Advertisement

Doctoral Research on Teachers as Technology Users: Summary of a Work in Progress

  • Agnese Karaseva
Conference paper
Part of the Communications in Computer and Information Science book series (CCIS, volume 552)

Abstract

This is a summary of a doctoral research study in progress which deals with secondary school teachers, and their use of different forms of information and communication technology (ICT). The particular focus of the study is on the relationships between various teacher-level, societal and contextual factors, and the ways in which these factors either support or constrain technology integration in education. This mixed-method small-scale study was conducted in Latvia and Estonia. Both countries have tried to make digital competences an integral part of every school subject, but there are no formal requirements on how subject teachers should integrate technology into their teaching. As a result, very diverse attitudes towards ICT and technology usage practices emerge. Part of this study was conducted as an action research project, and thus the findings have been utilized in providing recommendations to a group of teachers willing to make technology a more integral part of their teaching.

Keywords

Secondary school teachers Teachers’ beliefs Pedagogic use of ICT 

Notes

Acknowledgment

The author is grateful to the Tiger Leap Foundation for financing the study “Effect of teachers’ ICT use activity on pupils’ knowledgeable use of technology” and is grateful to the Estonian Research Council for the support of the project PUT44.

References

  1. 1.
    Rogers, E.M., Shoemaker, F.F.: Communication of Innovation. The Free Press, New York (1971)Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    Layder, D.: New Strategies in Social Research: An Introduction and Guide. Polity Press, Cambridge (1993)Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    Layder, D.: Modern Social Theory: Key Debates and New Directions. UCL Press, London and Bristol (1997)Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    Pruulmann-Vengerfeldt, P.: Information Technology Users and Uses within the Different Layers of the Information Environment in Estonia. Ph.D. thesis. Tartu University Press, Tartu (2006)Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    Mägi, E.: Issues in Estonia: The Challenge of Having Fewer Children! Thematic Dossiers for Observatory for the New Technologies and Education (2006)Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    Kangro, A., Kangro, I.: Integration of ICT in teacher education and different school subjects in latvia. Educ. Media Int. 41(1), 31–37 (2004)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Grivins, M.: Implementation of per capita education funding in the Baltic states. Baltic J. European Stud. 2(2), 87–108 (2012)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Karaseva, A., Pruulmann-Vengerfeldt, P., Siibak, A.: Comparison of different subject cultures and pedagogical use of ICTs in Estonian schools. Nord. J. Digit. Lit. 3, 157–171 (2013)Google Scholar
  9. 9.
    Zhao, Y.: Social Studies Teachers’ Perspectives on Technology Integration. Ph.D. thesis, University of Georgia, USAGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Goodson, I.F., Mangan, J.M.: Subject cultures and the introduction of classroom computers. Br. Educ. Res. J. 21(5), 613–629 (1995)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Karaseva, A., Siibak, A., Pruulmann-Vengerfeldt, P.: Relationships Between Teachers’ Pedagogical Beliefs, Subject Cultures, and Mediation Practices of Students’ Use of Digital Technology. Cyberpsychol. J. Psychol. Res. Cyberspace, 9(1) (2015)Google Scholar
  12. 12.
    Karaseva, A.: Pedagogy of connection: teachers’ experiences of promoting students’ digital literacy. In: Erstad, O., Kumpulainen, K., Mäkitalo, Å., Schrøder, K., Pruulmann-Vengerfeld, P., Jóhansdóttir, T. (eds.) Learning Across Contexts in the Knowledge Society. Sense Publishers, Rotterdam (in press)Google Scholar
  13. 13.
    Dillon, P.: Creativity, Integrativism and Pedagogy of Connection. Int. J. Thinking Skills Creativity 1(2), 69–83 (2006)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Dillon, P.: Pedagogy of connection and boundary crossing: methodological and epistemological transactions in working across and between disciplines. Innovations Educ. Teach. Int. 45(3), 255–262 (2008)MathSciNetCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Karaseva, A., Pruulmann-Vengerfeldt, P.: An Exploratory Study of Relationships between in-Service Teacher Achievement Motivation and their Technology Integration Practices (work in progress)Google Scholar
  16. 16.
    Butler, R.: Teachers’ achievement goal orientation and associations with teachers help seeking: examining a novel approach to teacher motivation. J. Educ. Psychol. 99(2), 241–252 (2007)MathSciNetCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Butler, R.: Striving to connect: extending an achievement goal approach to teacher motivation to include relational goal for teaching. J. Educ. Psychol. 104(3), 726–742 (2012)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    Karaseva, A.: Teachers as Internet Users: An Exploratory Study on the Relationships between Teachers’ Computer Self-efficacy and Search Performance (work in progress)Google Scholar
  19. 19.
    Bandura, A.: Self-efficacy mechanism in human agency. Am. Psychol. 37(2), 122–147 (1982)CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer International Publishing Switzerland 2015

Open Access This chapter is licensed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 2.5 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/2.5/), which permits any noncommercial use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license and indicate if changes were made.

The images or other third party material in this chapter are included in the chapter's Creative Commons license, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the chapter's Creative Commons license and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder.

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Faculty of Social Sciences and EducationUniversity of TartuTartuEstonia

Personalised recommendations