Skip to main content

Quantifying Soil Structure and Porosity Using Three-Dimensional Laser Scanning

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Digital Soil Morphometrics

Abstract

Advancements in three-dimensional (3D) digital surface scanning have opened up the possibility of capturing soil morphological information from irregular objects in high resolution. One of these advancements has been the development of a multistripe laser triangulation (MLT) technique that sweeps a series of laser stripes across a surface, while a camera offset from the laser source monitors the deformation and intensity of the reflected laser stripes. MLT scanning can be used to describe soil architecture (i.e., soil structure and porosity) from soil surfaces and soil specimens. The technique allows for the geometry of both small (<1 cm) and large (several meters) objects to be digitally captured in fine detail. In this paper, we provide examples of how MLT scanning has been applied to 3D soil specimens including the determination of bulk density from clods, the quantification of ped geometries, and the development of morphometrics from casted biopores. Examples of soil surface application of MLT scanning include the quantification of soil structure and interpedal pores from the field (excavation walls) and quantification of volume changes and crack formation in the laboratory (soil cores). When combined with other digital morphometric tools such as computed tomography, 3D laser scanning has the potential to quantify the architecture of soils across scales ranging from submicrometers to meters.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 119.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 159.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 159.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  • Aguilar MA, Aguilar FJ, Negreiros J (2009) Off-the-shelf laser scanning and close-range digital photogrammetry for measuring agricultural soils microrelief. Biosyst Eng 103:504–517

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Atkinson RJA, Nash RDM (1990) Some preliminary observations on the burrows of Callianassa subterranea (Montagu) (Decapoda: Thalassinidea) from the west coast of Scotland. J Nat Hist 24:403–413

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Blake GR, Hartge KH (1986) Bulk density. In: Klute A (ed) Methods of soil analysis, Part 1, 2nd edn. Agron. Monogr. 9. ASA and SSSA, Madison, WI, pp 363–375

    Google Scholar 

  • Burt R (ed) (2004) Soil survey laboratory methods manual, Ver. 4.0, Soil Survey Investigations Report No. 42. Natural Resources Conservation Service, Washington, DC

    Google Scholar 

  • Chhabra AB, Jensen RV (1989) Direct determination of the f (alpha) singularity spectrum. Phys Rev Lett 62–12:1327–1330

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chimi-Chiadjeu O, Hégarat-Mascle S, Vannier E, Taconet O, Dusséaux R (2014) Automatic clod detection and boundary estimation from Digital Elevation Model images using different approaches. Catena 118:73–83

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dalla Rosa J, Cooper M, Darboux F, Medeiros JC (2012) Soil roughness evolution in different tillage systems under simulated rainfall using a semivariogram-based index. Soil Tillage Res 124:226–232

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Darboux F, Huang C (2003) An instantaneous-profile laser scanner to measure soil surface microtopography. Soil Sci Soc Am J 67:92–99

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Davis A, Marshak A, Wiscombe W, Cahalan R (1994) Multifractal characterizations of nonstationarity and intermittency in geophysical fields—Observed, retrieved, or simulated. J Geophys Res Atmos 99:8055–8072

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Drager K (2014) Alterations of fine and coarse-textured soil material caused by the ant Formica subsericea. MS thesis. University of Kansas, Lawrence, KS

    Google Scholar 

  • Eck DV, Hirmas DR, Giménez D (2013) Quantifying soil structure from field excavation walls using multistripe laser triangulation scanning. Soil Sci Soc Am J 77:1319–1328

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Eck DV, Qin M, Hirmas DR, Giménez D, Brunsell N (2016) Relating quantitative soil structure metrics to saturated hydraulic conductivity. Vadose Zone J doi: 10.2136/vzj2015.05.0083

    Google Scholar 

  • Eltz FLF, Norton LD (1997) Surface roughness changes as affected by rainfall erosivity, tillage, and canopy cover. Soil Sci Soc Am J 61:1746–1755

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Frisbie JA, Graham RC, Lee BD (2014) A plaster cast method for determining soil bulk density. Soil Sci 179:103–106

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • García Moreno R, Díaz Álvarez M, Saa Requejo CA, Tarquis AM (2008) Multifractal analysis of soil surface roughness. Vadose Zone J 7-2:512–520

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Giménez D, Karmon JL, Posadas A, Shaw RK (2002) Fractal dimensions of mass estimated from intact and eroded soil aggregates. Soil Tillage Res 64:165–172

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Harral BB, Cove CA (1982) Development of an optical displacement transducer for the measurement of soil surface profiles. J Soil Agric Eng Res 27:412–429

    Google Scholar 

  • Hartemink AE, Minasny B (2014) Towards digital soil morphometrics. Geoderma 230–231:305–317

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hasiotis ST, Bourke MC (2006) Continental trace fossils and museum exhibits: displaying organism behavior frozen in time. Geol Curator 8:211–226

    Google Scholar 

  • Hirmas DR (2013) A simple method for removing artifacts from moist fine-textured soil faces 77:591–593

    Google Scholar 

  • Hirmas DR, Furquim SAC (2006) Simple modification of the clod method for determining bulk density of very gravelly soils. Commun Soil Sci Plant Anal 37:899–906

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Hirmas DR, Giménez D, Subroy V, Platt BF (2013) Fractal distribution of mass from the millimeter- to decimeter-scale in two soils under native and restored tallgrass prairie. Geoderma 207–208:121–130

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Huang C, Bradford JM (1990) Portable laser scanner for measuring soil surface roughness. Soil Sci Soc Am J 54:1402–1406

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Huang C, Bradford JM (1992) Applications of a laser scanner to quantify soil microtopography. Soil Sci Soc Am J 56:14–21

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Huang C, White I, Thwaite EG, Bendeli A (1988) A noncontact laser system for measuring soil surface topography. Soil Sci Soc Am J 52:350–355

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Knighton MS, Agabra DS, McKinley WD, Zheng JZ, Drobnis DD, Logan JD, Bahhour BF, Haynie JE, Vuong KH, Tandon A, Sidney KE, Diaconescu PL (2005) Three dimensional digitizer using multiple methods. US Patent 6,980,302 B2. Filed 17 Sept 2003, issued 27 Dec 2005

    Google Scholar 

  • Platt BF, Hasiotis ST, Hirmas DR (2010) Use of low-cost multistipe laser triangulation (MLT) scanning technology for three-dimensional, quantitative paleoichnological and neoichnological studies. J Sedim Res 80:590–610

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Posadas A, Giménez D, Quiroz R, Protz R (2003) Multifractal characterization of soil pore systems. Soil Sci Soc Am J 67:1361–1369

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Ribeiro Jr PJ, Diggle PJ (2015) geoR: analysis of geostatistical data. R package version 1.7-5.1. http://CRAN.R-project.org/package=geoR

  • Rieu M, Sposito G (1991) Fractal fragmentation, soil porosity, and soil-water properties. I. Theory. Soil Sci Soc Am J 55:1231–1238

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rossi AM, Hirmas DR, Graham RC, Sternberg PD (2008) Bulk density determination by automated three-dimensional laser scanning. Soil Sci Soc Am J 72:1591–1593

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Russ JC (2011) The image processing handbook, 6th edn. CRC Press, Boca Raton

    Google Scholar 

  • Sanchez M, Atique A, Kim S, Romero E, Zielinski M (2013) Exploring desiccation cracks in soils using a 2D profile laser device. Acta Geotech 8:583–596

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • San José Martínez F, Caniego J, Guber A, Pachepsky Y, Reyes M (2009) Multifractal modeling of soil microtopography with multiple transects data. Ecol Complexity 6:240–245

    Google Scholar 

  • Schaap MG, Leij FJ, van Genuchten MTh (2001) ROSETTA: a computer program for estimating soil hydraulic parameters with hierarchical pedotransfer functions. J Hydrol 251:163–176

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Schoeneberger PJ, Wysocki DA, Benham EC, Soil Survey Staff (2012) Field book for describing and sampling soils, ver. 3.0. Natural Resources Conservation Service, National Soil Survey Center, Lincoln, NE

    Google Scholar 

  • Steffens M, Buddenbaum H (2013) Laboratory imaging spectroscopy of a stagnic Luvisol profile—High resolution soil characterisation, classification and mapping of elemental concentrations. Geoderma 195–196:122–132

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Subroy V, Giménez D, Hirmas DR, Takhistov P (2012) On determining soil aggregate bulk density by displacement in two immiscible liquids. Soil Sci Soc Am J 76:1212–1216

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Thwaite EG, Bendeli A (1980) A noncontact profile recording instrument. In: Proceedings of the international conference on manufacturing engineering, Melbourne, Australia, 25–27 Aug 1980. Institution of Engineers in Canberra, ACT, Australia, pp 393–396

    Google Scholar 

  • Tschinkel WR (2010) Methods for casting subterranean ant nests. J Insect Sci 10:88

    Google Scholar 

  • Usamentiaga R, Molleda J, Garcia DF, Bulnes FG (2014) Removing vibrations in 3D reconstruction using multiple laser stripes. Opt Lasers Eng 53:51–59

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Vidal Vázquez E, Vivas-Miranda JG, Paz Gónzalez A (2005) Characterizing anisotropy and heterogeneity of soil surface microtopography using fractal models. Ecol Model 182:337–353

    Google Scholar 

  • Zielinski M, Sánchez M, Romero E, Atique A (2014) Precise observation of soil surface curling. Geoderma 226–227:85–93

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Daniel R. Hirmas .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2016 Springer International Publishing Switzerland

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Hirmas, D.R. et al. (2016). Quantifying Soil Structure and Porosity Using Three-Dimensional Laser Scanning. In: Hartemink, A., Minasny, B. (eds) Digital Soil Morphometrics. Progress in Soil Science. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-28295-4_2

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics