Skip to main content

Measuring and Modelling Soil Depth Functions

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Digital Soil Morphometrics

Part of the book series: Progress in Soil Science ((PROSOIL))

Abstract

Hans Jenny stated that the anisotropy of soil with depth means that the soil has a unique profile. Therefore, naturally every soil property has its specific depth function. The changes of soil particle size distribution in a soil profile can be used as an indicator of soil formation and processes and has been used as a proxy for soil age or degree of development. Uniform, gradational and rapidly changing (duplex) soil textures are examples of soil profile forms used for soil classification in Australia. Various parametric and nonparametric depth functions have been used to describe the variation of soil properties with depth. We have identified 7 typologies of depth functions: uniform, gradational, exponential, wetting front, abrupt, peak and minima–maxima. These depth functions are related to soil-forming processes. To test these functions, a proximal soil sensor was used to perform in situ digital morphometrics by which soil properties are measured along a soil profile wall at small depth increments. We explore the possibility of horizon boundary detection based on the changes in elemental concentrations. It was concluded that digital morphometrics enables soil scientists to measure the soil’s depth functions and weathering history quantitatively directly in the soil pit and assists in more objective delineation of soil horizons.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 119.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 159.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 159.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  • Adhikari K, Hartemink AE, Minasny B (2016) Mapping a profile wall of a typic Udipsamments from the Central Sands, WI, USA. In: Hartemink AE, Minasny B (eds) Digital soil morphometrics. Springer, Dordrecht

    Google Scholar 

  • Adhikari K, Kheir RB, Greve M, Greve MH, Malone MB, Minasny B, McBratney A (2014) Mapping soil pH and bulk density at multiple soil depths in Denmark. In: Arrouays D, McKenzie N, Hempel J, de Forges AR, McBratney AB (eds) GlobalSoilMap: basis of the global spatial soil information system. Taylor & Francis, London, pp 155–160

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Arkley RJ (1976) Statistical methods in soil classification research. Advances in Agronomy. Academic Press, New York, NY, pp 37–69

    Google Scholar 

  • Arriaga FJ, Lowery B, Reinert D, McSweeney K (2016) Cone penetrometers as a tool for distinguishing soil profiles and mapping soil erosion. In: Hartemink AE, Minasny B (eds), Digital soil morphometrics. Springer, Dordrecht, p. (this volume)

    Google Scholar 

  • Beaudette DE, Roudier P, Skovlin J (2016) Probabilistic representation of genetic soil horizons. In: Hartemink AE, Minasny B (eds), Digital soil morphometrics. Springer, Dordrecht, p. (this volume)

    Google Scholar 

  • Bernoux M, Arrouays D, Cerri CC, Bourennane H (1998) Modeling vertical distribution of carbon in oxisols of the Western Brazilian Amazon (Rondonia). Soil Sci 163:941–951

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Bishop TFA, McBratney AB, Laslett GM (1999) Modeling soil attribute depth functions with equal-area quadratic smoothing splines. Geoderma 91:27–45

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Brantley SL, Bandstra J, Moore J, White AF (2008) Modelling chemical depletion profiles in regolith. Geoderma 145:494–504

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Colwell J (1970) A statistical-chemical characterization of four great soil groups in southern New South Wales based on orthogonal polynomials. Soil Res 8:221–238

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Erh K (1972) Application of the spline function to soil science. Soil Sci 114:333–338

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fajardo M, McBratney A, Whelan B (2015) Fuzzy clustering of Vis–NIR spectra for the objective recognition of soil morphological horizons in soil profiles. Geoderma

    Google Scholar 

  • Grauer-Gray JR, Hartemink AE (2016) Variation of soil properties in a Mollisol profile wall. In: Hartemink AE, Minasny B (eds) digital soil morphometrics. Springer, Dordrecht

    Google Scholar 

  • Harden JW (1982) A quantitative index of soil development from field descriptions: Examples from a chronosequence in central California. Geoderma 28(1):1–28

    Google Scholar 

  • Hartemink AE, Minasny B (2014) Towards digital soil morphometrics. Geoderma 230:305–317

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jenny H (1941) Factors of soil formation. A system of quantitative pedology. McGraw-Hill, New York

    Google Scholar 

  • Jury WA (1982) Simulation of solute transport using a transfer function model. Water Resour Res 18:363–368

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Kempen B, Brus DJ, Stoorvogel JJ (2011) Three-dimensional mapping of soil organic matter content using soil type-specific depth functions. Geoderma 162:107–123

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Kirkby M (1977) Soil development models as a component of slope models. Earth Surf Process 2:203–230

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Kirkby MJ (1985) A basis for soil profile modelling in a geomorphic context. J Soil Sci 36:97–121

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Leblanc MA., Gagné G, Parent LE (2016) Numerical clustering of soil series using profile morphological attributes for potato. In: Hartemink AE, Minasny B (eds) Digital soil morphometrics. Springer, Dordrecht, p. (this volume)

    Google Scholar 

  • Madsen HB, Munk I (1987) The influence of texture, soil depth and geology on pH in farmland soils: a case study from southern Denmark. Acta Agricul Scand 37:407–418

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Maynard J (1992) Chemistry of modern soils as a guide to interpreting Precambrian paleosols. J Geol 279–289

    Google Scholar 

  • Meersmans J, van Wesemael B, De Ridder F, Van Molle M (2009) Modelling the three-dimensional spatial distribution of soil organic carbon (SOC) at the regional scale (Flanders, Belgium). Geoderma 152:43–52

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Mikhailova E, Bryant R, Vassenev I, Schwager S, Post C (2000) Cultivation effects on soil carbon and nitrogen contents at depth in the Russian Chernozem. Soil Sci Soc Am J 64:738–745

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Minasny B (2012) Contrasting soil penetration resistance values acquired from dynamic and motor-operated penetrometers. Geoderma 177–178:57–62

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Myers DB, Kitchen NR, Sudduth KA, Miles RJ, Sadler EJ, Grunwald S (2011) Peak functions for modeling high resolution soil profile data. Geoderma 166:74–83

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Northcote K (1971) A factual key for the recognition of Australian soils. CSIRO/Rellim, Glenside, South Australia

    Google Scholar 

  • Ponce-Hernandez R, Marriott FHC, Beckett PHT (1986) An improved method for reconstructing a soil profile from analyses of a small number of samples. J Soil Sci 37:455–467

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Russell J, Moore A (1968) Comparison of different depth weightings in the numerical analysis of anisotropic soil profile data. Transactions of the 9th International Congress of Soil Science, pp. 205–213

    Google Scholar 

  • Ruxton BP (1968) Measures of the degree of chemical weathering of rocks. J Geol 518–527

    Google Scholar 

  • Sauer D, Schellmann G, Stahr K (2007) A soil chronosequence in the semi-arid environment of Patagonia (Argentina). Catena 71:382–393

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Schaetzl RJ (1998) Lithologic discontinuities in some soils on drumlins: theory, detection, and application. Soil Sci 163:570–590

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Slater BK (1994) Continuous Classification and visualization of soil layers: a soil-landscape model of Pleasant Valley Wisconsin. University of Wisconsin, Department of Soil Science, Madison, Wisconsin

    Google Scholar 

  • Stockmann U, Minasny B, McBratney AB (2014) How fast does soil grow? Geoderma 216:48–61

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Walker P, Green P (1976) Soil trends in two valley fill sequences. Soil Res 14:291–303

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Webster R (1973) Automatic soil-boundary location from transect data. J Int Assoc Math Geol 5:27–37

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Webster R (1978) Mathematical treatment of soil information. Transactions of the 11th International Congress of Soil Science, pp 161–190

    Google Scholar 

  • Weindorf DC, Zhu Y, Haggard B, Lofton J, Chakraborty S, Bakr N, Zhang W, Weindorf WC, Legoria M (2012) Enhanced pedon horizonation using portable X-ray fluorescence spectrometry. Soil Sci Soc Am J 76:522–531

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Wetselaar R (1962) Nitrate distribution in tropical soils. Plant Soil 16:19–31

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Budiman Minasny .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2016 Springer International Publishing Switzerland

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Minasny, B., Stockmann, U., Hartemink, A.E., McBratney, A.B. (2016). Measuring and Modelling Soil Depth Functions. In: Hartemink, A., Minasny, B. (eds) Digital Soil Morphometrics. Progress in Soil Science. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-28295-4_14

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics