Skip to main content

Entrepreneurship and Hybrid Self-Employment

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Contemporary Entrepreneurship

Abstract

The paper deals with self-employment focusing on one-(wo)man-firms as the smallest units of entrepreneurial companies. We have been trained to think in binary terms of reciprocal exclusion, where people belong to one or another category within the system of employment. Generally, one distinguishes between dependent work including blue- and white-collar workers on the one and independent (self-employed) workers on the other hand. What is very often neglected is that overlapping phenomena can be observed when people combine both categories. In these cases, dependent workers and independent actors have overlapping identities. We call those identities hybrid entrepreneurs. Empirical findings are related to a representative online sample. Conclusions show that the majority of the hybrid one-person enterprises operate only as a sideline business. This category of micro enterprises holds a classical dependent employment (main activity) and additionally works on a self-employed basis. In contrast, the share of one-person enterprises whose self-employment represents the main activity (main business) amounts to merely a bit more than 15 %. Finally, nearly one third of the analyzed one-person enterprises are mixed forms, hence, “true” hybrids lying between the category of main and sideline business.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 129.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 169.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 169.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Notes

  1. 1.

    The literature is full of definitions of entrepreneurship, “which differ along a number of dimensions, i.e. whether entrepreneurship should be defined in terms of dispositions, behaviour, or outcomes; whether it belongs in the economic-commercial domain or can be exercised also in not-for-profit contexts; whether it belongs only in small and/or owner-managed firms or in any organizational context, and whether purpose, growth, risk, innovation or success are necessary criteria for something to qualify as entrepreneurship” (Davidsson 2003, 316).

References

  • Acs, Z. J., & Karlsson, C. (Eds.) (2002). Institutions, entrepreneurship and firm growth. Small Business Economics, Special Issue, 19(3), 183–290.

    Google Scholar 

  • Audretsch, D. B. (1995). Innovation and industry evolution. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Audretsch, D. B. (2007). The Entrepreneurial Society. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Blackburn, R., & Kovalainen, A. (2008). Researching small firms and entrepreneurship: Past, present and future. International Journal of Management Review, 11(2), 127–148.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Blossfeld, H.-P. (1987). Entry into the labour market and occupational career in the Federal Republic: A comparison with American studies. Comparative Studies of Social Structure, 86–115.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bögenhold, D., & Fachinger, U. (2007). Micro-firms and the margins of entrepreneurship: The restructuring of the labour market. The International Journal of Entrepreneurship and Innovation, 8(3), 281–297.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bögenhold, D., Fink, M., & Kraus, S. (2014a). Integrative entrepreneurship research—Bridging the gap between sociological and economic perspectives. International Journal of Entrepreneurial Venturing, 6, 118–139.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bögenhold, D., Heinonen, J., & Akola, E. (2014b). Entrepreneurship and independent professionals. Social and economic logics. International Advances in Economic Research, 20, 295–310.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bögenhold, D., & Klinglmair, A. (2014, August). Motive für die Tätigkeit als Ein-Personen-Unternehmen in Kärnten. Wirtschaftspolitische Blätter, 3–24.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bögenhold, D., & Klinglmair, A. (2015a). Micro-Entrepreneurship: Tendency towards precarious work? Empirical findings for Austria. Athens Journal of Economics and Business, 1(2), 107–121.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bögenhold, D., & Klinglmair, A. (2015b). Female solo self-employment. Features of gendered entrepreneurship. International Review of Entrepreneurship (IRE), 13(1), 47–58.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bonnet, J., Dejardin, M., & Madrid-Guijarro, A. (Eds.). (2012). The shift to the entrepreneurial society: A built economy in education, support and regulation. Cheltenham: Edward Elgar.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bonnet, J., García Pérez de Lema, D., & van Auken, H. (Eds.). (2010). The Entrepreneurial Society: How to fill the gap between knowledge and innovation. Cheltenham: Edward Elgar.

    Google Scholar 

  • Burke, A. (2012). The role of freelancers in the 21st century British economy. London: PCG.

    Google Scholar 

  • Burke, A. E., FitzRoy, F. R., & Nolan, M. A. (2008). What makes a die-hard entrepreneur? Beyond the “employee or entrepreneur” dichotomy. Small Business Economics, 31, 93–115.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Castells, M. (1998). The information age: Economy, society and culture (Vol. 3). Cambridge: Blackwell.

    Google Scholar 

  • Davidsson, P. (2003). The domain of entrepreneurship research: Some suggestions. In J. Katz & D. Shepherd (Eds.), Advances in entrepreneurship, firm emergence and growth (Vol. 6, pp. 315–398). Oxford: Elsevier.

    Google Scholar 

  • Davidsson, P. (2015). Entrepreneurial opportunities and the entrepreneurship nexus: A re-conceptualization. Journal of Business Venturing. doi: 10.1016/j.jbusvent.2015.01.002

    Google Scholar 

  • Davidsson, P., & Wiklund, J. (2001). Levels of analysis in entrepreneurship research: Current practice and suggestions for the future. Entrepreneurship Theory & Practice, 25(4), 81–99.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dey, P., & Steyaert, C. (2006). Keeping (social) entrepreneurship hybrid. Towards a dangerous research agenda. Paper Presented at the Rent Conference 2006.

    Google Scholar 

  • Eurostat Database. (2014). Selbständigkeit nach Geschlecht, Alter und Beruf (lfsa_esgais). Available under http://ec.europa.eu/eurostat/data/database. Download 11.11.2014.

  • Folta, T. B. (2007). Uncertainty rules the day. Strategic Entrepreneurship Journal, 1, 97–99.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Folta, T. B., Delmar, F., & Wennberg, K. (2010). Hybrid entrepreneurship. Management Science, 56, 253–269.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hytti, U. (2005). New meanings for entrepreneurs: From risk-taking heroes to safe-seeking professionals. Journal of Organizational Change Management, 18(6), 594–611. Special Issue: Change in the feminine: Women in change.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Johal, S., & Anastasi, G. (2015). From professional contractor to independent professional: The evolution of freelancing in the UK. Small Business Research. doi:10.1080/13215906.2015.1052342.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kalleberg, A. L. (2011). Good jobs, bad jobs. The rise of polarized employment systems in the United States. New York: Basic Books.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kautonen, T., Down, S., Welter, F., Vainio, P., & Palmroos, J. (2010). Involuntary self-employment as a public policy issue: A cross-country European view. International Journal of Entrepreneurial Behaviour and Research, 16(1–2), 112–129.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kitching, J., & Smallbone, D. (2012). Are freelancers a neglected form of small business? Journal of Small Business and Enterprise Development, 19(1), 74–91.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Klinglmair, A., & Bögenhold, D. (2014). Berufliche Zufriedenheit von Ein-Personen-Unternehmen in Kärnten—Ergebnisse einer empirischen Untersuchung. In K. Anderwald, P. Filzmaier, & K. Hren (Eds.). Kärntner Jahrbuch für Politik (pp. 197–218). Hermagoras Publishers.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mueller, S. L., & Thomas, A. S. (2000). Culture and entrepreneurial potential: A nine country study of control and innovativeness. Journal of Business Venturing, 16(1), 51–75.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Raffiee, J., & Feng, J. (2014). Should I quit my Job?: A hybrid path to entrepreneurship. Academy of Management Journal, 57(4), 936–963.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Shane, S. (2008). The illusions of entrepreneurship. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Shevchuk, A., & Strebkov, D. (2015). The rise of freelance contracting on the Russian-language Internet. Small Enterprise Research. doi: 10.1080/13215906.2015.1052341

    Google Scholar 

  • Statistik Austria. (2013a). Arbeitsmarktstatistiken—Ergebnisse der Mikrozensus Arbeitskräfteerhebung und der Offenen-Stellen-Erhebung. Vienna: Verlag Österreich.

    Google Scholar 

  • Statistik Austria. (2013b). Census 2011 Arbeitsstättenzählung, Ergebnisse zu Arbeitsstätten aus der Registerzählung. Vienna: Statistik Austria.

    Google Scholar 

  • Thurik, R., & Dejardin, M. (2012). Entrepreneurship and culture. In M. V. Gelderen & E. Masurel (Eds.), Entrepreneurship in context (pp. 175–186). London: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Welter, F. (2011). Contextualizing entrepreneurship—Conceptual challenges and ways forward. Entrepreneurship Theory and Practise, 35, 165–184.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Welter, F., & Lasch, F. (2008). Entrepreneurship research in Europe: Taking stock and looking forward. Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice, 32, 241–248.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wennberg, K., Folta, T. B., & Delmar, F. (2006). A real options model of stepwise entry into self-employment. In A. Zacharakis (Ed.), Frontiers in entrepreneurship research (pp. 119–132). Babson Park, MA: Babson College.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wennekers, A. R. M., van Stel, A. J., Carree, M. A., & Thurik, A. R. (2010). The relation between entrepreneurship and economic development: Is it U-shaped ? Foundations and Trends in Entrepreneurship, 6(3), 167–237.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Dieter Bögenhold .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2016 Springer International Publishing Switzerland

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Bögenhold, D., Klinglmair, A. (2016). Entrepreneurship and Hybrid Self-Employment. In: Bögenhold, D., Bonnet, J., Dejardin, M., Garcia Pérez de Lema, D. (eds) Contemporary Entrepreneurship. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-28134-6_8

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics