Field-Specific Information Needs of Doctoral Students in Psychology. A Comparative Study

  • Zuza WiorogórskaEmail author
Conference paper
Part of the Communications in Computer and Information Science book series (CCIS, volume 552)


The purpose of this exploratory study (to be held between February 2015 and June 2016) is to investigate the information needs of doctoral students in the field of psychology. The research will seek to identify the main information challenges and problems of doctoral students in their research process. There are three researched institutions: University of Warsaw, University of Lille 3, and University of California, Berkeley. The study will build upon information literacy (IL), the concept of methodological literacy as well as information behavior, and use of social media in science. The study involves comparisons of how Ph.D. candidates handle their retrieved information, obstacles they meet, and choices they make while searching for information. In 2015, the author conducted a pilot study among Polish and French doctoral students. This paper summarizes the findings at this stage of research.


Information literacy Information behavior Information needs Doctoral students in psychology Comparative study 


  1. 1.
    Wiorogórska, Z.: Information literacy and doctoral students in France and Poland: a comparative study - ZIN. Inf. Stud. 52(1), 52–66 (2014)Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    Collins, E., Jubb, M.: How do researchers in the humanities use information resources? LIBER Q. 21(2), 176–187 (2012)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Talja, S., Maula, H.: Reasons for the use and non-use of electronic journals and databases. J. Doc. 59(6), 673–691 (2003)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Steinerová, J.: Methodological literacy of doctoral students – an emerging model. In: Kurbanoğlu, S., Grassian, E., Mizrachi, D., Catts, R., Špiranec, S. (eds.) ECIL 2013. CCIS, vol. 397, pp. 148–154. Springer, Heidelberg (2013)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Chartered Institute of Library and Information Professionals. Information literacy – Definition (2014).
  6. 6.
    Wilson, T.D.: Models in information behaviour research. J. Doc. 55(3), 249–270 (1999)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Streatfield, D., Allen, D., Wilson, T.: Information literacy training for postgraduate and postdoctoral researchers: a national survey and its implications. Libri 60, 230–240 (2010)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Vezzosi, M.: Doctoral students’ information behaviour: an exploratory study at the University of Parma (Italy). New Libr. World 110(1/2), 65–80 (2009)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Drachen, T.M., Larsen, A.V., Gullbekk, E., Westbye, H., Lach, K.: Information Behaviour and Practices of Ph.D. Students. Research Support Services, Copenhagen University and Information Services. University of Oslo Library. Vienna University Library (2011).
  10. 10.
    Steinerová, J., Hrčková, A.: Information support of research information interactions of Ph.D. students in Slovakia. Grey J. 10(2), 79–85 (2014)Google Scholar
  11. 11.
    Macauley, P., Green, R.: Can our relationships be reconceptualized? Librarians, information literacy, and doctoral learners. J. Educ. Inf. Sci. 50(2), 68–78 (2009)Google Scholar
  12. 12.
    Kumar, S., Ochoa, M., Edwards, M.: Considering information literacy skills and needs: designing library instruction for the online learner. Commun. Inf. Lit. 6(1), 91–106 (2012)Google Scholar
  13. 13.
    Tuñón, J., Ramirez, L.: ABD or EdD? a model of library training for distance doctoral students. J. Libr. Admin. 50, 989–996 (2010)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Green, R.: Fostering a community of doctoral learners. J. Libr. Admin. 45(1/2), 169–183 (2006)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Miles, M.B., Huberman, A.M.: Qualitative Data Analysis: An Expanded Sourcebook. SAGE Publications, Thousand Oaks (1994)Google Scholar
  16. 16.
    Teichler, U.: Opportunities and problems of comparative higher education research: the daily life of research. High. Educ. 67(4), 393–408 (2014)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Reale, E.: Challenges in higher education research: the use of quantitative tools in comparative analyses. High. Educ. 67(4), 409–422 (2014)MathSciNetCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    Wiorogorska, Z., Rehman, S.U.: When librarians became researchers: the creation of international culture of knowledge sharing beyond the boarders. Pak. Libr. Inf. Sci. J. 43(2), 22–33 (2012)Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer International Publishing Switzerland 2015

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.University of Warsaw LibraryWarsawPoland

Personalised recommendations