Skip to main content

Part of the book series: Ius Comparatum - Global Studies in Comparative Law ((GSCL,volume 18))

Abstract

This article discusses the relationship between religious rules and State law in the Portuguese legal system. Sociological data concerning religious diversity and a brief description of the Portuguese constitutional and legal system of State/Religion relations (which can be labeled as a model of non-identification with cooperation), are provided in the Introduction, where the authors also discuss the meaning to be given to “religious rules”. In a second moment, different fields of intersection between religious rules or religiously enacted rules and State law, namely in the domain of family law, are identified. A special focus is given to the relevance of Canon law, due to a tradition of cooperation between the Portuguese state and the Catholic Church through Concordats. Finally, adjudication issues, concerning the relation between civil and religious jurisdictions, are discussed. The authors conclude that the Portuguese legal system is religion-friendly and reveals openness to religious pluralism.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 89.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 119.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 169.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Notes

  1. 1.

    According to data available at the website of the National Institute of Statistics, the Portuguese resident population in 2013 amounted to 10 427 301. http://www.ine.pt/. Accessed 31/03/2015.

  2. 2.

    Available at http://censos.ine.pt. Accessed 31/03/2015.

  3. 3.

    See data for 2012 available at the website of Pew Research Center’s Forum on Religion and Public Life, placing Portugal amongst the countries with a low level both of social hostility concerning religion and of government religion-based restriction. http://www.pewforum.org/2014/01/14/religious-hostilities-reach-six-year-high/. Accessed 10/02/2014.

  4. 4.

    The Constitution of the Portuguese Republic (hereinafter CPR) bears the date of its passage by the Constituent Assembly – April 2nd 1976 – and entered into force on April 25th 1976 (Article 296). The English translation available for consultation at the website of the Portuguese parliament [www.parlamento.pt] has been generally followed in this paper.

  5. 5.

    For an historical perspective about the relations between State and religions, see Adragão 2002.

  6. 6.

    Replacing the existing Law on Religious Freedom of 1971 and Concordat of 1940.

  7. 7.

    On this, see the contribution of Silvio Ferrari in this book.

  8. 8.

    Whether or not meeting the characteristics to be considered as “confessional laws”, “private orders” or “primary legal orders” (see Gonzalez del Valle 2005, 86–88; Raimundo 2012, 248), a question which falls outside the scope of this report.

  9. 9.

    In Case 423/87, the Constitutional Court sustained that all religions should be treated equally according to CPR, equality of treatment allowing for differentiated treatment of religions according their social representativeness but not for discrimination or privilege (on this, Miranda et al. 2007; Brito 1999; Adragão and Gonçalves 2006, 179 ff).

  10. 10.

    Agreement between the Imamat Ismaili (the institution representing Shia Imami Ismaili Muslims, according to article 2) and Portugal, signed in Lisbon on May 8th 2010 and approved by Resolution of the Assembly of the Republic 109/2010, hereinafter APII.

  11. 11.

    Decree Law 47344/66, November 25th, with subsequent amendments.

  12. 12.

    Therefore, susceptible to judicial review of constitutionality by the Constitutional Court under the terms established by Articles 277 ff CPR (on this, Adragão 2007, 184 ff).

  13. 13.

    The juridical nature of these agreements, as well as several aspects of their legal regime, are debated, see inter alia Canas 2007, 327 ff and Raimundo 2012, 351 ff. Diversity of legal instruments does not seem to amount to discrimination, rather mirroring the diverse legal nature of the religious denominations (Adragão 2007, 184; Medeiros 2012, 645 ff; Miranda and Marques 2010, 918 ff.).

  14. 14.

    Decree Law 48/95, March 15, with further ammendments.

  15. 15.

    More accurately, Coelho and Oliveira (2008, 186 ff) prefer to call it a system of optional civil marriage to Catholics and members of other religious communities settled in the country and a system of compulsory civil marriage to members of churches or religious communities not having the status of settled in the country, for the law gives no relevance to the religious ceremony eventually performed by these latter.

  16. 16.

    Divorce is not admitted by Canon Law; the application of civil divorce to canonical marriages was introduced in 1975, by the State, through an Additional Agreement that changed the Concordat of 1940.

  17. 17.

    Namely, decree Law 411/98, 30th December, with subsequent amendments.

  18. 18.

    See Article 11/2, Decree Law 411/98.

  19. 19.

    E.g. labor rules protecting working conditions (Canotilho and Machado 2013, 292 ff; Raimundo 2012, 248).

  20. 20.

    EU Directive 2000/78/EC on equal treatment in access to employment or occupation and membership of certain organizations allows for the existence of so-called “occupational requirements” in Article 4. The Labor Code (Law 7/2009, 12th February, with subsequent amendments, hereinafter LC) partially incorporates the regulation of this article in article 25/4 (on the issue, see Brito 2012, 279.

  21. 21.

    See also Decree-Law 70/2013 and Decree-Law 329/98, November 2nd.

  22. 22.

    Both parents have the right to educate their children in accordance with their own convictions on religious matters, “with respect for the moral and physical integrity of the children and without prejudice to their health”, until minors reach the age of 16 (Articles 11 LRF and 1886 CC).

  23. 23.

    Law 174/99, September 21st, abolished compulsory military service in peacetime, thus reducing the practical importance of this form of conscientious objection.

  24. 24.

    Law 12/2007, 17th April, article 6.

  25. 25.

    Law 32/2006, 26th July, article 11.

  26. 26.

    Law 25/2012, 16th July, article 9.

  27. 27.

    According to Article 14 of the Law 59/2008, September 11th

  28. 28.

    Discussing the constitutionality of this requirement, Adragão 2002, 522 ff.

  29. 29.

    Inter alia, Decision 545/2014 of the Constitutional Court and Neto 2009.

  30. 30.

    Article 11 of Decree-Law 252/09 and aAticle 12 of Decree-Law 253/2009.

  31. 31.

    Article 18 Concordat, Article 13 LRF, Decree-Law 253/2009 and Decree-Law 252/2009.

  32. 32.

    See Case 268/04 of the Constitutional Court, annotated by Adragão 2004, and, more recently, the judgment of the Court of Appeal of Coimbra on May 7th 2011 critically reviewed by Adragão (2012a).

  33. 33.

    The English translation used in the text follows the one available at http://www.concordatwatch.eu/showtopic.php?org_id=1361&kb_header_id=4131

  34. 34.

    On this issue, identifying strategies and tools, see Silvio Ferrari’s contribution on this book.

References

  • Adragão, Pulido. 2002. A liberdade religiosa e o Estado. Coimbra: Almedina.

    Google Scholar 

  • Adragão, Pulido. 2004. Ordem jurídica Portuguesa e Ordem Jurídica Canónica – Um tema invulgar na Jurisprudência Constitucional. Jurisprudência Constitucional 4: 30–39.

    Google Scholar 

  • Adragão, Paulo. 2007. Concordata. In Dicionário Jurídico da Administração Pública, 168–191. Coimbra: Coimbra Editora.

    Google Scholar 

  • Adragão, Paulo. 2010. A Lei da liberdade religiosa portuguesa: Um diagnóstico, 8 anos depois. In Constitución, leyes de libertad religiosa, acuerdos, derecho común, 29–45. León: Universidad de León.

    Google Scholar 

  • Adragão, Paulo. 2012a. A quem pertence a jurisdição nas questões relativas à vida interna das misericórdias? In Anuário Português de Direito Internacional 2011, 101–105. Lisboa: Instituto Diplomático – Ministério dos Negócios Estrangeiros.

    Google Scholar 

  • Adragão, Paulo. 2012b. Disciplina jurídica acerca da exposição (presença) de símbolos religiosos nas salas de aula das escolas públicas: breve parecer sobre Portugal. In Estudos em homenagem ao Prof. Doutor José Joaquim Gomes Canotilho, vol. 3, 9–14. Coimbra: Coimbra Editora.

    Google Scholar 

  • Adragão, Paulo. 2012c. Levar a sério a liberdade religiosa. Coimbra: Almedina.

    Google Scholar 

  • Adragão, Paulo. 2012d. A Lei da Liberdade religiosa: novo diagnóstico, onze anos depois. Forum Canonicum VII(2): 41–59.

    Google Scholar 

  • Adragão, Paulo, and Diogo Gonçalves. 2006. Educação religiosa católica nas escolas estatais, em Portugal: o estado da questão em 2006. In Estudos sobre a Nova Concordata, 175–191. Lisboa: Universidade Católica Portuguesa.

    Google Scholar 

  • Adragão, Paulo, and Anabela Leão. 2012. O direito à objecção de consciência por parte do Chefe de Estado, em questão. In Estudos em Homenagem ao Prof. Doutor Jorge Miranda, vol. 3, 133–170. Coimbra: Coimbra Editora.

    Google Scholar 

  • Amaral, Diogo Freitas. 2004. Manual de Introdução ao Direito, vol. I. Coimbra: Almedina.

    Google Scholar 

  • Brito, José de Sousa. 1999. A Jurisprudência constitucional em matéria de liberdade religiosa em Portugal. Report presented at XI Conference of Constitutional Courts of Europe, Poland. http://www.tribunalconstitucional.pt. Accessed 15 Feb 2014.

  • Brito, José de Sousa. 2012. Portugal. In Religion and discrimination law in the European union, ed. Mark Hill QC, 271 ss. Trier: European Consortium for State and Church Research. http://ubt.opus.hbz-nrw.de/volltexte/2012/742/. Accessed 15 Feb 2014.

  • Canas, Vitalino. 2007. Os acordos religiosos ou a generalização da fórmula concordatária. In Estudos em Memoria ao Conselheiro Luís Nunes de Almeida, 281–334. Coimbra: Coimbra Editora.

    Google Scholar 

  • Canotilho, J.J. Gomes, and Jónatas Machado. 2010. Metódica Multinível: Acordos Internacionais do Estado Português com Comunidades Religiosas. Revista de Legislação e Jurisprudência 139(3962): 254–269.

    Google Scholar 

  • Canotilho, J.J. Gomes, and Jónatas Machado. 2013. Igrejas e Sindicatos e o Dia do Senhor. In Estudos em Homenagem a António Barbosa de Melo, 285–319. Coimbra: Almedina.

    Google Scholar 

  • Canotilho, J.J. Gomes, and Vital Moreira. 2007. Constituição da República Portuguesa Anotada, vol. I. Coimbra: Coimbra Editora.

    Google Scholar 

  • Coelho, Francisco Pereira, and Guilherme de Oliveira. 2008. Curso de Direito da Família. Coimbra: Coimbra Editora.

    Google Scholar 

  • Costa, Elsa Maria Santos. 2006. Estatuto e reconhecimento das pessoas jurídicas canónicas. In Estudos sobre a Nova Concordata, 311–327. Lisboa: Universidade Católica Portuguesa.

    Google Scholar 

  • del Valle, Gonzalez, and José Maria. 2005. Derecho eclesiástico español. Madrid: Civitas.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fialho, António José. 2013. Guia prático do divórcio e das responsabilidades parentais. Lisboa: Centro de Estudos Judiciários. http://www.cej.gov.pt. Accessed 15 Feb 2014.

  • Finocchiaro, Francesco. 2007. Diritto Ecclesiastico. Bologna: Zanichelli.

    Google Scholar 

  • Folque, André. 2012. As pessoas colectivas no novo direito eclesiástico. In Estudos em Homenagem ao Prof. Doutor Jorge Miranda, vol. 1, 239–259. Coimbra: Coimbra Editora.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gouveia, Jorge Bacelar. 2012. Direito, religião e sociedade no Estado Constitucional. Lisboa: Instituto do Direito de Língua Portuguesa.

    Google Scholar 

  • II Programa de Acção para a Eliminação da Mutilação Genital Feminina. 2011. http://www.cig.gov.pt/planos-nacionais-areas/mutilacao-genital-feminina/. Accessed 15 Feb 2014.

  • Leite, André Lamas. 2012. Direito Penal e discriminação religiosa – subsídios para uma visão humanista. O Direito 144(4): 865–908.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lima Pinheiro, Luís. 2009. Direito Internacional Privado, vol. I. Coimbra: Almedina.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lopes, José Joaquim Almeida. 2008. Direito eclesiástico português no século XXI. Revista da Faculdade de Direito da Universidade do Porto 5: 143–213.

    Google Scholar 

  • Machado, Jónatas. 2010. A (in)definição do casamento no Estado Constitucional. Fundamentos meta-constitucionais da deliberação democrática. In Família, consciência, secularismo e religião, 9–37. Coimbra: Wolters Kluwer/Coimbra Editora.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mahmood, Tahir. 2012. Diritto e religione nell’Islam mediterraneo, 29–42. Bologna: il Mulino.

    Google Scholar 

  • Martins, Rosa. 2010. O reconhecimento da sentença de nulidade do casamento católico dos Tribunais Eclesiásticos em Portugal – a possível contradição dos seus efeitos civis com os da sentença de divórcio dos Tribunais do Estado. In Família, consciência, secularismo e religião, 241–273. Coimbra: Wolters Kluwer/Coimbra Editora.

    Google Scholar 

  • Medeiros, Rui. 2012. Uma leitura constitucionalmente comprometida da Concordata. In Estudos em Homenagem ao Prof. Doutor Jorge Miranda, vol. 3, 635–663. Coimbra: Coimbra Editora.

    Google Scholar 

  • Miranda, Jorge, and José de Melo Alexandrino. 2007. As grandes decisões do Tribunal Constitucional Português. http://www.fd.ul.pt/Portals/0/Docs/Institutos/ICJ/LusCommune/jmjma.pdf. Accessed 15 Feb 2014.

  • Miranda, Jorge, and Pedro Garcia Marques. 2010. Anotação ao artigo 41. In Anotada, Tomo I, edited by Jorge Miranda and Rui Medeiros, ed. Constituição Portuguesa, 890–921. Coimbra: Coimbra Editora and Wolters Kluwer Portugal.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mucznik, Esther. 2013. Os censos, reflexo da liberdade religiosa. Publico, January 7. http://www.publico.pt/opiniao/noticia/os-censos-reflexo-da-liberdade-religiosa-1579808. Accessed 3 Mar 2014.

  • Neto, Luísa. 2009. De die ad diem: os dias úteis ou a utilidade dos dias, Comentário ao Acórdão do TCAN (1.ª secção) de 8.2.2007, P.1394/06.OBEPRT. Cadernos de Justiça Administrativa 74: 37–54.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pinheiro, Jorge Duarte. 2008. Poligamia e uniões paralelas. In Escritos de direito das famílias: uma perspectiva luso-brasileira, 55–74. Porto Alegre: Magister Editora.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pinheiro, Jorge Duarte. 2010. O direito da família contemporâneo: lições. Lisboa: AAFDL.

    Google Scholar 

  • Raimundo, Miguel Assis. 2012. Direito Administrativo da Religião. In Administrativo Especial, vol. VI, ed. Tratado de Direito, 223–442. Coimbra: Almedina.

    Google Scholar 

  • Silva, Paula Costa e, and João de Oliveira Geraldes. 2010. A Concordata de 2004 e o novo artigo 1626.° do Código Civil. In Estudos em Homenagem ao Prof. Doutor Sérvulo Correia, 795–816. Coimbra: Coimbra Editora

    Google Scholar 

  • Teles, Eugénia Galvão, and Maria Helena Brito. 2007. Private international law. In Portuguese law. An overview, 287–303. Coimbra: Almedina.

    Google Scholar 

  • Vilaça, Helena. 2006. Da Torre de Babel às Terras Prometidas – Pluralismo Religioso em Portugal. Porto: Edições Afrontamento.

    Google Scholar 

  • Vilaça, Helena. 2010. Para lá da etnicidade: as comunidades religiosas dos imigrantes de leste em Portugal. In Religião e Movimento. Imigrantes e Diversidade Religiosa em Portugal e Itália, 73–91. Porto: Estratégias Criativas.

    Google Scholar 

  • Vitali, Enrico, and Antonio Chizzoniti. 2006. Manuale Breve: diritto ecclesiastico. Milano: Giuffrè.

    Google Scholar 

  • Vítor, Paula. 2010. A evolução legislativa recente do sistema de casamento português. In Família, consciência, secularismo e religião, 155–181. Coimbra: Wolters Kluwer/Coimbra Editora.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Paulo Pulido Adragão .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2016 Springer International Publishing Switzerland

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Adragão, P.P., Leão, A. (2016). Portugal: Religious Rules and State Law. In: Bottoni, R., Cristofori, R., Ferrari, S. (eds) Religious Rules, State Law, and Normative Pluralism - A Comparative Overview. Ius Comparatum - Global Studies in Comparative Law, vol 18. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-28335-7_18

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-28335-7_18

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Cham

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-319-28333-3

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-319-28335-7

  • eBook Packages: Law and CriminologyLaw and Criminology (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics