Skip to main content

Patch-Based Segmentation from MP2RAGE Images: Comparison to Conventional Techniques

  • Conference paper
  • First Online:
Book cover Patch-Based Techniques in Medical Imaging (Patch-MI 2015)

Abstract

In structural and functional MRI studies there is a need for robust and accurate automatic segmentation of various brain structures. We present a comparison study of three automatic segmentation methods based on the new T1-weighted MR sequence called MP2RAGE, which has superior soft tissue contrast. Automatic segmentations of the thalamus and hippocampus are compared to manual segmentations. In addition, we qualitatively evaluate the segmentations when warped to co-registered maps of the fractional anisotropy (FA) of water diffusion. Compared to manual segmentation, the best results were obtained with a patch-based segmentation method (volBrain) using a library of images from the same scanner (local), followed by volBrain using an external library (external), FSL and Freesurfer. The qualitative evaluation showed that volBrain local and volBrain external produced almost no segmentation errors when overlaid on FA maps, while both FSL and Freesurfer segmentations were found to overlap with white matter tracts. These results underline the importance of applying accurate and robust segmentation methods and demonstrate the superiority of patch-based methods over more conventional methods.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 39.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 54.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  1. Boccardi, M., et al.: Delphi definition of the EADC-ADNI Harmonized Protocol for hippocampal segmentation on magnetic resonance. Alzheimer’s Dement. J. Alzheimer’s Assoc. 11(2), 126–138 (2015)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Nugent, A.C., et al.: Automated subcortical segmentation using FIRST: test-retest reliability, interscanner reliability, and comparison to manual segmentation. Hum. Brain Mapp. 34(9), 2313–2329 (2013)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Han, X., et al.: Reliability of MRI-derived measurements of human cerebral cortical thickness: the effects of field strength, scanner upgrade and manufacturer. NeuroImage 32(1), 180–194 (2006)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Mulder, E.R., et al.: Hippocampal volume change measurement: quantitative assessment of the reproducibility of expert manual outlining and the automated methods FreeSurfer and FIRST. NeuroImage 92, 169–181 (2014)

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  5. Coupé, P., et al.: Patch-based segmentation using expert priors: application to hippocampus and ventricle segmentation. NeuroImage 54(2), 940–954 (2011)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Eskildsen, S.F., et al.: BEaST: brain extraction based on nonlocal segmentation technique. NeuroImage 59(3), 2362–2373 (2012)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Tong, T., et al.: Segmentation of MR images via discriminative dictionary learning and sparse coding: application to hippocampus labeling. NeuroImage 76, 11–23 (2013)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Coupé, P., et al.: Scoring by nonlocal image patch estimator for early detection of Alzheimer’s disease. NeuroImage Clin. 1(1), 141–152 (2012)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Marques, J.P., et al.: MP2RAGE, a self bias-field corrected sequence for improved segmentation and T1-mapping at high field. NeuroImage 49(2), 1271–1281 (2010)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Fujimoto, K., et al.: Quantitative comparison of cortical surface reconstructions from MP2RAGE and multi-echo MPRAGE data at 3 and 7 T. NeuroImage 90, 60–73 (2014)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Leemans, A., et al.: ExploreDTI: a graphical toolbox for processing, analyzing, and visualizing diffusion MR data. In: 17th Annual Meeting of International Society Magnetic Resonance Medicine, Hawaii, USA (2009)

    Google Scholar 

  12. Yushkevich, P.A., et al.: User-guided 3D active contour segmentation of anatomical structures: significantly improved efficiency and reliability. NeuroImage 31(3), 1116–1128 (2006)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Power, B.D., et al.: Validation of a protocol for manual segmentation of the thalamus on magnetic resonance imaging scans. Psychiatry Res. 232(1), 98–105 (2015)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Patenaude, B., et al.: A Bayesian model of shape and appearance for subcortical brain segmentation. NeuroImage 56(3), 907–922 (2011)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Dale, A.M., Fischl, B., Sereno, M.I.: Cortical surface-based analysis: I. Segmentation and surface reconstruction. NeuroImage 9(2), 179–194 (1999)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Manjon, J.V., et al.: Adaptive non-local means denoising of MR images with spatially varying noise levels. J. Magn. Reson. Imaging JMRI 31(1), 192–203 (2010)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Avants, B.B., et al.: A reproducible evaluation of ANTs similarity metric performance in brain image registration. NeuroImage 54(3), 2033–2044 (2011)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Weiskopf, N., et al.: Unified segmentation based correction of R1 brain maps for RF transmit field inhomogeneities (UNICORT). NeuroImage 54(3), 2116–2124 (2011)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. Morey, R.A., et al.: A comparison of automated segmentation and manual tracing for quantifying hippocampal and amygdala volumes. NeuroImage 45(3), 855–866 (2009)

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Simon F. Eskildsen .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2015 Springer International Publishing Switzerland

About this paper

Cite this paper

Næss-Schmidt, E.T. et al. (2015). Patch-Based Segmentation from MP2RAGE Images: Comparison to Conventional Techniques. In: Wu, G., Coupé, P., Zhan, Y., Munsell, B., Rueckert, D. (eds) Patch-Based Techniques in Medical Imaging. Patch-MI 2015. Lecture Notes in Computer Science(), vol 9467. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-28194-0_22

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-28194-0_22

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Cham

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-319-28193-3

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-319-28194-0

  • eBook Packages: Computer ScienceComputer Science (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics