Skip to main content

Modelling Non-empirical Confirmation

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Book cover Models and Inferences in Science

Part of the book series: Studies in Applied Philosophy, Epistemology and Rational Ethics ((SAPERE,volume 25))

Abstract

The paper provides a presentation and motivation of the concept of non-empirical theory confirmation. Non-empirical theory confirmation is argued to play an important role in the scientific process that has not been adequately acknowledged so far. Its formalization within a Bayesian framework demonstrates that non-empirical confirmation does have the essential structural characteristics of theory confirmation.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 84.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Notes

  1. 1.

    For an instructive philosophical perspective on historical sciences, see Turner (2007).

  2. 2.

    The concept was first laid out in Dawid (2006) and then further developed in Dawid (2013). A Bayesian formalization of one argument of non-empirical confirmation was given in Dawid et al. (2015).

  3. 3.

    The presentation of this section is largely taken from Dawid et al. (2015).

  4. 4.

    For the purpose of our argument, it is not necessary to assign a precise operational meaning to the various levels of \(S\). It is sufficient that they satisfy a natural monotonicity assumption with regard to their impact on \(F_{A}\)—see condition A3.

References

  • Bovens, L., Hartmann, S.: Bayesian epistemology. Oxford University Press, Oxford (2003)

    Google Scholar 

  • Dawid, R.: Underdetermination and theory succession from the perspective of string theory. Philos. Sci. 73, 298–322 (2006)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dawid, R.: String theory and the scientific method. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge (2013)

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Dawid, R., Hartmann, S., Sprenger, J.: The no alternatives argument. Brit. J. Philos. Sci. 66(1), 213–234 (2015)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Howson, C., Urbach, P.: Scientific reasoning: the Bayesian approach, 3rd edn. Open Court, La Salle (2006)

    Google Scholar 

  • Strominger, A., Vafa, C.: Microscopic origin of the Bekenstein Hawking entropy. Phyiscs lett. B379, 99–104 (2006)

    Google Scholar 

  • Turner, D.: Making prehistory: historical science and the scientific realism debate. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge (2007)

    Book  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Richard Dawid .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2016 Springer International Publishing Switzerland

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Dawid, R. (2016). Modelling Non-empirical Confirmation. In: Ippoliti, E., Sterpetti, F., Nickles, T. (eds) Models and Inferences in Science. Studies in Applied Philosophy, Epistemology and Rational Ethics, vol 25. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-28163-6_11

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics