• Felipe BravoEmail author
  • Robert Jandl
  • Valerie LeMay
  • Klaus von Gadow
Part of the Managing Forest Ecosystems book series (MAFE, volume 34)


The recent rates of climate changes are unprecedented given past climate change evidence. Variations in gas concentrations within the Earth’s atmosphere cause changes in the climate, and these atmospheric gases are impacted by human activities as well as by natural disturbances. Since human activities alter atmospheric gases concentrations, there is a perception that humans must alter land use practices to reduce the rates of climate changes and alleviate any resulting negative social, economic, and environmental impacts. In this book global change and forestry activities interaction are addressed by four different point of views including a general overview of the problem and the capacity of forests to cope with climate change, a description of the role of monitoring and modeling approaches to estimate carbon stocks and stock changes the climate change impacts on forest health and a presentation of several approaches to economic analysis of different management scenarios. Finnally, a range of case studies on climate change impacts and mitigation activities in different ecosystems across Africa, Asia, Europe and the Americas is presented.


Forest Management Carbon Stock Climate Change Impact Pinus Pinaster Forest Stewardship Council 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.


  1. Aitken SN, Whitlock MD (2013) Assisted gene flow to facilitate local adaptation to climate change. Annu Rev Ecol Evol Syst 44:367–388CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Apps MJ, Price DT (eds) (1996) Forest ecosystems, forest management and the global carbon cycle. In: Proceedings of the NATO advanced research workshop: the role of global forest ecosystems and forest resource management in the global cycle, Banff, Canada, 12–16 September 1994. Springer, BerlinGoogle Scholar
  3. Bettinger P, Sessions J, Boston K (1997) Using tabu search to schedule timber harvests subject to spatial wildlife goals for big game. Ecol Model 94:111–123CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Besseau P, Dansou K, Johnson F (2002) The International Model Forest Network (IMFN): elements of success. For Chron 78(5):648–654CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Bogino S, Bravo F (2008) Growth response of Pinus pinaster Ait. to climatic variables in central Spanish forests. Ann For Sci 65(506):1–13. doi: 10.1051/forest:2008025 Google Scholar
  6. Bogino S, Bravo F, Herrero C (2006) Carbon dioxide accumulation by pure and mixed woodlands of Pinus sylvestris L. and Quercus pyrenaica Willd. in Central Mountain Range Spain. In: Bravo F (ed) Proceedings of the IUFRO Meeting on Managing Forest Ecosystems: the challenges of climate change, Palencia, 3–7 April 2006Google Scholar
  7. Bravo F, Bravo-Oviedo A, Díaz-Balteiro L (2008) Carbon sequestration in Spanish Mediterranean forests under two management alternatives: a modeling approach. Eur J For Res. doi: 10.1007/s10342-007-0198-y
  8. Bravo F, Osorio LF, Pando V, Del Peso C (2010) Long-term implications of traditional forest regulation methods applied to Maritime pine (Pinus pinaster Ait.) forests in central Spain: a century of management plans. iForest 3:33–38. Available at:
  9. Bravo-Oviedo A, Tomé M, Bravo F, Montero G, del Río M (2008) Dominant height equations including site attributes in generalized algebraic difference approach Canadian. J For Res 38:2348–2358. doi: 10.1139/X08-077
  10. Chen BW, Gadow K (2002) Timber harvest planning with spatial objectives using the method of simulated annealing. Forstwiss Ce ntralblatt 121:25–34CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Ciais P, Reichstein M, Viovy N, Granier A, Ogé J, Allard V, Aubinet M, Buchmann N, Bernhofer C, Carrara A, Chevallier F, De Noblet N, Friend AD, Friedlingstein P, Grünwald T, Heinesch B, Keronen P, Knohl A, Krinner G, Loustau D, Manca G, Matteucci G, Miglietta F, Ourcival JM, Papale D, Pilegaard K, Rambal S, Seufert G, Soussana JF, Sanz MJ, Schulze ED, Vesala T, Valentini R (2005) Europe-wide reduction in primary productivity caused by the heat and drought in 2003. Nature 437:529–533CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  12. Clutter JL, Fortson JC, Pienaar LV, Brister GH, Bailey RL (1983) Timber management – a quantitative approach. Wiley, New York, pp. 238–252Google Scholar
  13. Cook T, Campbell D (1979) Quasi-experimental design. Rand McNally, ChicagoGoogle Scholar
  14. Eid T, Hobbelstad K (2000) AVVIRK-2000: a large-scale forestry scenario model for longterm investment, income and harvest analyses. Scand J For Res 15(4):472–482CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Fujimori T (2001) Ecological and silvicultural strategies for sustainable forest management. Elsevier, AmsterdamGoogle Scholar
  16. Gadow Kv, Kleinn C (2005) Forest management, science-based and understandable. In: Peterson CE. Maguire DA (eds) Balancing ecosystem values: innovative experiments for sustainable forestry. US Department of Agriculture, Forest Service Gen. Tech. Rep. PNW-GTR-635, Portland, OR, pp 15–23Google Scholar
  17. Gadow Kv, Kurttila M, Leskinen P, Leskinen L, Nuutinen T, Pukkala T 2007 Designing forested landscapes to provide multiple services. CAB Rev (submitted)Google Scholar
  18. Gracia C, Sabaté S, López B, Sánchez A (2001) Presente y futuro del bosque mediterráneo: balance de carbono, gestión forestal y cambio global. In: Zamora R, Puignaire FI (eds) Aspectos funcionales de los ecosistemas mediterráneos. CSIC-AEET, Granada, pp. 351–372Google Scholar
  19. Gurjanov M, Gadow Kv (2005) Analyse der nachhaltigen Nutzung im schlagweisen Betrieb am Beispiel des Forstbetriebes Lissino bei St. Petersburg, Russland. Forstarchiv 76:177–183Google Scholar
  20. Hoganson HM, Rose DW (1984) A simulation approach for optimal timber management scheduling. For Sci 30(1):200–238Google Scholar
  21. Herold M, Román-Cuesta RM, Mollicone D, Hirata Y, Van Laake P, Asner GP, Souza C, Skutsch M, Avitabile V, MacDicken K et al (2011) Options for monitoring and estimating historical carbon emissions from forest degradation in the context of REDD+. Carbon Balance Manag 6:13CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  22. Humphreys D (2006) LogJam – deforestation and the crisis of global governance. Earthscan, London 302ppGoogle Scholar
  23. Innes JL (2005) Long-term forest experiments: the need to convert data into knowledge. In: Peterson CE, Maguire DA (ed) Balancing ecosystem values: innovative experiments for sustainable forestry. U.S.D.A. Forest Service PNW-GTR-635, pp 25–31Google Scholar
  24. IPCC (Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change) (2000) Land use, land-use change, and forestry. Special report of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change. Cambridge University Press, CambridgeGoogle Scholar
  25. IPCC (Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change) (2001) Climate change 2001: the scientific basis. contribution of working Group I to the Third Assessment Report of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change. Cambridge University Press, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  26. IPCC (Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change) (2007) Summary for policymakers. In: Solomon S, Qin D, Manning M, Chen Z, Marquis M, Averyt KB, Tignor M, Miller HL (eds) Climate change 2007: the physical science basis. contribution of Working Group I to the Fourth Assessment Report of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change. Cambridge University Press, CambridgeCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. IPCC (2014) Climate Change 2014: synthesis Report. Contribution of Working Groups I, II and III to the Fifth Assessment Report of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change [Core Writing Team, RK. Pachauri and LA Meyer (eds)]. IPCC, Geneva, Switzerland, 151 ppGoogle Scholar
  28. Jylhä K (2007) What are the expected changes in climate and what uncertainties are involved? Presentation during the seminar on adaptive forest management in changing climate, Vantaa, Finland, March 21, 2007Google Scholar
  29. Kuehl RO (1994) Statistical principles of research design and analysis. Duxbury, Belmont, 686 ppGoogle Scholar
  30. Kurz WA, Apps MJ (1999) A 70-year retrospective analysis of carbon fluxes in the Canadian forest sector. Ecol Appl 9:526–547CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Lappi J (1992) JLP – a linear programming package for management planning. the finnish forest research institute. Res Pap 414:1–134Google Scholar
  32. Mund M, Schulze ED (2006) Impacts of forest management on the carbon budget of European beech (Fagus sylvatica) forests. Allgemeine Forst- und Jagdzeitung 177:47–63Google Scholar
  33. NOAA (National Centers for Environmental Information) (2015) State of the climate: global Analysis for May 2015,, published online June 2015. Retrieved on August 14, 2015
  34. Norby RJ, Rustad LE, Dukes JS, Ojima DS, Parton WJ, Del Grosso SJ, McMurtie RE, Pepper DA (2007) Ecosystem responses to warming and interacting global change factors. Chapter 3. In: Canadell JG, Pataki EE, Pitelka LF (eds) Terrestrial ecosystems in a changing world, The IGBP Series. Elsevier, HeidelbergGoogle Scholar
  35. Nyberg JB (1998) Statistics and the practice of adaptive management. In: Sit V, Taylor B (eds) Statistical methods for adaptive management studies. Research Branch, British Columbia Ministry of Forests, Land Management Handbook No. 42, Victoria, British Columbia, Canada, pp 1–7Google Scholar
  36. Öhman K (2002) Forest planning with consideration to spatial relationships. Doctoral dissertation. Department of Forest Resource Management and Geomatics, SLU. Acta Universitatis Agriculturae Sueciae, Silvestria, Vol 198Google Scholar
  37. Peñuelas J, Filella I, Zhang XY, Llorens L, Ogaya R (2004) Complex spatiotemporal phonological shifts as a response to rainfall changes. New Phytol 161(3):837–846CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. Pretzsch H (2009) Forest dynamics, growth and yield: from measurement to model. Springer Verlag, Berlin, 664 pGoogle Scholar
  39. Pretzsch H, Biber P, Schütze G, Bielak K (2013) Changes of forest stand dynamics in Europe. Facts from long-term observational plots and their relevance for forest ecology and management. For Ecol Manage 315:65–77Google Scholar
  40. Pretzsch H, Biber P, Schütze g Uhl E, Rötzer T (2014) Forest stand growth dynamics in Central Europe have accelerated since 1870. Nat Commun 5:4967. doi: 10.1038/ncomms5967
  41. Prieto-Recio C, Martin-Garcia J, Bravo F, Diez JJ (2015) Unravelling the associations between climate, soil properties and forest management in Pinus pinaster decline in the Iberian Peninsula. For Ecol Manage (in press). doi: 10.1016/j.foreco.2015.07.033
  42. Pukkala T, Kangas J (1993) A heuristic optimization method for forest planning and decision making. Scand J For Res 8:560–570CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. Raupach MR, Marland G, Ciais P, Le Quéré C, Canadell JP, Klepper G, Field CB (2007) Global and regional drivers of accelerating CO2 emissions. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 104(24):10288–10293CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  44. Reichstein M, Tenhunen JD, Roupsard O, Ourcival JM, Rambal S, Miglietta F, Peressotti A, Pecchiari M, Tirone G, Valentini R (2002) Severe drought effects on ecosystem CO2 and H2O fluxes at three mediterranean evergreen sites: revision of current hypothesis? Glob Chang Biol 8:999–1017CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  45. Sayer J, Campbell B (2004) The science of sustainable development. Cambridge University Press, CambridgeGoogle Scholar
  46. Schwichtenberg G, Sánchez Orois S (2003) Optimising management alternatives in an Acaciamangium-plantation in Columbia. (In Spanish). In: Proceedings of the VI Congreso Mexicano de Recursos Forestales, San Luís de Potosí, MexicoGoogle Scholar
  47. Shipley B (2000) Cause and Correlation in Biology. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, 317 ppCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  48. Stern N (2006) The economics of climate change: the stern review. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, 692 pp. Accessed Nov 2007
  49. Tang L, Shao G (2015) Drone remote sensing for forestry research and practices. J For Res. doi:10.1007/s11676-015-0088-Google Scholar
  50. UNFCCC (United Nations Framework Convention on Climate Change) (1997) The Kyoto Protocol.
  51. Weiskittel AR, MacFarlane DW, Radtke P-J, Affleck DLR, Temesgen H, Woodall CW, Westfall JA, Coulston JW (2015) A call to improve methods for estimating tree biomass for regional and national assessments. J For 113(4):414–424. Available on line at:

Copyright information

© Springer International Publishing Switzerland 2017

Authors and Affiliations

  • Felipe Bravo
    • 1
    Email author
  • Robert Jandl
    • 2
  • Valerie LeMay
    • 3
  • Klaus von Gadow
    • 4
  1. 1.ETS de Ingenierías Agrarias - Universidad de Valladolid & iuFOR - Sustainable Forest Management Research InstituteUniversidad de Valladolid - INIAPalenciaSpain
  2. 2.Austrian Research Centre for Forests (BFW)ViennaAustria
  3. 3.Forest Resources Management DepartmentUniversity of British ColumbiaVancouverCanada
  4. 4.Georg-August-UniversitätGöttingenGermany

Personalised recommendations