed polyploid plants diversify at lower rates. Science 333(6047): 1257.
McCall, A.C. 2006. Natural and artificial floral damage induces resistance in Nemophila menziesii (Hydrophyllaceae) flowers. Oikos 112: 660–666.
Moldenke, A.R. 1976. California pollination ecology and vegetation types. Phytologia 34: 304–361.
Morgan, M.D. 1971: Life history and energy relationships of Hydrophyllum appendiculatum. Ecol. Monogr. 41: 329–349.
Mori, M., Kondo, T., Toki, K., Yoshida, K. 2006. Structure of anthocyanin from the blue petals of Phacelia campanularia and its blue flower color development. Phytochemistry 67: 622–629.
Munz, P.A. 1932. Dermatitis produced by Phacelia (Hydrophyllaceae). Science 76(1965): 194.
Murphy, D.D. 1982. On the status of Euphydryas editha baroni with a range extension of E. editha luesterae. J. Res. Lepidoptera 21: 194–198.
O’Neill, K.M. 2001. Solitary Wasps: Behaviour and Natural History. Ithaca, London: Comstock Publishing Associates. 406 pp.
Pemberton, R.W., Irving, D.W. 1990. Elaiosomes on weed seeds and the potential for myrmecochory in naturalized plants. Weed Sci. 38: 615–619.
Powell, J.A. 1973. A Systematic Monograph of New World Ethmiid Moths (Lepidoptera: Gelechioidea). Washington DC: Smithsonian Institution Press. 302 pp.
Quick, C.R. 1947. Germination of Phacelia seeds. Madroño 9: 17–20.
Quinn, R.D., Keeley, S.C. 2006. Introduction to California Chaparral. Berkeley, CA: University of California Press, 304 pp.
Reynolds, G., Rodriguez, E. 1979. Geranylhydroquinone: A contact allergen from trichomes of Phacelia crenulata. Phytochemistry 18: 1567–1568.
Reynolds, G., Rodriguez, E. 1981a. Prenylated hydroquinones: contact allergens from trichomes of Phacelia minor and P. parryi. Phytochemistry 20: 1365–1366.
Reynolds, G., Rodriguez, E. 1981b. Prenylated phenols that cause contact dermatitis from trichomes of Phacelia ixodes. Planta Med. 43: 187–193.
Reynolds, G., Rodriguez, E. 1986. Dermatotoxic phenolics from glandular trichomes of Phacelia campanularia and P. pedicellata. Phytochemistry 25: 1617–1619.
Reynolds, G., Epstein, W., Terry, D., Rodriguez, E. 1980. A potent contact allergen of Phacelia (Hydrophyllaceae). Contact Dermatitis 6: 272–274.
Reynolds, G.W., Proksch, P., Rodriguez, E. 1985. Prenylated phenolics that cause contact dermatitis from glandular trichomes of Turricula parryi. Planta Med. 51: 494–498.
Reynolds, G.W., Epstein, W., Rodriguez, E. 1986. Unusual contact allergens from plants in the family Hydrophyllaceae. Contact Dermatitis 14: 39–44.
Reynolds, G.W., Gafner, F., Rodriguez, E. 1989. Contact allergens of an urban shrub Wigandia caracasana. Contact Dermatitis 21: 65–68.
Rittenhouse, B. 1993. Observation on the pollination of silvery phacelia. Bull. Native Plant Soc. Oregon 26: 10.
Rodriguez, E. 1983. Cytotoxic and insecticidal chemicals of desert plants. ACS Symp. Ser. 208: 291–302.
Rodriguez, E. 1985. Insect feeding deterrents from semiarid and arid land plants. ACS Symp. Ser. 276: 447–453.
Safford, H.D, Viers, J.H., Harrison, S.P. 2005. Serpentine endemism in the California flora: a database of serpentine affinity. Madroño 52: 222–257.
Sampson, A.W. Jespersen, B.S. 1963. California range brushlands and browse plants. Berkeley, CA: University of California, Division of Agricultural Sciences, California Agricultural Experiment Station, Extension Service, 162 pp.
Schultz, A.M., Biswell, H.H. 1952. Competition between grasses reseeded on burned bushlands in California. J. Range Manage. 5: 338–345.
Schwarzer, C. 2007. Systematische Untersuchungen an den peruanischen Vertretern der Gattungen Pectocarya DC. ex Meisn., Amsinckia Lehm., Plagiobothrys Fisch. & C.A. Mey. und Cryptantha Lehm. ex G. Don (Boraginaceae). Diploma Thesis, Systematic Botany, FU Berlin.
Serrato-Valenti, G., Cornara, L., Modenesi, P., Piana, M., Mariotti, M.G. 2000. Structure and histochemistry of embryo envelope tissues in the mature dry seed and early germination of Phacelia tanacetifolia. Ann. Bot. 85: 625–634.
Sewell, M., Vincent, M.A. 2009. Biosystematics of the Phacelia ranunculacea complex (Hydrophyllaceae). Castanea 71: 192–209.
Shelly, J.S. 1989. Biosystematic studies of Phacelia capitata (Hydrophyllaceae), a species endemic to serpentine soils in southwestern Oregon. Madroño 36: 232–247.
Svensson, H.G. 1925. Zur Embryologie der Hydrophyllaceen, Borraginaceen und Heliotropiaceen mit besonderer Rücksicht auf die Endospermbildung. Uppsala Univ. Årsskr. 2: 1–176.
Taylor, S.I., Levy, F. 2002. Responses to soils and a test for preadaptation to serpentine in Phacelia dubia (Hydrophyllaceae). New Phytol. 155: 437–447.
Thorp, R.W., Horning, D.S., Dunning, L.L. 1983. Bumble bees and cuckoo bumble bees of California (Hymenoptera, Apidae). Berkeley, CA: University of California Press, 79 pp.
Walden, G.K. 2010. Phylogeny of infrageneric relationships within Phacelia (Boraginaceae) inferred from chloroplast sequence data. M.S. Thesis, Biology, San Francisco State University, San Francisco.
Walden, G.K., Patterson, R. 2010. Howellanthus dalesianus, recognition of a new genus and species in tribe Phacelieae (Boraginaceae). Madroño 57: 268–273.
Weigend, M., Hilger, H.H. 2010. Codonaceae – a newly required family name in Boraginales. Phytotaxa 10: 26–30.
Weigend, M., Luebert, F., Gottschling, M., Couvreur, T.L.P., Hilger, H.H., Miller, J. 2014. From capsules to nutlets—phylogenetic relationships in the Boraginales. Cladistics 30: 508–518.
Wicklow, D.T. 1977. Germination response in Emmenanthe penduliflora (Hydrophyllaceae). Ecology 58: 201–205.
Wolfe, L.M., Shore, J.S. 1992. The mating system of Hydrophyllum appendiculatum, a protandrous species. Sex. Plant Reprod. 5: 239–245.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2016 Springer International Publishing Switzerland
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Hofmann, M., Walden, G.K., Hilger, H.H., Weigend, M. (2016). Hydrophyllaceae. In: Kadereit, J., Bittrich, V. (eds) Flowering Plants. Eudicots. The Families and Genera of Vascular Plants, vol 14. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-28534-4_20
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-28534-4_20
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Cham
Print ISBN: 978-3-319-28532-0
Online ISBN: 978-3-319-28534-4
eBook Packages: Biomedical and Life SciencesBiomedical and Life Sciences (R0)