Skip to main content

Supporting the Process: Adapting Search Systems to Search Stages

  • Conference paper
  • First Online:

Part of the book series: Communications in Computer and Information Science ((CCIS,volume 552))

Abstract

Search engines have become indispensable tools for the information related tasks performed by a wide variety of searchers across the globe, and the information literacy of these search engine users varies widely. The more complex tasks performed using search engines, involving learning and construction, may consist of multiple stages, potentially affecting searchers’ feelings, thoughts and actions. However, despite recent advances in personalization and contextualization, current search engines do not necessarily support these stages. This conceptual paper discusses the potential impact of search stages on the desired functionality of search systems. First, it looks at process models in the context of information literacy, followed by the support of current search engines for the stages described in these models. Finally, the paper reconciles the information literacy and system perspectives by discussing novel stage-aware search systems.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution.

References

  1. ALA, ACRL: Information literacy competency standards for higher education (2000). http://arizona.openrepository.com/arizona/handle/10150/105645

  2. Kuhlthau, C.C.: Seeking Meaning: a Process Approach to Library and Information Services. Libraries Unlimited, Westport (2004)

    Google Scholar 

  3. Eisenberg, M.B.: Information literacy: essential skills for the information age. DESIDOC J. Libr. Inf. Technol. 28(2), 39–47 (2008)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Huurdeman, H.C., Kamps, J.: From multistage information-seeking models to multistage search systems. In: Proceedings IIiX, IIiX 2014, pp. 145–154. ACM, New York (2014)

    Google Scholar 

  5. Kumpulainen, S., Huurdeman, H.C.: Shaken, not steered: the value of shaking up the search process. In: Proceedings of the First International Workshop on Supporting Complex Search Tasks co-located with ECIR. CEUR-WS, Vienna (2015)

    Google Scholar 

  6. Wilson, T.D.: Models in information behaviour research. J. Doc. 55, 249–270 (1999)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Bawden, D.: Information and digital literacies: a review of concepts. J. Doc. 57(2), 218–259 (2001)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Virkus, S.: Information literacy in Europe: a literature review. Inf. Res. 8(4) (2003). http://www.informationr.net/ir/8-4/paper159.html

  9. Doyle, C.S.: Information Literacy in an Information Society: a Concept for the Information Age. Information Resources Publications, Syracuse University, Syracuse (1994)

    Google Scholar 

  10. Lloyd, A.: Information Literacy Landscapes. Chandos Information Professional Series. Chandos Publishing, Oxford (2010)

    Book  Google Scholar 

  11. Association for College and Research Libraries: Framework for information literacy for higher education (2015). http://www.ala.org/acrl/standards/ilframework

  12. Eisenberg, M.B., Berkowitz, R.: Information-Problem Solving: the Big Six Skills Approach. Ablex, Norwood (1990)

    Google Scholar 

  13. Kuhlthau, C., Heinstrom, J., Todd, R.: The information search process revisited: is the model still useful? Inf. Res. 13(4), 45 (2008). http://www.informationr.net/ir/13-4/paper355.html

    Google Scholar 

  14. Eisenberg, M.B.: Technology for a purpose: technology for information problem-solving with the Big6. TechTrends 47(1), 13–17 (2003)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Vakkari, P.: A theory of the task-based information retrieval process: a summary and generalisation of a longitudinal study. J. Doc. 57(1), 44–60 (2001)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Wilson, M.L.: Search User Interface Design. Synthesis lectures on information concepts, retrieval, and services 3(3), 1–143 (2011)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Ingwersen, P., Järvelin, K.: The Turn - Integration of Information Seeking and Retrieval in Context. Springer, Dordrecht (2005)

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  18. Hearst, M.: Search User Interfaces. Cambridge University Press, New York (2009). http://searchuserinterfaces.com/book/

    Book  Google Scholar 

  19. White, R.W., Roth, R.A.: Exploratory search: beyond the query-response paradigm. Synth. Lectures Inf. Concepts Retr. Serv. 1(1), 1–98 (2009)

    Google Scholar 

  20. Marchionini, G.: Exploratory search: from finding to understanding. Commun. ACM 49(4), 41–46 (2006)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. Cole, C.: Google, tear down this wall to exploratory search! Bull. ASIST 40(5), 50–54 (2014)

    Google Scholar 

  22. Borlund, P.: The IIR evaluation model: a framework for evaluation of interactive information retrieval systems. Inf. Res. 8(3) (2003). http://www.informationr.net/ir/8-3/paper152.html

  23. Beaulieu, M.: Interaction in information searching and retrieval. J. Doc. 56(4), 431–439 (2000)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  24. Moraveji, N., Russell, D., Bien, J., Mease, D.: Measuring improvement in user search performance resulting from optimal search tips. In: Proceedings SIGIR, SIGIR 2011, pp. 355–364. ACM, New York (2011)

    Google Scholar 

  25. Bateman, S., Teevan, J., White, R.W.: The search dashboard: how reflection and comparison impact search behavior. In: Proceedings CHI, CHI 2012, pp. 1785–1794. ACM, New York (2012)

    Google Scholar 

  26. Gäde, M., Hall, M., Huurdeman, H., Kamps, J., Koolen, M., Skov, M., Toms, E., Walsh, D.: Overview of the INEX 2015 interactive social book search track. In: CLEF 2015 Online Working Notes. CEUR (2015)

    Google Scholar 

  27. Huurdeman, H., Kamps, J., Koolen, M., Kumpulainen, S.: The value of multistage search systems for book search. In: CLEF 2015 Online Working Notes. CEUR (2015)

    Google Scholar 

  28. Freund, L., O’Brien, H., Kopak, R.: Getting the big picture: supporting comprehension and learning in search. In: Proceedings Searching as Learning Workshop. University of Regensburg, Regensburg (2014)

    Google Scholar 

  29. Vakkari, P.: Exploratory searching as conceptual exploration. In: Proceedings HCIR, pp. 24–27. Rutgers University, New Brunswick (2010)

    Google Scholar 

  30. Walton, G., Hepworth, M.: A longitudinal study of changes in learners’ cognitive states during and following an information literacy teaching intervention. J. Doc. 67(3), 449–479 (2011)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  31. Johnston, B., Webber, S.: Information literacy in higher education: a review and case study. Stud. High. Educ. 28(3), 335--352 (2003)

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Hugo C. Huurdeman .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2015 Springer International Publishing Switzerland

About this paper

Cite this paper

Huurdeman, H.C., Kamps, J. (2015). Supporting the Process: Adapting Search Systems to Search Stages. In: Kurbanoglu, S., Boustany, J., Špiranec, S., Grassian, E., Mizrachi, D., Roy, L. (eds) Information Literacy: Moving Toward Sustainability. ECIL 2015. Communications in Computer and Information Science, vol 552. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-28197-1_40

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-28197-1_40

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Cham

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-319-28196-4

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-319-28197-1

  • eBook Packages: Computer ScienceComputer Science (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics