Prismatic Realities: Multidisciplinary and Interdisciplinary Cultures and Implications for Information Literacy in Visual Studies: The Case of History of Photography

Conference paper
Part of the Communications in Computer and Information Science book series (CCIS, volume 552)

Abstract

The specialized field of history of photography (HP) is continually evolving, and its capability to use an historical image as explanatory lens, challenges students navigating the scholarly literature, with implications for information literacy and scholarly communication. How is HP constructed, or mediated via different disciplinary perspectives? Within the domain of visual studies, finding the best way to introduce users to the disciplinary cultures that animate HP is imperative for helping them appreciate the complexity and influence on scholarly communication within the wider scope of visual studies and literacy. Too often the first recourse is fine arts literature and not the richly layered literature appearing in other disciplines—therefore this diagrammatic, and graphical presentation is proposed to inform their information needs and strategies. Predicated upon a definitional conceptual model of disciplinary culture and disciplinary formation informing information literacy, this presentation can be applicable to other humanities disciplinary instruction.

Keywords

Disciplines History of photography Interdisciplinary Multidisciplinary Visual literacy/studies 

References

  1. 1.
    Benjamin, W.: The Work of Art in the Age of Mechanical Reproduction. Prism Key Press, Garden City (2010)Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    Gasser, M.: Histories of photography 1839–1939. Hist. Photogr. 16, 50–60 (1992)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Henisch, H., Henisch, B. (eds.): The early years of history of photography, an interview with Heinz and Bridget Henisch. Hist. Photogr. 30, 196–202 (2006)Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    Trachtenberg, A.: Reading American Photographs: Images as History. Mathew Brady to Walker Evans. Hill and Wang, New York (1989)Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    Hannavy, J. (ed.): Encyclopedia of Nineteenth-century Photography. Taylor & Francis Group, New York (2008)Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    Warren, L. (ed.): Encyclopedia of Twentieth-century Photography. Routledge, New York (2006)Google Scholar
  7. 7.
    Nickel, D.R.: History of photography: the state of research. Art Bull. 83, 548–558 (2001)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Hershberger, A.E.: The past, present and future of the history of photography: interviews with Peter C. Bunnell, Gretchen Garner and Britt Salvesen. Hist. Photogr. 30, 203–211 (2006)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Newhall, B.: The History of Photography from 1839 to the Present Day, 3rd edn. Museum of Modern Art, New York (1949)Google Scholar
  10. 10.
    Kelsey, R., Stimson, B. (eds.): The Meaning of Photography. Sterling and Francine Clark Art Institute, Williamstow (2008)Google Scholar
  11. 11.
    Brennen, B., Hardt, H. (eds.): Picturing the Past: Media, History, and Photography. University of Illinois Press, Urbana (1999)Google Scholar
  12. 12.
    Clarke, G.: The Photograph. Oxford University Press, Oxford (1997)Google Scholar
  13. 13.
    Peters, M., Mergen, B.: Doing the rest: the uses of photographs in American studies. Am. Q. 29, 280–303 (1977)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Buchanan, A.L., Hérubel, J.-P.V.M.: Clio’s other photographic literature: searching the historical journal literature using America: history and life to explore the history of photography. Art Documentation 3, 199–209 (2012)Google Scholar
  15. 15.
    Buchanan, A.L., Hérubel, J.-P.V.M.: Through Clio’s lens: exploring disciplinary, intellectual, and historical orientations in the history of photography. J. Sch. Publishing 44, 237–255 (2013)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Hérubel, J.-P.V.M.: Disciplinary morphologies, interdisciplinarities: conceptualizations and implications for academic libraries. In: Mack, D.C., Gibson, C. (eds.) Interdisciplinarity and Academic Libraries: ACRL Publications in Librarianship, vol. 66, pp. 17–53. ACRL, Chicago (2012)Google Scholar
  17. 17.
    Elkins, J.: Responses to Mieke Bal’s `Visual essentialism and the object of visual culture’ (2003): Nine modes of interdisciplinarity for visual studies. J. Vis. Cult. 2, 232–237 (2003)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    Tagg, J.: The Burden of Representation: Essays on Photographies and Histories. University of Massachusetts Press, Amherst (1988)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    Tagg, J.: The Disciplinary Frame: Photographic Truths and the Capture of Meaning. University of Minnesota Press, Minneapolis (2009)Google Scholar
  20. 20.
    Visual Rhetoric/Visual Literacy: Writing about Photography. http://twp.duke.edu/uploads/assets/photography.pdf
  21. 21.
    Mitchell, W.J.T.: Interdisciplinarity and visual culture. Art Bull. 77, 540–544 (1995)Google Scholar
  22. 22.
    Dikovitskaya, M.: Visual Culture: The Study of the Visual after the Cultural Turn. MIT Press, Cambridge (2005)Google Scholar
  23. 23.

Copyright information

© Springer International Publishing Switzerland 2015

Open Access This chapter is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution Noncommercial License, which permits any noncommercial use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author(s) and source are credited.

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.LibrariesPurdue UniversityWest LafayetteUSA

Personalised recommendations