Skip to main content

Lateral Approach for Spondylolisthesis

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Lateral Access Minimally Invasive Spine Surgery

Abstract

Spondylolisthesis causing central spinal canal or neuroforaminal stenosis is one of the most common indications for lumbar decompression and fusion. Patients typically present with back and leg pain. The back pain is typically mechanical, particularly if the listhesis is mobile; the leg pain is typically radicular. Neurogenic claudication is often described in patients with central canal stenosis. Several studies have documented superior outcomes in surgical cohorts of patients with symptomatic spondylolisthesis as compared to their counterparts managed conservatively. Direct lateral, or extreme lateral, interbody fusion is a safe, minimally invasive alternative to traditional open decompression and fusion procedures to treat spondylolisthesis. Lateral interbody fusion reduces the listhesis, restores disk height, indirectly decompresses the nerve roots, and inhibits motion across an unstable segment. The nerves of the lumbosacral plexus pass through the psoas muscle fibers, and they are at risk of injury when accessing the spine using a transpsoas approach. Thigh symptoms such as numbness, pain, and weakness have been noted to be relatively common postoperatively, but these symptoms are largely transient.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

eBook
USD 16.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 159.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  1. Ahmadian A, Bach K, Bolinger B, Malham GM, Okonkwo DO, Kanter AS, Uribe JS. Stand-alone minimally invasive lateral lumbar interbody fusion: multicenter clinical outcomes. J Clin Neurosci. 2015;22:740–6.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Ahmadian A, Verma S, Jr Mundis GM, Jr Oskouian RJ, Smith DA, Uribe JS. Minimally invasive lateral retroperitoneal transpsoas interbody fusion for L4-5 spondylolisthesis: clinical outcomes. J Neurosurg Spine. 2013;19:314–20.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Alimi M, Hofstetter CP, Cong GT, Tsiouris AJ, James AR, Paulo D, Elowitz E, Hartl R. Radiological and clinical outcomes following extreme lateral interbody fusion. J Neurosurg Spine. 2014;20:623–35.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Amin BY, Mummaneni PV, Ibrahim T, Zouzias A, Uribe J. Four-level minimally invasive lateral interbody fusion for treatment of degenerative scoliosis. Neurosurg Focus, 2013;35, Video 10.

    Google Scholar 

  5. Cahill KS, Martinez JL, Wang MY, Vanni S, Levi AD. Motor nerve injuries following the minimally invasive lateral transpsoas approach. J Neurosurg Spine. 2012;17:227–31.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Cummock MD, Vanni S, Levi AD, Yu Y, Wang MY. An analysis of postoperative thigh symptoms after minimally invasive transpsoas lumbar interbody fusion. J Neurosurg Spine. 2011;15:11–8.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Davis TT, Hynes RA, Fung DA, Spann SW, MacMillan M, Kwon B, Liu J, Acosta F, Drochner TE. Retroperitoneal oblique corridor to the L2-S1 intervertebral discs in the lateral position: an anatomic study. J Neurosurg Spine. 2014;21:785–93.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Gibson JN, Grant IC, Waddell G. The Cochrane review of surgery for lumbar disc prolapse and degenerative lumbar spondylosis. Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 1999;24:1820–32.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  9. Gill GG, Manning JG, White HL. Surgical treatment of spondylolisthesis without spine fusion; excision of the loose lamina with decompression of the nerve roots. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 1955;37-A:493–520.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Kretzer RM, Molina C, Hu N, Umekoji H, Baaj AA, Serhan H, Cunningham BW. A Comparative biomechanical analysis of stand alone versus facet screw and pedicle screw augmented lateral interbody arthrodesis: an in vitro human cadaveric model. J Spinal Disord Tech. 2013;1:40–7. PMID: 22425888.

    Google Scholar 

  11. Le TV, Burkett CJ, Deukmedjian AR, Uribe JS. Postoperative lumbar plexus injury after lumbar retroperitoneal transpsoas minimally invasive lateral interbody fusion. Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2013;38:E13–20.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Lykissas MG, Aichmair A, Hughes AP, Sama AA, Lebl DR, Taher F, Du JY, Cammisa FP, Girardi FP. Nerve injury after lateral lumbar interbody fusion: a review of 919 treated levels with identification of risk factors. Spine J. 2014;14:749–58.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Marchi L, Abdala N, Oliveira L, Amaral R, Coutinho E, Pimenta L. Stand-alone lateral interbody fusion for the treatment of low-grade degenerative spondylolisthesis. Sci World J. 2012;2012:456346.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Martin CR, Gruszczynski AT, Braunsfurth HA, Fallatah SM, O’Neil J, Wai EK. The surgical management of degenerative lumbar spondylolisthesis: a systematic review. Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2007;32:1791–8.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Meyerding HW. Spondylolisthesis; surgical fusion of lumbosacral portion of spinal column and interarticular facets; use of autogenous bone grafts for relief of disabling backache. J Int Coll Surg. 1956;26:566–91.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Ozgur BM, Aryan HE, Pimenta L, Taylor WR. Extreme lateral interbody fusion (XLIF): a novel surgical technique for anterior lumbar interbody fusion. Spine J. 2006;6:435–43.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. Resnick DK, Choudhri TF, Dailey AT, Groff MW, Khoo L, Matz PG, Mummaneni P, Watters 3rd WC, Wang J, Walters BC, Hadley MN, American Association of Neurological Surgeons/Congress of Neurological, S. Guidelines for the performance of fusion procedures for degenerative disease of the lumbar spine. Part 9: fusion in patients with stenosis and spondylolisthesis. J Neurosurg Spine. 2005;2:679–85.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. Resnick DK, Watters 3rd WC, Sharan A, Mummaneni PV, Dailey AT, Wang JC, Choudhri TF, Eck J, Ghogawala Z, Groff MW, Dhall SS, Kaiser MG. Guideline update for the performance of fusion procedures for degenerative disease of the lumbar spine. Part 9: lumbar fusion for stenosis with spondylolisthesis. J Neurosurg Spine. 2014;21:54–61.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. Rodgers WB, Lehmen JA, Gerber EJ, Rodgers JA. Grade 2 spondylolisthesis at L4-5 treated by XLIF: safety and midterm results in the “worst case scenario”. Sci World J. 2012;2012:356712.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  20. Turner JA, Ersek M, Herron L, Deyo R. Surgery for lumbar spinal stenosis. Attempted meta-analysis of the literature. Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 1992;17:1–8.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  21. Uribe JS, Arredondo N, Dakwar E, Vale FL. Defining the safe working zones using the minimally invasive lateral retroperitoneal transpsoas approach: an anatomical study. J Neurosurg Spine. 2010;13:260–6.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  22. Uribe JS, Vale FL, Dakwar E. Electromyographic monitoring and its anatomical implications in minimally invasive spine surgery. Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2010;35:S368–74.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  23. Wang MY, Vasudevan R, Mindea SA. Minimally invasive lateral interbody fusion for the treatment of rostral adjacent-segment lumbar degenerative stenosis without supplemental pedicle screw fixation. J Neurosurg Spine. 2014;21:861–6.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  24. Weinstein JN, Lurie JD, Tosteson TD, Hanscom B, Tosteson AN, Blood EA, Birkmeyer NJ, Hilibrand AS, Herkowitz H, Cammisa FP, Albert TJ, Emery SE, Lenke LG, Abdu WA, Longley M, Errico TJ, Hu SS. Surgical versus nonsurgical treatment for lumbar degenerative spondylolisthesis. N Engl J Med. 2007;356:2257–70.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  25. Weinstein JN, Lurie JD, Tosteson TD, Zhao W, Blood EA, Tosteson AN, Birkmeyer N, Herkowitz H, Longley M, Lenke L, Emery S, Hu SS. Surgical compared with nonoperative treatment for lumbar degenerative spondylolisthesis. four-year results in the Spine Patient Outcomes Research Trial (SPORT) randomized and observational cohorts. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2009;91:1295–304.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  26. Wiltse LL. Etiology of spondylolisthesis. Clin Orthop. 1957;10:48–60.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  27. Wiltse LL, Newman PH, Macnab I. Classification of spondylolysis and spondylolisthesis. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 1976;23–9.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Beejal Y. Amin MD .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2017 Springer International Publishing Switzerland

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Johans, S.J., Ackerman, P.D., Park, P., Ohya, J., Amin, B.Y., Mummaneni, P.V. (2017). Lateral Approach for Spondylolisthesis. In: Wang, M., Sama, A., Uribe, J. (eds) Lateral Access Minimally Invasive Spine Surgery. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-28320-3_19

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-28320-3_19

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Cham

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-319-28318-0

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-319-28320-3

  • eBook Packages: MedicineMedicine (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics