Supporting the Process: Adapting Search Systems to Search Stages

Conference paper
Part of the Communications in Computer and Information Science book series (CCIS, volume 552)

Abstract

Search engines have become indispensable tools for the information related tasks performed by a wide variety of searchers across the globe, and the information literacy of these search engine users varies widely. The more complex tasks performed using search engines, involving learning and construction, may consist of multiple stages, potentially affecting searchers’ feelings, thoughts and actions. However, despite recent advances in personalization and contextualization, current search engines do not necessarily support these stages. This conceptual paper discusses the potential impact of search stages on the desired functionality of search systems. First, it looks at process models in the context of information literacy, followed by the support of current search engines for the stages described in these models. Finally, the paper reconciles the information literacy and system perspectives by discussing novel stage-aware search systems.

Keywords

Information seeking Information literacy Search stages Search systems 

References

  1. 1.
    ALA, ACRL: Information literacy competency standards for higher education (2000). http://arizona.openrepository.com/arizona/handle/10150/105645
  2. 2.
    Kuhlthau, C.C.: Seeking Meaning: a Process Approach to Library and Information Services. Libraries Unlimited, Westport (2004)Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    Eisenberg, M.B.: Information literacy: essential skills for the information age. DESIDOC J. Libr. Inf. Technol. 28(2), 39–47 (2008)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Huurdeman, H.C., Kamps, J.: From multistage information-seeking models to multistage search systems. In: Proceedings IIiX, IIiX 2014, pp. 145–154. ACM, New York (2014)Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    Kumpulainen, S., Huurdeman, H.C.: Shaken, not steered: the value of shaking up the search process. In: Proceedings of the First International Workshop on Supporting Complex Search Tasks co-located with ECIR. CEUR-WS, Vienna (2015)Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    Wilson, T.D.: Models in information behaviour research. J. Doc. 55, 249–270 (1999)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Bawden, D.: Information and digital literacies: a review of concepts. J. Doc. 57(2), 218–259 (2001)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Virkus, S.: Information literacy in Europe: a literature review. Inf. Res. 8(4) (2003). http://www.informationr.net/ir/8-4/paper159.html
  9. 9.
    Doyle, C.S.: Information Literacy in an Information Society: a Concept for the Information Age. Information Resources Publications, Syracuse University, Syracuse (1994)Google Scholar
  10. 10.
    Lloyd, A.: Information Literacy Landscapes. Chandos Information Professional Series. Chandos Publishing, Oxford (2010)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Association for College and Research Libraries: Framework for information literacy for higher education (2015). http://www.ala.org/acrl/standards/ilframework
  12. 12.
    Eisenberg, M.B., Berkowitz, R.: Information-Problem Solving: the Big Six Skills Approach. Ablex, Norwood (1990)Google Scholar
  13. 13.
    Kuhlthau, C., Heinstrom, J., Todd, R.: The information search process revisited: is the model still useful? Inf. Res. 13(4), 45 (2008). http://www.informationr.net/ir/13-4/paper355.htmlGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Eisenberg, M.B.: Technology for a purpose: technology for information problem-solving with the Big6. TechTrends 47(1), 13–17 (2003)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Vakkari, P.: A theory of the task-based information retrieval process: a summary and generalisation of a longitudinal study. J. Doc. 57(1), 44–60 (2001)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Wilson, M.L.: Search User Interface Design. Synthesis lectures on information concepts, retrieval, and services 3(3), 1–143 (2011)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Ingwersen, P., Järvelin, K.: The Turn - Integration of Information Seeking and Retrieval in Context. Springer, Dordrecht (2005)MATHGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    Hearst, M.: Search User Interfaces. Cambridge University Press, New York (2009). http://searchuserinterfaces.com/book/CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    White, R.W., Roth, R.A.: Exploratory search: beyond the query-response paradigm. Synth. Lectures Inf. Concepts Retr. Serv. 1(1), 1–98 (2009)Google Scholar
  20. 20.
    Marchionini, G.: Exploratory search: from finding to understanding. Commun. ACM 49(4), 41–46 (2006)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. 21.
    Cole, C.: Google, tear down this wall to exploratory search! Bull. ASIST 40(5), 50–54 (2014)Google Scholar
  22. 22.
    Borlund, P.: The IIR evaluation model: a framework for evaluation of interactive information retrieval systems. Inf. Res. 8(3) (2003). http://www.informationr.net/ir/8-3/paper152.html
  23. 23.
    Beaulieu, M.: Interaction in information searching and retrieval. J. Doc. 56(4), 431–439 (2000)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. 24.
    Moraveji, N., Russell, D., Bien, J., Mease, D.: Measuring improvement in user search performance resulting from optimal search tips. In: Proceedings SIGIR, SIGIR 2011, pp. 355–364. ACM, New York (2011)Google Scholar
  25. 25.
    Bateman, S., Teevan, J., White, R.W.: The search dashboard: how reflection and comparison impact search behavior. In: Proceedings CHI, CHI 2012, pp. 1785–1794. ACM, New York (2012)Google Scholar
  26. 26.
    Gäde, M., Hall, M., Huurdeman, H., Kamps, J., Koolen, M., Skov, M., Toms, E., Walsh, D.: Overview of the INEX 2015 interactive social book search track. In: CLEF 2015 Online Working Notes. CEUR (2015)Google Scholar
  27. 27.
    Huurdeman, H., Kamps, J., Koolen, M., Kumpulainen, S.: The value of multistage search systems for book search. In: CLEF 2015 Online Working Notes. CEUR (2015)Google Scholar
  28. 28.
    Freund, L., O’Brien, H., Kopak, R.: Getting the big picture: supporting comprehension and learning in search. In: Proceedings Searching as Learning Workshop. University of Regensburg, Regensburg (2014)Google Scholar
  29. 29.
    Vakkari, P.: Exploratory searching as conceptual exploration. In: Proceedings HCIR, pp. 24–27. Rutgers University, New Brunswick (2010)Google Scholar
  30. 30.
    Walton, G., Hepworth, M.: A longitudinal study of changes in learners’ cognitive states during and following an information literacy teaching intervention. J. Doc. 67(3), 449–479 (2011)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. 31.
    Johnston, B., Webber, S.: Information literacy in higher education: a review and case study. Stud. High. Educ. 28(3), 335--352 (2003)Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer International Publishing Switzerland 2015

Open Access This chapter is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution Noncommercial License, which permits any noncommercial use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author(s) and source are credited.

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.University of AmsterdamAmsterdamThe Netherlands

Personalised recommendations