Abstract
We explore the role of corporeality, affect, and metaphoring in problem-solving. Our experimental research background includes average and gifted Chilean high school students, juvenile offenders, prospective teachers, and mathematicians, tackling problems in a workshop setting. We report on observed dramatic changes in attitude toward mathematics triggered by group working for long enough periods on problem-solving, and we describe ways in which (possibly unconscious) metaphoring determines how efficiently and creatively you tackle a problem. We argue that systematic and conscious use of metaphoring may significantly improve performance in problem-solving. The effect of the facilitator ignoring the solution of the problem being tackled is also discussed.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
References
Arcavi, A., Kessel, C., Meira, L., & Smith, J. (1998). Teaching mathematical problem solving: A microanalysis of an emergent classroom community. In A. Schoenfeld, E. Dubinsky, & J. Kaput (Eds.), Research in collegiate mathematics education III (pp. 1–70). Providence, RI: American Mathematical Society.
English, L. (Ed.). (1997). Mathematical reasoning: Analogies, metaphors, and images. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
Flessas, J. (1997). L’impact du style cognitive sur les apprentissages, Revue Éducation Francoph., 25, n° 2. Retrieved from http://www.acelf.ca/c/revue/revuehtml/25-2/r252-03.html
Flessas, J., & Lussier, F. (2005). La neuropsychologie de l’enfant. Paris, France: Dunod.
Hannula, M. (2013). Affect in mathematics education. In S. Lerman (Ed.), Encyclopedia of mathematics education (pp. 23–27). doi 10.1007/SpringerReference_331465
Isoda, M., & Katagiri, S. (2012). Mathematical thinking: How to develop it in the classroom. Singapore, Singapore: World Scientific.
Isoda, M., & Nakamura, T. (2010). Mathematics education theories for lesson study: Problem solving approach and the curriculum through extension and integration. Journal of Japan Society of Mathematical Education, 92(11), 1–157.
Järvinen, E.-M., & Twyford, J. (2000). The influences of socio-cultural interaction upon children’s thinking and actions in prescribed and open-ended problem solving situations. International Journal of Technology and Design Education, 10, 21–41. Dordrecht: Kluwer Academic Publishers.
Lakoff, G., & Nuñez, R. (2000). Where mathematics comes from. New York: Basic Books.
Liljedahl, P. (2014). The affordances of using visually random groups in a mathematics classroom. In Y. Li, E. Silver, & S. Li (Eds.), Transforming mathematics instruction: Multiple approaches and practices. New York, NY: Springer.
Luria, A. (1973). The working brain. New York: Penguin.
Pehkonen, E. (1995). Introduction: Use of open-ended problems. ZDM, 27(2), 55–57.
Pólya, G. (1945). How to solve it. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press. 2nd edition, 1957.
Presmeg, N. C. (1997). Reasoning with metaphors and metonymies in mathematics learning. In L. D. English (Ed.), Mathematical reasoning: Analogies, metaphors, and images (pp. 267–279). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
Presmeg, N. (2006). Research on visualization in learning and teaching mathematics. In A. Gutiérrez & P. Boero (Eds.), Handbook of research on the psychology of mathematics education: Past, present and future (pp. 205–235). Rotterdam, Netherlands: Sense.
Schoenfeld, A. H. (1985). Mathematical problem solving. Orlando, FL: Academic.
Schoenfeld, A. H. (1992). Learning to think mathematically: Problem solving, metacognition, and sense making in mathematics. In D. Grouws (Ed.), The handbook of research on the teaching and learning of mathematics (pp. 334–370). New York: Macmillan.
Schoenfeld, A. H. (2010). How we think: A theory of goal-oriented decision making and its educational applications. New York: Routledge.
Schoenfeld, A. (2012). Social dynamics for supporting creative mathematical thinking and problem solving, International Congress in Mathematical Education (pp. 4478–4487). Seoul, Korea, TSG22-6.
Schwank, I. (1999). On predicative versus functional cognitive structures, European Research. In Proceedings of CERME 1 (The First Conference of The European Society for Research in Mathematics Education) (pp. 84–96).
Sfard, A. (1997). Commentary: On metaphorical roots of conceptual growth. In L. English (Ed.), Mathematical reasoning: Analogies, metaphors, and images (pp. 339–371). London, England: Erlbaum.
Sfard, A. (2009). Metaphors in education. In H. Daniels, H. Lauder, & J. Porter (Eds.), Educational theories, cultures and learning : A critical perspective (pp. 39–50). New York: Routledge.
Silver, E. A. (1985). Research on teaching mathematical problem solving: Some underrepresented themes and needed directions. In E. A. Silver (Ed.), Teaching and learning mathematical problem solving: Multiple research perspectives (pp. 247–266). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
Soto-Andrade, J. (2006). Un monde dans un grain de sable: Métaphores et analogies dans l’apprentissage des maths. Annales de Didactique et de Sciences Cognitives, 11, 123–147.
Soto-Andrade, J. (2007). Metaphors and cognitive styles in the teaching-learning of mathematics. In D. Pitta-Pantazi, & J. Philippou (Eds.). Proceedings CERME 5 (pp. 191–200). Retrieved May 21, 2008, from http://ermeweb.free.fr/CERME5b/
Soto-Andrade J. (2013). Metaphors in mathematics education. In: Lerman S. (Ed.) Encyclopedia of mathematics education. Berlin, Germany: Springer. (pp. 447–453) Retrieved Oct 1, 2013, from (www.springerreference.com). DOI: 10.1007/SpringerReference_313292
Soto-Andrade, J., & Reyes-Santander, P. (2012) Mathematical cognition in juvenile offenders: A case study, en Proceedings ICME 12 (July 2012) (pp. 4721–4730). Seoul, Korea.
Thurston, W. (1998). How to see 3-manifolds. Classical and Quantum Gravity, 15, 2545–2555.
Varela, F. J. (1987). Lying down a path in walking. In W. I. Thompson (Ed.), Gaia: A way of knowing (pp. 48–64). Hudson, NY: Lindisfarne Press.
Varela, F. J. (1999). Ethical know-how: Action, wisdom, and cognition. Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press.
vom Hofe, R. (1995). Grundvorstellungen mathematischer inhalte. Heidelberg, Germany: Spektrum Akademischer Verlag.
Acknowledgments
Support from University of Chile RIA Domeyko Project and funding from PIA-CONICYT Basal Funds for Centers of Excellence Project BF0003 is gratefully acknowledged.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2016 Springer International Publishing Switzerland
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Libedinsky, N., Soto-Andrade, J. (2016). On the Role of Corporeality, Affect, and Metaphoring in Problem-Solving. In: Felmer, P., Pehkonen, E., Kilpatrick, J. (eds) Posing and Solving Mathematical Problems. Research in Mathematics Education. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-28023-3_4
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-28023-3_4
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Cham
Print ISBN: 978-3-319-28021-9
Online ISBN: 978-3-319-28023-3
eBook Packages: EducationEducation (R0)