Skip to main content

Improved Ultrasound Based Computer Aided Diagnosis System for Breast Cancer Incorporating a New Feature of Mass Central Regularity Degree (CRD)

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Artificial Neural Network Modelling

Part of the book series: Studies in Computational Intelligence ((SCI,volume 628))

Abstract

Ultrasound is one of the most frequently used methods for early detection of breast cancer. Currently, the accuracy of Computer Aided Diagnosis (CAD) systems based on ultrasound images is about 90 % and needs further enhancement in order to save lives of the undetected. A meaningful approach to do this is to explore new and meaningful features with effective discriminating ability and incorporate them into CAD systems. Some of the most powerful features used in cancer detection are based on the gross features of mass (e.g., shape and margin) that are subjectively evaluated. Recently, from an extensive investigation of ultrasound images, we extracted an easily quantifiable and easily measurable new geometric feature related to the mass shape in ultrasound images and called it Central Regularity Degree (CRD) as an effective discriminator of breast cancer. This feature takes into account a consistent pattern of regularity of the central region of the malignant mass. To demonstrate the effect of CRD on differentiating malignant from benign masses and the potential improvement to the diagnostic accuracy of breast cancer using ultrasound, this chapter evaluates the diagnostic accuracy of different classifiers when the CRD was added to five powerful mass features obtained from previous studies including one geometric feature: Depth-Width ratio (DW); two morphological features: shape and margin; blood flow and age. Feed forward Artificial Neural Networks (ANN) with structure optimized by SOM/Ward clustering of correlated weighted hidden neuron activation, K-Nearest Neighbour (KNN), Nearest Centroid and Linear Discriminant Analysis (LDA) were employed for classification and evaluation. Ninety nine breast sonograms—46 malignant and 53 benign- were evaluated. The results reveal that CRD is an effective feature discriminating between malignant and benign cases leading to improved accuracy of diagnosis of breast cancer. The best results were obtained by ANN where accuracy for training and testing using all features except CRD was 100 and 81.8 %, respectively, and 100 and 95.45 % using all features. Therefore, the overall improvement by adding CRD was about 14 %, a significant improvement.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 129.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 169.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 169.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  1. R.J. Mason, C.V. Broaddus, T. Martin, T. King, D. Schraufnagel, J.F. Murray, J.A. Nadel, Benign tumors, in Murray & Nadel’s Textbook of Respiratory Medicine (Saunders Elsevier, Philadelphia, 2005)

    Google Scholar 

  2. R.N. Panda, D.B.K. Panigrahi, D.M.R. Patro, Feature extraction for classification of microcalcifications and mass lesions in mammograms. Int. J. Comput. Sci. Netw. Secur. 9, 255–265 (2009)

    Google Scholar 

  3. M.B. Popli, Pictorial essay: sonographic differentiation of solid breast lesions, Indian J. Radiol. Imaging 12, 275–279 (2002)

    Google Scholar 

  4. G. Rahbar, A.C. Sie, G.C. Hansen, J.S. Prince, M.L. Melany, H.E. Reynolds, V.P. Jackson, J.W. Sayre, L.W. Bassett, Benign versus malignant solid breast masses: US differentiation 1. Radiology 213, 889–894 (1999)

    Google Scholar 

  5. H. Madjar, E.B. Mendelson, The Practice of Breast Ultrasound Technigues: Findings.differential Diagnosis, 2 edn. (Thieme Verlag, New York, 2008)

    Google Scholar 

  6. Y.L. Huang, D.R. Chen, Y.R. Jiang, S.J. Kuo, H.K. Wu, W.K. Moon, Computer-aided diagnosis using morphological features for classifying breast lesions on ultrasound. Ultrasound Obstet. Gynecol. 32, 565–572 (2008)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. R. Sivaramakrishna, K.A. Powell, M.L. Lieber, W.A. Chilcote, R. Shekhar, Texture analysis of lesions in breast ultrasound images. Comput. Med. Imaging Graph.: Off. J. Comput. Med. Imaging Soc. 26, 303–307 (2002)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. W.J. Kuo, R.F. Chang, D.R. Chen, C.C. Lee, Data mining with decision trees for diagnosis of breast tumor in medical ultrasonic images. Breast Cancer Res. Treat. 66, 51–57 (2001).

    Google Scholar 

  9. F. Zakeri, H. Behnam, N. Ahmadinejad, Classification of benign and malignant breast masses based on shape and texture features in sonography images. J. Med. Syst. 36, 1621–1627 (2012). 2012/06/01

    Google Scholar 

  10. X. Shi, H.D. Cheng, L. Hu, Mass detection and classification in breast ultrasound images using fuzzy SVM. Proceedings of the Joint Conf. on Information Sciences, Taiwan (2006)

    Google Scholar 

  11. W.C. Shen, R.F. Chang, W.K. Moon, Y.H. Chou, C.S. Huang, Breast ultrasound computer-aided diagnosis using BI-RADS features. Acad. Radiol 14(8), 928–939 (2007)

    Google Scholar 

  12. R.F. Chang, W.J. Wu, W.K. Moon, D.R. Chen, Automatic ultrasound segmentation and morphology based diagnosis of solid breast tumors. Breast Cancer Res. Treat. 89, 179–185 (2005). 2005/01/01

    Google Scholar 

  13. C.M. Chen, Y.H. Chou, K.C. Han, G.S. Hung, C.M. Tiu, H.J. Chiou, S.Y. Chiou, Breast lesions on sonograms: computer-aided diagnosis with nearly setting-independent features and artificial neural networks 1. Radiology 226, 504–514 (2003). February 1

    Google Scholar 

  14. J. Heinig, R. Witteler, R. Schmitz, L. Kiesel, J. Steinhard, Accuracy of classification of breast ultrasound findings based on criteria used for BI-RADS. Ultrasound Obstet. Gynecol. 32, 573–578 (2008)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. A.S. Hong, E.L. Rosen, M.S. Soo, J.A. Baker, BI-RADS for sonography: positive and negative predictive values of sonographic features. Am. J. Roentgenol. 184, 1260–1265 (2005). April 1

    Google Scholar 

  16. G.N. Lee, D. Fukuoka, Y. Ikedo, T. Hara, H. Fujita, E. Takada, T. Endo, T. Morita, Classification of benign and malignant masses in ultrasound breast image based on geometric and echo features, in Digital Mammography, Proceedings, vol. 5116, ed. by E.A. Krupinski (Springer, Berlin, 2008), pp. 433–439

    Google Scholar 

  17. J.W. Tian, Y. Wang, J.H. Huang, C.P. Ning, H.M. Wang, Y. Liu, X.L. Tang, The digital database for breast ultrasound image. Presented at the proceedings of the 11th joint conference on information sciences, Paris (2008)

    Google Scholar 

  18. S. Johnson, Hierarchical clustering schemes. Psychometrika 32, 241–254 (1967)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. A. Al-yousef and S. Samarasinghe, Ultrasound based computer aided diagnosis of breast cancer: evaluation of a new feature of mass central regularity degree, in Proceedings of the 19th International Congress on Modelling and Simulation (MODSIM’11). Perth, Australia, 12–16 December 2011 (2011), pp. 1063–1069

    Google Scholar 

  20. S. Samarasinghe, Neural networks for water system analysis: from fundamentals to complex pattern recognition. Presented at the hydrocomplexity: new tools for solving wicked water problems, Paris (2010)

    Google Scholar 

  21. X. Wu, V. Kumar, J.R. Quinlan, J. Ghosh, Q. Yang, H. Motoda, G.J. McLachlan, A. Ng, B. Liu, P.S. Yu, Z.-H. Zhou, M. Steinbach, D.J. Hand, D. Steinberg, Top 10 algorithms in data mining. Knowl. Inf. Syst. 14, 1–37 (2007)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  22. G.A. Marcoulides, The elements of statistical learning: data mining, inference and prediction. Struct. Equ. Model. Multi. J. 11, 150–151 (2004)

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  23. S. Balakrishnama, A. Ganapathiraju, Linear Discriminant Analysis—A brief Tutorial. Institute for Signal and information processing (1998). http://www.music.mcgill.ca/~ich/classes/mumt611/classifiers/lda_theory.pdf

  24. D.G. Altman, J.M. Bland, Statistics notes: diagnostic tests 1: sensitivity and specificity. BMJ 308, 1552 (1994). 1994-06-11 00:00:00

    Google Scholar 

  25. D.G. Altman, J.M. Bland, Statistics notes: diagnostic tests 1: sensitivity and specificity. BMJ 308(6943), 1552 (1994)

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Sandhya Samarasinghe .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2016 Springer International Publishing Switzerland

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Al-Yousef, A., Samarasinghe, S. (2016). Improved Ultrasound Based Computer Aided Diagnosis System for Breast Cancer Incorporating a New Feature of Mass Central Regularity Degree (CRD). In: Shanmuganathan, S., Samarasinghe, S. (eds) Artificial Neural Network Modelling. Studies in Computational Intelligence, vol 628. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-28495-8_10

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-28495-8_10

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Cham

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-319-28493-4

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-319-28495-8

  • eBook Packages: EngineeringEngineering (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics