Skip to main content

Xamobile: Usability Evaluation of Text Input Methods on Mobile Devices for Historical African Languages

  • Conference paper
  • First Online:
Digital Libraries: Providing Quality Information (ICADL 2015)

Part of the book series: Lecture Notes in Computer Science ((LNISA,volume 9469))

Included in the following conference series:

  • 2887 Accesses

Abstract

Customized text input editors on mobile devices for languages with no standard language models, such as some African languages, are vital to allow text input tasks to be crowdsourced and thus enable quick and precise participation. We investigated 4 different mobile input techniques for complex language scripts like |Xam and collected accuracy data from experiments with the Xwerty, T9, Pinyin script and hierarchical entry methods for mobile devices and also usability data from the participants. Our results on usability testing show that Xwerty methods offer substantial benefits to the majority of users in terms of speed for |Xam text entry and ease of use.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 39.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 54.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Munyaradzi, N., Suleman, H.: Quality assessment in crowdsourced indigenous language transcription. In: Aalberg, T., Papatheodorou, C., Dobreva, M., Tsakonas, G., Farrugia, C.J. (eds.) TPDL 2013. LNCS, vol. 8092, pp. 13–22. Springer, Heidelberg (2013)

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  2. Soukoreff, R.W., MacKenzie, I.S.: Metrics for text entry research: an evaluation of MSD and KSPC, and a new unified error metric. In: ACM Proceedings of the SIGCHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems, pp. 1–3 (2003)

    Google Scholar 

  3. Liu, Y.: Chinese Text Entry with Mobile Devices, Ph.D., University of Tampere (2010)

    Google Scholar 

  4. Wismer, A.J., Madathil, K.C., Koikkara, R., Juang, K.A., Greenstein, J.S.: Evaluating the usability of CAPTCHAs on a mobile device with voice and touch input. In: Proceedings of the Human Factors and Ergonomics Society 2012 Annual Meeting, pp. 1228–1232 (2012)

    Google Scholar 

  5. Ilinkin, I., Kim, S.: Evaluation of text entry methods for korean mobile phones, a user study. In: CHI(2010), pp. 2023–2026 (2010)

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Sunkanmi Olaleye .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2015 Springer International Publishing Switzerland

About this paper

Cite this paper

Olaleye, S., Suleman, H. (2015). Xamobile: Usability Evaluation of Text Input Methods on Mobile Devices for Historical African Languages. In: Allen, R., Hunter, J., Zeng, M. (eds) Digital Libraries: Providing Quality Information. ICADL 2015. Lecture Notes in Computer Science(), vol 9469. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-27974-9_21

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-27974-9_21

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Cham

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-319-27973-2

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-319-27974-9

  • eBook Packages: Computer ScienceComputer Science (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics