Skip to main content

The Quality/Cost/Value Relationship

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Quality Evaluation in Non-Invasive Cardiovascular Imaging

Abstract

The cost of healthcare in the United States is growing at a rate that is non-sustainable given its percentage of the gross domestic product. This is in the setting of poor quality as defined by preventable mortality, access to care and equitable and efficient care delivery measured relative to other nations. Given the potential significant growth in individuals requiring healthcare, emphasis must be placed on the improvement in the value of care delivery. In order to improve the value, quality must be improved, or cost/or volume must be reduced in order to effect the value = quality/cost equation. The cost of quality theoretical model will be reviewed to understand how this has evolved as we move through the quality improvement era. Mechanisms to improve quality and cost including value stream analysis, value on investment and the use of interdisciplinary teams to improve the value of healthcare delivery will be examined.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

eBook
USD 16.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 129.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  1. Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services. National health expenditure data. [Internet] 2008 [cited 2015 Feb 17]. Available from: http://www.cms.gov/Research-Statistics-Data-and-Systems/Statistics-Trends-and-Reports/NationalHealthExpendData/index.html?redirect=/NationalHealthExpendData/25_NHE_Fact_Sheet.asp#TopOfPage.

  2. The World Bank. Health expenditure, total (% of GDP). [Internet] 2013 [cited 2015 Feb 16]. Available from: http://data.worldbank.org/indicator/SH.XPD.TOTL.ZS?order=wbapi_data_value_2011+wbapi_data_value+wbapi_data_value-last&sort=desc.

  3. Healthcare Financial Management Association. Common definitions. [Internet] 2015 [cited 2015 Feb 17]. Available from: http://www.hfma.org/Content.aspx?id=24225.

  4. Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality. National Healthcare Quality Report 2007. [Internet] 2007 [cited 2015 Feb 17]. Available from: http://archive.ahrq.gov/qual/nhqr07/nhqr07.pdf.

  5. Healthcare Financial Management Association. The future of U.S. health care: value = quality/cost. (Industry Update). 2009 Buyer’s Resource Guide. Healthc Financ Manage. 2008:22–5.

    Google Scholar 

  6. Konski A. Cost, quality, and value in healthcare: a new paradigm. Oncology (Williston Park). 2010;24(6):542–3.

    Google Scholar 

  7. Ogden CL, Carroll MD, Kit BK, Flegal KM. Prevalence of obesity in the United States, 2009–2010. NCHS Data Brief. 2012;82:1–8.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. Crude and age-adjusted percentage of civilian, noninstitutionalized adults with diagnosed diabetes, United States, 1980–2012. [Internet] 2013 [cited Feb 17]. Available from: http://www.cdc.gov/diabetes/statistics/prev/national/figage.htm.

  9. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. Division for heart disease and stroke prevention: data trends & maps. [Internet] 2015 [cited 2015 Feb 17]. Available from: http://nccd.cdc.gov/DHDSP_DTM/Default.aspx.

  10. Congressional Budget Office. Technological change and the growth of health care spending. [Internet] 2008 [cited Feb 17]. Available from: http://www.cbo.gov/sites/default/files/cbofiles/ftpdocs/89xx/doc8947/01-31-techhealth.pdf.

  11. US Census Bureau. Population: estimates and projections by age, sex, race/ethnicity. [Internet] 2012 [cited Feb 17]. Available from: https://www.census.gov/compendia/statab/cats/population/estimates_and_projections_by_age_sex_raceethnicity.html.

  12. US Census Bureau. 2012 National population projections: summary tables. [Internet] 2012 [cited Feb 17]. Available from: https://www.census.gov/population/projections/data/national/2012/summarytables.html.

  13. Gordon JE, Leiman JM, Deland EL, Pardes H. Delivering value: provider efforts to improve the quality and reduce the cost of health care. Annu Rev Med. 2014;65:447–58.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Plunkett JJ, Dale BG. Quality costs: a critique of some “economic cost of quality” models. Int J Prod Res. 1988;26(11):1713–26.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Association of Healthcare Value Analysis Professionals. Homepage. [Internet] 2015 [cited Feb 17]. Available from: http://www.ahvap.org.

  16. Yokl RW, Tinker P. Having my say: leading practices in value analysis drive quality, cost effectiveness. [Internet]. 2014 [cited 2015 Feb 8]. Available from: http://www.hpnonline.com/inside/2014-06/1406-HMS-AHVAP.html.

  17. Association for Healthcare Resource & Materials Management. White paper – cost, quality, and outcomes: the supply chain value equation. [Internet]. 2014 [cited 2015 Feb 8]. Available from: http://www.ahrmm.org/ahrmm/kc_documents/whitepapers_case_studies/2013_AHRMM_Executive_Thought_Leader_Forum.jsp.

  18. Taylor R, Manzo J, Sinnett M. Quantifying value for physician order-entry systems: a balance of cost and quality. Healthc Financ Manage. 2002;56(7):44–8.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. Brita-Rossi P, Adduci D, Kaufman J, Lipson SJ, Totte C, Wasserman K. Improving the process of care: the cost-quality value of interdisciplinary collaboration. J Nurs Care Qual. 1996;10(2):10–6.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  20. Makadon HJ, Bharucha F, Gavin M, Oliveira J, Wietecha M. Value management: optimizing quality, service, and cost. J Healthc Qual. 2010;32(1):29–34.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  21. Evans M. Higher-value performance: checklist’s 10 strategies aimed at improving quality, cutting costs. Mod Healthc. 2012;42(24):8–9.

    Google Scholar 

  22. Freiesleben J. On the limited value of cost of quality models. Total Qual Manag Bus Excell. 2004;15(7):959–69.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Peter L. Tilkemeier MD, MMM .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2016 Springer International Publishing Switzerland

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Tilkemeier, P.L. (2016). The Quality/Cost/Value Relationship. In: Tilkemeier, P., Hendel, R., Heller, G., Case, J. (eds) Quality Evaluation in Non-Invasive Cardiovascular Imaging. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-28011-0_3

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-28011-0_3

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Cham

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-319-28009-7

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-319-28011-0

  • eBook Packages: MedicineMedicine (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics