Skip to main content

Participatory Journalism, Blurred Boundaries: Introducing Theoretical IS Frameworks to Re-Orient Research Practices

  • Conference paper
  • First Online:

Part of the book series: Lecture Notes in Computer Science ((LNISA,volume 9469))

Abstract

Social media now plays a pivotal role in how broadcast media engages with their audiences. This paper contemplates the nature of our digital media culture, the diversity of actors involved and how the role of the journalist has evolved. The methodology includes examining the findings of a pilot research study investigating journalists’ information practices in the digital realm. Two theoretical frameworks from the discipline of Information Science are introduced to re-orient research practices. The findings reveal digital journalism facilitates richer and more expansive storytelling, with connectivity between experts, journalists and the public. The author posits that the citizen-informant is reconceptualised in the news milieu.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution.

Buying options

Chapter
USD   29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD   39.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD   54.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Learn about institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Martin, N.: Information Verification in the Age of Digital Journalism. Paper presented at the Special Libraries Association Annual Conference, Vancouver, June 8-10, 2014. https://www.sla.org/wp-content/uploads/2014/07/Information-Verification.pdf

  2. Bryman, A.: Social Research Methods. OUP, Oxford (2012)

    Google Scholar 

  3. Domingo, D., Le Cam, F.: Journalism in Dispersion. Digital Journalism 2(3), 310–321 (2014). doi:10.1080/21670811.2014.897832

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Lewis, J., Williams, A., Franklin, B., Thomas, J., Mosdell, N.: The quality and Independence of British Journalism. Project Report, MediaWise (2008). http://www.mediawise.org.uk/wp-content/uploads/2011/03/Quality-Independence-of-British-Journalism.pdf

  5. Godler, Y., Reich, Z.: How Journalists “Realize” Facts. Journalism Practice 7(6), 674–689 (2013). doi:10.1080/17512786.2013.791067

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Shapiro, I., Brin, C., Bédard-Brûlé, I., Mychajlowycz, K.: Verification as a Strategic Ritual. Journalism Practice 7(6), 1–18 (2013). doi:10.1080/17512786.2013.765638

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Dervin, B., Dewdney, P.: Neutral Questioning: A New Approach to the Reference Interview. Reference Quarterly 25(4), 506–513 (1986)

    Google Scholar 

  8. Glaser, B.G., Strauss, A.L.: Basics of Grounded Theory Analysis. Sociology Press, Mill Valley (1967)

    Google Scholar 

  9. Chatman, E.A.: The Impoverished Life World of Outsiders. J. Am. Soc. Inf. Sci 47(3), 193–206 (1996)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Hersberger, J.A.: Are the Economically Poor Information Poor? Does the Digital Divide Affect the Homeless and Access to Information? Can. J. Inform. Lib. Sci. 27(3), 44–63 (2003)

    Google Scholar 

  11. Jericho, G.: The Rise of the Fifth Estate: Social Media and Blogging in Australian Politics. Scribe, Brunswick (2012)

    Google Scholar 

  12. Baker, L.M.: Monitoring and blunting. In: Fisher, K.E, Erdelez, S., McKechnie, L. (eds.) Theories of Information Behavior. Information Today, Medford (2005)

    Google Scholar 

  13. Hedman, U., Djerf-Pierre, M.: The Social Journalist. Digital Journalism 1(3), 368–385 (2013). doi:10.1080/21670811.2013.776804

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Olsson, M.: Gently to Hear, Kindly to Judge: the Affective Information Practices of Theatre Professionals and Journalists. Information Research 18(3) (2013). http://InformationR.net/ir/18-3/colis/paperC22.html

  15. Nielsen Online Ratings.: IpsosMediaCT, people 14+ for the twelve months ending December 2013. emma™ (Enhanced Media Metrics Australia) (2013)

    Google Scholar 

  16. Jarvis, J.: For the Record | Comment. The Guardian, December 1, 2007. http://www.theguardian.com/commentisfree/2007/nov/30/fortherecord

  17. Olsson, M.: Information Practices in Contemporary Cosmopolitan Civil Society. Cosmopolitan Civil Societies Journal 6(2), 79–93 (2014). doi:10.5130/ccs.v6i2.3948

    MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  18. Steele, B.: Journalism ethics then and now. In: McBride, K., Rosenstiel, T. (eds.) The New Ethics of Journalism, pp. vii–ix. CQ Press, Thousand Oaks (2014)

    Google Scholar 

  19. Kovach, B., Rosenstiel, T.: Blur: How to Know What’s True in the Age of Information Overload. Bloomsbury, New York (2010)

    Google Scholar 

  20. Larsson, U. (ed.): Cultures of Creativity. Science History Publications (2006)

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Nora Martin .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2015 Springer International Publishing Switzerland

About this paper

Cite this paper

Martin, N. (2015). Participatory Journalism, Blurred Boundaries: Introducing Theoretical IS Frameworks to Re-Orient Research Practices. In: Allen, R., Hunter, J., Zeng, M. (eds) Digital Libraries: Providing Quality Information. ICADL 2015. Lecture Notes in Computer Science(), vol 9469. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-27974-9_19

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-27974-9_19

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Cham

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-319-27973-2

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-319-27974-9

  • eBook Packages: Computer ScienceComputer Science (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics