Abstract
With reference to the experimental work in Chap. 4, we summarize the main findings in point form for the benefit of a wider readership. Notably, the fact that processing power and memory do not seem to have a significant effect on composing efficiency using the Digital Synaptic Neural Substrate (DSNS) approach, and how the quality of the compositions is higher compared to a random piece placement approach. In addition, the DSNS happens to be better than the present state-of-the-art ‘experience table’ approach that is also better at composing than simple random piece placement. Furthermore, in certain cases, variations in the number of photographs or chess games used to seed the DSNS process may be significant. Similarly, so do variations in the number of attributes used that represent the fragments of information taken from the aforemention domains. Possible limitations of the DSNS are discussed, including a brief exploration of its potential applications in other domains and fields .
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2016 The Author(s)
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Iqbal, A., Guid, M., Colton, S., Krivec, J., Azman, S., Haghighi, B. (2016). Consolidation of Results. In: The Digital Synaptic Neural Substrate. SpringerBriefs in Cognitive Computation, vol 3. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-28079-0_5
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-28079-0_5
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Cham
Print ISBN: 978-3-319-28078-3
Online ISBN: 978-3-319-28079-0
eBook Packages: Biomedical and Life SciencesBiomedical and Life Sciences (R0)