Skip to main content

Distributed Leadership: Theory and Practice Dimensions in Systems, Schools, and Communities

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Leadership in Diverse Learning Contexts

Part of the book series: Studies in Educational Leadership ((SIEL,volume 22))

Abstract

Leadership, no matter the setting in which it is exercised, always involves three central concepts: purpose, context, and human agency. Consistent with this understanding, in this chapter we discuss the significance of contextual influences on leadership and the need to acquire a contextual literacy capacity as leaders engage with others in the pursuit of desired ends.

The importance of the capacity to understand the context in which leadership and learning take place has been raised and discussed in scholarly writing for over 50 years in education but with little empirical backing until recently. We therefore offer first, a brief discussion of the writing of some of the key scholars who have highlighted the need for greater attention to be given to learning contexts because of the ever-present influence they bring to leadership activity that makes a difference in people’s lives. This discussion serves as a warrant for the focus of the book on a diverse range of studies and projects from different school and social settings aimed at making a difference through leadership by, with, and through others. This view of leadership leads us to interrogate current understandings and practices of distributed leadership, responding to two salient questions: Why the turn to distributed leadership in schools and communities? And, how can the complexity of distributed leadership be understood as it occurs, not only in educational systems but more broadly in schools and communities, by principals, teachers, students, parents, carers, and community groups?

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 84.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  • Alberta Education. (2009). Principal quality practice guideline: Promoting successful school leadership in Alberta. Alberta: Alberta Education.

    Google Scholar 

  • Anderson, M. (2012). The struggle for collective leadership: Thinking and practice in a multi-campus school setting. Educational Management Administration & Leadership, 40(3), 328–342.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Angelle, P. S. (2010). An organizational perspective of distributed leadership: A portrait of a middle school. Research in Middle Level Education, 33(5), 1–16.

    Google Scholar 

  • Angelle, P. S. (2014). Teacher leadership and collective efficacy: Teacher perceptions in three US school districts. Journal of Educational Administration, 52(6), 738–753.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Australian Government Department of Education. (2014). Review of the Australian Curriculum: Initial Australian Government response. Retrieved from https://docs.education.gov.au/system/files/doc/other/initial_australian_government_response_final_0.pdf.

  • Australian Institute for Teaching and School Leadership (AITSL). (2011). Australian professional standard for principals. Carlton: MCEECDYA.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bangs, J., & Frost, D. (2012). Teacher self-efficacy, voice and leadership: Towards a policy framework for Education International. Brussels: Education International Research Institute.

    Google Scholar 

  • Barnett, K., & McCormick, J. (2012). Leadership and team dynamics in senior executive leadership teams. Educational Management Administration & Leadership, 40(6), 653–671.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • BCPVPA Standards Committee. (2013). Leadership standards for principals and vice-principals in British Columbia. Vancouver: British Columbia Principals and Vice-Principals’ Association.

    Google Scholar 

  • Berg, J. H., Carver, C. L., & Mangin, M. M. (2014). Teacher leader model standards: Implications for preparation, policy, and practice. Journal of Research on Leadership Education, 92(2), 195–217.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Berman, P., & McLaughlin, M. W. (1974). Federal programs supporting educational change: Vol. 1, a model of educational change. Santa Monica: RAND Corporation.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bishop, R., Ladwig, J., & Berryman, M. (2014). The centrality of relationships for pedagogy: The Whanaugatanga thesis. American Educational Research Journal, 51(1), 184–214.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bolden, R. (2011). Distributed leadership in organizations: A review of theory and research. International Journal of Management Reviews, 13(3), 251–269.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bolivar, J. M., & Chrispeels, J. H. (2011). Enhancing parent leadership through building social and intellectual capital. American Educational Research Journal, 48(1), 4–38.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bossert, S., Dwyer, D., Rowan, B., & Lee, G. (1982). The instructional management role of the principal. Educational Administration Quarterly, 18(3), 34–64.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bowen, C., & Bateson, D. (2008). Everyone a leader: Identifying the core principles and practices that enable everyone to be a leader and play their part in distributed leadership. Nottingham: NCSL.

    Google Scholar 

  • Boylan, M. (2013). Deepening system leadership: Teachers leading from below. Educational Management Administration & Leadership, 28, 1–16. doi:10.1177/1741143213501314.

    Google Scholar 

  • Chang, I.-H. (2011). A study of the relationship between distributed leadership, teacher academic optimism and student achievement in Taiwanese elementary schools. School Leadership & Management, 31(5), 491–515.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Coleman, J., Campbell, E., Hobson, C., McPartland, J., Mood, A., Weinfeld, F., & York, R. (1966). Equality of educational opportunity. Washington, DC: US Government Printing Office.

    Google Scholar 

  • Copland, M. A. (2003). Leadership of inquiry: Building and sustaining capacity for school improvement. Educational Evaluation and Policy Analysis, 25(4), 375–395.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Crawford, M. (2012). Solo and distributed leadership: Definitions and dilemmas. Educational Management Administration & Leadership, 40(5), 610–620.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Day, C., Sammons, P., Hopkins, D., Harris, A., Leithwood, K., Gu, Q., & Brown, E. (2010). 10 strong claims about successful school leadership. Nottingham: National College for Leadership of Schools and Children’s Services.

    Google Scholar 

  • Department for Education and Skills, UK. (2004). National standards for headteachers. Nottingham: Department for Education and Skills.

    Google Scholar 

  • Epstein, J. L. (1995). School/family/community partnerships. Phi Delta Kappan, 76(9), 701.

    Google Scholar 

  • Epstein, J. L. (2013). Ready or not? Preparing future educators for school, family, and community partnerships. Teaching Education, 24(2), 115–118.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Epstein, J., Coates, L., Salinas, K. C., Sanders, M. G., & Simon, B. S. (1997). School, family, and community partnerships. Thousand Oaks: Corwin Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Epstein, J. L., Sanders, M. G., Simon, B. S., Salinas, K. C., Jansorn, N. R., & Van Voorhis, F. L. (2002). School, family, and community partnerships: Your handbook for action. Thousand Oaks: Corwin Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Epstein, J. L., Galindo, C. L., & Sheldon, S. B. (2011). Levels of leadership: Effects of district and school leaders on the quality of school programs of family and community involvement. Educational Administration Quarterly, 47(3), 462–495.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Euridice Network. (2013). Key data on teachers and school leaders in Europe. Brussels: European Commission.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fielding, M. (2004). Transformative approaches to student voice: Theoretical underpinnings, recalcitrant realities. British Educational Research Journal, 30(2), 295–311.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Flessa, J. (2009). Educational micropolitics and distributed leadership. Peabody Journal of Education, 84(3), 331–349.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Frost, D. (2006). The concept of ‘agency’ in leadership for learning. Leading & Managing, 12(2), 19–28.

    Google Scholar 

  • Frost, R. (2008). Developing student participation, research and leadership: The HCD student partnership. School Leadership & Management, 28(4), 353–368.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Frost, D. (Ed.). (2014). Transforming education through teacher leadership. Cambridge: University of Cambridge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Frost, D., Durrant, J., Head, M., & Holden, G. (2000). Teacher-led school improvement. London: Routledge Falmer.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fuller, K., Parsons, S., MacNab, N., & Thomas, H. (2013). How far is leadership distributed in extended service provision? Educational Management Administration & Leadership, 41(5), 598–619.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • General Teaching Council for Scotland. (2012). The standards for leadership and management: Supporting leadership and management development. Edinburgh: GTC Scotland.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gertler, P., Patrinos, H., Bubio-Codina, M. (2008). Empowering parents to improve education: Evidence from rural Mexico (Impact Evaluation Series No. 4. World Bank Policy Research Working Paper 3935). Retrieved from http://www-wds.worldbank.org/servlet/WDSContentServer/WDSP/IB/2008/05/21/000158349_20080521103145/Rendered/PDF/wps3935.pdf

  • Grenda, J. P., & Hackmann, D. G. (2014). Advantages and challenges of distributing leadership in middle-level schools. NASSP Bulletin, 98(1), 53–74.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gronn, P. (2000). Distributed properties: A new architecture for leadership. Educational Management and Administration, 28(3), 317–338.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gronn, P. (2002). Distributed leadership as a unit of analysis. The Leadership Quarterly, 13(4), 423–451.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gronn, P. (2003). The new work of educational leaders: Changing leadership practice in an era of school reform. London: Sage/Paul Chapman.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gunter, H., Hall, D., & Bragg, J. (2013). Distributed leadership: A study of knowledge production. Educational Management Administration & Leadership, 41(5), 555–580.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hallinger, P. (2011). Leadership for learning: Lessons from 40 years of empirical research. Journal of Educational Administration, 49(2), 125–142.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Harris, A. (2009). Distributed leadership: Different perspectives (Vol. 7). Dordrecht: Springer.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Harris, A. (2012). Distributed leadership: Implications for the role of principal. Journal of Management Development, 31(1), 7–17.

    Google Scholar 

  • Harris, A., & Spillane, J. (2008). Distributed leadership through the looking glass. Management in Education, 22(1), 31–34.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hartley, D. (2009). Education policy, distributed leadership and socio-cultural theory. Educational Review, 61(2), 139–150.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hulpia, H., & Devos, G. (2010). How distributed leadership can make a different in teachers’ organizational commitment? A qualitative study. Teaching and Teacher Education, 26, 565–575.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hulpia, H., Devos, G., & Rosseel, Y. (2009). The relationship between the perception of distributed leadership in secondary schools and teachers’ and teacher leaders’ job satisfaction and organizational commitment. School Effectiveness and School Improvement: An International Journal of Research, Policy and Practice, 20(3), 291–317.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ishimaru, A. (2013). From heroes to organizers: Principals and education organizing in urban school reform. Educational Administration Quarterly, 49(1), 3–51.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jacobsen, S. (2011). Leadership effects on student achievement and sustained school success. International Journal of Educational Management, 25(1), 33–44.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jimenez, E., & Sawada, Y. (1999). Do community-managed schools work? An evaluation of El Salvador’s EDUCO program. The World Bank Economic Review, 11(3), 415–441.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Leithwood, K. (2011). School leadership, evidence-based decision making, and large-scale student assessment. In C. F. Webber & J. L. Lupart (Eds.), Leading student assessment (pp. 17–39). Dordrecht: Springer.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Leithwood, K. (2012). The Ontario leadership framework 2012 with a discussion of the research foundations. Ontario: Institute for Education Leadership.

    Google Scholar 

  • Leithwood, K., & Jantzi, D. (2008). Linking leadership to student learning: The contributions of leader efficacy. Educational Administration Quarterly, 44(4), 496–528.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Leithwood, K., & Riehl, C. (2005). What do we already know about educational leadership? In W. Firestone & C. Riehl (Eds.), A new agenda for research in educational leadership (pp. 12–27). New York: Teachers College Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Leithwood, K., Mascall, B., Strauss, T., Sacks, R., Memon, N., & Yashkina, A. (2007). Distributing leadership to make schools smarter: Taking the ego out of the system. Leadership and Policy, 6(1), 37–67.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Leithwood, K., Harris, A., & Hopkins, D. (2008). Seven strong claims about successful school leadership. School Leadership & Management, 28(1), 27–42.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Leithwood, K., Mascall, B., & Strauss, T. (Eds.). (2009). Distributed leadership according to the evidence. New York: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lizzio, A., Dempster, N., & Neumann, R. (2011). Pathways to formal and informal student leadership: The influence of peer and teacher-student relationships and level of school identification on students’ motivations. International Journal of Leadership in Education, 14(1), 85–102.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lovett, S., & Andrews, D. (2011). Leadership for learning: What it means for teachers. In J. MacBeath & T. Townsend (Eds.), International handbook of leadership for learning (pp. 719–739). Dordrecht: Springer.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • MacBeath, J. (2005). Leadership as distributed: A matter of practice. School Leadership & Management, 25(4), 349–366.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • MacBeath, J., Oduro, G. K. T., & Waterhouse, J. (2004). Distributed leadership in action: Full report. Nottingham: National College for School Leadership.

    Google Scholar 

  • Maxcy, B. D., & Nguyen, T. S. T. (2006). The politics of distributing leadership: Reconsidering leadership distribution in two Texas elementary schools. Educational Policy, 20(1), 163–196.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mayrowetz, D. (2008). Making sense of distributed leadership: Exploring the multiple usages of the concept in the field. Educational Administration Quarterly, 44(3), 424–435.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • McLaughlin, M. (1998). Listening and learning from the field: Tales of policy implementation and situated practice. In A. Lieberman (Ed.), The roots of educational change (pp. 58–72). Dordrecht: Springer.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ministry of Education, Finland. (2007). Improving school leadership, Finland: Country background report. Finland: Department for Education and Science Policy.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ministry of Education, New Zealand. (2014). Distributed/shared leadership. Retrieved from http://www.educationalleaders.govt.nz/Culture/Distributed-shared-leadership

  • Mitra, D. (2004). The significance of students: Can increasing “student voice” in schools lead to gains in youth development? Teachers College Record, 106(4), 651–688.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mitra, D. L. (2007). The role of administrators in enabling youth-adult partnerships in schools. NASSP Bulletin, 91(3), 237–256.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Moos, L., & Dempster, N. (1998). Some comparative learnings from the study. In J. MacBeath (Ed.), Effective school leadership: Responding to change (pp. 98–112). London: Paul Chapman.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Morrison, A. R. (2013). Educational leadership and change: Structural challenges in the implementation of a shifting paradigm. School Leadership & Management, 33(4), 412–424.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Muijs, D., & Harris, A. (2003). Teacher leadership – Improvement through empowerment? An overview of the literature. Educational Management, Administration & Leadership, 31(4), 437–448.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Muijs, D., & Harris, A. (2004). Improving schools through teacher leadership. Maidenhead: Open University Press McGraw-Hill Education.

    Google Scholar 

  • Muijs, D., Chapman, C., & Armstrong, P. (2013). Can early career teachers be teacher leaders? A study of second-year trainees in the Teach First alternative certification program. Educational Management Administration & Leadership, 41(6), 767–781.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mullick, J., Sharma, U., & Deppeler, J. (2013). School teachers’ perception about distributed leadership practices for inclusive education in primary schools in Bangladesh. School Leadership & Management, 33(2), 151–168.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Murphy, J., Smylie, M., Mayrowetz, D., & Louis, K. S. (2009). The role of the principal in fostering the development of distributed leadership. School Leadership & Management, 29(2), 181–241.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Park, V., & Datnow, A. (2009). Co-constructing distributed leadership: District and school connections in data-driven decision-making. School Leadership & Management, 29(5), 477–494.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Poekert, P. E. (2012). Teacher leadership and professional development: Examining links between two concepts central to school improvement. Professional Development in Education, 38(2), 169–188.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • PricewaterhouseCoopers. (2007). Independent study into school leadership. Research report RB818 for the Department for Education and Skills, UK. Nottingham: PricewaterhouseCoopers.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ranson, S. (2011). School governance and the mediation of engagement. Educational Management Administration & Leadership, 39(4), 398–413.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Robinson, V. M. J. (2009). Fit for a purpose: An educationally relevant account of distributed leadership. In A. Harris (Ed.), Distributed leadership: Different perspectives (Vol. 7, pp. 219–240). Dordrecht: Springer.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Silins, H., & Mulford, W. (2002). Leadership and school results. In K. Leithwood & P. Hallinger (Eds.), Second international handbook of educational leadership and administration (pp. 561–612). Dordrecht: Kluwer.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Spillane, J. P. (2006). Distributed leadership. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.

    Google Scholar 

  • Spillane, J. P., & Coldren, A. F. (2011). Diagnosis and design for school improvement: Using a distributed perspective to lead and manage change. New York: Teachers College Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Spillane, J. P., & Diamond, J. B. (Eds.). (2007). Distributed leadership in practice. New York: Teachers College, Columbia University.

    Google Scholar 

  • Spillane, J. P., Halverson, R., & Diamond, J. B. (2001). Investigating school leadership practice: A distributed perspective. American Educational Research Journal, 30(3), 23–28.

    Google Scholar 

  • Spillane, J. P., Halverson, R., & Diamond, J. B. (2004). Towards a theory of leadership practice: A distributed perspective. Journal of Curriculum Studies, 36(1), 3–34.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Swedish National Agency for School Improvement. (2007). Improving school leadership: Background report Sweden. Paris: Organisation for Economic Cooperation and Development.

    Google Scholar 

  • The World Bank. (2004). Making services work for poor people. World Development Report 2004. Washington, DC: The World Bank.

    Google Scholar 

  • Torrance, D. (2013). Distributed leadership: Challenging five generally held assumptions. School Leadership & Management, 33(4), 354–372.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Yukl, G. (1999). An evaluation of the conceptual weaknesses in transformational and charismatic leadership theories. Leadership Quarterly, 10(2), 285–305.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Greer Johnson .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2016 Springer International Publishing Switzerland

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Johnson, G., Dempster, N., Wheeley, E. (2016). Distributed Leadership: Theory and Practice Dimensions in Systems, Schools, and Communities. In: Johnson, G., Dempster, N. (eds) Leadership in Diverse Learning Contexts. Studies in Educational Leadership, vol 22. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-28302-9_1

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-28302-9_1

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Cham

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-319-28300-5

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-319-28302-9

  • eBook Packages: EducationEducation (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics