Learning Scholarly Information Competencies in the Community of Practice: A Case Study of Polish Critical Pedagogy Researchers

Conference paper
Part of the Communications in Computer and Information Science book series (CCIS, volume 552)

Abstract

The present paper presents the findings of research conducted in 2014/2015. The aim of the research was to understand how members of a particular academic community learn scholarly information competencies, wherein learning was perceived as a social and cultural phenomenon and, especially, as a practice. The research methodology was based on semi-structured interviews with individual members of the community and focus-group interviews. The community under study consisted of Polish critical pedagogy researchers. My investigations drew on Schatzki, Lave, and Wenger for the theoretical and philosophical underpinnings of the qualitative data analysis. The research showed that being a part of the community of practice offers multiple opportunities to learn scholarly information literacy. However, at the same time, being inside and co-creating a community does not necessarily entail new scholarly information competencies since the group may hinder the inclusion of new practices.

Keywords

Scholarly information literacy Community of practice Social learning Poland 

Notes

Acknowledgments

I would like to thank the respondents for their cooperation and trust. I am grateful to Patrycja Poniatowska and Emanuel Kulczycki for their valuable remarks.

References

  1. 1.
    Kulczycki, E.: Assessing Publications in the Humanities and Social Sciences: A Case of Parametric Evaluation in Poland (2015). https://www.academia.edu/12877616/Assessing_Publications_in_the_Humanities_and_Social_Sciences_a_Case_of_Parametric_Evaluation_in_Poland
  2. 2.
    Wenger, E.: Communities of Practice: Learning, Meaning, and Identity. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge (1998)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Lave, J., Wenger, E.: Situated Learning. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge (1991)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Lupton, M., Bruce, C.: Windows on information literacy worlds. In: Lloyd, A., Talja, S. (eds.) Practising Information Literacy, pp. 4–27. Centre for Information Studies, Wagga Wagga (2010)Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    Fry, J.: Scholarly research and information practices. Inf. Process. Manage. 42(1), 299–316 (2006)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Talja, S., Savolainen, R., Maula, H.: Field differences in the use and perceived usefulness of scholarly mailing lists. Inf. Res. 10 (2004) http://www.informationr.net/ir/10-1/paper200.html
  7. 7.
    Palmer, C.L., Teffeau, L.C., Pirmann, C.M.: Scholarly Information Practices in the Online Environment: Themes from the Literature and Implications for Library Service Development. OCLC Research, Dublin (2009)Google Scholar
  8. 8.
    Talja, S.: Information sharing in academic communities. New Rev. Inf. Behav. Res. 3, 143–159 (2002)Google Scholar
  9. 9.
    Wenger, E., McDermott, R., Snyder, W.M.: Cultivating Communities of Practice. Harvard Business School Press, Boston (2002)Google Scholar
  10. 10.
    Schatzki, T.R.: On organizations as they happen. Organ. Stud. 27, 1863–1873 (2006)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Schatzki, T.R.: Introduction: Practice Theory. In: Schatzki, T.R., Savigny, E.V., Knorr-Cetina, K. (eds.) The Practice Turn in Contemporary Theory, pp. 10–23. Routlegde, London (2001)Google Scholar
  12. 12.
    Schreiber, T.: Information literacy, mobile technologies and study practices. In: Kurbanoğlu, S., Grassian, E., Mizrachi, D., Catts, R., Špiranec, S. (eds.) ECIL 2013. CCIS, vol. 397, pp. 317–323. Springer, Heidelberg (2013)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Kemmis, S., Wilkinson, J., Edwards-Groves, C., Hardy, I., Grootenboer, P., Bristol, L.: Changing Practices, Changing Education. Springer, Singapore (2014)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Lloyd, A., Bonner, A., Dawson-Rose, C.: The health information practices of people living with chronic health conditions. J. Libr. Inf. Sci. 46(3), 207–216 (2014)Google Scholar
  15. 15.
    Lloyd, A.: Information literacy as a socially enacted practice. J. Doc. 68(6), 772–783 (2012)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Wenger, E.: Communities of practice and social learning systems: the career of a concept. In: Blackmore, C. (ed.) Social Learning Systems and Communities of Practice, pp. 179–198. Springer, London (2010)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Illeris, K.: Trzy Wymiary Uczenia się. Wydawnictwo Naukowe DSWE TWP, Wrocław (2006)Google Scholar
  18. 18.
    Stake, R.E.: Case studies. In: Denzin, N.K., Lincoln, Y.S. (eds.) Handbook of Qualitative Research, pp. 236–247. Sage, Thousand Oaks (1994)Google Scholar
  19. 19.
    Onwuegbuzie, A.J., Dickinson, W.B., Leech, N.L., Zoran, A.G.: A qualitative framework for collecting and analyzing data in focus group research. Int. J. Qual. Methods 8, 1–21 (2009)CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer International Publishing Switzerland 2015

Open Access This chapter is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution Noncommercial License, which permits any noncommercial use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author(s) and source are credited.

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.University of Lower SilesiaWroclawPoland

Personalised recommendations