Skip to main content

About the Hausdorff Dimension of the Set of Endpoints of Convex Surfaces

  • Conference paper
  • First Online:
Convexity and Discrete Geometry Including Graph Theory

Part of the book series: Springer Proceedings in Mathematics & Statistics ((PROMS,volume 148))

  • 936 Accesses

Abstract

We mainly prove that most d-dimensional convex surfaces \(\Sigma \) have a set of endpoints of Hausdorff dimension at least \(d-2\). A recent previous work of the author gave d / 3 as a lower bound, which is thus improved when \(d \ge 4\). Our proof uses a rather simple example where this dimension is \(d-2\) and the corresponding Hausdorff measure is positive. We also address several related problems. An endpoint is a point not lying in the interior of any shortest path in \(\Sigma \). “Most” means that the exceptions constitute a meager set, relatively to the usual Pompeiu-Hausdorff distance.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 84.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Notes

  1. 1.

    One can also use as a more explicit denomination the term “Euclidean closed convex hypersurface”.

  2. 2.

    We refer for example to [7] or [8] for definitions and basic facts concerning Hausdorff dimension and measure; knowing them precisely is not necessary for understanding the proofs in this paper.

  3. 3.

    The set of outer unit normal vectors to \(\Sigma \) at points of \(U_\infty (C)\).

  4. 4.

    Concerning theses spaces, and Alexandrov spaces, we refer to [5, 6, 19] for terminology and basic facts. Except at a precise point in the proof of Lemma 1, we will just need to know that they are a generalization of the convex complete hypersurfaces of Euclidean spaces, with their inner metric.

  5. 5.

    The idea of considering that kind of exemple came rather lately to my mind, after a conversation with David Guy.

  6. 6.

    The tangent cone \(T_p(\Sigma )\) defined in the introduction is known to be isometric to the abstract tangent cone used in the framework of Alexandrov surfaces.

  7. 7.

    We do not know a direct proof of Lemma 1, though it should exist for a so simple set.

  8. 8.

    Indeed the unit ball of \(T_x\Sigma \) has smaller \(\mathcal {H}^d\)-measure than the unit ball of , the ratio being \(\displaystyle 2^{q-1} \sin ^{q-1} {\arctan r \over 2}\).

  9. 9.

    True for example in finite dimension.

  10. 10.

    A proof of this is given in Lemma 4 of [15].

References

  1. K. Adiprasito, Infinite curvature on typical convex surfaces. Geom. Dedicata 159, 267–275 (2012)

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  2. K. Adiprasito, T. Zamfirescu, Large curvature on typical convex surfaces. J. Convex Anal. 19(2), 385–391 (2012)

    MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  3. K. Adiprasito, T. Zamfirescu, Few Alexandrov surfaces are Riemann. J. Nonlinear Convex Anal. 16, 1147–1153 (2015)

    Google Scholar 

  4. A.D. Aleksandrov, Almost everywhere existence of the second differential of a convex function and some properties of convex surfaces connected with it. Uchen. Zap. Leningrad. Gos. Univ. Math. Ser. 6, 3–35 (1939). (in Russian)

    MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  5. Y. Burago, M. Gromov, G. Perel’man, A.D. Alexandrov spaces with curvature bounded below. Uspekhi mat. Naut, Russian Mah. Surveys 47(2), 1–58 (1992)

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  6. Y. Burago, D. Burago, S. Ivanov, A course in metric geometry. Amer. Math. Soc. (2001)

    Google Scholar 

  7. K. Falconer, Fractal Geometry (Wiley, 1990)

    Google Scholar 

  8. H. Federer, Geometric Measure Theory (Springer, Berlin, 1969)

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  9. V. Klee, Some new results on smoothness and rotundity in normed linear spaces. Math. Ann. 139, 51–63 (1959)

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  10. A.D. Milka, Geodesics and shortest lines on convex hypersurfaces. ii. smoothness of a hypersurface at points of a shortest line. (russian). Ukrain Geom. Sb., 26 103–110 (1983)

    Google Scholar 

  11. Y. Otsu, T. Shioya, The riemannian structure of Alexandrov spaces. J. Differ. Geom. 39(3), 629–658 (1994)

    MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  12. A. Petrunin, Parallel transportation for Alexandrov space with curvature bounded below. Geom. Funct. Anal. 1, 123–148 (1998)

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  13. A. Rivière, Dimension de Hausdorff de la nervure. Geom. Dedicata 85, 217–235 (2001)

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  14. A. Rivière, Hausdorff dimension of cut loci of generic subspaces of Euclidean spaces. J. Convex Anal. 14(4), 823–854 (2007)

    MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  15. A. Rivière, Hausdorff dimension and derivatives of typical nondecreasing continuous functions (2014).<hal-01154558>, https://hal.archives-ouvertes.fr/hal-01154558

  16. A. Rivière, Hausdorff dimension of the set of endpoints of typical convex surfaces. J. Convex Anal. 22(2) (2015)

    Google Scholar 

  17. R. Schneider, Curvatures of typical convex bodies–the complete picture. Proc. Am. Math. Soc. 143, 387–393 (2015)

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  18. R. Schneider, Convex surfaces, curvature and surface area measures, in Handbook of Convex Geometry, vol. A, ed. by P. Gruber, J. Wills (Amsterdam Elserver Science, 1993), pp. 273–299

    Google Scholar 

  19. K. Shiohama, An introduction to the geometry of Alexandrov spaces. Lecture Notes Serie, 8. (Seoul National University, 1992)

    Google Scholar 

  20. C. Vîlcu, On typical degenerate convex surfaces. Math. Ann. 340(3), 543–567 (2008)

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  21. T. Zamfirescu, The curvature of most convex surfaces vanishes almost everywhere. Math. Z. 174, 135–139 (1980)

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  22. T. Zamfirescu, Nonexistence of curvature in most points of most convex surfaces. Math. Ann. 252, 217–219 (1980)

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  23. T. Zamfirescu, Many endpoints and few interior points of geodesics. Inventiones Mathematicae 69(1), 253–257 (1982)

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  24. T. Zamfirescu, On the cut locus in Alexandrov spaces and applications to convex surfaces. Pacific J. Math. 217(2), 375–386 (2004)

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

Thanks are due to Costin Vîlcu for many informations and useful suggestions, and to the referee, who greatly helped to improve the English and the presentation, and to eliminate some mistakes.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Alain Rivière .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2016 Springer International Publishing Switzerland

About this paper

Cite this paper

Rivière, A. (2016). About the Hausdorff Dimension of the Set of Endpoints of Convex Surfaces. In: Adiprasito, K., Bárány, I., Vilcu, C. (eds) Convexity and Discrete Geometry Including Graph Theory. Springer Proceedings in Mathematics & Statistics, vol 148. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-28186-5_8

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics