Abstract
The Israeli legal system may serve as a laboratory for the application of religious law in a multi-religious state. While defined as a Jewish State so many religions are represented here, some embracing large communities others having a little numbers of followers in some cases no more than a handful. It would be wrong however to view the Israeli system as a classic model. The approach to religion in the State of Israel is inherently eclectic. It combines traditional and new theories, communal and individual rights, freedom from religion and religious coercion, freedom of religion from state intervention, equality among religions and differential treatment of them. These eclectic principles are rooted in historical, theological, political and national grounds. Perhaps the most significant factor contributing to the complexity of relations between religion and state in Israel is that this part of the world – the Holy Land – is the birthplace of monotheism. It occupies a central place in the theology of many religions, including the three main monotheistic religions, each religion having its own view of the relationship between state and religion, which sometimes come into conflict. Moreover, the principles and practices of previous regimes that governed the Holy Land still have their influence, even though today Israel is predominantly Jewish in culture and religion. This essay aims to give a comprehensive yet concise overview of the status of the application of religious law in the State of Israel against this complex background.
Keywords
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution.
Buying options
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Learn about institutional subscriptionsNotes
- 1.
HCJ 153/87 Shakdiel v. Minister of Religious Affairs, IsrSC 42(2) 221 [1988].
- 2.
HCJ 4733/94 Naot v. Haifa Municipal Council , IsrSC 49(5) 111 (1996).
- 3.
HCJ 953/87 Poraz v. Mayor of Tel-Aviv – Jaffa , IsrSC 42(2) 309 [1988] (In Hebrew).
- 4.
CA 6821/93, 1908/94, 3363/94, United Mizrahi Bank v. Migdal Cooperative Village, [1995] IsrSC 49(4) 221.
- 5.
HCJ 6698/95, Ka’adan v. Israel Land Administration. IsrSC 54(1) 258 [2000].
- 6.
HCJ 143/62, Funk-Schlesinger v. Minister of Interior, IsrSC 17, 225 [1963]. (In Hebrew).
- 7.
CA 778/77, Farkash v. Farkash, IsrSC 33(2) 469 [1979]. (In Hebrew).
- 8.
HCJ 3045/05, Ben- Ari v. Commissioner of the Population Registry, IsrSC 61(3) 537 [2006].
- 9.
HCJ 2232/03, 2232/03, Anonymous v. District Rabbinical Court in Tel Aviv, IsrSC 61(3) 496.
- 10.
Fam. App. 9607/03, Anonymous v. Anonymous, IsrSC 61(3) 726 [2006]. (In Hebrew).
- 11.
CA 238/53, Cohen v. A.G., IsrSC 8, 4 [1954].
- 12.
HCJ 465/89 Raskin v. Jerusalem Religious Council, IsrSC 44(2) 673 [1990] (In Hebrew).
- 13.
HCJ 77/02 Aviv Delicatessen v. The Chief Rabbinate Council, IsrSC 56(6) 249 [2002], (In Hebrew).
- 14.
HCJ 4805/07 The Center for Jewish Pluralism v. Ministry of Education [2008].
- 15.
HCJ 3752/10 Rubinstein v. The Knesset [2014] (In Hebrew).
- 16.
HCJ 4298/93, Jabareen v. Minister of Education, IsrSC 48(5) 199 [1994]. (In Hebrew).
- 17.
LD (Jer.) 9022-06-10, Nameri v. Scmid Girls School. (In Hebrew).
- 18.
HCJ 9106/11, “Noar Cahalakha” v. Ministry of Education, [2013]. (In Hebrew).
- 19.
Crim. C (Jerusalem) 4726/07 State of Israel v. Terminal Twenty One [2008].
- 20.
HCJ 746/07, Ragen v. Ministry of Transportation, [2011].
- 21.
HCJ 5016/96, Horev v. Minister of Transportation, IsrSC 51(4)1 [1997].
References
Elon, Menachem. 1994. Jewish law: History, sources, principles. Philadelphia: The Jewish Publication Society.
Gans, Chaim. 1995. The law of return and affirmative action. Iyunei Mishpat 19: 683–697 (Hebrew).
Gans, Chaim. 2008. A just Zionism – On the morality of the Jewish State. New York: Oxford University Press.
Lapidoth, Ruth. 1986. The right of return in international law, with special reference to the Palestinian refugees. Israel Yearbook on Human Rights 16: 103–125.
Lerner, Natan. 1985. Inter-group tensions in Israel: Are legal solutions effective? Israel Yearbook on Human Rights 15: 88–100.
Maoz, Asher. 1996. Religious human rights in the State of Israel. In Religious human rights in global perspective – Legal perspectives, ed. Johan D. van Vyyer and Witte John Jr., 349–390. The Hague: Martinus Nijhoff.
Maoz, Asher. 2004. Can Judaism serve as a source of human rights? Heidelberg Journal of International Law 64: 677–722.
Maoz, Asher. 2006. Religious education in Israel. University of Detroit Mercy Law Review 83(5): 679–728.
Maoz, Asher. 2011. The values of Israel as a Jewish and democratic state. In Israel as a Jewish and democratic state: Jewish law association studies XXI, ed. Asher Maoz, 149–237. Liverpool: Deborah Charles Publications.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2016 Springer International Publishing Switzerland
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Maoz, A. (2016). The Application of Religious Law in a Multi-Religion Nation State: The Israeli Model. In: Bottoni, R., Cristofori, R., Ferrari, S. (eds) Religious Rules, State Law, and Normative Pluralism - A Comparative Overview. Ius Comparatum - Global Studies in Comparative Law, vol 18. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-28335-7_13
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-28335-7_13
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Cham
Print ISBN: 978-3-319-28333-3
Online ISBN: 978-3-319-28335-7
eBook Packages: Law and CriminologyLaw and Criminology (R0)