Advertisement

Estimating Carbon Stocks and Stock Changes in Forests: Linking Models and Data Across Scales

  • V. LeMayEmail author
  • W. A. Kurz
Chapter
Part of the Managing Forest Ecosystems book series (MAFE, volume 34)

Abstract

The increasing amount of atmospheric carbon has been linked with changes in climate, prompting efforts to reduce the amount of carbon emissions. Estimates of forest carbon stocks and stock changes are needed, along with how these change over time, and how sequestration might be increased through forest management activities such as afforestation, reforestation, stand management, and forest protection. Carbon is accrued through increased live biomass and/or increased dead organic matter and soil carbon, whereas carbon is released to the atmosphere through respiration, decomposition, and burning. For large land areas, estimating the amount of carbon sequestration into and out of a forest system involves integrating a number of data sources and models at a variety of spatial and temporal scales. The methods used to integrate data and models across time and spatial scales vary. In this paper, we present a discussion of methods used to obtain information on carbon stocks for very large land areas, using reported analyses as examples.

Keywords

Carbon Stock Forest Land Dead Organic Matter Forest Carbon Stock Forest Management Activity 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

References

  1. Akindele SO, LeMay VM (2006) Development of tree volume equations for common timber species in tropical rain forest areas of Nigeria. For Ecol Manag 226:41–48CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Beets PN, Robertson KA, Ford-Robertson JB, Gordon J, MacLaren JP (1999) Description and validation of C_change: a model for simulating carbon content in managed Pinus radiata stands. N Z J For Sci 19(3):409–427Google Scholar
  3. Bi H, Turner J, Lambert MJ (2004) Additive biomass equations for native eucalypt forest trees of temperate Australia. Trees 18:467–479CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Binkley CS, Brand D, Harkin Z, Bull G, Ravindranath NH, Obersteiner M, Nilsson S, Yamagata Y, Krott M (2002) Carbon sink by the forest sector—options and needs for implementation. Forest Policy Econ 4:65–77CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Cairns MA, Brown S, Helmer EH, Baumgardner GA (1997) Root biomass allocation in the world’s upland forests. Oecologia 111(1):1–11CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  6. Cao MK, Woodward FI (1998) Dynamic responses of terrestrial ecosystem carbon cycling to global climate change. Nature 393:249–252CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Chave J, Andalo C, Brown S, Cairns MA, Chambers JQ, Eamus D, Fölster H, Fromard F, Higuchi N, Kira T, Lescure J-P, Nelson BW, Ogawa H, Puig H, Riéra B, Yamakura T (2005) Tree allometry and improved estimation of carbon stocks and balance in tropical forests. Oecologia 145:87–99CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  8. Christensen JH, Hewitson B, Busuioc A, Chen A, Gao X, Held I, Jones R, Kolli RK, Kwon W-T, Laprise R, Magaña Rueda V, Mearns L, Menéndez CG, Räisänen J, Rinke A, Sarr A, Whetton P (2007) Regional climate projections. In: Solomon S, Qin D, Manning M, Chen Z, Marquis M, Averyt KB, Tignor M, Miller HL (eds) Climate change 2007: the physical science basis. Contribution of Working Group I to the Fourth Assessment Report of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change. Cambridge University Press, CambrigeGoogle Scholar
  9. Cochran WG (1977) Sampling techniques, 3rd edn. Wiley, TorontoGoogle Scholar
  10. Coops NC, Waring RH (2001) The use of multi-scale remote sensing imagery to derive regional estimates of forest growth capacity using 3-PGS. Remote Sens Environ 75(3):324–334CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Fang J, Chen A, Peng C, Zhao S, Ci L (2001) Changes in forest biomass carbon storage in China between 1949 and 1998. Science 292:2320–2322CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  12. Franklin SE, Lavigne MB, Wulder MA, Stenhouse GB (2002) Change detection and landscape structure mapping using remote sensing. For Chron 78(5):618–625CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Ganjegunte GK, Condron LM, Clinton PW, Davis MR, Mahieu N (2004) Decomposition and nutrient release from radiata pine (Pinus radiata) coarse woody debris. For Ecol Manag 187:197–211CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Gertner G (2003) Assessment of computationally intensive spatial statistical methods for generating inputs for spatially explicit error budgets. For Biometry Modelling Inform Sci 1:27–34 Retrieved March 2006, http://www.fbmis.info Google Scholar
  15. Gower ST, McMurtrie RE, Murty D (1996) Aboveground net primary production decline with stand age: potential causes. Trends Ecol Evol 11(9):378–382CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  16. Halme M, Tomppo E (2001) Improving the accuracy of multisource forest inventory estimates by reducing plot location error – a multicriteria approach. Remote Sens Environ 78(3):321–327CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Heikkinen JEP, Virtanen T, Huttunen JT, Elsakov V, Martikainen PJ (2004) Carbon balance in East European tundra. Glob Biogeochem Cycles 18:14 GB1023CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Iles K, Smith N (2006) A new type of sample plot that is particularly useful for sampling small clusters of objects. For Sci 52(2):148–154Google Scholar
  19. IPCC (2007) Summary for policymakers. In: Solomon S, Qin D, Manning M, Chen Z, Marquis M, Averyt KB, Tignor M, Miller HL (eds) Climate change 2007: The physical science basis. Contribution of Working Group I to the Fourth Assessment Report of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change. Cambridge University Press, CambridgeGoogle Scholar
  20. Jenkins JC, Chojnacky DC, Heath LS, Birdsey RA (2003) National-scale biomass equations for United States tree species. For Sci 49(1):12–35Google Scholar
  21. Johnson DS, Williams MS, Czaplewski RL (2003) Comparison of estimators for rolling samples using forest inventory and analysis data. For Sci 49(1):50–63Google Scholar
  22. Katila M (2004) Controlling the estimation errors in the Finnish multisource National Forest Inventory, Research Papers (dissertation) 910. Finish Forest Research Institute, VantaaGoogle Scholar
  23. Katila M, Heikkinen J, Tomppo E (2000) Calibration of small-area estimates for map errors in mulitsource forest inventory. Can J For Res 30:1329–1339CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Kauppi PE (2003) New, low estimate for carbon stock in global forest vegetation based on inventory data. Silva Fennica 37(4):451–457CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Kurz WA, Apps MJ (1999) A 70-year retrospective analysis of carbon fluxes in the Canadian forest sector. Ecol Appl 9(1):526–547CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Kurz WA, Beukema SJ, Apps MJ (1998) Carbon budget implications of the transition from natural to managed disturbance regimes in forest landscapes. Mitig Adapt Strateg Glob Chang 2:405–421Google Scholar
  27. Kurz WA, Apps M, Banfield E, Stinson G (2002) Forest carbon accounting at the operational scale. For Chron 78(5):672–679CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Lambert M-C, Ung C-H, Raulier F (2005) Canadian national tree aboveground biomass. Can J For Res 35:1996–2018CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. LeMay V, Temesgen H (2005a) Comparison of nearest neighbor methods for estimating basal area and stems per ha using aerial auxiliary variables. For Sci 51(2):109–119Google Scholar
  30. LeMay V, Temesgen H (2005b) Connecting inventory information sources for landscape level analyses. For Biometry Modelling Inform Sci 1:37–49 Retrieved March 2006, http://www.fbmis.info Google Scholar
  31. Li Z, Apps MJ, Banfield E, Kurz WA (2002) Estimating net primary production of forests in the Canadian Prairie Provinces using an inventory-based carbon budget model. Can J For Res 32(1):161–169CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Li Z, Kurz WA, Apps MJ, Beukema SJ (2003a) Belowground biomass dynamics in the carbon budget model of the Canadian Forest Sector: recent improvements and implications of the estimation of NPP and NEP. Can J For Res 33:126–136CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Li Z, Apps MJ, Kurz WA, Banfield E (2003b) Temporal changes of forest net primary production and net ecosystem production in west central Canada associated with natural and anthropogenic disturbances. Can J For Res 33:2340–2351CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Lim KS, Treitz PM (2004) Estimation of above ground forest biomass from Airborne Discrete Return Laser scanner data using canopy-based quantile estimators. Scand J For Res 29:558–570CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Luken JO, Hinton AC, Baker DG (1991) Forest edges associated with power-line corridors and implications for corridor siting. Landsc Urban Plan 20(4):315–324CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Mäkelä A (2003) Process-based modelling of tree and stand growth: towards a hierarchical treatment of multiscale processes. Can J For Res 33(3):398–409CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. Maltamo M, Kangas A (1998) Methods based on k-nearest neighbor regression in the prediction of basal area diameter distribution. Can J For Res 28:1107–1115CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. McRoberts RE, Nelson MD, Wendt DG (2002) Stratified estimation of forest area using satellite imagery, inventory data, and the k-Nearest Neighbors technique. Remote Sens Environ 82:457–468CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. Moeur M (2000) Extending stand exam data with most similar neighbor inference. Proceedings of the Society of American Foresters National Convention, September 11–15, 1999. Portland, pp. 99–107.Google Scholar
  40. Mouillet F, Field CB (2005) Fire history and the global carbon budget: a 1° × 1° fire history reconstruction for the 20th century. Glob Chang Biol 11:398–420CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. Mueller TG, Pierce FJ (2003) Soil carbon maps: enhancing spatial estimates with simple terrain attributes at multiple scales. Soil Sci Soc Am J 67:258–267CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. Myneni RB, Dong J, Tucker CJ, Kaufmann RK, Kauppi PE, Liski J, Zhou L, Alexeyev V (2001) A large carbon sink in the woody biomass of northern forests. Proc Natl Acad Sci 98(26):14784–14789CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  43. Nabuurs GJ, Masera O, Andrasko K, Benitez-Ponce P, Boer R, Dutschke M, Elsiddig E, Ford-Robertson J, Frumhoff P, Karjalainen T, Krankina O, Kurz W, Matsumoto M, Oyhantcabal W, Ravindranath NH, Sanz Sanchez MJ, Zhang X (2007) Forestry. In: Metz B, Davidson OR, Bosch PR, Dave R, Meyer LA (eds) Climate change 2007: mitigation. Contribution of Working group III to the Fourth Assessment Report of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change. Cambridge University Press, CambridgeGoogle Scholar
  44. Neeff T, Dutra LV, dos Santos JR, da Costa Freitas C, Araujo LS (2005) Tropical forest measurement by interferometric height modeling and P-band radar backscatter. For Sci 51(6):585–594Google Scholar
  45. Nelson J (2003) Forest-level models and challenges for their successful application. Can J For Res 33(3):422–429CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  46. Nuutinen T, Kellomäki S (2001) A comparison of three modelling approaches for large-scale forest scenario analysis in Finland. Silva Fennica 35(3):299–308CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  47. Oliver GR, Beets PN, Garrett LG, Pearce SH, Kimberly MO, Ford-Robertson JB, Robertson KA (2004) Variation in soil carbon in pine plantations and implications for monitoring soil carbon stocks in relation to land-use change and forest site management in New Zealand. For Ecol Manag 203:283–295CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  48. Penman J, Gytarsky M, Hiraishi T, Kurg T, Kruger D, Pipatti R, Buendia L, Miwa K, Ngara T, Tanabe K, Wagner F (eds) (2003) Good practice guidance for land use, land-use change and forestry. Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC/IGES), JapanGoogle Scholar
  49. Richards GP (2002) The FULLCAM carbon accounting model: development, calibration and implementation for the National Carbon Accounting System, NCAS Technical Report No. 28. Australian Greenhouse Office, CanberraGoogle Scholar
  50. Robinson A, Wykoff WR (2004) Imputing missing height measure using a mixed-effects modeling strategy. Can J For Res 34:2492–2500CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  51. Roesch FA, Realms GA (1999) Analytical alternatives for an annual inventory system. J For 97:33–37Google Scholar
  52. Rohner M, Böswald K (2001) Forestry development scenarios: timber production, carbon dynamics in tree biomass and forest values in Germany. Silva Fennica 35(3):277–297CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  53. Schimel D, Melillo J, Tian H, McGuire AD, Kicklighter D, Kittel T, Rosenbloom N, Running S, Thornton P, Ojima D, Parton W, Kelly R, Sykes M, Neilson R, Rizzo B (2000) Contribution of increasing CO2 and climate to carbon storage by ecosystems in the United States. Science 287:2004–2006CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  54. Smith JE, Heath LS (2002) A model of forest floor carbon mass for United States forest types, Research Paper NE-722. USDA Forest Service, Newtown SquareCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  55. Suratman MN, Bull GQ, Leckie DG, LeMay V, Marshall PL, Mispan MR (2004) Prediction models for estimating volume, age, predicting area of rubber (Hevea brasiliensis) plantations in Malaysia using Landsat TM data. Int For Rev 6(1):1–12CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  56. Temesgen H, LeMay VM, Froese KL, Marshall PL (2003) Imputing tree-lists from aerial attributes for complex stands of south-eastern British Columbia. For Ecol Manag 177:277–285CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  57. Tomppo E, Nilsson M, Rosengren M, Aalto P, Kennedy P (2002) Simultaneous use of Landsat-TM and IRS-1C WiFS data in estimating large area tree stem volume and above-ground biomass. Remote Sens Environ 82(1):156–177CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  58. Vågen TG, Lal R, Singh BR (2005) Soil carbon sequestration in Sub-Saharan Africa: a review. Land Degrad Dev 16:53–71CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  59. White TM, Kurz WA (2005) Afforestation on private land in Canada from 1990 to 2002 estimated from historical records. For Chron 81(4):491–497CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  60. Wulder MA, Kurz WA, Gillis M (2003) National level forest monitoring and modeling in Canada. Prog Plan 61:365–381CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  61. Yang YS, Guo J, Chen G, Xie J, Gao R, Li Z, Jin Z (2005) Carbon and nitrogen pools in Chinese fir and evergreen broadleaved forests and changes associated with felling and burning in mid-subtropical China. For Ecol Manag 216:216–226CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  62. Zeide B (2003) The U-approach to forest modeling. Can J For Res 33(3):480–489CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer International Publishing Switzerland 2017

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Forest Resources Management DepartmentUniversity of British ColumbiaVancouverCanada
  2. 2.Natural Resources CanadaCanadian Forest ServiceVictoriaCanada

Personalised recommendations