Abstract
The promise of smart grids is very attractive. However, it is not yet clear what the future smart grid will look like. Although most researchers acknowledge that users will play a more prominent role in smart grids, there is a lot of uncertainty on this issue. To counter the strong technological bias in smart grid research and literature, we propose that research should focus more on the social and business dimension of smart grid developments. The main elements of such a research agenda are:
-
Developing more socially embedded visions on smart grids and the services it will provide
-
A shift in the focus on developing smart grids components and systems towards the services it will deliver
-
Development and testing of innovative user-centered business models and ecosystems.
More general, on the role of users in smart grids, the main lesson is that user roles should be taken more seriously in relation to smart grids: experts should no longer regard users exclusively and/or simply as potential barriers to smart grid innovation but also as important stakeholders and potential participants in the innovation process.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Notes
- 1.
Literally this translates as ‘the energetic society’.
- 2.
One might view ‘individual’ versus ‘collective’ roles as a third dichotomy but we thought it wise not to formally introduce it as a third dimension to our tentative typology for reasons of clarity.
References
Adner, R., Kapoor, R.: Value creation in innovation ecosystems: how the structure of technological interdependence affects firm performance in new technology generations. Strateg. Manag. J. 31(3), 306–333 (2010)
Akrich, M.: The de-scription of technical objects. Shaping Technol./Building Soc. 205–224 (1992)
Asmus, P.: Exploring New Models of Solar Energy Development. The Electricity Journal 21(3), 61–70 (2008)
Boons, F., Lüdeke-Freund, F.: Business models for sustainable innovation: state-of-the-art and steps towards a research agenda. J. Clean. Prod. 45, 9–19 (2013)
Bowden, J.: European smart grid roll-out on target. Eur. Energy Rev. [Online] 14 Aug 2014. Available at http://europeanenergyreview.com/site/pagina.php?id=4296. Accessed 25 June 2015
Chesbrough, H.: Business model innovation: opportunities and barriers. Long Range Plan. 43(2–3), 354–363 (2010)
Dewald, U., Truffer, B.: Market formation in technological innovation systems—diffusion of photovoltaic applications in Germany. Industry Innov. 18(3), 285–300 (2011)
Dignum, M.: The power of Large Technological Visions: The promise of hydrogen energy. PhD-Thesis: TU/e (2013)
Drury, E., Miller, M., Macal, C.M., Graziano, D.J., Heimiller, D., Ozik, J., Perry IV, T.D.: The transformation of southern California’s residential photovoltaics market through third-party ownership. Energy Policy 42, 681–690 (2012)
E.ON: New corporate strategy. 30 Nov 2014 [Online]. Available from: http://www.eon.com/. Accessed 25 June 2015
Giddens, A.: The Constitution of Society: The Outline of the Theory of Structuration. University of California Press, Berkeley (1984)
Giordano, V., Fulli, G.: A business case for Smart Grid technologies: a systemic perspective. Energy Policy 40, 252–259 (2012)
Geels, F.W., Verhees, B.: Cultural legitimacy and framing struggles in innovation journeys: a cultural-performative perspective and a case study of Dutch nuclear energy (1945–1986). Technol. Forecast. Soc. Chang. 78(6), 910–930 (2011)
Goulden, M., Bedwell, B., Rennick-Egglestone, S., Rodden, T., Spence, A.: Smart grids, smart users? The role of the user in demand side management. Energy Res. Soc. Sci. 2, 21–29 (2014)
Gram-Hanssen, K.: Standby consumption in households analyzed with a practice theory approach. J. Ind. Ecol. 14(1), 150–165 (2010)
Habich, A, Raven, R., Schot, J., Thøgersen, J., Verbong, G., Verhees, B.: The Multi-Level Perspective and its relevance for EU-Innovate, A WP1 interim report EU-InnovatE (2015)
Hargreaves, T., Longhurst, N., Seyfang, G.: Up, down, round and round: connecting regimes and practices in innovation for sustainability. Environ. Plan. A 45(2), 402–420 (2013)
Huijben, J.C.C.M., Verbong, G.P.J.: Breakthrough without subsidies? PV business model experiments in the Netherlands. Energy Policy 56, 362–370 (2013)
Höffken, J.: Power to the people? Civic engagement with small scale hydroelectric plants in India. Den Bosch: BoxPress. Ph.D. Dissertation (2012)
Naus, J., Spaargaren, G., Van Vliet, B., Van der Horst, H.: Smart grids, information flows and emerging domestic energy practices. Energy Policy 68, 436–446 (2014)
Osterwalder, A., Pigneur, Y.: Business Model Generation: a Handbook for Visionaries, Game Changers, and Challengers. Wiley, New Jersey (2010)
Reckwitz, A.: Toward a theory of social practices: a development in culturalist theorizing. Eur. J. Social Theory 5(2), 243–263 (2002)
Schatzki, T.R.: Social Practices: A Wittgensteinian Approach to Human Activity and the Social. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge (1996)
Seyfang, G., Smith, A.: Grassroots innovations for sustainable development: towards a new research and policy agenda. Environ. Politics 16(4), 583–603 (2007)
Seyfang, G., Park, J.J., Smith, A.: A thousand flowers blooming? An examination of community energy in the UK. Energy Policy 61, 977–989 (2013)
Shell: New lens scenarios. A shift in perspective for a world in transition (2014). [Online] http://www.shell.com/global/future-energy/scenarios/new-lens-scenarios.html. Accessed 25 June 2015
Shove, E.: What is energy for? Social practice and energy demand. Theory, Culture Soc. 31(5), 41–58 (2014)
Shove, E., Pantzar, M.: Consumers, producers and practices: understanding the invention and reinvention of Nordic walking. J. Consum. Culture 5(1), 43–64 (2005)
Shove, E., Pantzar, M., Watson, M.: The dynamics of social practice. Everyday life and how it changes. Sage, London (2012)
Van Berlo, P.: Business model innovation for Dutch power utilities: why, what and how? How the multi-level perspective and business model theory contribute to thinking about the sustainability transition from an incumbents perspectiv. M.Sc. thesis: TU/e (2014)
Van Lente, H.: Promising technology. The Dynamics of Expectations in Technological Developments. Enschede (1993)
Van Vlimmeren, Y.: The introduction of local system services: the case of storage in the low voltage network. M.Sc. thesis: TU/e, Alliander, N.V (2010)
Vasileiadou, E., Huijben, J.C.C.M., Raven, R.P.J.M.: Three is a crowd? Exploring the potential of crowdfunding for renewable energy in The Netherlands. J. Cleaner Prod. (2015, in press)
Verbong, G.P.J., Geels, F.W.: The ongoing energy transition: Lessons from a socio-technical, multi-level analysis of the Dutch electricity system (1960–2004). Energy Policy 35, 1025–1037 (2007)
Verbong, G.P.J., Geels, F.W.: Exploring sustainability transitions in the electricity sector with socio-technical pathways. Technol. Forecast. Soc. Chang. 77, 1214–1221 (2010)
Verbong, G.P.J., Beemsterboer, S., Sengers, F.: Smart grids and smart users?: involving users in developing a low carbon electricity economy. Energy Policy 52, 117–125 (2013)
Von Hippel, E.: The dominant role of users in the scientific instrument innovation process. Res. Policy 5, 212–239 (1976)
Von Hippel, E.A.: Democratizing innovation. MIT press, Cambridge, MA (2005)
Walker, G., Cass, N.: Carbon reduction, ‘the public’ and renewable energy: engaging with socio-technical configurations. Area 39(4), 458–469 (2007)
Warde, A.: Consumption and theories of practice. J. Consum. Culture 5(2), 131–153 (2005)
Warde, A.: After taste: culture, consumption and theories of practice. J. Consum. Culture 14(3), 279–303 (2014)
Wiek, A., Iwaniec, D.: Quality criteria for visions and visioning in sustainability science. Sustain. Sci. 9(4), 497–512 (2014)
Wikipedia (2015) Smart grid. [Online] Available from: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Smart_grid. Accessed 25 June 2015
Wolsink, M.: The research agenda on social acceptance of distributed generation in smart grids: renewable as common pool resources. Renew. Sustain. Energy Rev. 16(1), 822–835 (2012)
Woolgar, S.: Configuring the user: the case of usability trials. Sociol. Rev. 38(S1), 58–99 (1990)
Wyatt, S.: Non-users also matter. In: Oudshoorn, N., Pinch, T. (eds.) How Users Matter: The Co-construction of Users and Technologies. MIT press, Cambridge, MA (2003)
Yildiz, Ö., Rommel, J., Debor, S., Holstenkamp, L., Mey, F., Müller, J.R., Radtke, J., Rognli, J.: Renewable energy cooperatives as gatekeepers or facilitators? Recent developments in Germany and a multidisciplinary research agenda. Energy Res. Soc. Sci. 6, 59–73 (2015)
Zott, C., Amit, R., Massa, L.: The business model: recent developments and future research. J. Manag. 37(4), 1019–1042 (2011)
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2016 Springer International Publishing Switzerland
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Verbong, G.P.J., Verkade, N., Verhees, B., Huijben, J.C.C.M., Höffken, J.I. (2016). Smart Business for Smart Users: A Social Agenda for Developing Smart Grids. In: Beaulieu, A., de Wilde, J., Scherpen, J. (eds) Smart Grids from a Global Perspective. Power Systems. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-28077-6_3
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-28077-6_3
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Cham
Print ISBN: 978-3-319-28075-2
Online ISBN: 978-3-319-28077-6
eBook Packages: EnergyEnergy (R0)