Abstract
We consider an online throughput maximization problem in sensor nodes that can harvest energy. The sensor nodes generate and forward packets, which cost energy; they can also harvest energy from the environment, but the amount of energy that can be harvested is not known in advance. We give a number of algorithms and lower bounds for the case of a single node. We consider both the general case and some types of ‘non-idling’ adversaries where we can get better bounds. We also consider the case of networks with multiple nodes and demonstrate that some very simple scenarios already admit no competitive algorithms.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Notes
- 1.
In [12] it was stated that the greedy algorithm is 2-competitive against non-idling adversaries, apparently as a corollary from [7] which is about UJS. However our problem is not a special case of UJS, even for strongly non-idling adversaries. We give a separate 2-competitive proof, both because of this and because of the difference in the (strongly) non-idling definitions.
References
Borodin, A., El-Yaniv, R.: Online Computation and Competitive Analysis. Cambridge University Press, New York (1998)
Chin, F.Y.L., Chrobak, M., Fung, S.P.Y., Jawor, W., Sgall, J., Tichý, T.: Online competitive algorithms for maximizing weighted throughput of unit jobs. J. Discrete Algorithms 4(2), 255–276 (2006)
Chin, F.Y.L., Fung, S.P.Y.: Online scheduling with partial job values: does timesharing or randomization help? Algorithmica 37(3), 149–164 (2003)
Englert, M., Westermann, M.: Considering suppressed packets improves buffer management in quality of service switches. SIAM J. Comput. 41(5), 1166–1192 (2012)
Goldwasser, M.H.: A survey of buffer management policies for packet switches. SIGACT News 45(1), 100–128 (2010)
Hajek, B.: On the competitiveness of online scheduling of unit-length packets with hard deadlines in slotted time. In: Proceedings of 35th Annual Conference on Information Sciences and Systems, pp. 434–438 (2001)
Kesselman, A., Lotker, Z., Mansour, Y., Patt-Shamir, B., Schieber, B., Sviridenko, M.: Buffer overflow management in QoS switches. SIAM J. Comput. 33(3), 563–583 (2004)
Lei, J., Yates, R., Greenstein, L.: A generic model for optimizing single-hop transmission policy of replenishable sensors. IEEE Trans. Wirel. Commun. 8(2), 547–551 (2009)
Li, F.: Personal communication (2014)
Mao, Z., Koksal, C.E., Shroff, N.S.: Optimal online scheduling with arbitrary hard deadlines in multihop communication networks. In: Proceedings of IEEE INFOCOM, pp. 2463–2471 (2013)
Moser, C., Brunelli, D., Thiele, L., Benini, L.: Real-time scheduling for energy harvesting sensor nodes. Real-Time Syst. 37, 233–260 (2007)
Wang, H., Zhang, J.X., Li, F.: Worst-case performance guarantees of scheduling algorithms maximizing weighted throughput in energy-harvesting networks. Sustainable Comput.: Inform. Syst. 4, 172–182 (2014)
Wang, H., Zhang, J.X., Li, F.: Corrigendum to worst-case performance guarantees of scheduling algorithms maximizing weighted throughput in energy-harvesting networks. Sustain. Comput.: Inf. Syst. 5, 64 (2015)
Zhu, A.: Analysis of queueing policies in QoS switches. J. Algorithms 53, 137–168 (2004)
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2015 Springer International Publishing Switzerland
About this paper
Cite this paper
Fung, S.P.Y. (2015). Maximizing Throughput in Energy-Harvesting Sensor Nodes. In: Bose, P., Gąsieniec, L., Römer, K., Wattenhofer, R. (eds) Algorithms for Sensor Systems. ALGOSENSORS 2015. Lecture Notes in Computer Science(), vol 9536. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-28472-9_10
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-28472-9_10
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Cham
Print ISBN: 978-3-319-28471-2
Online ISBN: 978-3-319-28472-9
eBook Packages: Computer ScienceComputer Science (R0)