Skip to main content

Efficient Multi-scale Patch-Based Segmentation

  • Conference paper
  • First Online:
  • 941 Accesses

Part of the book series: Lecture Notes in Computer Science ((LNIP,volume 9467))

Abstract

The objective of this paper is to devise an efficient and accurate patch-based method for image segmentation. The method presented in this paper builds on the work of Wu et al. [14] with the introduction of a compact multi-scale feature representation and heuristics to speed up the process. A smaller patch representation along with hierarchical pruning allowed the inclusion of more prior knowledge, resulting in a more accurate segmentation. We also propose an intuitive way of optimizing the search strategy to find similar voxel, making the method computationally efficient. An additional approach at improving the speed was explored with the integration of our method with Optimised PatchMatch [11]. The proposed method was validated using the 100 hippocampus images with ground truth segmentation from ADNI-1 (mean DSC = 0.892) and the MICCAI SATA segmentation challenge dataset (mean DSC = 0.8587).

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution.

Buying options

Chapter
USD   29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD   39.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD   54.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Learn about institutional subscriptions

Notes

  1. 1.

    http://www.hippocampal-protocol.net.

References

  1. Heckemann, R.A., et al.: Automatic anatomical brain MRI segmentation combining label propagation and decision fusion. NeuroImage 33(1), 115–126 (2006)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Aljabar, P., et al.: Multi-atlas based segmentation of brain images: atlas selection and its effect on accuracy. Neuroimage 46(3), 726–738 (2009)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Liu, J., Ji, S., Ye, J.: SLEP: sparse learning with efficient projections. Ariz. State Univ. 6, 491 (2009)

    Google Scholar 

  4. Wright, J., et al.: Robust face recognition via sparse representation. IEEE Trans. Pattern Anal. Mach. Intell. 31(2), 210–227 (2009)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Coupé, P., Manjón, J.V., Fonov, V., Pruessner, J., Robles, M., Collins, D.L.: Nonlocal patch-based label fusion for hippocampus segmentation. In: Jiang, T., Navab, N., Pluim, J.P.W., Viergever, M.A. (eds.) MICCAI 2010, Part III. LNCS, vol. 6363, pp. 129–136. Springer, Heidelberg (2010)

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  6. Rousseau, F., Habas, P.A., Studholme, C.: A supervised patch-based approach for human brain labeling. IEEE Trans. Med. Imaging 30(10), 1852–1862 (2011)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Coupé, P., et al.: Patch-based segmentation using expert priors: application to hippocampus and ventricle segmentation. NeuroImage 54(2), 940–954 (2011)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Zhang, D., Guo, Q., Wu, G., Shen, D.: Sparse patch-based label fusion for multi-atlas segmentation. In: Yap, P.-T., Liu, T., Shen, D., Westin, C.-F., Shen, L. (eds.) MBIA 2012. LNCS, vol. 7509, pp. 94–102. Springer, Heidelberg (2012)

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  9. Tong, T., et al.: Segmentation of brain MR images via sparse patch representation. In: MICCAI Workshop on Sparsity Techniques in Medical Imaging (STMI) (2012)

    Google Scholar 

  10. Asman, A., et al.: Miccai 2013 segmentation algorithms, theory and applications (SATA) challenge results summary. In: MICCAI Challenge Workshop on Segmentation: Algorithms, Theory and Applications (SATA) (2013)

    Google Scholar 

  11. Ta, V.-T., Giraud, R., Collins, D.L., Coupé, P.: Optimized PatchMatch for near real time and accurate label fusion. In: Golland, P., Hata, N., Barillot, C., Hornegger, J., Howe, R. (eds.) MICCAI 2014, Part III. LNCS, vol. 8675, pp. 105–112. Springer, Heidelberg (2014)

    Google Scholar 

  12. Roche, F., et al.: Accuracy of BMAS hippocampus segmentation using the harmonized hippocampal protocol. Alzheimer’s Dementia J. Alzheimer’s Assoc. 10(4), P705–P706 (2014)

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  13. Gray, K.R., et al.: Integration of EADC-ADNI harmonised hippocampus labels into the LEAP automated segmentation technique. Alzheimer’s Dementia J. Alzheimer’s Assoc. 10(4), P119–P120 (2014)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Wu, G., et al.: Hierarchical multi-atlas label fusion with multi-scale feature representation and label-specific patch partition. NeuroImage 106, 34–46 (2015)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Rivest-Hénault, D., et al.: Robust inverse-consistent affine CT-MR registration in MRI-assisted and MRI-alone prostate radiation therapy. Med. Image Anal. 23(1), 56–69 (2015)

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Abinash Pant .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2015 Springer International Publishing Switzerland

About this paper

Cite this paper

Pant, A., Rivest-Hénault, D., Bourgeat, P. (2015). Efficient Multi-scale Patch-Based Segmentation. In: Wu, G., Coupé, P., Zhan, Y., Munsell, B., Rueckert, D. (eds) Patch-Based Techniques in Medical Imaging. Patch-MI 2015. Lecture Notes in Computer Science(), vol 9467. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-28194-0_25

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-28194-0_25

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Cham

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-319-28193-3

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-319-28194-0

  • eBook Packages: Computer ScienceComputer Science (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics