Abstract
Ultrasound is one of the most frequently used methods for early detection of breast cancer. Currently, the accuracy of Computer Aided Diagnosis (CAD) systems based on ultrasound images is about 90 % and needs further enhancement in order to save lives of the undetected. A meaningful approach to do this is to explore new and meaningful features with effective discriminating ability and incorporate them into CAD systems. Some of the most powerful features used in cancer detection are based on the gross features of mass (e.g., shape and margin) that are subjectively evaluated. Recently, from an extensive investigation of ultrasound images, we extracted an easily quantifiable and easily measurable new geometric feature related to the mass shape in ultrasound images and called it Central Regularity Degree (CRD) as an effective discriminator of breast cancer. This feature takes into account a consistent pattern of regularity of the central region of the malignant mass. To demonstrate the effect of CRD on differentiating malignant from benign masses and the potential improvement to the diagnostic accuracy of breast cancer using ultrasound, this chapter evaluates the diagnostic accuracy of different classifiers when the CRD was added to five powerful mass features obtained from previous studies including one geometric feature: Depth-Width ratio (DW); two morphological features: shape and margin; blood flow and age. Feed forward Artificial Neural Networks (ANN) with structure optimized by SOM/Ward clustering of correlated weighted hidden neuron activation, K-Nearest Neighbour (KNN), Nearest Centroid and Linear Discriminant Analysis (LDA) were employed for classification and evaluation. Ninety nine breast sonograms—46 malignant and 53 benign- were evaluated. The results reveal that CRD is an effective feature discriminating between malignant and benign cases leading to improved accuracy of diagnosis of breast cancer. The best results were obtained by ANN where accuracy for training and testing using all features except CRD was 100 and 81.8 %, respectively, and 100 and 95.45 % using all features. Therefore, the overall improvement by adding CRD was about 14 %, a significant improvement.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
References
R.J. Mason, C.V. Broaddus, T. Martin, T. King, D. Schraufnagel, J.F. Murray, J.A. Nadel, Benign tumors, in Murray & Nadel’s Textbook of Respiratory Medicine (Saunders Elsevier, Philadelphia, 2005)
R.N. Panda, D.B.K. Panigrahi, D.M.R. Patro, Feature extraction for classification of microcalcifications and mass lesions in mammograms. Int. J. Comput. Sci. Netw. Secur. 9, 255–265 (2009)
M.B. Popli, Pictorial essay: sonographic differentiation of solid breast lesions, Indian J. Radiol. Imaging 12, 275–279 (2002)
G. Rahbar, A.C. Sie, G.C. Hansen, J.S. Prince, M.L. Melany, H.E. Reynolds, V.P. Jackson, J.W. Sayre, L.W. Bassett, Benign versus malignant solid breast masses: US differentiation 1. Radiology 213, 889–894 (1999)
H. Madjar, E.B. Mendelson, The Practice of Breast Ultrasound Technigues: Findings.differential Diagnosis, 2 edn. (Thieme Verlag, New York, 2008)
Y.L. Huang, D.R. Chen, Y.R. Jiang, S.J. Kuo, H.K. Wu, W.K. Moon, Computer-aided diagnosis using morphological features for classifying breast lesions on ultrasound. Ultrasound Obstet. Gynecol. 32, 565–572 (2008)
R. Sivaramakrishna, K.A. Powell, M.L. Lieber, W.A. Chilcote, R. Shekhar, Texture analysis of lesions in breast ultrasound images. Comput. Med. Imaging Graph.: Off. J. Comput. Med. Imaging Soc. 26, 303–307 (2002)
W.J. Kuo, R.F. Chang, D.R. Chen, C.C. Lee, Data mining with decision trees for diagnosis of breast tumor in medical ultrasonic images. Breast Cancer Res. Treat. 66, 51–57 (2001).
F. Zakeri, H. Behnam, N. Ahmadinejad, Classification of benign and malignant breast masses based on shape and texture features in sonography images. J. Med. Syst. 36, 1621–1627 (2012). 2012/06/01
X. Shi, H.D. Cheng, L. Hu, Mass detection and classification in breast ultrasound images using fuzzy SVM. Proceedings of the Joint Conf. on Information Sciences, Taiwan (2006)
W.C. Shen, R.F. Chang, W.K. Moon, Y.H. Chou, C.S. Huang, Breast ultrasound computer-aided diagnosis using BI-RADS features. Acad. Radiol 14(8), 928–939 (2007)
R.F. Chang, W.J. Wu, W.K. Moon, D.R. Chen, Automatic ultrasound segmentation and morphology based diagnosis of solid breast tumors. Breast Cancer Res. Treat. 89, 179–185 (2005). 2005/01/01
C.M. Chen, Y.H. Chou, K.C. Han, G.S. Hung, C.M. Tiu, H.J. Chiou, S.Y. Chiou, Breast lesions on sonograms: computer-aided diagnosis with nearly setting-independent features and artificial neural networks 1. Radiology 226, 504–514 (2003). February 1
J. Heinig, R. Witteler, R. Schmitz, L. Kiesel, J. Steinhard, Accuracy of classification of breast ultrasound findings based on criteria used for BI-RADS. Ultrasound Obstet. Gynecol. 32, 573–578 (2008)
A.S. Hong, E.L. Rosen, M.S. Soo, J.A. Baker, BI-RADS for sonography: positive and negative predictive values of sonographic features. Am. J. Roentgenol. 184, 1260–1265 (2005). April 1
G.N. Lee, D. Fukuoka, Y. Ikedo, T. Hara, H. Fujita, E. Takada, T. Endo, T. Morita, Classification of benign and malignant masses in ultrasound breast image based on geometric and echo features, in Digital Mammography, Proceedings, vol. 5116, ed. by E.A. Krupinski (Springer, Berlin, 2008), pp. 433–439
J.W. Tian, Y. Wang, J.H. Huang, C.P. Ning, H.M. Wang, Y. Liu, X.L. Tang, The digital database for breast ultrasound image. Presented at the proceedings of the 11th joint conference on information sciences, Paris (2008)
S. Johnson, Hierarchical clustering schemes. Psychometrika 32, 241–254 (1967)
A. Al-yousef and S. Samarasinghe, Ultrasound based computer aided diagnosis of breast cancer: evaluation of a new feature of mass central regularity degree, in Proceedings of the 19th International Congress on Modelling and Simulation (MODSIM’11). Perth, Australia, 12–16 December 2011 (2011), pp. 1063–1069
S. Samarasinghe, Neural networks for water system analysis: from fundamentals to complex pattern recognition. Presented at the hydrocomplexity: new tools for solving wicked water problems, Paris (2010)
X. Wu, V. Kumar, J.R. Quinlan, J. Ghosh, Q. Yang, H. Motoda, G.J. McLachlan, A. Ng, B. Liu, P.S. Yu, Z.-H. Zhou, M. Steinbach, D.J. Hand, D. Steinberg, Top 10 algorithms in data mining. Knowl. Inf. Syst. 14, 1–37 (2007)
G.A. Marcoulides, The elements of statistical learning: data mining, inference and prediction. Struct. Equ. Model. Multi. J. 11, 150–151 (2004)
S. Balakrishnama, A. Ganapathiraju, Linear Discriminant Analysis—A brief Tutorial. Institute for Signal and information processing (1998). http://www.music.mcgill.ca/~ich/classes/mumt611/classifiers/lda_theory.pdf
D.G. Altman, J.M. Bland, Statistics notes: diagnostic tests 1: sensitivity and specificity. BMJ 308, 1552 (1994). 1994-06-11 00:00:00
D.G. Altman, J.M. Bland, Statistics notes: diagnostic tests 1: sensitivity and specificity. BMJ 308(6943), 1552 (1994)
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2016 Springer International Publishing Switzerland
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Al-Yousef, A., Samarasinghe, S. (2016). Improved Ultrasound Based Computer Aided Diagnosis System for Breast Cancer Incorporating a New Feature of Mass Central Regularity Degree (CRD). In: Shanmuganathan, S., Samarasinghe, S. (eds) Artificial Neural Network Modelling. Studies in Computational Intelligence, vol 628. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-28495-8_10
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-28495-8_10
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Cham
Print ISBN: 978-3-319-28493-4
Online ISBN: 978-3-319-28495-8
eBook Packages: EngineeringEngineering (R0)